Other Resources My Cup of Joe » tablet vs. e reader Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
2011-11-30 11:39 AM

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: tablet vs. e reader
My sister wants to get my dad an e reader. I don't get this. What is the difference between an e reader and a tablet. The Blackberry playbooks are on sale and you can get a 16gb one which is 7 inches for 200 bucks. An ereader, which is also 7 inches seems to be about 100 bucks.

Does it make sense to use a tablet as an ereader or is that just dumb. Anyone have an opinion on this, pro and con wise. I am in the dark.

Thanks.


2011-11-30 12:00 PM
in reply to: #3920622

User image

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader
I have a PB and a Kindle; I prefer my Kindle for reading however my wife has "borrowed" mine to read a few books and I've been reading only on my PB for the past couple of weeks. I've also read several articles on it (and my previous tablet) and while my preference is reading an e-ink screen, reading on a tablet screen isn't nearly as bad as I had thought it would be.

Shane
2011-11-30 12:18 PM
in reply to: #3920622

User image

Runner
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader
Well, the difference is the purpose.

An e-reader has a very specific function, to provide books (and audio books). A tablet, however, is more for multimedia; you can read books, watch movies, stream music, and a host of other things (depending on the tablet).

I have a Kindle, and I absolutely love it. The screen is great, easy to read in direct sunlight, it's lightweight (easy to hold and operate with one hand), and does its job quite well. I don't own a tablet because I'm generally not interested in all the apps and movies and whatnot. Plus, the screen on tablets doesn't always work as nicely in direct light.
2011-11-30 12:43 PM
in reply to: #3920622

Extreme Veteran
861
5001001001002525
Northbridge, Massachusetts
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader

If he is strictly a reader, go with the e-reader for the E-Ink technology.  It is not back lit and is easier on the eyes.  I have the new Kindle Fire and the last generation of Kindle and it really depends on what I am using it for as to which one I turn to at the time. 

The Fire is backlit and I find I don't read as long at night before bed, makes my eyes more tired after a day already spent at a computer.  I think the Fire is going to be my go to device on trips since I can read without a light on the plane and use it with any wi-fi spot for e-mail, Facebook etc.

For outdoor daylight reading, I prefer the Kindle (no glare).  Comes in very handy at swim meets, practices and water polo games.

2011-11-30 1:12 PM
in reply to: #3920622

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader
If your dad reads books, he's going to prefer an e-reader.  It actually looks like a book.  Can't play angry birds, but that's not the point.  Reading a tablet screen is hard on my eyes, and like pointed out, you can't read one in the sun (think of trying to check your phone outside on a bright day).  An e-reader still looks like a book.
2011-11-30 2:27 PM
in reply to: #3920755

User image

Extreme Veteran
792
500100100252525
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader

The e-reader is great because of the screen.  Tablets are LCD which is hard to read when it's dark because the screen is so bright, or it's hard to read in the sunlight.  The screen is also reflective.

E-Reader screens are much less reflective and immune to lighting.  They are made to be stared at for hours on end.  Staring at an LCD screen for hours will cause pain.

Hi.  My name is Shaun.  My post just re-hashes what everybody else has already said.



2011-11-30 2:55 PM
in reply to: #3920622

User image

Master
2277
2000100100252525
Lake Norman, NC
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader

Simple...

eReader PROS:  e-ink uses very little charge - the battery life is WEEKS!  eReader can be read anywhere there's background light (like a book), no glare and can be read otudoors.  eReader produces less eyestrain and headaches.  MUCH cheaper than a tablet.  Purpose-built for reading eBooks.
eReader CONS:  It's just meant for reading eBooks.  Only black & white.  Color eReaders are LCD and NOT e-ink.

eReader models:  Kindle is popular and current version will only read books bought from Amazon.  Next generation will be more flexible.  Nook can download books from Amazon, Barnes & Noble and libraries with online services.  We bought my daughter a Nook and she gets plenty from the NC eLibrary.

Tablet PROS:  Do most everything.  Apps, movies, web, email, etc.  They can be used for eBooks, but do so much more.  No one buys a tablet for just reading books.
Tablet CONS:  Battery life is hours.  Tablets use LCD which produces it's own light.  Tough to read in sunlight and will produce eyestrain and/or headaches over time.  Much more expensive.

Tablet models:  There are only two to consider; iPad 2 or Samsung Galaxy.  Everythign else is crap.  The BB Playbook isn't worth $200 and Verizon won't even sell them anymore.  The touchscreen isn't worth squat.  RIM and HP totally crashed and burned with their tablets.

 

2011-11-30 3:07 PM
in reply to: #3920622

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader
hey thanks, that really helps. He likes to read and he likes to surf the net. But he is 67 and I imagine would appreciate reading on an ereader now that I hear about this e-ink.

