General Discussion Triathlon Talk » What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2009-01-27 10:46 PM

User image

Extreme Veteran
314
100100100
Subject: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?

I was watching the 2008 Ironman video and noticed something interesting. If you recall, the Navy Seal they kept talking about was putting in some decent work, yet his time was not great.

It seems you hear a lot about guys putting in 20-30 hours of work, yet seeing 14-16 hour IM times.

Then, you've got others putting in the same work or less and hitting 9-10 hours.

What is the main factor, as you see it, between these types of people?

Furthermore, what are guys like Sindballe and Lieto doing wrong when it comes to the run?

For the most part, it seems that the phrase "race your strength" only applies if you are a good runner. Good swimmers and cyclists can't seem to hold anyone off down the stretch. The only exception to that seems to be Wellington, who is great on the run and the bike.

 

Any thoughts?



2009-01-27 10:58 PM
in reply to: #1932938

Extreme Veteran
437
10010010010025
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
7 hours ? Just kidding.

Probably # of years of training or bad training program.

2009-01-28 12:07 AM
in reply to: #1932938

Extreme Veteran
428
10010010010025
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
The Seal admitted his training program was not usual. Sounds like he basically did as much as he could when he could - very unstructured. Imagine what a good coach could do with someone who's already in that kind of shape!
2009-01-28 6:54 AM
in reply to: #1932938

User image

Pro
4675
20002000500100252525
Wisconsin near the Twin Cities metro
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
nhangen - 2009-01-27 10:46 PM

It seems you hear a lot about guys putting in 20-30 hours of work, yet seeing 14-16 hour IM times.

you hear a LOT about these type of people?  I think this would be a very rare situation, but maybe I'm wrong.  Maybe they won't get to break 9 hours but I would think if anyone trains 20-30 hours they're getting sub 11 or 10 fairly easily

2009-01-28 7:30 AM
in reply to: #1932938

User image

over a barrier
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
Unless someone had a major mechinical on the bike...most of the 15-17 hrs finishers are at Kona by Lottery or are in one of the older age groups. That's not to say all Lottery athletes finish in this range but many do.

Guys/gals training 20+ hrs week for years are at the pointy end of the results.

IMO, for Thunderbear and Chris they are racing their strength - its a fine line between walking a marathon and winning Kona (which is what they're trying to do). They could change up their strategy and put up Top 10 finsihes but thats not why they're at Kona. They want to win.
2009-01-28 11:03 AM
in reply to: #1933080

User image

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
Birkierunner - 2009-01-28 6:54 AM

nhangen - 2009-01-27 10:46 PM

It seems you hear a lot about guys putting in 20-30 hours of work, yet seeing 14-16 hour IM times.

you hear a LOT about these type of people?  I think this would be a very rare situation, but maybe I'm wrong.  Maybe they won't get to break 9 hours but I would think if anyone trains 20-30 hours they're getting sub 11 or 10 fairly easily



I went 9:40 on 15-17 hours per week after having established a strong base.


2009-01-28 1:23 PM
in reply to: #1932938

User image

Veteran
238
10010025
Raleigh, NC
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?

I'm assuming youre talking about Goggins....and I would have to say the type of training. 

He is historically and Ultra athlete.  An insane one for that matter....His most recent (Jan 17).  The H.U.R.T. 100 ultra - 21 hours and change 4th place.  Until this year only 2 people had gone sub 24 hrs.

The guys putting in 9 and under are pro triathletes....Iron-athletes. This is what they train for and every minute detail matters when you're starring at the pace car most of the race.

It's comparing Apples to Skyscrapers....

Oh and here's an article about Goggins after IMWC...

2009-01-28 3:59 PM
in reply to: #1933864

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
Tri'nNC - 2009-01-28 12:23 PM

I'm assuming youre talking about Goggins....and I would have to say the type of training. 

He is historically and Ultra athlete.  An insane one for that matter....His most recent (Jan 17).  The H.U.R.T. 100 ultra - 21 hours and change 4th place.  Until this year only 2 people had gone sub 24 hrs.

The guys putting in 9 and under are pro triathletes....Iron-athletes. This is what they train for and every minute detail matters when you're starring at the pace car most of the race.

It's comparing Apples to Skyscrapers....

Oh and here's an article about Goggins after IMWC...



Nice article. You know, even though he kinda bashed the ironman in terms of difficulty, overall he came across as very modest when speaking of his other achievements.
2009-01-28 5:36 PM
in reply to: #1932938

User image

Master
2125
200010025
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
nhangen - 2009-01-27 11:46 PM

I was watching the 2008 Ironman video and noticed something interesting. If you recall, the Navy Seal they kept talking about was putting in some decent work, yet his time was not great.

It seems you hear a lot about guys putting in 20-30 hours of work, yet seeing 14-16 hour IM times.

Then, you've got others putting in the same work or less and hitting 9-10 hours.

What is the main factor, as you see it, between these types of people?

Furthermore, what are guys like Sindballe and Lieto doing wrong when it comes to the run?

For the most part, it seems that the phrase "race your strength" only applies if you are a good runner. Good swimmers and cyclists can't seem to hold anyone off down the stretch. The only exception to that seems to be Wellington, who is great on the run and the bike.

 

Any thoughts?



Goggins is a machine but he was not "racing" the Ironman.  It was a training day for him.  He waited near the finish line to finish with the othe Navy Seal. 

