Other Resources My Cup of Joe » *WARNING* to the Girls of BT Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2009-03-30 9:41 AM

User image

Pro
3673
200010005001002525
MAC-opolis
Subject: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT

It is illegal in Thailand to leave your house without wearing any underwear.

Don't say I didn't warn you.

 



2009-03-30 9:44 AM
in reply to: #2048396

User image

Extreme Veteran
737
50010010025
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
Did you play some Balderdash over the weekend?
2009-03-30 9:45 AM
in reply to: #2048396

Iron Donkey
38643
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
Big Mac - 2009-03-30 9:41 AM

It is illegal in Thailand to leave your house without wearing any underwear.

Don't say I didn't warn you.

So, why DID that hooker run out of house and down the street without them in the first place?

2009-03-30 9:52 AM
in reply to: #2048396

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT

Illegal just for girls?

2009-03-30 10:05 AM
in reply to: #2048438

User image

Pro
3673
200010005001002525
MAC-opolis
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
run4yrlif - 2009-03-30 10:52 AM

Illegal just for girls?

Illegal for all.  I guess the subject line should have been a warning to BT girls, Bear and hippies.

2009-03-30 10:08 AM
in reply to: #2048396

User image

Arch-Bishop of BT
10278
50005000100100252525
Pittsburgh
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
Big Mac - 2009-03-30 10:41 AM

It is illegal in Thailand to leave your house without wearing any underwear.

Don't say I didn't warn you.

 

And this is why America rocks!  Women are free to be underwear-less...



2009-03-30 10:12 AM
in reply to: #2048396

User image

Expert
1456
10001001001001002525
Central New Jersey
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
which leads to the age old question, is a thong underwear?
2009-03-30 10:14 AM
in reply to: #2048492

User image

Arch-Bishop of BT
10278
50005000100100252525
Pittsburgh
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT

wwlani - 2009-03-30 11:12 AM which leads to the age old question, is a thong underwear?

I was not aware that there was a debate on this topic... what are the arguments AGAINST it being underwear?

2009-03-30 10:14 AM
in reply to: #2048396

User image

Pro
4612
20002000500100
MA
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT

the questions are:

do they check?
how/where do they perform the check?
what do they consider "suspicious" for them to initiate a check?

2009-03-30 10:16 AM
in reply to: #2048492

User image

Pro
3673
200010005001002525
MAC-opolis
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT

wwlani - 2009-03-30 11:12 AM which leads to the age old question, is a thong underwear?

Perhaps a post of some pics with thong and with full panties may help us in determining. 

2009-03-30 10:54 AM
in reply to: #2048500

User image

Elite
3290
20001000100100252525
Oliver, BC, "Wine Capital of Canada"
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
D.K. - 2009-03-30 8:14 AM

the questions are:


what do they consider "suspicious" for them to initiate a check?

Dandruff on there shoes? 



2009-03-30 10:58 AM
in reply to: #2048500

User image

Elite
3022
20001000
Preferably on my bike somewhere
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
D.K. - 2009-03-30 11:14 AM

the questions are:

do they check?
how/where do they perform the check?
what do they consider "suspicious" for them to initiate a check?



That's where the story goes from amusing/alarming to downright SCARY. I'm afraid to know the criteria for the "under-pants check", because I am CERTAIN there is a procedure.


\
2009-03-30 11:05 AM
in reply to: #2048486

User image

Veteran
840
50010010010025
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT

There is a very good reason why we need these laws in the US too!

Remember the picture right after this one?

Just say no to crack!

2009-03-30 12:11 PM
in reply to: #2048500

User image

Champion
5868
50005001001001002525
Urbandale, IA
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
D.K. - 2009-03-30 10:14 AM

the questions are:

do they check?
how/where do they perform the check?
what do they consider "suspicious" for them to initiate a check?

You forgot to add - "How does one apply to be a checker in the female line/"

2009-03-30 12:14 PM
in reply to: #2048396

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
oh my i would never consider going anywhere in thailand without underwear...yech.
2009-03-30 12:31 PM
in reply to: #2048812

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.


2009-03-30 1:40 PM
in reply to: #2048804

Elite
3022
20001000
Preferably on my bike somewhere
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
jdwright56 - 2009-03-30 1:11 PM

D.K. - 2009-03-30 10:14 AM

the questions are:

do they check?
how/where do they perform the check?
what do they consider "suspicious" for them to initiate a check?

You forgot to add - "How does one apply to be a checker in the female line/"



Just remember that hottie tri chicks are a small percentage of the overall female population. There are more Rosanne Barr's and Rosie O'Donnells than there are (insert hottie BT Chicks userid here).


2009-03-30 2:09 PM
in reply to: #2048396

Pro
4353
200020001001001002525
Wallingford, PA
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
... but what if you're wearing bike shorts???
2009-03-30 2:10 PM
in reply to: #2048486

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
akustix - 2009-03-30 8:08 AM
Big Mac - 2009-03-30 10:41 AM

It is illegal in Thailand to leave your house without wearing any underwear.

Don't say I didn't warn you.

 

And this is why America rocks!  Women are free to be underwear-less...

Good bless America

2009-03-30 2:19 PM
in reply to: #2048396

Champion
6046
5000100025
New York, NY
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT

so yeah, if I am commando in my jeans they are going to make me drop my pants????

you have to wonder exactly how this law was initiated....

2009-03-30 2:21 PM
in reply to: #2048862

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.


2009-03-30 3:55 PM
in reply to: #2049082

Master
1903
1000500100100100100
Portland, Oregon
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT

jsnowash - 2009-03-30 12:09 PM ... but what if you're wearing bike shorts???

 

pigfinn and Mike-from-My-Group-Ride would not be arrested. The rest of us... I guess they'd have to catch us first. How fast is a fully laden Thai cop?

2009-03-30 3:56 PM
in reply to: #2049346

Elite
3022
20001000
Preferably on my bike somewhere
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
ell-in-or - 2009-03-30 4:55 PM

jsnowash - 2009-03-30 12:09 PM ... but what if you're wearing bike shorts???

 

pigfinn and Mike-from-My-Group-Ride would not be arrested. The rest of us... I guess they'd have to catch us first. How fast is a fully laden Thai cop?



What kind, African or European?
2009-03-30 8:23 PM
in reply to: #2048396

Member
271
1001002525
Ontario
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT
However, here in Canada, people in hospital emergency rooms don't get why you can't wear underwear with your bike shorts and give you funny looks....not that I know personally or anything.....nevermind.
2009-03-30 8:32 PM
in reply to: #2048396

Champion
6503
50001000500
NOVA - Ironic for an Endurance Athlete
Subject: RE: *WARNING* to the Girls of BT

Wouldn't that make tri-suits, and for that matter, bathing suits illegal as well?

And a friend of mine has forgotten to pack his undies in bag for AFTER a swim, bike, run and/or race.  I wonder what I would do?

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » *WARNING* to the Girls of BT Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2