I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" (Page 4)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2010-09-16 12:54 PM in reply to: #3102367 |
Buttercup 14334 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" WaitingGuilty - 2010-09-16 1:29 PM Renee... This "He" you speak of...I was not singling anyone out, just the overall vibe from some that are so sure that there is meat on this bone based on what is likely their proclivity to read Tom Clancy novels. I did not imply that there was nobody on BT who may have some background in these matters. I simply stated my opinion that those types of people (In all likelihood) do not go around TELLING people on chat rooms that they have experience in these matters. That seems like a reasonable assumption to make no? I feel compelled to establish that I have never read a Tom Clancy novel! I don't read spy novels of any kind. I prefer history, non-fiction. And jdwright - "he" - I know of his background due to comments made in the past that have nothing to do with this topic. It seemed like you were referring to him, since you quoted a partial statement that he had made. Since he and I are the only ones being overt about our opinion that they are Operators (NOT spies), I assume your comments could only be referring to us. As I said, I don't read spy novels (Clancy or otherwise) and the other person actually has a background that would be relevant. Sorry to be vague; it's not my place to be more specific. However, he might be guilty of reading Clancy. I have no inside information on this. For the record, I was not accusing you of implying that BT is absent of people with relevant backgrounds. Instead, I made the point to illustrate that it is not unlikely that someone with knowledge or background can be found on BT. I can think of 7 8 BTers who would fall into this category. Again, I agree that someone who has the current and relevant type of background would not be chiming in with specifics. I don't see that happening, though. For the record, I'm just a girl with an unusual background and exposure to all types of interesting people. Who doesn't read spy novels. Edited by Renee 2010-09-16 12:56 PM |
|
2010-09-16 1:00 PM in reply to: #3102450 |
Champion 7821 Brooklyn, NY | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" Renee - 2010-09-16 12:54 PM WaitingGuilty - 2010-09-16 1:29 PM Renee... This "He" you speak of...I was not singling anyone out, just the overall vibe from some that are so sure that there is meat on this bone based on what is likely their proclivity to read Tom Clancy novels. I did not imply that there was nobody on BT who may have some background in these matters. I simply stated my opinion that those types of people (In all likelihood) do not go around TELLING people on chat rooms that they have experience in these matters. That seems like a reasonable assumption to make no? I feel compelled to establish that I have never read a Tom Clancy novel! I don't read spy novels of any kind. I prefer history, non-fiction. And jdwright - "he" - I know of his background due to comments made in the past that have nothing to do with this topic. It seemed like you were referring to him, since you quoted a partial statement that he had made. Since he and I are the only ones being overt about our opinion that they are Operators (NOT spies), I assume your comments could only be referring to us. As I said, I don't read spy novels (Clancy or otherwise) and the other person actually has a background that would be relevant. Sorry to be vague; it's not my place to be more specific. However, he might be guilty of reading Clancy. I have no inside information on this. For the record, I was not accusing you of implying that BT is absent of people with relevant backgrounds. Instead, I made the point to illustrate that it is not unlikely that someone with knowledge or background can be found on BT. I can think of 7 8 BTers who would fall into this category. Again, I agree that someone who has the current and relevant type of background would not be chiming in with specifics. I don't see that happening, though. For the record, I'm just a girl with an unusual background and exposure to all types of interesting people. Who doesn't read spy novels. And who isn’t so good at sharing the black jujubes. |
2010-09-16 1:04 PM in reply to: #3102460 |
