Other Resources My Cup of Joe » HUNGER GAMES Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 5
 
 
2012-03-28 8:53 AM
in reply to: #4116765

Master
1946
100050010010010010025
Memphis, TN
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES
briderdt - 2012-03-28 8:30 AM
Jtiger - 2012-03-28 5:57 AM
briderdt - 2012-03-28 7:36 AM
Jtiger - 2012-03-28 5:24 AM
briderdt - 2012-03-27 2:18 PM
the bear - 2012-03-27 11:53 AM
trinnas - 2012-03-27 1:44 PM

This is exactly what makes reading so much more rewarding than watching a movie though, don't you agree?

Even my 15-yo mostly non-readers commented at length on how much detail was omitted in the movie. Hopefully that will prod them a little more into reading. If all the detail the boys said they missed was in the movie it would have been six hours long rather than 2:22.

And really, I'd rather see a 6-hour, true-to-the-book movie than a Reader's Digest interpretation.

 

No you wouldn't.  They have to edit for the sake of pacing. The movie at 2.5 hours is already pushing the time limit for a movie as it is.

You mean YOU wouldn't...

 

You would seriously watch a 6 hour movie?  I know we like to exaggerate for the sake of those that will listen but I'm just calling BS in reality.  I think most know that movies based on novels are abbreviated and that is part of the deal.  If you want all the details read the book.

Yes, I would. And I did read the book. Which is why I wanted the details in the movie.

 

You are in the extreme minority then. 



2012-03-28 8:54 AM
in reply to: #4083471

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES
When they made The Stand into a miniseries, I thought that was the way to go. There were way too many characters and it was too complex a story to do justice in a couple of hours. Same goes for making the last Harry Potter book into two movies.
But those were LONG books. Hunger Games is a quick read with only a handful of major characters. If anything, I thought there were stretches of the book that were too long (like Katniss' struggling with dehydration.) I dont know what they'd do with six hours. Do we need to see every meal on the train? I guess some more exposition would have been good, and they did sort of gloss over some stuff, but the book barely took me six hours to read. I can't imagine a six-hour movie series.
2012-03-28 12:33 PM
in reply to: #4083471

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES
i'm finally going to see the movie TONIGHT!!! WHEE!!! 
2012-04-02 7:06 AM
in reply to: #4083471

Master
1946
100050010010010010025
Memphis, TN
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES
Saw the movie this weekend and I was very impressed. I think it stayed as true to the book as it could.  I'm looking forward to the next installment. 
2012-04-02 8:45 AM
in reply to: #4124056

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES

Jtiger - 2012-04-02 8:06 AM Saw the movie this weekend and I was very impressed. I think it stayed as true to the book as it could.  I'm looking forward to the next installment. 

i agree.  they skipped a lot of the set up to get to the exciting part, and if i hadn't read the books i may have been curious about some of the characters.  but the games were done great, the feeling or terror/fear the day of the reaping.  and i like that they showed haymitch working his magic on seneca/the sponsors.  they are setting the movie up very nicely for the sequels...

2012-04-02 9:11 AM
in reply to: #4124258

Master
1946
100050010010010010025
Memphis, TN
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES
mehaner - 2012-04-02 8:45 AM

Jtiger - 2012-04-02 8:06 AM Saw the movie this weekend and I was very impressed. I think it stayed as true to the book as it could.  I'm looking forward to the next installment. 

i agree.  they skipped a lot of the set up to get to the exciting part, and if i hadn't read the books i may have been curious about some of the characters.  but the games were done great, the feeling or terror/fear the day of the reaping.  and i like that they showed haymitch working his magic on seneca/the sponsors.  they are setting the movie up very nicely for the sequels...

 

The only thing I would have liked is the set up back in District 12 so you can see why Katniss is such a badass with the bow.  Woody Harrelson is perfect for the role.  The Seneca at the end was priceless I don't remember that being in the book but very clever.



2012-04-02 9:16 AM
in reply to: #4124310

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES
Jtiger - 2012-04-02 10:11 AM
mehaner - 2012-04-02 8:45 AM

Jtiger - 2012-04-02 8:06 AM Saw the movie this weekend and I was very impressed. I think it stayed as true to the book as it could.  I'm looking forward to the next installment. 

i agree.  they skipped a lot of the set up to get to the exciting part, and if i hadn't read the books i may have been curious about some of the characters.  but the games were done great, the feeling or terror/fear the day of the reaping.  and i like that they showed haymitch working his magic on seneca/the sponsors.  they are setting the movie up very nicely for the sequels...

