General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Heart Rate Monitor Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2008-09-24 12:06 PM

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.


2008-09-24 12:52 PM
in reply to: #1693317

Veteran
244
10010025
South Carolina
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor

OK, I think I've posted all this before, but I'll say it again! I'm a newbie. I bought a couple $12  HRMs in Feb. '07.  Of course, my sweat, water, etc. burned out the straps in just a month or so.  Then I went on heartratemonitors.com, and bought one of the Timex Ironman ones, and was really happy with it, for the money.

Then I got a super deal on a Garmin 305 about a year ago around Christmas, what with rebate and sale from Costco and all.  I thought I was too new to need all that fancy stuff, but I was wrong!  The ability to compare pace and heart rate has really helped improve my running.  If I think I'm pushing hard, but my heart rate says I have a teeny ways to go, I can pick up the pace a bit.  I have added the cadence sensor to my bike.  Those of you who are reading, if you don't have a cadence sensor on your bike, go out right now and buy one!  Riding with the right cadence has saved my knees!  I highly recommend the Garmin 305.  Yes, you are right.  You are better off to bite the bullet, pay the bucks, and get a good HRM with all the bells and whistles, rather than buying 2 or 3 cheapies. 

 

2008-09-24 1:25 PM
in reply to: #1693317

Runner
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor
I have the Garmin 305, don't use HR feature at all.  Actually, at this point all I look at is elapsed time and distance.
2008-09-24 2:24 PM
in reply to: #1693317

Master
1790
1000500100100252525
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor
I wish I had the GPS on my HR monitor. I don't run a lot on roads, so I can only guess for now at my actual distance.
2008-09-24 4:04 PM
in reply to: #1693317

Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor

I picked up a S.I Pro 9 from Nasbar for $20.  I was not to happy at first, but now that a few people on here helped me with how to use it I am happy with it.  IT does not allow PC interface.  It will sense the Polar T31 straps, which are sealed units so they might work in the water.

I was banging my head reading reviews and people's opinons on different HRMs, but for $20 I figured I coudl not go wrong and it would tell me what I really wanted for added features on the next one.

Joe

2008-09-25 9:42 AM
in reply to: #1693317

Master
3022
20001000
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor
Putting in my vote for the Polar RS400SD.  It utilizes a footpod for running distance calculation and it is amazingly accurate.  Has programmable heart rate zones and training programs can be uploaded via included computer software.  Also, gives you current pace, etc. while running.  Just my $0.02....


2008-09-25 9:48 AM
in reply to: #1693317

Runner
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor
You can train without one, quite successfully too.  Just throwing out that option.
2008-09-25 9:52 AM
in reply to: #1695531

Master
1222
1000100100
Lafayette, IN
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor

dangremond - 2008-09-25 9:42 AM Putting in my vote for the Polar RS400SD.  It utilizes a footpod for running distance calculation and it is amazingly accurate.  Has programmable heart rate zones and training programs can be uploaded via included computer software.  Also, gives you current pace, etc. while running.  Just my $0.02....

How long have you had yours?  I am asking for one for Christmas this year since my older Polar is just about dead.  After all the research I have done, it seems like the RS is the best one for what I want.  Essentially a unit that I can wear for all three disciplines and still record pace and distance when run training.

What do you like about it?  Any dislikes?  Does it upload to pc well?  Thanks.

2008-09-25 10:20 AM
in reply to: #1693317

Regular
204
100100
BA, Oklahoma
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor

I've had a Garmin 305 for only about a week now.  I am in love with it already.  Quite nice features and data tracking.  I am going to get the Cadence Sensor soon.  I really wish they would design some sort of bike mount for it though.

In case you are interested, here is where I got mine from:  http://www.pcnation.com/web/details.asp?affid=808&item=6G0200

It was the cheapest one I could find at $190 from a place I knew I could trust.  I found a few cheaper, and refurbished, but they didn't look too reputable.

2008-09-25 11:33 AM
in reply to: #1695663

Expert
1049
100025
Burnaby, BC
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor
toader - 2008-09-25 8:20 AM

I've had a Garmin 305 for only about a week now.  I am in love with it already.  Quite nice features and data tracking.  I am going to get the Cadence Sensor soon.  I really wish they would design some sort of bike mount for it though.

 You mean like this:

 https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?pID=8544

2008-09-26 5:53 AM
in reply to: #1693317

New user
54
2525
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor
The way I see it, Garmin 305 is way too expensive to be even considering it. Where I'm from, it costs as of this date 513 U$. That is not expensive, it's ridiciuosly expensive. If it were 200 to 250 U$, then yes, I would probably buy it for training. As of now, I'm using a Polar FS3c, and it has worked flawlessyly in providing me with what I really need to know - heartrate and training time. GPS would be nice, but at a given price point it's not really an option. If you can get a higher placed model, then go for it. Personally I had tried a few models, and polar was simply the best and most reliable from all of them. But for a low price of 190 U$, Garmin might be a good choice. Heck, I paid around 130 U$ for FS3c.


2008-09-26 7:01 AM
in reply to: #1697895

Expert
924
500100100100100
Louisville, KY
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor

meow-cat - 2008-09-26 6:53 AM The way I see it, Garmin 305 is way too expensive to be even considering it. Where I'm from, it costs as of this date 513 U$. That is not expensive, it's ridiciuosly expensive. If it were 200 to 250 U$, then yes, I would probably buy it for training. As of now, I'm using a Polar FS3c, and it has worked flawlessyly in providing me with what I really need to know - heartrate and training time. GPS would be nice, but at a given price point it's not really an option. If you can get a higher placed model, then go for it. Personally I had tried a few models, and polar was simply the best and most reliable from all of them. But for a low price of 190 U$, Garmin might be a good choice. Heck, I paid around 130 U$ for FS3c.

Holy smokes, I wouldn't buy one for +-$500 either.  I have to assume that you aren't in/from the US.  Garmin 305's can be easily be found for around and under $200.

2008-09-26 8:46 AM
in reply to: #1693317

Champion
7558
500020005002525
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Subject: RE: Heart Rate Monitor

I've got a Nike Triax that I got on clearance last year from the LBS. 

Computer interface is bluetooth (or similar) with a USB dongle.  The chest strap and wristwatch parts are submersible (unlike the Garmin 305). 

It's got a footpod to measure speed/distance.  It has an adapter for cycling, but I haven't put it on my (crowded) handlebars.  It isn't tied into the bike computer. 

Disadvantages:  The wristwatch is pretty bulky and it has a voracious appetite for batteries.  In less than a year, I've replaced the watch battery twice and the heart strap battery twice (Note:  I don't know how much life was left in the batteries when I bought it. )  Part of this is the wireless link. 

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Heart Rate Monitor Rss Feed