Feds can't force Domino's founder to offer contraceptives, judge says (Page 8)

Sure you can.  You may be dishonorably discharged, but you can leave the military if you wanted out right now.  And you'd have to pay the government back as well most likely.  It's a contract, you can break it.  There are consequences, but you can break it if you really wanted to.

The difference being that antibiotics treat bacterial infections...which could KILL you.

A heavy/bad period will not kill you.

Oh, sorry...I figured most people would draw the line at breaking the law.  Yes, could I murder someone and get out, yeah...I'll work on that.

I will modify my definition of choice to limit it to things that do not break the law.  I thought that was inferred.

Like I said...I only care that I don't pay a higher premium because of it.  If you want to pay a higher premium to have BC covered I could really care less....to each his own.  But I do not want to have to shoulder the cost of something I am morally and physically opposed to.  I understand that a small percentage of the population would be using it solely for a reason other than preventing pregnancy...but I also think that if that was "allowed' then the excuse would get seriously abused.

Whether we like it or not certain medical treatments are in the moral gray area...BC and abortions are the two that stick out the most in my brain.  People who are morally opposed to these medical treatments shouldn't have to contribute financially to their practice.  I cannot control what people do to their own bodies...but I can control whether I enable them or not.

No murder required, please don't be absurd.  You can break your contract.  There are consequences ( as there are with any contract ), but you can certainly break the contract without breaking the law.

Um, Active Duty Service Commitments are BINDING.  You cannot just "break" them.  This isn't a normal contract.  Every now and then personnel center will "right size" the force and let people voluntarily leave before their service commitment is up, but you can't just walk away no matter how much money you pay them...they don't have to release you.  In fact, many times they will implement "stop loss" meaning you can't leave even if you don't have a commitment.  They own you and they tell you what you can/cannot do.  The only way I could get out right now would be to break the law.  I guess I could also fail the fitness test four times but that takes over a year...so, again...I can't walk into work tomorrow and quit....

Edit: Here's an example of the voluntary measures going on lately.  Again, if you read the article it's only certain career fields.  Pilot is one that they will not approve the waiver for because they are undermanned in pilots.

The sense of entitlement here is astounding.

I must have missed the natural rights to health insurance and employment and who/what bestowed those rights upon us.

No one owes you a job in the field you want to be in.

No one owes you health insurance or health care.

It is completely laughable to think that your employer owes you anything health related at all other than a reasonably safe work environment. I have a job and no benefits whatsoever, I suppose my rights are being violated. My wife has a job and no benefits whatsoever, so I suppose the fact that she is not even offered subsidized BC by her employer is a gross violation of her rights and discriminatory.

If your employer is so incredibly gracious enough to offer you health insurance in addition to your pay for the work you provide I would suggest you don't look that gift horse in the mouth. The appropriate thing to do would be to say thank you and take what you are GIVEN.

Don't like the plan or it doesn't cover every little thing that is important to you? Do what a lot of people do and go get your own dang plan and pay for it.

I don't care if it is for religious reasons or not no employer should be forced to provide health insurance and if they are nice enough to do it they get to decide what is covered.

All this ACA BS is exactly that, unconstitutional BS. It is not based at all on the principles of "insurance" it was specifically designed to bankrupt the private insurance industry, to train the masses that they are owed or have a right to health insurance and to get enough people on board to go to a single payer system. Simple as that. But before the single payer happens, if an employer wants to object I don't have a problem with them using any means available to object. 

ETA: last sentence.