Thanks.
2011-11-30 3:31 PM
in reply to: #3920943

User image

Master
2277
2000100100252525
Lake Norman, NC
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader

BigDH - 2011-11-30 4:07 PM hey thanks, that really helps. He likes to read and he likes to surf the net. But he is 67 and I imagine would appreciate reading on an ereader now that I hear about this e-ink. Thanks.

I can honestly say that I'll bet he wouldn't like surfing the net or reading on a tablet.  Small screen for web-surfing.  An iPad or Galaxy is the same as a smartphone with a bigger screen.  It's built for m-sites like m.nfl.com as compared web sites like nfl.com.  He'll probably like a bigger LCD monitor for the net.  For reading, the e-ink on a black & white Nook or Kindle is really easy on the eyes and you can increase the font-size up or down with a push of a single button.  Nook vs. Kindle really just depends on whether you want free library eBooks or not.  It requires a PC to download the book and then put onto the Nook, but once you get the hang of it, it's fairly easy.  Both are on the same quality and cost about the same.  You can go to Best Buy and try out both to see what they're like.

My wife and daughter fight over the Nook.  They both have books loaded onto it and they love it.  I think Hannukah Harry's going to have to bring my wife her own this year.  Although watching them argue over it is quite entertaining for me.

 

2011-11-30 3:59 PM
in reply to: #3920622

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader
One other difference is weight. I have a Xoom, mrs gearboy has a kindle. Whenever I hand her my tablet to show her something on line, she feels like she is carrying a brick. And the newest Kindles are even lighter. (And as endurance athletes  we all know the importance of shaving a few ounces here and there!)
2011-11-30 4:10 PM
in reply to: #3920926

User image

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader
Bigfuzzydoug - 2011-11-30 4:55 PM

The BB Playbook isn't worth $200 and Verizon won't even sell them anymore.  The touchscreen isn't worth squat.


I'm curious as to what you think the PB should do that it doesn't?

Shane


2011-11-30 4:50 PM
in reply to: #3920622

User image

Pro
5011
5000
Twin Cities
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader

I have a tablet (Kindle Fire), and I have e-readers (Kindles...2,3,4). I also have the Kindle app on my phone and my PCs. I do not read on any backlit device unless I have to.

If you want an e-reader, get an e-reader, not a tablet. The e-ink makes all the difference.

2011-11-30 4:52 PM
in reply to: #3920926

User image

Pro
5011
5000
Twin Cities
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader

eReader models:  Kindle is popular and current version will only read books bought from Amazon.

 

Not true. Kindle can read pretty much anything you want it to read. 

2011-12-01 11:51 AM
in reply to: #3920622

User image

Extreme Veteran
792
500100100252525
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader

mmrocker-

My wife got a Kindle literally a month before the fire announcement.  I was considering getting her a fire for christmas.  As a person who uses kindles, do you think that the Fire is a good present, or are you just happy with the kindle?

2011-12-01 2:17 PM
in reply to: #3922182

User image

Pro
5011
5000
Twin Cities
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader

For reading, I 100% prefer the e-readers. Which isn't to say I don't like the Fire...I am enjoying it as a browser, and as something to play games on in the car, and will probably watch some videos on it at the gym or whatnot. But that's what I got it for. I bought the Fire not to read on, but to carry around the house as a conveinient internet source, more or less.

So, if your wife would like a media tablet, and you don't think she needs all the bells and whistles that an ipad has...then sure, it's a great toy. But I don't think of it as a replacement for an e-reader.

2011-12-01 2:54 PM
in reply to: #3920926

User image

Extreme Veteran
580
500252525
Kansas City, MO
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader

Bigfuzzydoug - 2011-11-30 2:55 PM

... Tablet models:  There are only two to consider; iPad 2 or Samsung Galaxy.  Everythign else is crap.  ...

 

I actually like the Motorola Xoom I bought too - considered the Galaxy Tab 10.1 since I had a 7'' Tab, but like the expansion/peripheral options on the Xoom better.  I also figured that since Google bought Motorola Mobility updates for the Xoom would be faster and (hopefully) better tested than on competing products.

 

Both the iPad2 and Galaxy Tab are sexier than the Xoom though.  



2011-12-01 4:11 PM
in reply to: #3920622

User image

Elite
3471
200010001001001001002525
Evergreen, CO
Subject: RE: tablet vs. e reader
I got the Asus eeepad and really like it.  I have the Nook and Kindle apps and read on it all the time -- can do black background with white letters so easier on the eyes.  Can also download library books to it.  Purchased the keyboard too so it has 16 hr battery life when connected to the keyboard, but can take off the keyboard to use like a pad.  I like that it acts like a small laptop and fits in my purse and I don't have to worry about the screen.
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » tablet vs. e reader Rss Feed