General Discussion Triathlon Talk » The L OOOO N G S L OW run Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2008-09-28 2:53 PM

User image

Master
1547
100050025
Subject: The L OOOO N G S L OW run

On today's run I had to walk about 4 times after mile 6...walked for prob 30 sec at a time to try and keep my HR down into z2 or at least low z3.  Today was esp hot feeling and I had some fluid issues. 

 

But my concern is that if I had to walk today on the long slow run how will that translate to the race?  I have a half marathon coming up in a few weeks and now I am starting to build some anxiety that I won't be able to run it nearly as fast as I want to.  I can't count on the race being cool.  It is along the beach so most likely it will be cooler but I can't control the sun.

 

What are your experinces with the LSD and  how it translates into race day?



Edited by sax 2008-09-28 2:54 PM


2008-09-28 3:11 PM
in reply to: #1701830

User image

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run

How fast you want to run your 1/2 Mary how did you determine that?

Wishing to do a certain pace doesn't make it so. 

My long runs around the time I did my 2 non tapering train through 1/2 Mary's this spring, I was just about 40"/mile faster than my training long runs.

2008-09-28 3:45 PM
in reply to: #1701830

User image

Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
My long slow runs have nothing to do with pace on race day   Training is training, racing is racing.   I assume you aren't going to run the half in zone 2?
2008-09-28 3:46 PM
in reply to: #1701830

User image

Champion
6999
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run

You really never know.  Sometimes in training like in races you have your good days and bad days.  Your training course might be harder than your race course or vis versa.  Sometimes you just need that thrill and excitement of the crowds and the competition to really fly.  

 I tend to run faster on race day but it may hurt.  You will go into z3 and you have to hold on.  If you race corrently you will be faster.  You have to listen to your body and if you can not hold it then you have to slow down. 

2008-09-28 3:56 PM
in reply to: #1701870

User image

Master
1678
1000500100252525
Olney, MD
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run

ChrisM - 2008-09-28 4:45 PM My long slow runs have nothing to do with pace on race day   Training is training, racing is racing.  

Mine either.  My race times have been about 1:00 to 1:25/ mile faster than my training paces.  When I look at my results I always think... how the heck did I pull that off? 

Just get the mileage in and don't worry about the pace too much -- especially for the first time you have done a certain distance.  Go out, have fun, listen to your body, and just run.  If you've done the training, I think you'll be surprised at how fast you are on race day.



Edited by vball03umd 2008-09-28 3:56 PM
2008-09-28 6:22 PM
in reply to: #1701870

Extreme Veteran
428
10010010010025
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run

ChrisM - 2008-09-29 8:45 AM My long slow runs have nothing to do with pace on race day   Training is training, racing is racing.   I assume you aren't going to run the half in zone 2?

So how then do you "train like you intend to race and race like you trained"?



2008-09-28 7:36 PM
in reply to: #1701842

User image

Master
1547
100050025
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
KathyG - 2008-09-28 1:11 PM

How fast you want to run your 1/2 Mary how did you determine that?

Wishing to do a certain pace doesn't make it so. 

My long runs around the time I did my 2 non tapering train through 1/2 Mary's this spring, I was just about 40"/mile faster than my training long runs.

 

For the most part my pace is determined by my HR but I came up with my goal time based on a the mcmilliam calculator.  I seem to be right in the window for the recovery run.  I took a nap a bit ago...I was exp tired today afterwards.  I think it was the heat.  I also need more fluids now that I am up over 10 miles.  The little 8oz bottles arn't cutting it.  I was 5lbs lighter today which was all sweat.  

2008-09-28 8:33 PM
in reply to: #1702216

Expert
810
500100100100
Southeast
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
sax - 2008-09-28 8:36 PM

  I was 5lbs lighter today which was all sweat.  