Buttercup 14334 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" jmk-brooklyn - 2010-09-16 2:00 PM Renee - 2010-09-16 12:54 PM And who isn’t so good at sharing the black jujubes. WaitingGuilty - 2010-09-16 1:29 PM Renee... This "He" you speak of...I was not singling anyone out, just the overall vibe from some that are so sure that there is meat on this bone based on what is likely their proclivity to read Tom Clancy novels. I did not imply that there was nobody on BT who may have some background in these matters. I simply stated my opinion that those types of people (In all likelihood) do not go around TELLING people on chat rooms that they have experience in these matters. That seems like a reasonable assumption to make no? I feel compelled to establish that I have never read a Tom Clancy novel! I don't read spy novels of any kind. I prefer history, non-fiction. And jdwright - "he" - I know of his background due to comments made in the past that have nothing to do with this topic. It seemed like you were referring to him, since you quoted a partial statement that he had made. Since he and I are the only ones being overt about our opinion that they are Operators (NOT spies), I assume your comments could only be referring to us. As I said, I don't read spy novels (Clancy or otherwise) and the other person actually has a background that would be relevant. Sorry to be vague; it's not my place to be more specific. However, he might be guilty of reading Clancy. I have no inside information on this. For the record, I was not accusing you of implying that BT is absent of people with relevant backgrounds. Instead, I made the point to illustrate that it is not unlikely that someone with knowledge or background can be found on BT. I can think of 7 8 BTers who would fall into this category. Again, I agree that someone who has the current and relevant type of background would not be chiming in with specifics. I don't see that happening, though. For the record, I'm just a girl with an unusual background and exposure to all types of interesting people. Who doesn't read spy novels. But who will give you more than a fair proportion in exchange for hogging the black ones! 3 regular Jujubes for every 1 black one. |
2010-09-16 2:00 PM in reply to: #3099609 |
Pro 4277 Parker, CO | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" this thread is actually very entertaining. and to think I originally felt it would get past 2 pages. |
2010-09-16 2:47 PM in reply to: #3099609 |
Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" Is there a way to merge this thread with the Questions for the backpackers.... thread? Advice #1 for new backpackers: don't backpack in a war zone Advice #2 for new backpackers: if you do, carry bear protection like trinnas Edited by dontracy 2010-09-16 2:48 PM |
2010-09-16 2:54 PM in reply to: #3099609 |
Veteran 667 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" What the fark were they doing hiking along the Iraq-Iran border to begin with?! Oh, I think I have the answer for this: "Being stupid." |
|
2010-09-16 3:03 PM in reply to: #3102748 |
Melon Presser 52116 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" Johners - 2010-09-17 3:54 AM What the fark were they doing hiking along the Iraq-Iran border to begin with?! Oh, I think I have the answer for this: "Being stupid." And the wheel goes round and round. It's come down to "stupid" vs. "operator" with a number of people claiming "stupid" because it has fewer letters. |
2010-09-16 3:07 PM in reply to: #3102775 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. Edited by PennState 2010-09-16 3:08 PM |
2010-09-16 3:10 PM in reply to: #3102775 |
Veteran 667 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" TriAya - 2010-09-16 3:03 PM Johners - 2010-09-17 3:54 AM What the fark were they doing hiking along the Iraq-Iran border to begin with?! Oh, I think I have the answer for this: "Being stupid." And the wheel goes round and round. It's come down to "stupid" vs. "operator" with a number of people claiming "stupid" because it has fewer letters. 1. They got captured. Not very operatorish. Maybe they were interns. b. If they were operators, I'm sure all they were doing was lacing Iran's water supply with flouride so we could mind control the populace. Thirdly, there are no phones in the desert. |
2010-09-16 3:21 PM in reply to: #3102800 |
Buttercup 14334 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" Johners - 2010-09-16 4:10 PM 1. They got captured. Not very operatorish. Maybe they were interns. My friend, the Army Intel colonel, was shot twice in the shoulder during a mission. Not in a war zone or even in a country where we have military. Not very Army Intel-ish. His buddy was shot, too. What did you do? I asked. We bled, he replied. I'll ask him if he was interning at the time. He wasn't carrying a weapon because wasn't supposed to be carrying a weapon. As someone mentioned, this isn't Jason Bourne territory. Stuff happens. I'm not going to be derisive about their abilities when it happens. It's funny. People can't believe we have Operators in this area. But they also can't believe our Operators - who aren't there! - are capable of being captured. Edited by Renee 2010-09-16 3:22 PM |
2010-09-16 3:28 PM in reply to: #3099609 |
Champion 18680 Lost in the Luminiferous Aether | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" May be I'm still a little influenced by the 60's but 3 kids from Berkley as spies or operators not nearly as likely as hikers out to see an exotic location. |
|
2010-09-16 3:33 PM in reply to: #3099609 |
