General Discussion Triathlon Talk » 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2012-04-27 1:33 AM

User image

Expert
819
500100100100
Subject: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?

So, I do not have much pain and the shoes look OK.  Do I really need to drop $130 on a new pair. 

I have a HIM in 6+ weeks.  Maybe get a new pair after that?  If I get some before, how far out to break them in?



2012-04-27 2:17 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
New shoes don't need a break in period. I run a few times in mine before a long race just to make sure there's not a seam in an awkward place or one of those nylon threads that's going to poke me for a few hours on the run but they don't need broken in.

"Looks okay" is really not a good indicator of running shoe health and by the time you feel any twinges in your legs you've already over ran your shoes' life span.

I, personally, change mine out around 300 miles. If I don't my knees and ankles will start having bad days regularly so I change them out before I feel much of anything. 300 miles or so seems to be a generally accepted life span for running shoes from all I've read as well.



2012-04-27 5:38 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Expert
819
500100100100
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
You don't own shares in Mizuno do you?
2012-04-27 5:45 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Regular
174
1002525
Kansas City Area
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
A lot of people swap them outon a regular basis. I, personally, swap mine around 500 miles although I have had a couple pair of Saucony that I waited until 550 and they still were holding up. There are some people who get more like a 1000 miles (such as my running partner) so who knows really. I think that over time you will find your own cadence on this. My experience is that new shoes do not need broken in although I do try them out ona couple training runs prior to a longer run. Hope this helps!
2012-04-27 5:49 AM
in reply to: #4176065

User image

Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
leftrunner - 2012-04-27 6:38 AM

You don't own shares in Mizuno do you?


No and I really couldn't care less if they're making money or not as long as they stay in business.

Cheaper to buy shoes too often than it is to get knees and hips replaced later in life and a WHOLE lot less painful.

Your choice.

2012-04-27 6:01 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Pro
6011
50001000
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?

When my shoes are shot, I start getting knee and back pain.  With my old Asics, this was around 300 miles.  With the Saucony Kinvaras I use now, it's more like 250.



2012-04-27 6:17 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Melon Presser
52116
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000100
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?

Well ... you shouldn't have any pain. So on that, yeah, I'd definitely get another pair. That said, mileage is very individual. (And for me, it has changed throughout my running career).

Yup. If the shoe fits, it doesn't need breaking in, but as others said, it's a good idea to wear them for a run or two just to see if there are any issues.

2012-04-27 7:00 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image


1439
100010010010010025
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?

I get new ones when the soles are worn out or the fabric is tearing. I do not prescribe to the shoe companies theory that you need new shoes every xxx amount of miles. I wear a neutral shoe that has very little cushioning to begin with. Mine go to around 1000-1200 miles before the soles are almost worn through, then they go in the garbage.

 

I do keep a relatively lower mile shoe for racing only because I do not want my high milage shoe falling apart while I am in a race. For what it is worth I run in Zoots.

2012-04-27 7:59 AM
in reply to: #4176073


1660
10005001002525
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?

DanielG - 2012-04-27 5:49 AM
leftrunner - 2012-04-27 6:38 AM You don't own shares in Mizuno do you?
No and I really couldn't care less if they're making money or not as long as they stay in business. Cheaper to buy shoes too often than it is to get knees and hips replaced later in life and a WHOLE lot less painful. Your choice.

 

Except that there is zero evidence showing that purchasing new shoes reduces wear and tear in the knees and hips, or correlates at all to hip replacements or knee replacements. Nor does the amount you run unless you've already had a surgery in that area or have known pre-existing disease.

 

2012-04-27 8:39 AM
in reply to: #4176284

User image

Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
yazmaster - 2012-04-27 8:59 AM

DanielG - 2012-04-27 5:49 AM
leftrunner - 2012-04-27 6:38 AM You don't own shares in Mizuno do you?
No and I really couldn't care less if they're making money or not as long as they stay in business. Cheaper to buy shoes too often than it is to get knees and hips replaced later in life and a WHOLE lot less painful. Your choice.

 

Except that there is zero evidence showing that purchasing new shoes reduces wear and tear in the knees and hips, or correlates at all to hip replacements or knee replacements. Nor does the amount you run unless you've already had a surgery in that area or have known pre-existing disease.

 



So don't change your shoes as often if that's your preference.

2012-04-27 8:50 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Expert
945
50010010010010025
, Michigan
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?

Off topic a bit, but I found it interesting this week that my insurance wouldn't cover any part of my $250 orthotics, but would pay 20-40 grand for a new knee if I needed it.



2012-04-27 8:54 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Champion
10668
500050005001002525
Tacoma, Washington
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?

Depends on the shoe, you, and your running style.

I've got a pair of Altra Instincts with over 450 miles on them, and so there's no signs of them giving up. I also had a pair of Saucony Kinvaras that were showing signs of the end of their life at less than 300 miles.

Six weeks is plenty of time to make sure the shoes are formed to your feet. You could wait two or three weeks of you prefer.

But the "not much pain" part concerns me. That by itself may be the reason to get new shoes. I'd recommend having (at least) two pair staggered in their life, so that you're getting one new pair when the other is about half-way through.

2012-04-27 9:16 AM
in reply to: #4176423

Master
10208
50005000100100
Northern IL
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
briderdt - 2012-04-27 8:54 AM

But the "not much pain" part concerns me. That by itself may be the reason to get new shoes. I'd recommend having (at least) two pair staggered in their life, so that you're getting one new pair when the other is about half-way through.

I'd recommend this as well, and believe it to be a big reason for having multiple shoes. So you have a solid reference for just how worn down the older pair is.