 

The only thing I would have liked is the set up back in District 12 so you can see why Katniss is such a badass with the bow.  Woody Harrelson is perfect for the role.  The Seneca at the end was priceless I don't remember that being in the book but very clever.

i personally LOVED the seneca ending.  since the books are written from kat's perspective, you don't learn about seneca being killed by snow until maybe a third of the way into the second book.  the movie hints at a handful of things that kat doesn't learn about (and therefore the reader doesn't know) until book 2.  but i think gary ross's interpretaton of how seneca was killed is just AWESOME.

2012-04-23 11:51 AM
in reply to: #4083471

User image

Champion
12759
5000500020005001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES

Picked the book up yesterday morning at my ex's house, finished it last night.  Really kept my attention and a great fast read.  Well written and made me feel a lot of emotions.  Still thinking is it appropriate for MY 10-year old to read?

Will look for the second this week. 

2012-04-23 12:00 PM
in reply to: #4167310

User image

Master
2277
2000100100252525
Lake Norman, NC
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES
NRG42 - 2012-04-23 12:51 PM

Picked the book up yesterday morning at my ex's house, finished it last night.  Really kept my attention and a great fast read.  Well written and made me feel a lot of emotions.  Still thinking is it appropriate for MY 10-year old to read?

Will look for the second this week. 

Opinions from my 10-yr-old daughter "bookworm", Gracie:

"The Hunger Games is one of my favorite books of all time.  Some scary and sad parts, but I was able to handle it.  The movie was a really good adaptation of the book."

"Catching Fire was good, not as good as The Hunger Games.  It was kind of a setup for the last book.  It was also OK for me to read.  It had some pretty good surprises in it."

"Mocking Jay was really disturbing.  I don't know if it was appropriate for me to read it.  I had to since I read the first two.  But the ending really bothered me.  I mean REALLY bothered me.  I was upset for a couple of days afterwards.  I had to do lots of yoga and Tai Chi to get grounded and relaxed after reading that.  When they make it into a movie, I'm either going to have to close my eyes or leave the theater during some parts."

I read all three books as well and would agree.  G is 10 going on 20, so she may be a little different.  But Mocking Jay can get downright disturbing for many.

2012-04-23 12:10 PM
in reply to: #4083471

User image

Alpharetta, Georgia
Bronze member
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES
Agree with the 3rd book stuff... I just finished it last night.
I really enjoyed all of them, but not sure it would be appropriate for all youngsters. 
2012-04-23 12:15 PM
in reply to: #4167339

Master
1946
100050010010010010025
Memphis, TN
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES
Bigfuzzydoug - 2012-04-23 12:00 PM
NRG42 - 2012-04-23 12:51 PM

Picked the book up yesterday morning at my ex's house, finished it last night.  Really kept my attention and a great fast read.  Well written and made me feel a lot of emotions.  Still thinking is it appropriate for MY 10-year old to read?

Will look for the second this week. 

Opinions from my 10-yr-old daughter "bookworm", Gracie:

"The Hunger Games is one of my favorite books of all time.  Some scary and sad parts, but I was able to handle it.  The movie was a really good adaptation of the book."

"Catching Fire was good, not as good as The Hunger Games.  It was kind of a setup for the last book.  It was also OK for me to read.  It had some pretty good surprises in it."

"Mocking Jay was really disturbing.  I don't know if it was appropriate for me to read it.  I had to since I read the first two.  But the ending really bothered me.  I mean REALLY bothered me.  I was upset for a couple of days afterwards.  I had to do lots of yoga and Tai Chi to get grounded and relaxed after reading that.  When they make it into a movie, I'm either going to have to close my eyes or leave the theater during some parts."

I read all three books as well and would agree.  G is 10 going on 20, so she may be a little different.  But Mocking Jay can get downright disturbing for many.

 

I agree that Mocking Jay is by far the most disturbing book.  If you can get past the kids killing kids thing the last is the toughest read. 



2012-04-23 12:34 PM
in reply to: #4083471

User image

Expert
997
500100100100100252525
North Central WV
Subject: RE: HUNGER GAMES

My husband came to the movie with me. He has not read the books.  He really enjoyed the movie.  I wondered if it would be easy to follow if you hadn't read the books but he said he had no trouble.  He isn't a reader and will never read the books.  He doesn't want to know anything about the second book because he wants to see the movie when it comes out.  I heard on the radio last week that it won't be out until November 2013.  I guess they will have to show the first installment again so people can remember what happened!

I think I enjoyed this movie more than any other movie that I have read first.  The only difference being that I didn't come away from the movie hating The Capitol.

I am re-reading the books.  I raced through them the first time because I wanted to see what guy she ended up with.  He he he, I cannot help being a romantic.  I totally agree with those who felt disturbed by the third book. 

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » HUNGER GAMES Rss Feed  
 
 
of 5