General Discussion Triathlon Talk » wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2010-03-24 10:56 AM
in reply to: #2745199

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.


2010-03-24 11:11 AM
in reply to: #2744362

Expert
735
50010010025
Chatham, Ontario
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
TAKE EM OFF!!!
2010-03-24 11:15 AM
in reply to: #2744362

Elite
2645
200050010025
Phoenix, AZ
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
Off topic, but Cosmo declared "the thong is dead." I've seen the proof first hand at the gym. VPL is apparently acceptable now.
2010-03-24 11:18 AM
in reply to: #2744362

Extreme Veteran
767
5001001002525
Rockville, MD
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
I can understand maybe wearing tighty whities underneath but just thinking about wearing boxers underneath makes me cringe.

Not from a cycling 'ettiquete" standpoint, but from a comfort standpoint.

I would say give going commando a shot but at the end of the day, its what youre comfortable wearing that matters.
2010-03-24 11:21 AM
in reply to: #2745350

Expert
994
500100100100100252525
Clio, MIchigan
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?

Slidell4life - 2010-03-24 12:15 PM Off topic, but Cosmo declared "the thong is dead." I've seen the proof first hand at the gym. VPL is apparently acceptable now.

I read that article too, 96% of the people out there, I dont want to see your VPL.  Keep the thong.



Edited by Shortyy 2010-03-24 11:22 AM
2010-03-24 11:57 AM
in reply to: #2745373

Champion
4835
2000200050010010010025
Eat Cheese or Die
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
nhunter344 - 2010-03-24 11:18 AM

I can understand maybe wearing tighty whities underneath but just thinking about wearing boxers underneath makes me cringe.

Not from a cycling 'ettiquete" standpoint, but from a comfort standpoint.

I would say give going commando a shot but at the end of the day, its what youre comfortable wearing that matters.


Boxer briefs are not boxers. Boxer briefs are like long legged versions of tighty whities. They fit tight to the skin.

That being said I wear nothing under my shorts. I also only use chamois creme on rides over 2 hours, and only if I remember. Y'all have soft tushies if you need chamois creme on short rides.


2010-03-24 12:12 PM
in reply to: #2744362

Extreme Veteran
395
100100100252525
Smyrnasty
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
i chaffed on my very first ride two years ago...boxer briefs and basketball shorts on a 16 mile ride...OUCH!! comando with bike shorts ever since. no more chaffing. however some intresting numbness on occasion (yes i said it)
2010-03-24 12:16 PM
in reply to: #2745382

Lafayette, CO
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
Shortyy - 2010-03-24 10:21 AM

Slidell4life - 2010-03-24 12:15 PM Off topic, but Cosmo declared "the thong is dead." I've seen the proof first hand at the gym. VPL is apparently acceptable now.

I read that article too, 96% of the people out there, I dont want to see your VPL.  Keep the thong.



Or, better yet just like cycling shorts, go commando at the gym.  Well, so long as your shorts don't give peeks of your junk.  I hate VPL under my running shorts/capris/tights. 
2010-03-24 12:42 PM
in reply to: #2744362

Expert
1123
1000100
Falls Church, VA
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
Let me guess.. you probably wear underwear under your running shorts too? 
2010-03-24 12:48 PM
in reply to: #2745574

Elite
2645
200050010025
Phoenix, AZ
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
COSkiGirl - 2010-03-24 10:16 AM
Shortyy - 2010-03-24 10:21 AM

Slidell4life - 2010-03-24 12:15 PM Off topic, but Cosmo declared "the thong is dead." I've seen the proof first hand at the gym. VPL is apparently acceptable now.

I read that article too, 96% of the people out there, I dont want to see your VPL.  Keep the thong.



Or, better yet just like cycling shorts, go commando at the gym.  Well, so long as your shorts don't give peeks of your junk.  I hate VPL under my running shorts/capris/tights. 


"peeks of your junk"

Classic
2010-03-24 12:56 PM
in reply to: #2745497

Extreme Veteran
767
5001001002525
Rockville, MD
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
graceful_dave - 2010-03-24 12:57 PM
nhunter344 - 2010-03-24 11:18 AM I can understand maybe wearing tighty whities underneath but just thinking about wearing boxers underneath makes me cringe.

Not from a cycling 'ettiquete" standpoint, but from a comfort standpoint.