Well, it wasn't ALL sweat.  You burn calories when you run, and they have to come from somewhere...  Smile  (But it was mostly sweat)

 X2 on the 'run properly according to your current ability and don't worry about your goal pace'.  That's a way to set yourself up for disappointment.  I do like the McMillan calculator for training paces.  I periodically do a time trial (short, like 5K or 10K) and use the result to reset my training paces.  I don't think much about pace on race day until it gets close and I need to do some planning (if it is a long race -- if it is short then the plan is to run very hard the whole way).

2008-09-28 10:22 PM
in reply to: #1702070

User image

Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
Gerrard - 2008-09-28 4:22 PM

ChrisM - 2008-09-29 8:45 AM My long slow runs have nothing to do with pace on race day   Training is training, racing is racing.   I assume you aren't going to run the half in zone 2?

So how then do you "train like you intend to race and race like you trained"?

Good question.   Frankly, I don't.  When I race I go as fast as I can for the distance. If I trained like that, I wouldn't get very many miles in.  You (general you, not you) can take a lot of tri sayings too literally, IMHO.

 

2008-09-29 7:29 AM
in reply to: #1701830

User image

Runner
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run

I don't do long slow distance.  I do long STEADY distance.  My long runs are seldom, if ever, my slowest runs of the week.

As for training like I race, I have done it.  I incorporate faster paces into my long runs, I do tempo runs during the week.

But, I was doing a lot more miles per week, and was focused on a marathon.

2008-09-29 10:11 AM
in reply to: #1701830

User image

Expert
2555
20005002525
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run

My experience with the long run is the more I do them the easier they become. Generally speaking, long runs are about building endurance. It takes time for the body to adapt to the stresses of running long distances. My goal on long runs is to maintain a steady easy pace - not my fastest or slowest, just easy. Easy could be defined as having the ability to carry on a conversation while running. If you're running so fast where that would be difficult - it's likely too fast for a long run. When a person first starts doing long runs the easy pace can be very slow, but over time the body will adapt and the pace will get faster. However, it takes time and there aren't any shortcuts. A problem occurs when people think they should be able to do the long runs faster like they have when training for short distance racing. But think back to when you started running and when going three miles at a fast pace was difficult. It likely took some time to be able to run decently fast for three miles, and it will take time to run fast at longer distances.

For now, focus on getting in the miles for your longs runs - not on the time it takes. Do enough long runs - maybe one or two a week - and over time you will get faster. It could take 4-6-8 months or more. Unless you're some kind of genetic freak it's not likely you are going to be able to build the necessary physiological adaptations in the next couple of weeks for your upcoming race. Use the race as a measuring stick to see where you are and build from there.

Keep in mind that any particular run can be lousy for any number of reasons. Even as much as I run I still have a lousy day about once a month. Don't be overly concerned about one run, but if the runs are all lousy then something should be changed.

I also noticed you seem to have trouble with tightness in your calves. I've found that a good session of stretching after every run will help with this kind of thing. Again, it will take time, but if it's done consistently you should see some relief from this problem over the course of a month or two. The body tends to adapt much slower than most people would like, so you need to be consistent with this stuff over a fairly long period to see the benefits.



2008-09-29 10:17 AM
in reply to: #1701830

Member
53
2525
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
To kind of hijack here, I have switched training to simplify. I now look at runs one of three ways; easy (where the idea is just to keep my legs moving), medium and hard. Easy runs I try and finish wanting to go longer, medium I try and finish with the ability to go longer, but not so much on the desire, and hard I try and use it all during the run. Right now I am running 1 hard, 2 easy (one is a hash run so not sure that even counts) and 3 medium per week. My question is should my long run be the hard run, or should I back the pace on that to make it medium and run a shorter run hard?

I just started re-logging workouts, so there's not much help in my logs. Thanks for any advice.

By the way, focusing on running only right now to work up to a marathon in Feb.
2008-09-29 10:21 AM
in reply to: #1703083

User image

Runner
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run

First, define "long run".

