Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2010-01-20 6:42 AM

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
That was fast...and funny...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5VLeBhzE3Y&feature=player_embedded

The last line was the best...

I'll save the deep, meaningful analysis of this win for another thread...


2010-01-20 8:49 AM
in reply to: #2623443

User image

Master
2802
2000500100100100
Minnetonka, Minnesota
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
That was very funny...almost shot coffee from my nose all over my keyboard...  Thanks for the link!
2010-01-20 8:58 AM
in reply to: #2623443

Veteran
645
50010025
Tennessee
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
When I saw the Subject I thought it was going to be Obama speaking!
2010-01-20 9:08 AM
in reply to: #2623443

User image

Master
2380
2000100100100252525
Beijing
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
TriRSquared - 2010-01-19 7:42 AM That was fast...and funny...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5VLeBhzE3Y&feature=player_embedded

The last line was the best...

I'll save the deep, meaningful analysis of this win for another thread...


This clip gets used over and over for various events.... and it's funny every time.  I have no idea why.
2010-01-20 10:17 AM
in reply to: #2623736

User image

over a barrier
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
iruptacopula - 2010-01-20 8:58 AM

When I saw the Subject I thought it was going to be Obama speaking!


Why?
2010-01-20 10:24 AM
in reply to: #2623443

User image

Regular
121
100
Franklin, VA
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
hil-air-i-ous.

The Third Reich = Bilderberg


2010-01-20 10:52 AM
in reply to: #2623788

User image

Master
2802
2000500100100100
Minnetonka, Minnesota
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
moondawg14 wrote: 

This clip gets used over and over for various events.... and it's funny every time.  I have no idea why.


Yes, it does get used a lot.  It was even used by a union against management where my wife works and featured her among others - and yes, it was still very funny.
2010-01-20 2:14 PM
in reply to: #2623443

User image

Master
2277
2000100100252525
Lake Norman, NC
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
Pardon my German but, F'ING HILARIOUS!!!!

2010-01-20 2:33 PM
in reply to: #2623443

User image

Champion
5522
5000500
Frisco, TX
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass

LOL - nicely done....

2010-01-20 2:41 PM
in reply to: #2624705

User image

Elite
3090
20001000252525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass

I guess I'm confused as to why Hitler is being portrayed as being upset at the defeat of a Democrat.

Nazism and fascism reject communism and liberalism. Most proponents of Nazism and fascism generally attract support from the far right. Nazism specifically is definitely a form of far right politics. I guess some people don't know that.

Funny, though, even if it's totally out of context.



Edited by zed707 2010-01-20 3:01 PM
2010-01-20 4:02 PM
in reply to: #2624720

User image

Champion
5376
5000100100100252525
PA
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
zed707 - 2010-01-20 3:41 PM

I guess I'm confused as to why Hitler is being portrayed as being upset at the defeat of a Democrat.

Nazism and fascism reject communism and liberalism. Most proponents of Nazism and fascism generally attract support from the far right. Nazism specifically is definitely a form of far right politics. I guess some people don't know that.

Funny, though, even if it's totally out of context.



But you have to consider that modern day liberalism is far from the liberalism of the past.  One of my favorite economists was a classic liberal.  He would be opposed to what is described as liberalism in the U.S.  This is actually, contextually correct and as you state.. very funny!


2010-01-20 4:35 PM
in reply to: #2624720

User image

Member
1699
1000500100252525
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
zed707 - 2010-01-20 2:41 PM

I guess I'm confused as to why Hitler is being portrayed as being upset at the defeat of a Democrat.

Nazism and fascism reject communism and liberalism. Most proponents of Nazism and fascism generally attract support from the far right. Nazism specifically is definitely a form of far right politics. I guess some people don't know that.

Funny, though, even if it's totally out of context.



I realize people call today's neo-nazi's far-right, but in my mind, Nazism is not a form of far right politics. In general, the right wingers in the United States believe in smaller government, capitalism and individual rights and responsibilities. The Nazi's believed in a strong government, socialist central planning and no individual rights.


2010-01-20 5:13 PM
in reply to: #2624720

User image

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
zed707 - 2010-01-20 3:41 PM

I guess I'm confused as to why Hitler is being portrayed as being upset at the defeat of a Democrat.

Nazism and fascism reject communism and liberalism. Most proponents of Nazism and fascism generally attract support from the far right. Nazism specifically is definitely a form of far right politics. I guess some people don't know that.

Funny, though, even if it's totally out of context.



