Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 17
 
 
2013-04-04 10:25 AM
in reply to: #4686524

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
Left Brain - 2013-04-04 11:24 AM 

I don't think ladies should talk that way.

At least not in mixed company.

 



2013-04-04 10:25 AM
in reply to: #4686524

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
Left Brain - 2013-04-04 11:24 AM
trinnas - 2013-04-04 10:23 AM
Left Brain - 2013-04-04 11:17 AM

Actually, Trinnas, the origional comment was that a woman would be justified for "clocking" (that's a punch btw) a man who smacked her in the butt.  You were then asked if a man would be justified in the same scenario.......you won't answer.

The answer is........ of course not.

It's not really a double standard, it's just societal norms.  I teach my daughters to go ahead and clock (punch, wallop, kick in the balls, etc) any man who touches them uninvited.  I teach my son to never strike a woman under any circumstance except a fight for his life.

You can agree or disagree, but I'm around alot of men.....we pretty much teach our kids some form of that lesson.....as we were taught.

For me, it's why these types of (harmless) incidents are always funny.......I'd rather someone just got their clock cleaned and we move on.....because all the rest of this is just a waste of time.

I rarely think of clocked as punched I think of it as struck in some manner in this case as backhanded across the face.

I have answered your question repeatedly I have simply refused to be baited into a reducto ad absurdum argument.

 

I don't think ladies should talk that way.

I do not recall professing to be a lady.

 

2013-04-04 10:31 AM
in reply to: #4686521

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
Goosedog - 2013-04-04 10:23 AM
Left Brain - 2013-04-04 11:22 AM
Goosedog - 2013-04-04 10:15 AM

wannabefaster - 2013-04-04 11:13 AM

Women don't think that way.... Most women (I think), if pinched on the butt by any man would think, that lecherous a#$H)%#, who does he think he is touching my butt... Men don't think that way. Both groups are unable to conceptualize the other groups response (this is a gross generalization, of course people can understand, but many just don't quite 'get it').

We've got to remove gender distinctions.  There is only one correct response.

 

That's no more true than to say the games of the NBA and WNBA are the same.

You guys are slipping.

It's no different than arguing with your wife.....the longer it goes on the less chance you have.

2013-04-04 10:33 AM
in reply to: #4686539

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
Left Brain - 2013-04-04 11:31 AM
Goosedog - 2013-04-04 10:23 AM
Left Brain - 2013-04-04 11:22 AM
Goosedog - 2013-04-04 10:15 AM

wannabefaster - 2013-04-04 11:13 AM

Women don't think that way.... Most women (I think), if pinched on the butt by any man would think, that lecherous a#$H)%#, who does he think he is touching my butt... Men don't think that way. Both groups are unable to conceptualize the other groups response (this is a gross generalization, of course people can understand, but many just don't quite 'get it').

We've got to remove gender distinctions.  There is only one correct response.

 

That's no more true than to say the games of the NBA and WNBA are the same.

You guys are slipping.

It's no different than arguing with your wife.....the longer it goes on the less chance you have.

Dude arguing is an endurance sport!  HTFU and train harder!

 

2013-04-04 10:34 AM
in reply to: #4686529

User image

Champion
6962
500010005001001001001002525
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
trinnas - 2013-04-04 11:25 AM
Left Brain - 2013-04-04 11:24 AM
trinnas - 2013-04-04 10:23 AM
Left Brain - 2013-04-04 11:17 AM

Actually, Trinnas, the origional comment was that a woman would be justified for "clocking" (that's a punch btw) a man who smacked her in the butt.  You were then asked if a man would be justified in the same scenario.......you won't answer.

The answer is........ of course not.

It's not really a double standard, it's just societal norms.  I teach my daughters to go ahead and clock (punch, wallop, kick in the balls, etc) any man who touches them uninvited.  I teach my son to never strike a woman under any circumstance except a fight for his life.

You can agree or disagree, but I'm around alot of men.....we pretty much teach our kids some form of that lesson.....as we were taught.

For me, it's why these types of (harmless) incidents are always funny.......I'd rather someone just got their clock cleaned and we move on.....because all the rest of this is just a waste of time.

I rarely think of clocked as punched I think of it as struck in some manner in this case as backhanded across the face.

I have answered your question repeatedly I have simply refused to be baited into a reducto ad absurdum argument.

 

I don't think ladies should talk that way.

I do not recall professing to be a lady.

 



But I and others do know that you're awesome.  Just putting that on the record.
2013-04-04 10:34 AM
in reply to: #4684426

User image

Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
Only 9 pages? Pick it up


2013-04-04 10:58 AM
in reply to: #4686543

User image

Master
3127
2000100010025
Sunny Southern Cal
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
Pro cycling is making a great rebound.  We've progressed from doping to merely being a dope.
2013-04-04 12:00 PM
in reply to: #4684426

User image

Pro
5169
50001002525
Burbs
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch

Haven't read all 9 pages, but in Maryland that is fourth degree sexual assault and second degree assault.