2012-04-27 9:28 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Regular
77
252525
Newport News
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
I know after 400 miles I can feel a noticeable difference in new shoes.  I take the plunge and buy two pairs and rootate them after each run.
2012-04-27 9:40 AM
in reply to: #4176073

User image

Pro
4824
20002000500100100100
Houston
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
DanielG - 2012-04-27 5:49 AM
leftrunner - 2012-04-27 6:38 AMYou don't own shares in Mizuno do you?
No and I really couldn't care less if they're making money or not as long as they stay in business.Cheaper to buy shoes too often than it is to get knees and hips replaced later in life and a WHOLE lot less painful.Your choice.
This.
2012-04-27 9:41 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
beat up shoes should not cause pain. running in a way your body isn't meant to causes pain. having a good workout causes pain. what do you mean pain.

and buy 2 pairs at least and alternate them. let those dogs air out. <----psa for the day. and buy different shoes, different brands, different styles. man. buy a new pair every month until you have 10 or 15.


2012-04-27 10:02 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Expert
819
500100100100
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
I should clarify.  THe pain to which I referred is after a long run, my knees are on fire for about 5 min then all is well.  I ice them for a bit and no pain for the rest of the week, until after the next long run.
2012-04-27 10:22 AM
in reply to: #4176561

User image

Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
BigDH - 2012-04-27 10:41 AM

beat up shoes should not cause pain. running in a way your body isn't meant to causes pain. having a good workout causes pain. what do you mean pain.

and buy 2 pairs at least and alternate them. let those dogs air out. <----psa for the day.


Alternative to that is I've got a small box fan that I just leave on low all the time. I put my running shoes and bike shoes in front of it as soon as I'm done that workout. Shoes are dry within a few hours and even under the insole is dry by the next day.

2012-04-27 10:30 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Member
89
252525
Austin, North Carolina
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?

I can feel when I need new shoes (real subjective, right?). That happens anywhere between 250 and 500 miles though, and is highly dependent on how I'm running, where I'm running, if they get wet, etc. etc.

+1 for multiple pairs rotating. I generally find last years model on sale and buy 2-3 at a time. RunnersWarehouse is where it's at, imo.

2012-04-27 10:33 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Regular
459
1001001001002525
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?

I don't like to be in a situation where I realize I need something, and I need it NOW.

With that in mind, if I were in your situation, I would buy a new pair of shoes, and start rotating them in.  When your HIM comes, I'd run in whichever pair is feeling better for you.

You may still be able to run in your shoes for a while and you can still do that even once you buy another pair.

2012-04-27 10:34 AM
in reply to: #4176031

User image

Regular
174
1002525
Kansas City Area
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?

I also strongly agree with the recommendation of having multiple pairs of shoes and rotate.  I also try to have a new pair sitting in the closet.  Wait until you can get them on sale and buy 2-3 pairs at a time.  Works for me anyway.



2012-04-27 10:41 AM
in reply to: #4176655

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
DanielG - 2012-04-27 9:22 AM

BigDH - 2012-04-27 10:41 AM

beat up shoes should not cause pain. running in a way your body isn't meant to causes pain. having a good workout causes pain. what do you mean pain.

and buy 2 pairs at least and alternate them. let those dogs air out. <----psa for the day.


Alternative to that is I've got a small box fan that I just leave on low all the time. I put my running shoes and bike shoes in front of it as soon as I'm done that workout. Shoes are dry within a few hours and even under the insole is dry by the next day.



Good idea.
2012-04-27 10:46 AM
in reply to: #4176496

Master
10208
50005000100100
Northern IL
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
brigby1 - 2012-04-27 9:16 AM
briderdt - 2012-04-27 8:54 AM

But the "not much pain" part concerns me. That by itself may be the reason to get new shoes. I'd recommend having (at least) two pair staggered in their life, so that you're getting one new pair when the other is about half-way through.

I'd recommend this as well, and believe it to be a big reason for having multiple shoes. So you have a solid reference for just how worn down the older pair is.

Seeing more posts about having multiple shoes for rotation, but not sure that really does much if their mileage isn't staggered. That was why I pulled this part specifically.

2012-04-27 10:53 AM
in reply to: #4176413

User image

Veteran
178
100252525
, New York
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
DV 1 - 2012-04-27 9:50 AM

Off topic a bit, but I found it interesting this week that my insurance wouldn't cover any part of my $250 orthotics, but would pay 20-40 grand for a new knee if I needed it.

I think that must change depending on insurance.  Mine completely covered $300 orthotics but had trouble getting it to cover a hip arthroscopy.  

 

And the multiple shoes for rotation thing- when I was just a runner I used to hear this.  I was told that it's because if you're running twice a day, it can take more than then the hours you have between runs for the cushioned part of the sole of the shoe to recover.  



Edited by elrasc06 2012-04-27 10:57 AM
2012-04-27 12:49 PM
in reply to: #4176743

User image

Regular
174
1002525
Kansas City Area
Subject: RE: 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes?
brigby1 - 2012-04-27 10:46 AM
brigby1 - 2012-04-27 9:16 AM
briderdt - 2012-04-27 8:54 AM

But the "not much pain" part concerns me. That by itself may be the reason to get new shoes. I'd recommend having (at least) two pair staggered in their life, so that you're getting one new pair when the other is about half-way through.

I'd recommend this as well, and believe it to be a big reason for having multiple shoes. So you have a solid reference for just how worn down the older pair is.

Seeing more posts about having multiple shoes for rotation, but not sure that really does much if their mileage isn't staggered. That was why I pulled this part specifically.

Agreed.  Definitely stagger them. Another benefit of having two pairs is that if you run in the rain one day you have more time for them to air dry while you run in the other pair.  Of course DanielG's approach with the fan solves this problem too. 

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » 450+ miles...Time to buy new shoes? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2