You're talking this way too seriously.  This video clip has been used hundreds of times with all kinds of different subtitles for all kinds of different topics.

http://www.wired.com/underwire/2008/05/adolf-hitler-is/
2010-01-20 5:19 PM
in reply to: #2625042

User image

Elite
3090
20001000252525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass

newleaf - 2010-01-20 5:13 PM
zed707 - 2010-01-20 3:41 PM

I guess I'm confused as to why Hitler is being portrayed as being upset at the defeat of a Democrat.

Nazism and fascism reject communism and liberalism. Most proponents of Nazism and fascism generally attract support from the far right. Nazism specifically is definitely a form of far right politics. I guess some people don't know that.

Funny, though, even if it's totally out of context.



You're talking this way too seriously.  This video clip has been used hundreds of times with all kinds of different subtitles for all kinds of different topics.

http://www.wired.com/underwire/2008/05/adolf-hitler-is/

Well, I did say it was funny

Just didn't make any sense.



Edited by zed707 2010-01-20 5:20 PM
2010-01-20 8:49 PM
in reply to: #2623443

User image

Veteran
144
10025
El Dorado Hills, CA
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
So...hot and sour soup and this clip....not a good combo...but my sinuses are clear so there is a bonus.

Totally hilarious!
2010-01-20 9:14 PM
in reply to: #2625042

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
newleaf - 2010-01-20 5:13 PM
zed707 - 2010-01-20 3:41 PM

I guess I'm confused as to why Hitler is being portrayed as being upset at the defeat of a Democrat.

Nazism and fascism reject communism and liberalism. Most proponents of Nazism and fascism generally attract support from the far right. Nazism specifically is definitely a form of far right politics. I guess some people don't know that.

Funny, though, even if it's totally out of context.



You're talking this way too seriously.  This video clip has been used hundreds of times with all kinds of different subtitles for all kinds of different topics.

http://www.wired.com/underwire/2008/05/adolf-hitler-is/



Like this classic, for example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx2Ow_fSt9I 


2010-01-20 9:22 PM
in reply to: #2623443

New user
11

Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
Zed,

You could not be more incorrect.  Nazism is the farthest extreme of liberalism.
2010-01-20 9:48 PM
in reply to: #2624720

User image

Master
2006
2000
Portland, ME
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
zed707 - 2010-01-20 2:41 PM

I guess I'm confused as to why Hitler is being portrayed as being upset at the defeat of a Democrat.

Nazism and fascism reject communism and liberalism. Most proponents of Nazism and fascism generally attract support from the far right. Nazism specifically is definitely a form of far right politics. I guess some people don't know that.

Funny, though, even if it's totally out of context.



Can you give me your definition of far right and far left and give me your explanation of why Nazism and Fascism is a rejection of communism and liberalism. You may need to give your definitions of the four -ism to explain your statement better.

2010-01-20 10:09 PM
in reply to: #2625502

User image

Master
2006
2000
Portland, ME
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
footer32 - 2010-01-20 9:22 PM Zed,

You could not be more incorrect.  Nazism is the farthest extreme of liberalism.


Not sure about it being the farthest extreme as Nazism stresses socialism/liberalism on the national level while communism stresses expansion on a global level. Nazism embraced western civilization to rebuild nations with a statist/liberal agenda. While communism destroyed western civilization to replace it with a statist/liberal agenda.

Though both systems required blind faith in central control I think people can debate which is more extreme liberalism. To me it just the same thing but just a different way to get there.

2010-01-20 10:19 PM
in reply to: #2625477

User image

Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
jmk-brooklyn - 2010-01-20 7:14 PM
newleaf - 2010-01-20 5:13 PM
zed707 - 2010-01-20 3:41 PM

I guess I'm confused as to why Hitler is being portrayed as being upset at the defeat of a Democrat.

Nazism and fascism reject communism and liberalism. Most proponents of Nazism and fascism generally attract support from the far right. Nazism specifically is definitely a form of far right politics. I guess some people don't know that.

Funny, though, even if it's totally out of context.



You're talking this way too seriously.  This video clip has been used hundreds of times with all kinds of different subtitles for all kinds of different topics.

http://www.wired.com/underwire/2008/05/adolf-hitler-is/



Like this classic, for example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx2Ow_fSt9I 


i don't understand why Hitler would even be talking about slowtwitch.  Everyone knows he was a duathlete 
2010-01-20 10:31 PM
in reply to: #2623443

User image

Expert
770
5001001002525
Long Island, NY
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass

Bush got Cs.  Obama probably failed lunch.

That clip had me rolling!

 



2010-01-21 12:29 AM
in reply to: #2623443

User image

Champion
6931
5000100050010010010010025
Bellingham, Washington
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
Wasn't Dolph on PEDs or type of medication???