I've prosecuted it.

2013-04-04 12:08 PM
in reply to: #4686733

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
trishie - 2013-04-04 1:00 PM

Haven't read all 9 pages, but in Maryland that is fourth degree sexual assault and second degree assault.

I've prosecuted it.

Thanks for chiming in.  I hoped you would a few pages back.  Here's my question: Let's say you know that Person X pinched Person Y on the rear.  What other questions would you need answers to before deciding it is criminal?  Or are those facts sufficient?  Certainly, if Person Y consented it's not criminal, but what else would you need to know.

 

2013-04-04 12:11 PM
in reply to: #4686494

User image

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch

Marvarnett - 2013-04-04 11:07 AM

Technically, one response is retaliatory and the other you get to go through the courts to get resolution.

Thanks for making this distinction. Retaliation and self defense are two different things.

2013-04-04 12:13 PM
in reply to: #4686733

User image

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
trishie - 2013-04-04 12:00 PM

Haven't read all 9 pages, but in Maryland that is fourth degree sexual assault and second degree assault.

I've prosecuted it.

ooh i'm interested again. If a woman pinched my butt, and I punched her in the face, what happens? (context on the previous page)



2013-04-04 12:57 PM
in reply to: #4684426

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
I learned it from watching you Jan!



(ullrich_distracted.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
ullrich_distracted.jpg (31KB - 8 downloads)
2013-04-04 1:06 PM
in reply to: #4686759

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
mrbbrad - 2013-04-04 1:11 PM

Marvarnett - 2013-04-04 11:07 AM

Technically, one response is retaliatory and the other you get to go through the courts to get resolution.

Thanks for making this distinction. Retaliation and self defense are two different things.

I will agree there is a distinction but I will not agree with it being retaliation or the courts dichotomy.  Is a woman supposed to let a man stand there and grope her till she can find a cop?

2013-04-04 1:07 PM
in reply to: #4684426

User image

Regular
673
5001002525
SF Bay area
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
There is a positive side for the lady involved here, assuming (we have assumed a LOT in this thread) that she is a model.  If he hadn't pinched her for the photo, how many people would have seen her image.  Since he did, and it has gone viral(Google "Peter Sagan Pinch" and you get 162,000 results!  Here's one http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2303916/Cyclist-Peter-Sagan-sparks-sexism-row-fans-pinch-idea-new-internet-craze.html?ito=feeds-newsxml) and she will likely make millions of impressions which, in the modeling world, can only lead to more bookings.  So a childish prank for a photo may actually work out to her benefit, his detriment (or not), and an increased awareness of something (which is currently under hot debate in this thread).
2013-04-04 1:20 PM
in reply to: #4686851

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch

pitt83 - 2013-04-04 12:57 PM I learned it from watching you Jan!

So he's trying to read her banners......what?

2013-04-04 1:24 PM
in reply to: #4686865

User image

Champion
6962
500010005001001001001002525
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
trinnas - 2013-04-04 2:06 PM
mrbbrad - 2013-04-04 1:11 PM

Marvarnett - 2013-04-04 11:07 AM

Technically, one response is retaliatory and the other you get to go through the courts to get resolution.

Thanks for making this distinction. Retaliation and self defense are two different things.

I will agree there is a distinction but I will not agree with it being retaliation or the courts dichotomy.  Is a woman person supposed to let a man another person stand there and grope her them till she they can find a cop?



Fixed that for you!

Random Dan thought:  I just realized that when I go back on course after a race and cheer people on that I sometimes smack them on the butt with a keep going.  Granted, it's usually males or females that I know well.  BUT...technically if they are having a bad day they, according to the strict letter of the law, could have me arrested for assault.  Interesting....


2013-04-04 1:27 PM
in reply to: #4684426

User image

Veteran
283
100100252525
Racine, WI
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
In the words of Billy Madison, "That's assault, brotha!"
2013-04-04 1:27 PM
in reply to: #4686895

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
Marvarnett - 2013-04-04 2:24 PM
trinnas - 2013-04-04 2:06 PM
mrbbrad - 2013-04-04 1:11 PM

Marvarnett - 2013-04-04 11:07 AM

Technically, one response is retaliatory and the other you get to go through the courts to get resolution.

Thanks for making this distinction. Retaliation and self defense are two different things.

I will agree there is a distinction but I will not agree with it being retaliation or the courts dichotomy.  Is a woman person supposed to let a man another person stand there and grope her them till she they can find a cop?