Expert 1146 Johns Creek, Georgia | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" I'm still perplexed about the journalists that went to N korea thinking somehow it was ok and they were assured they would be allowed to leave. Frankly we bail out every idiot that does something stupid, or shall I say stupid operators. Moving on.... |
2010-09-16 3:33 PM in reply to: #3102792 |
Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" PennState - 2010-09-16 1:07 PM TriAya - 2010-09-16 4:03 PM Johners - 2010-09-17 3:54 AM What the fark were they doing hiking along the Iraq-Iran border to begin with?! Oh, I think I have the answer for this: "Being stupid." And the wheel goes round and round. It's come down to "stupid" vs. "operator" with a number of people claiming "stupid" because it has fewer letters. hee, hee, hee. Maybe they were stupid operators? I don't know any operators, but I have a friend or two (who I can't divulge his/her names) who are sort of stupid and know stuff about 'being stupid' and such. oops I said too much sheesh, no wonder they screwed up. Being an operator sounds hard. from wiki (the source of all knowledge) An operator (not to be confused with operation) is a mapping from one vector space or module to another. Operators are of critical importance to both linear algebra and functional analysis. Important properties that various operators may exhibit include linearity, continuity, and boundedness. Important special cases of an operator include:
|
2010-09-16 3:34 PM in reply to: #3102853 |
Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" hrliles - 2010-09-16 1:33 PM I'm still perplexed about the journalists that went to N korea thinking somehow it was ok and they were assured they would be allowed to leave. Frankly we bail out every idiot that does something stupid, or shall I say stupid operators. Moving on.... Trivia time!! What is the relationship between BT and these two fine young ladies????? |
2010-09-16 3:35 PM in reply to: #3099609 |
Elite 3090 Spokane, WA | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" (OPERATOR2.jpg) (OPERATOR.jpg) Attachments ---------------- OPERATOR2.jpg (44KB - 3 downloads) OPERATOR.jpg (53KB - 5 downloads) |
2010-09-16 3:37 PM in reply to: #3099609 |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" |
|
2010-09-16 3:42 PM in reply to: #3099609 |
Elite 3090 Spokane, WA | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" 1 ringy dingy.... 2 ringy dingy.... |
2010-09-16 3:43 PM in reply to: #3102855 |
Melon Presser 52116 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" ChrisM - 2010-09-17 4:33 AM sheesh, no wonder they screwed up. Being an operator sounds hard. from wiki (the source of all knowledge) An operator (not to be confused with operation) is a mapping from one vector space or module to another. Operators are of critical importance to both linear algebra and functional analysis. Important properties that various operators may exhibit include linearity, continuity, and boundedness. Important special cases of an operator include:
Speaking of college mathy stuffy ... Differential Equations = Diffy Q Functional Analysis = Funky Anal Man, Diffy Q is hard. No kidding. Hey, have you done your Funky Anal yet? |
2010-09-16 3:47 PM in reply to: #3102878 |
Champion 18680 Lost in the Luminiferous Aether | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" TriAya - 2010-09-16 4:43 PM ChrisM - 2010-09-17 4:33 AM sheesh, no wonder they screwed up. Being an operator sounds hard. from wiki (the source of all knowledge) An operator (not to be confused with operation) is a mapping from one vector space or module to another. Operators are of critical importance to both linear algebra and functional analysis. Important properties that various operators may exhibit include linearity, continuity, and boundedness. Important special cases of an operator include:
Speaking of college mathy stuffy ... Differential Equations = Diffy Q Functional Analysis = Funky Anal Man, Diffy Q is hard. No kidding. Hey, have you done your Funky Anal yet? Diffy Q's not hard PDE's were hard I don't think I could do a fourier transform to save my soul any more. Systems of Diffy Q's = Fun Edited by trinnas 2010-09-16 3:48 PM |
2010-09-16 3:53 PM in reply to: #3102828 |
Veteran 667 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" Renee - 2010-09-16 3:21 PM Johners - 2010-09-16 4:10 PM 1. They got captured. Not very operatorish. Maybe they were interns. My friend, the Army Intel colonel, was shot twice in the shoulder during a mission. Not in a war zone or even in a country where we have military. Not very Army Intel-ish. His buddy was shot, too. What did you do? I asked. We bled, he replied. I'll ask him if he was interning at the time. He wasn't carrying a weapon because wasn't supposed to be carrying a weapon. As someone mentioned, this isn't Jason Bourne territory. Stuff happens. I'm not going to be derisive about their abilities when it happens. It's funny. People can't believe we have Operators in this area. But they also can't believe our Operators - who aren't there! - are capable of being captured. Well, since we're taking this so very seriously. Sure, there may be operators