Some will say that the long run is, by default, a hard workout, because it thrashes you.  I think the reason it thrashes people is because they are not used to the mileage.  Once you get weekly volume up there, a long run of 15-18 miles doesn't leave you burnt (unless you run it faster).

If it were me, I'd alternate on the long run: one week run it harder (but not too hard or you WILL leave your legs thrashed), next couple run it easy.

2008-09-29 10:34 AM
in reply to: #1701830

User image

Member
381
100100100252525
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
i realize that my following comment/question opens me up to getting blasted for breaking a fundamental law of heart rate training, but...

sax - What was your perceived exertion during the times when you needed to slow down and walk? I ask this because it seems that there might be occasions where due to things like dehydration or hot weather or whatever, that your heart rate might be slightly elevated over what is normal for you. But if you feel fine and well within yourself, why not just keep running and see if the heart rate steadies out at say 10bpm faster than normal? it doesn't seem like that big of a problem to me. especially if it is just every once in a while.
2008-09-29 12:59 PM
in reply to: #1701830

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
I am a relative new runner, about 18 months at it if you stretch your definition of runner. That beings said I have doen 2 half marys, a 50 k ultra and an ironman.

I do not really train by my heart rate but I do wear a Heart rate monitor, but my percieved rate of excertion is a very comfortable one as I feel that I do not really have the base to push my running hard without risking injury yet. As such, I have found that my overall training pace on a long run is usually what I end up at during a race.

I do find, especially after 10 k, that my heart race will climb even though my percieved rate of excertion does not. Part of it I think is a defecient fueling stratagy. There are things I still need to work out when it comes to race/training/nutrition strategy and I think the only way to work it out is by reading a bit but mostly by trial and error.

Good luck at your race.
2008-09-29 1:12 PM
in reply to: #1703614

User image

Runner
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
Fueling should not be an issue over a 10K.


2008-09-29 1:15 PM
in reply to: #1703671

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
Scout7 - 2008-09-29 12:12 PM

Fueling should not be an issue over a 10K.


No, right, what I am saying is that after I run 10k which takes me like 65 minutes at least, and say run 10k more, fueling becomes an issue, for me anyways.
2008-09-29 1:19 PM
in reply to: #1703686

User image

Member
381
100100100252525
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
BigDH - 2008-09-29 12:15 PM

Scout7 - 2008-09-29 12:12 PM

Fueling should not be an issue over a 10K.


No, right, what I am saying is that after I run 10k which takes me like 65 minutes at least, and say run 10k more, fueling becomes an issue, for me anyways.


regardless of the fueling issue, I think the phenomena you are talking about is fairly common and is referred to as "cardiac drift" by sports medicine folk. I've definitely seen it on long runs during hot days.
2008-09-29 1:50 PM
in reply to: #1703614

User image

Master
1795
1000500100100252525
Boynton Beach, FL
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
BigDH - 2008-09-29 1:59 PM

I am a relative new runner, about 18 months at it if you stretch your definition of runner. That beings said I have doen 2 half marys, a 50 k ultra and an ironman.

Ultra and Ironman after 18 months of running? Your a better man than most... To do that and avoid injury is worth talking about. Kudos!



2008-09-29 2:43 PM
in reply to: #1703850

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: RE: The L OOOO N G S L OW run
cardenas1 - 2008-09-29 12:50 PM

BigDH - 2008-09-29 1:59 PM

I am a relative new runner, about 18 months at it if you stretch your definition of runner. That beings said I have doen 2 half marys, a 50 k ultra and an ironman.

Ultra and Ironman after 18 months of running? Your a better man than most... To do that and avoid injury is worth talking about. Kudos!







Ha, you know people say that, but I am a master of the long very slow run. My ultra took 7 hours and my iron marathon took 6:05. There is no real secret expect having alot of time available to devote to running and the humility to keep it slow.

Edited by BigDH 2008-09-29 2:44 PM
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » The L OOOO N G S L OW run Rss Feed