Fixed that for you!

Random Dan thought:  I just realized that when I go back on course after a race and cheer people on that I sometimes smack them on the butt with a keep going.  Granted, it's usually males or females that I know well.  BUT...technically if they are having a bad day they, according to the strict letter of the law, could have me arrested for assault.  Interesting....

Good point!!

2013-04-04 1:31 PM
in reply to: #4684426

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
I, for one, am NOT hitting some woman no matter how much she gropes me.

Edited by Left Brain 2013-04-04 1:31 PM
2013-04-04 1:34 PM
in reply to: #4686895

User image

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
Marvarnett - 2013-04-04 1:24 PM
trinnas - 2013-04-04 2:06 PM
mrbbrad - 2013-04-04 1:11 PM

Marvarnett - 2013-04-04 11:07 AM

Technically, one response is retaliatory and the other you get to go through the courts to get resolution.

Thanks for making this distinction. Retaliation and self defense are two different things.

I will agree there is a distinction but I will not agree with it being retaliation or the courts dichotomy.  Is a woman person supposed to let a man another person stand there and grope her them till she they can find a cop?



Fixed that for you!

Random Dan thought:  I just realized that when I go back on course after a race and cheer people on that I sometimes smack them on the butt with a keep going.  Granted, it's usually males or females that I know well.  BUT...technically if they are having a bad day they, according to the strict letter of the law, could have me arrested for assault.  Interesting....

Doesn't intent factor into this as well? For instance, I am not going to be arrested for bumping someone by accident on the sidewalk.

2013-04-04 1:38 PM
in reply to: #4686906

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch

Left Brain - 2013-04-04 2:31 PM I, for one, am NOT hitting some woman no matter how much she gropes me.

Be glad you have never been put in the situation where you have had to defend yourself against a sexual assault.  I have not been so lucky.  When they are bigger and stronger than you it is not uncommon that they do not stop at simple groping.

 



2013-04-04 1:43 PM
in reply to: #4686895

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch

Marvarnett - 2013-04-04 2:24 PM 

Random Dan thought:  I just realized that when I go back on course after a race and cheer people on that I sometimes smack them on the butt with a keep going.  Granted, it's usually males or females that I know well.  BUT...technically if they are having a bad day they, according to the strict letter of the law, could have me arrested for assault.  Interesting....

DQ for outside assistance.

2013-04-04 1:43 PM
in reply to: #4686917

User image

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
trinnas - 2013-04-04 1:38 PM

Left Brain - 2013-04-04 2:31 PM I, for one, am NOT hitting some woman no matter how much she gropes me.

Be glad you have never been put in the situation where you have had to defend yourself against a sexual assault.  I have not been so lucky.  When they are bigger and stronger than you it is not uncommon that they do not stop at simple groping.

 

I am sorry that happened to you, but I would think having a traumatic experience like that would bias you on this subject matter no?

2013-04-04 1:47 PM
in reply to: #4686917

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
trinnas - 2013-04-04 1:38 PM

Left Brain - 2013-04-04 2:31 PM I, for one, am NOT hitting some woman no matter how much she gropes me.

Be glad you have never been put in the situation where you have had to defend yourself against a sexual assault.  I have not been so lucky.  When they are bigger and stronger than you it is not uncommon that they do not stop at simple groping.

 

But in the case at hand here.........no.  I think this the point that everyone gets hung up on.  "Those who would be offended" see this as a clear crossing of the line.....those who worry more about SERIOUS and REAL assaults see this as stupid, and nothing more.  Stupid gets you into trouble, but let's not confuse the two, or the amount of trouble each can garner you.

Trinna.......I'm pretty sure I understand fighting for my life as well as anyone on this board.

2013-04-04 1:57 PM
in reply to: #4686751

User image

Pro
5169
50001002525
Burbs
Subject: RE: Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch
Goosedog - 2013-04-04 1:08 PM
trishie - 2013-04-04 1:00 PM

Haven't read all 9 pages, but in Maryland that is fourth degree sexual assault and second degree assault.

I've prosecuted it.

Thanks for chiming in.  I hoped you would a few pages back.  Here's my question: Let's say you know that Person X pinched Person Y on the rear.  What other questions would you need answers to before deciding it is criminal?  Or are those facts sufficient?  Certainly, if Person Y consented it's not criminal, but what else would you need to know.

 

Every case is fact dependent, but the facts here would be sufficient.

A second degree assault is an unlawful/ offensive touching (or an intent to frighten, depends on the theory you're going on). A fourth degree sexual offense is unlawful/ offensive touching on sexual body parts (ie breasts, buttocks)



Edited by trishie 2013-04-04 1:58 PM
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Peter Sagan....it was just a pinch Rss Feed  
 
 
of 17