and they might even get caught every now and again! I just don't think they're going to be a photo journalist, an English teacher, and an environmentalist. Maybe that's just the perfect cover... You'd never peg a trio of hippies as hardcore government agents, right? I'd also wonder what they were doing. Mapping? We have satellites that do that, so probably not. Stashing "stuff"? Maybe, but you'd think that the Iranian would have found some kind of evidence indicating that was the case. Or maybe it was fluoride, and maybe they just used their mind control juju to get them to gloss over little incidental things like evidence. Maybe they were sneaking in to commit an assassination, since they were doing such a phenomenal job of blending in that nearby villages referred to them as the "Americans." OR MAYBE, they were being irresponsible on their vacation, strayed a itsy bit too close to the boarder of a very belligerent country and got caught. Then again, Julia Child was a spy. Of course, she didn't get caught. Or at least she allayed suspicion with her cooking. She did like to use a lot of alcohol, after all. Edited by Johners 2010-09-16 4:01 PM |
2010-09-16 4:12 PM in reply to: #3102890 |
Buttercup 14334 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" Johners - 2010-09-16 4:53 PM Renee - 2010-09-16 3:21 PM Johners - 2010-09-16 4:10 PM 1. They got captured. Not very operatorish. Maybe they were interns. My friend, the Army Intel colonel, was shot twice in the shoulder during a mission. Not in a war zone or even in a country where we have military. Not very Army Intel-ish. His buddy was shot, too. What did you do? I asked. We bled, he replied. I'll ask him if he was interning at the time. He wasn't carrying a weapon because wasn't supposed to be carrying a weapon. As someone mentioned, this isn't Jason Bourne territory. Stuff happens. I'm not going to be derisive about their abilities when it happens. It's funny. People can't believe we have Operators in this area. But they also can't believe our Operators - who aren't there! - are capable of being captured. Well, since we're taking this so very seriously. Sure, there may be operators and they might even get caught every now and again! I just don't think they're going to be a photo journalist, an English teacher, and an environmentalist. Maybe that's just the perfect cover... You'd never peg a trio of hippies as hardcore government agents, right? I'd also wonder what they were doing. Mapping? We have satellites that do that, so probably not. Stashing "stuff"? Maybe, but you'd think that the Iranian would have found some kind of evidence indicating that was the case. Or maybe it was flouride, and maybe they just used their mind control juju to get them to gloss over little incidental things like evidence. Maybe the were sneaking in to commit an assassination, since American blend so well. OR MAYBE, they were being irresponsible on the vacation, strayed a itsy bit too close to the boarder of a very belligerent country and got caught. Then again, Julia Child was a spy. Of course, she didn't get caught. Or at least beguiled people with her cooking. I see how being fantastical in your "maybes" can lend itself towards making their presence seem absurd to the point of being completely unrealistic. Maybe they were hunting for the Ark of the Covenant! But it also suggests that you lack basic knowledge of what kinds of missions an Operator might perform. They can't all be Austin Powers and save the world from Doctor Evil. But I'm curious. If it strains your credulity that a Special Forces operator would use an environmentalist, teacher or photo journalist as cover occupations, what kinds of cover occupations would you be prepared to accept? My friend who was shot wasn't carrying a gun because, at the time, he was a Canadian tourist. Canadian tourists don't typically carry weapons in their luggage when they enter a foreign country (No, they didn't air drop him into the country. Crazy, huh?) Except my friend isn't Canadian and wasn't a tourist. I know, hard to believe that our government constructs alternate identities for our intelligence assets! Nope, you'd never peg "hippies" for SFs. You'd also never peg WaPo journalists for CIA operatives. But it happens. They don't all have to dress shagadelic, nor dress in tuxedos, to do important work. |
|
2010-09-16 4:19 PM in reply to: #3102878 |
Pro 4277 Parker, CO | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" TriAya - 2010-09-16 2:43 PM ChrisM - 2010-09-17 4:33 AM sheesh, no wonder they screwed up. Being an operator sounds hard. from wiki (the source of all knowledge) An operator (not to be confused with operation) is a mapping from one vector space or module to another. Operators are of critical importance to both linear algebra and functional analysis. Important properties that various operators may exhibit include linearity, continuity, and boundedness. Important special cases of an operator include:
Speaking of college mathy stuffy ... Differential Equations = Diffy Q Functional Analysis = Funky Anal Man, Diffy Q is hard. No kidding. Hey, have you done your Funky Anal yet? never graduated to that "Funky Anal". But that Diffy Q...that's some fun stuff! |
2010-09-16 4:20 PM in reply to: #3102921 |
Extreme Veteran 513 Albuquerque | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" Renee - 2010-09-16 2:12 PM Johners - 2010-09-16 4:53 PM Renee - 2010-09-16 3:21 PM Johners - 2010-09-16 4:10 PM 1. They got captured. Not very operatorish. Maybe they were interns. My friend, the Army Intel colonel, was shot twice in the shoulder during a mission. Not in a war zone or even in a country where we have military. Not very Army Intel-ish. His buddy was shot, too. What did you do? I asked. We bled, he replied. I'll ask him if he was interning at the time. He wasn't carrying a weapon because wasn't supposed to be carrying a weapon. As someone mentioned, this isn't Jason Bourne territory. Stuff happens. I'm not going to be derisive about their abilities when it happens. It's funny. People can't believe we have Operators in this area. But they also can't believe our Operators - who aren't there! - are capable of being captured. Well, since we're taking this so very seriously. Sure, there may be operators and they might even get caught every now and again! I just don't think they're going to be a photo journalist, an English teacher, and an environmentalist. Maybe that's just the perfect cover... You'd never peg a trio of hippies as hardcore government agents, right? I'd also wonder what they were doing. Mapping? We have satellites that do that, so probably not. Stashing "stuff"? Maybe, but you'd think that the Iranian would have found some kind of evidence indicating that was the case. Or maybe it was flouride, and maybe they just used their mind control juju to get them to gloss over little incidental things like evidence. Maybe the were sneaking in to commit an assassination, since American blend so well. OR MAYBE, they were being irresponsible on the vacation, strayed a itsy bit too close to the boarder of a very belligerent country and got caught. Then again, Julia Child was a spy. Of course, she didn't get caught. Or at least beguiled people with her cooking. I see how being fantastical in your "maybes" can lend itself towards making their presence seem absurd to the point of being completely unrealistic. Maybe they were hunting for the Ark of the Covenant! But it also suggests that you lack basic knowledge of what kinds of missions an Operator might perform. They can't all be Austin Powers and save the world from Doctor Evil. But I'm curious. If it strains your credulity that a Special Forces operator would use an environmentalist, teacher or photo journalist as cover occupations, what kinds of cover occupations would you be prepared to accept? My friend who was shot wasn't carrying a gun because, at the time, he was a Canadian tourist. Canadian tourists don't typically carry weapons in their luggage when they enter a foreign country (No, they didn't air drop him into the country. Crazy, huh?) Except my friend isn't Canadian and wasn't a tourist. I know, hard to believe that our government constructs alternate identities for our intelligence assets! Nope, you'd never peg "hippies" for SFs. You'd also never peg WaPo journalists for CIA operatives. But it happens. They don't all have to dress shagadelic, nor dress in tuxedos, to do important work. Does it really strain your credulity that it is possible that these three people, who by all appearances are your everyday nature-loving, travel-happy, adventure-seeking young adults, might actually have been hiking in the mountains and gotten off their intended course? Is that really so hard to imagine? It sure seems a lot more likely to me than your very complicated situation of Special Forces coverups and fabricated identities. And nothing you say about your friends who have been in SF will make me change my mind. (If their jobs [your friends] are so secretive and important, why do you know so much about what they did and what missions they were on and where they're being sent and what their coverup story would be? That makes no sense.) |
2010-09-16 4:41 PM in reply to: #3102921 |
Veteran 667 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" Renee - 2010-09-16 4:12 PM Johners - 2010-09-16 4:53 PM Renee - 2010-09-16 3:21 PM Johners - 2010-09-16 4:10 PM 1. They got captured. Not very operatorish. Maybe they were interns. My friend, the Army Intel colonel, was shot twice in the shoulder during a mission. Not in a war zone or even in a country where we have military. Not very Army Intel-ish. His buddy was shot, too. What did you do? I asked. We bled, he replied. I'll ask him if he was interning at the time. He wasn't carrying a weapon because wasn't supposed to be carrying a weapon. As someone mentioned, this isn't Jason Bourne territory. Stuff happens. I'm not going to be derisive about their abilities when it happens. It's funny. People can't believe we have Operators in this area. But they also can't believe our