Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Palin affair???? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2008-09-05 7:06 AM
in reply to: #1651566

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Palin affair????
medic1962 - 2008-09-04 10:14 PM

All 3 networks think that Obama is  the next coming and can do no wrong. 

If that's true, then why is most of the stuff they report about him negative?

http://www.cmpa.com/Studies/Election08/election%20news%207_29_08.htm



2008-09-05 7:33 AM
in reply to: #1648133

User image

Tyler,
Subject: RE: Palin affair????
She's hot, enough said.
2008-09-06 12:41 AM
in reply to: #1648133

User image

Expert
906
500100100100100
Olathe, KS
Subject: RE: Palin affair????
2008-09-06 6:28 AM
in reply to: #1648133

User image

Elite
2777
2000500100100252525
In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats.
Subject: RE: Palin affair????

Oh wait!!! Let's complicate this even more. Maybe the affair resulted in the pregnancy and that's why she went to such extremes to return to Wasilla to have it delivered by her personal physician. Wouldn't want any blood samples used for DNA test.

I could write for the Natl Enq

2008-09-06 6:57 AM
in reply to: #1652039

User image

Master
2231
200010010025
Des Moines, Iowa
Subject: RE: Palin affair????
run4yrlif - 2008-09-05 7:06 AM
medic1962 - 2008-09-04 10:14 PM

All 3 networks think that Obama is  the next coming and can do no wrong. 

If that's true, then why is most of the stuff they report about him negative?

http://www.cmpa.com/Studies/Election08/election%20news%207_29_08.htm

Info on the cmpa...looks like they have a conservative agenda.

2008-09-06 7:23 AM
in reply to: #1648133

User image

Elite
2777
2000500100100252525
In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats.
Subject: RE: Palin affair????

Good to see the nut doesn't fall far from the tree.

Sarah Heath and Todd Palin elope - August 29, 1988

Track Palin born - April 20, 1989

7 months, 21 days between marriage and birth.

Abstinence only education didn't work for Sarah or Bristol.

National Enquirer, it's the new Swiftboat Veterans for Truth.



2008-09-06 7:27 AM
in reply to: #1654810

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Palin affair????
shawn barr - 2008-09-06 7:57 AM
run4yrlif - 2008-09-05 7:06 AM
medic1962 - 2008-09-04 10:14 PM

All 3 networks think that Obama is  the next coming and can do no wrong. 

If that's true, then why is most of the stuff they report about him negative?

http://www.cmpa.com/Studies/Election08/election%20news%207_29_08.htm

Info on the cmpa...looks like they have a conservative agenda.

Yeah.

The media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) has challenged CMPA's non-partisan claim, based on the argument that much of its funding has come from conservative sources, and that its founder, Dr. S. Robert Lichter, once held a chair in mass communications at the American Enterprise Institute and was a Fox News contributor.[citation needed] After a Washington Post article referred to CMPA as "conservative," the Post published a "Clarification," which concluded, "The Center describes itself as nonpartisan, and its studies have been cited by both conservative and liberal commentators."[18]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Media_and_Public_Affairs

Media Transparency documents that between 1986 and 2005 CMPA received 55 grants totaling $2,960,916 (unadjusted for inflation).[6] The data reveals that the overwhelming proportion of CMPA's funding comes from conservative foundations.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/wiki.phtml?title=Center_for_Media_and_Public_Affairs



Edited by run4yrlif 2008-09-06 7:41 AM
2008-09-07 7:38 PM
in reply to: #1654832

User image

Master
2231
200010010025
Des Moines, Iowa
Subject: RE: Palin affair????
run4yrlif - 2008-09-06 7:27 AM
shawn barr - 2008-09-06 7:57 AM
run4yrlif - 2008-09-05 7:06 AM
medic1962 - 2008-09-04 10:14 PM

All 3 networks think that Obama is  the next coming and can do no wrong. 

If that's true, then why is most of the stuff they report about him negative?

http://www.cmpa.com/Studies/Election08/election%20news%207_29_08.htm

Info on the cmpa...looks like they have a conservative agenda.

Yeah.

The media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) has challenged CMPA's non-partisan claim, based on the argument that much of its funding has come from conservative sources, and that its founder, Dr. S. Robert Lichter, once held a chair in mass communications at the American Enterprise Institute and was a Fox News contributor.[citation needed] After a Washington Post article referred to CMPA as "conservative," the Post published a "Clarification," which concluded, "The Center describes itself as nonpartisan, and its studies have been cited by both conservative and liberal commentators."[18]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Media_and_Public_Affairs

Media Transparency documents that between 1986 and 2005 CMPA received 55 grants totaling $2,960,916 (unadjusted for inflation).[6] The data reveals that the overwhelming proportion of CMPA's funding comes from conservative foundations.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/wiki.phtml?title=Center_for_Media_and_Public_Affairs

It's obviously a reverse psychology ploy then

(seriously, thanks for the info)

2008-09-07 8:54 PM
in reply to: #1648133

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Palin affair???? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2