2010-01-21 6:46 AM
in reply to: #2625584

User image

Extreme Veteran
751
5001001002525
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
Jackemy - 2010-01-20 11:09 PM
footer32 - 2010-01-20 9:22 PM Zed,

You could not be more incorrect.  Nazism is the farthest extreme of liberalism.


Not sure about it being the farthest extreme as Nazism stresses socialism/liberalism on the national level while communism stresses expansion on a global level. Nazism embraced western civilization to rebuild nations with a statist/liberal agenda. While communism destroyed western civilization to replace it with a statist/liberal agenda.

Though both systems required blind faith in central control I think people can debate which is more extreme liberalism. To me it just the same thing but just a different way to get there.



Yepper...increase central power in the name of the people while diluting individual rights/freedom.
2010-01-21 9:29 AM
in reply to: #2625584

Pro
4040
2000200025
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass

Jackemy - 2010-01-20 11:09 PM
footer32 - 2010-01-20 9:22 PM Zed,

You could not be more incorrect.  Nazism is the farthest extreme of liberalism.


Not sure about it being the farthest extreme as Nazism stresses socialism/liberalism on the national level while communism stresses expansion on a global level. Nazism embraced western civilization to rebuild nations with a statist/liberal agenda. While communism destroyed western civilization to replace it with a statist/liberal agenda.

Though both systems required blind faith in central control I think people can debate which is more extreme liberalism. To me it just the same thing but just a different way to get there.

 

IMHO, Nazism was less about economic systems and more about nationalism and militarism. Nazism rose out of a German economy devastated by a series of economic tsunamis: WWI and the crippling reparations to be paid, hyper-inflation which may or may not have been precipitated by the assassination of Walter Rathenau (a Jewish industrialist and German foreign minister and arguably the single greatest hope that Germany had for a war-free recovery), the great depression and deep-seated insecurity and intolerance for "foreigners".

Nazis are indeed seen as right-wing, but IMHO, more because of their nationalist and militaristic bent and their invocation of some kind of mystical ideal of "the way things were" (even if they were never actually that way).

The first chance the Nazis got, they established a dictatorship, shut down all opposition and cribbed their industrialization strategy from the neighboring Soviets. So, in reality there was very little separating the Nazis and the Communists. This makes sense, as totalitarian states are necessarily very similar.   

Although I may have argued in the past that comparisons of modern Western political leaders to Nazis is fair game, when you really look at how the Nazis grabbed power, and what they did when they got it, it's clear that no such comparison holds water.

2010-01-21 10:07 AM
in reply to: #2626095

User image

Master
2006
2000
Portland, ME
Subject: RE: Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass
Opus - 2010-01-21 9:29 AM

Jackemy - 2010-01-20 11:09 PM
footer32 - 2010-01-20 9:22 PM Zed,

You could not be more incorrect.  Nazism is the farthest extreme of liberalism.


Not sure about it being the farthest extreme as Nazism stresses socialism/liberalism on the national level while communism stresses expansion on a global level. Nazism embraced western civilization to rebuild nations with a statist/liberal agenda. While communism destroyed western civilization to replace it with a statist/liberal agenda.

Though both systems required blind faith in central control I think people can debate which is more extreme liberalism. To me it just the same thing but just a different way to get there.

 

IMHO, Nazism was less about economic systems and more about nationalism and militarism. Nazism rose out of a German economy devastated by a series of economic tsunamis: WWI and the crippling reparations to be paid, hyper-inflation which may or may not have been precipitated by the assassination of Walter Rathenau (a Jewish industrialist and German foreign minister and arguably the single greatest hope that Germany had for a war-free recovery), the great depression and deep-seated insecurity and intolerance for "foreigners".

Nazis are indeed seen as right-wing, but IMHO, more because of their nationalist and militaristic bent and their invocation of some kind of mystical ideal of "the way things were" (even if they were never actually that way).

The first chance the Nazis got, they established a dictatorship, shut down all opposition and cribbed their industrialization strategy from the neighboring Soviets. So, in reality there was very little separating the Nazis and the Communists. This makes sense, as totalitarian states are necessarily very similar.   

Although I may have argued in the past that comparisons of modern Western political leaders to Nazis is fair game, when you really look at how the Nazis grabbed power, and what they did when they got it, it's clear that no such comparison holds water.



So North Korea is nationalistic and militaristic and therefore right-wing?

Well since we know that North Korea is let-wing, then we are essentially saying the communism
 and Facism are two sides of the same coin. It seems to me that the left right argument and pinning Nazism as a conservative moment is fatally flawed.


Edited by Jackemy 2010-01-21 10:19 AM
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Hitler reacts to Scott Brown winning Mass Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2