I would say give going commando a shot but at the end of the day, its what youre comfortable wearing that matters.
Boxer briefs are not boxers. Boxer briefs are like long legged versions of tighty whities. They fit tight to the skin. That being said I wear nothing under my shorts. I also only use chamois creme on rides over 2 hours, and only if I remember. Y'all have soft tushies if you need chamois creme on short rides.


Sorry. I completely missed the briefs part in the post.


2010-03-24 1:03 PM
in reply to: #2745704

Extreme Veteran
614
500100
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
Next up... baggy boxers worn under boardshorts at the beach.

Never got that one either.
2010-03-25 9:04 PM
in reply to: #2744368

Regular
121
100
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
AdventureBear - 2010-03-23 11:59 PM Commando under the bike shorts for both boys and girls. No wearing the bike shorts 2 days in a row...change immediately after your ride and if you don't shower, use a cleaning cloth to help decrease bacterial load in the private area in order to prevent boils and other nasties down there.


Ewwwww!  LOL
2010-03-25 9:54 PM
in reply to: #2745044

Regular
534
50025
Philadelphia
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
BoobieDr - 2010-03-24 11:00 AM
swiss tri - 2010-03-24 8:55 AM Once you go Commando, you'll never go back. Welcome to the dark side



This....

I've found that i don't even like to wear underwear under anything now!

*adjusts kilt*


http://www.utilikilts.com/
 
2010-03-25 10:21 PM
in reply to: #2745683

Lafayette, CO
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
Slidell4life - 2010-03-24 11:48 AM
COSkiGirl - 2010-03-24 10:16 AM
Shortyy - 2010-03-24 10:21 AM

Slidell4life - 2010-03-24 12:15 PM Off topic, but Cosmo declared "the thong is dead." I've seen the proof first hand at the gym. VPL is apparently acceptable now.

I read that article too, 96% of the people out there, I dont want to see your VPL.  Keep the thong.



Or, better yet just like cycling shorts, go commando at the gym.  Well, so long as your shorts don't give peeks of your junk.  I hate VPL under my running shorts/capris/tights. 


"peeks of your junk"

Classic


Ever been opposite some dude on adjacent weight benches and gotten an eyeful?  Yeah, really don't need that. 
2010-03-25 10:58 PM
in reply to: #2744374

Extreme Veteran
667
5001002525
Melbourne
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
Beil - 2010-03-24 5:04 PM hmmmm. i've never had a problem with chafing between my boxers and shorts. but oh well, i'll try going commando tomorrow...


As a community announcement, make sure you check the shorts aren't going 'thread bare' in certain spots, you may not have noticed previously


2010-03-26 1:40 AM
in reply to: #2745683

Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
"piece of your junk"   hmmm sorry but that just seems mean...  Especially when your a single woman without any of that around that doesnt need a battery!  LOL    I like men in spandex..   Gives great scenery to watch while I am out there cheering for everyone (mainly Men) that swims, runs or bike past me!!

But, back to the topic,  I have worn panties under my bike shorts.  Won't do it again..  The elastic in the legs just rubbed me raw.  It is commando on the bike for me!!  WHOOOPIE!!!
2010-03-26 3:29 PM
in reply to: #2749838

Elite
2645
200050010025
Phoenix, AZ
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
hvcycle - 2010-03-25 11:40 PM "piece of your junk"   hmmm sorry but that just seems mean...  Especially when your a single woman without any of that around that doesnt need a battery!  LOL    I like men in spandex..   Gives great scenery to watch while I am out there cheering for everyone (mainly Men) that swims, runs or bike past me!!

But, back to the topic,  I have worn panties under my bike shorts.  Won't do it again..  The elastic in the legs just rubbed me raw.  It is commando on the bike for me!!  WHOOOPIE!!!


Your post cracks me up. ...especially with your animated avatar.
2010-03-26 9:39 PM
in reply to: #2751431

Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?

ha ha    I didn't even think of that when I posted...  too funny..  the avatar was so cute though that I had to use it..   (thank goodness I don't have a rear view like that AND I am much better fitted to my bike).  

2010-03-26 10:21 PM
in reply to: #2744362

Member
27
25
Colorado Springs
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
Whoever you may be let your junk ride free!
2010-03-26 10:22 PM
in reply to: #2744362

Master
1410
1000100100100100
White Plains NY
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
commando all the way!!!


2010-03-27 7:56 AM
in reply to: #2744362

Extreme Veteran
635
50010025
Georgia
Subject: RE: wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts?
used to wear those bike model 7133's with everthing, until they went out of production..
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » wait wait wait...nothing under biker shorts? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2