Second, there are many more things to consider than just corolating training hours to results.  For many at Kona, it is their second IM for the year and they may just be there to enjoy it.  Or they may have gotten injured between their qualifying race and Kona.  Having said that, most folks putting in 20-30 hours per week are not finishing in the 14-16 hour range.

I got in via the lottery.  It was my second year of training for triathlon.  My biggest week was a 17 hour week and I finished 13:55.    

With respect to Thunderbear and Lieto, that goes to show you how hard that particular race is.  It was over 100 degs in the lava fields.  We had brutal head and side winds and of course high humidity.  There is not an ounce of shade on the entire course.  Those pros are racing for 8 hours and are living right on the edge.  Heck, even Mark Allan walked parts of the marathon in his first 6 years.  

Second, Kona is won in the last hour of the race.  It all comes down to the run into the energy lab and back to Kona.  While there are some that get enough of a lead (Stadler) that no one can catch them, the overwhelming majority of the time it is won out on the Queen K on foot.  Mark Allen preaches this, Crowie has said this and it wasn't until Macca learned this that he finally won.  
2009-01-28 8:59 PM
in reply to: #1932938

User image

Veteran
238
10010025
Raleigh, NC
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
...great post Jonathan!
2009-01-29 12:28 AM
in reply to: #1932938

User image

Champion
6993
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?

When you talk hours there is big difference between when I do a 20 hour week and then Bryan or Brikie do a 20 hour week. 

 Even people on Biggest Loser will train 20 hours a week.

 Sometimes less is more A friend of mine just won a 72 hour race for the women division and 2nd overall and she trains about 50 miles a week. She  avg 73 miles a day for 3 days straight. 

 

 



2009-01-29 9:37 AM
in reply to: #1934232

User image

Elite
2768
20005001001002525
Raleigh
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
BigDH - 2009-01-28 3:59 PM
Tri'nNC - 2009-01-28 12:23 PM

I'm assuming youre talking about Goggins....and I would have to say the type of training. 

He is historically and Ultra athlete.  An insane one for that matter....His most recent (Jan 17).  The H.U.R.T. 100 ultra - 21 hours and change 4th place.  Until this year only 2 people had gone sub 24 hrs.

The guys putting in 9 and under are pro triathletes....Iron-athletes. This is what they train for and every minute detail matters when you're starring at the pace car most of the race.

It's comparing Apples to Skyscrapers....

Oh and here's an article about Goggins after IMWC...

Nice article. You know, even though he kinda bashed the ironman in terms of difficulty, overall he came across as very modest when speaking of his other achievements.

Compared to the 100 mile runs and 24 hour events that Goggins has done, IM is a cake walk. There have been several pro IM atheletes who have dabbled in the ultra running world and all of them have said that doing a IM in 8-9 hours is a whole lot easier that running 100 miles in 22 hours or less.

2009-01-29 12:16 PM
in reply to: #1932938


115
100
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I certainly would not say an 11:24:00 is "not all that great" for a 195 lb guy on what I believe is his first IM and generally does not train IM specific.

In most IM races other than Kona that time would put you in the top 10-20% of all finishers.

The pointy end of the field finishing sub 10 hours is pretty small percentage wise when you look at the results, and most of those folks are dedicating close to 100% of their training towards IM racing. At Kona in 2008, 307 out of 1710 starters went sub-10 (just under 18%), and that was the mostly by-qualification World Championship.
2009-01-29 1:00 PM
in reply to: #1932938

User image

Pro
4100
20002000100
Wherever the trail takes me, WA.
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?

ONE WORD: BASE

 

These people have been at it for years, and they have such a huge base!  I did Ironman 3 years ago, and worked my butt off.  This past year I worked less, stressed less, and finished faster!

2009-01-29 6:50 PM
in reply to: #1932938

User image

Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?

A lot depends on what you're doing for your 20 hrs of training per week.  There are not many people who train regularily over 20hrs per week, unless they do it full time.   Even fewer are actually training well for those 20hrs.  My wife won an Ironman on ~20hrs per week.  I've gone sub 9:00 (Arizona, not Hawaii) on similar training volume.  We train like we race and work full time (until tomorrow, anyway) as well.  It's just about consistency and making your training feel like race day (most of the time anyway)- 3 years of 20hr weeks adds up.

If someone says they put in 20-30 hours of training per week on a regular basis (over more than just a few months) and they don't see a time of around 10 hours I would bet they are exagerating the weekly training volume in a big big way.  Either that or they include all their stretching and shower time in the training as well.  But, if all the training is legit then I would bet it has something to do with either lack of nutrition or lack of mental strength.

Or they simply enjoy the training and enjoy the racing and don't really care what kind of time they finish in.  Nothing wrong with that either.

Someone above definitely hit the nail on the head with Sindballe and Lieto.  They go for the win.  When it comes to Hawaii I think they run into difficulties with the heat more than anything else.  Big guys soak up the heat like crazy. 

 

2009-01-29 6:54 PM
in reply to: #1935900

User image

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona?
swbkrun - 2009-01-29 1:00 PM

ONE WORD: BASE

 

These people have been at it for years, and they have such a huge base!  I did Ironman 3 years ago, and worked my butt off.  This past year I worked less, stressed less, and finished faster!




...or genetics. I qualified for Kona with a 9:43 IMAZ within 13 months of my first triathlon, although I had been a runner for years and a swimmer as a kid.


New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » What seperates 9hrs and 16hrs at Kona? Rss Feed