Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Series - Reviews Please I'm in the minority. I did Steelhead 70.3 as a relay, two weeks after I had done the Endurathon in Muncie Indiana. The only thing I can say is that the 70.3 cost alot more and is very over rated. Hell the 70.3 cost me as much as Muncie and I was on a relay team. I had a great time being part of a realy with Matt3liv and Trixie, that's not to mention all the great folks I met at the Jazz house overlooking Lake Michigan.
I found the course at Steelhead was lame as hell with to many folks on roads open on the bike, where Muncie was run on a closed bike course, where drafting wasn't an issue with plenty of room to pass and stay legal. If you spend any time reading 70.3 race reports, there's virtually always about the obscene drafting that occurs and packs of cyclist. If you look at some it won't take long to find.
The run course was even worse. I knew three other runners at Muncie, I yelled out at two on the simple out and back course. At Steelhead I knew at least 12 to 15 others that would be on the run course and the way it's set up I never saw anyone I knew.
I never felt alone on the course in Muncie, which by the way will be running there 30th event this coming July, and I never had to worry about packs of drafters. Damn near every RR written about 70.3 and even some IM's there's numerous complaints about drafting and packs. If you find you need a IM brand to make you happy have at it, but there are plenty of great independent HIM's out there that can't use the ridiculus 70.3 moniker that are ran just as well if not better then 70.3 events. JMHO
|