Operators - who aren't there! - are capable of being captured. Well, since we're taking this so very seriously. Sure, there may be operators and they might even get caught every now and again! I just don't think they're going to be a photo journalist, an English teacher, and an environmentalist. Maybe that's just the perfect cover... You'd never peg a trio of hippies as hardcore government agents, right? I'd also wonder what they were doing. Mapping? We have satellites that do that, so probably not. Stashing "stuff"? Maybe, but you'd think that the Iranian would have found some kind of evidence indicating that was the case. Or maybe it was flouride, and maybe they just used their mind control juju to get them to gloss over little incidental things like evidence. Maybe the were sneaking in to commit an assassination, since American blend so well. OR MAYBE, they were being irresponsible on the vacation, strayed a itsy bit too close to the boarder of a very belligerent country and got caught. Then again, Julia Child was a spy. Of course, she didn't get caught. Or at least beguiled people with her cooking. I see how being fantastical in your "maybes" can lend itself towards making their presence seem absurd to the point of being completely unrealistic. Maybe they were hunting for the Ark of the Covenant! But it also suggests that you lack basic knowledge of what kinds of missions an Operator might perform. They can't all be Austin Powers and save the world from Doctor Evil. But I'm curious. If it strains your credulity that a Special Forces operator would use an environmentalist, teacher or photo journalist as cover occupations, what kinds of cover occupations would you be prepared to accept? My friend who was shot wasn't carrying a gun because, at the time, he was a Canadian tourist. Canadian tourists don't typically carry weapons in their luggage when they enter a foreign country (No, they didn't air drop him into the country. Crazy, huh?) Except my friend isn't Canadian and wasn't a tourist. I know, hard to believe that our government constructs alternate identities for our intelligence assets! Nope, you'd never peg "hippies" for SFs. You'd also never peg WaPo journalists for CIA operatives. But it happens. They don't all have to dress shagadelic, nor dress in tuxedos, to do important work. I submit that my maybes are much less fantastical than your maybes! Except for the fluoride one. By the way, does your friend happen to be Archer, AKA Duchess? Because he's, like, the only spy I know that walks around telling people he's a spy. Edited by Johners 2010-09-16 4:42 PM |
2010-09-16 4:55 PM in reply to: #3102937 |
Buttercup 14334 | Subject: RE: I'm curious about "hiking in Iran" megtrow - 2010-09-16 5:20 PM Does it really strain your credulity that it is possible that these three people, who by all appearances are your everyday nature-loving, travel-happy, adventure-seeking young adults, might actually have been hiking in the mountains and gotten off their intended course? It's entirely possible that the story is legitimate. I just don't believe that it is legitimate. Not for a second. It sure seems a lot more likely to me than your very complicated situation of Special Forces coverups and fabricated identities. I see it as just the opposite. If our military does not have SF in that area, I would be SHOCKED and disbelieving. Fabricated identities are a given. Very basic. Nothing complicated about that idea at all. That you don't know just reflects your lack of appreciation for how things are done with SF. And nothing you say about your friends who have been in SF will make me change my mind. I'm not trying to change your mind. I am expounding on what I know about how things are done, how our most elite soldiers are trained and used. Just because you do not have this knowledge in your brain does not make it a secret. Try reading Blackhawk Down to learn about the kind of training these guys receive. (If their jobs [your friends] are so secretive and important, why do you know so much about what they did and what missions they were on and where they're being sent and what their coverup story would be? That makes no sense.)
My oldest sister flew on General Omar Torrijos' (benevolent dictator of Panama) private jet to Cuba to participate in a Latin American swim competition when she was around 12. My second cousin served as a legal translator for former dictator Manuel Noriega during his trial in France. How's that for straining your credulity? I'm probably the most liberal person on this board, except for 2 or 3 outliers *coughAcescough*. But I have no problem comprehending and accepting that Special Forces are essential to our military operations and something other than "evil" people, whose missions might be something other than to assassinate people or poison their water supply. I also understand that they are some of the most violent people on the Earth, to quote my CIA friend. I've also broken bread and had beers with some of these people. Met their parents and their children, even. |
|