Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not? Here's a big real reason: They're not optimized for aerodynamics. This is actually a big deal for a lot of triathletes, particularly any who have spent good money (often $1-2K+) on aerodynamic bike frame (Cervelo) or race wheels. You put on a Camelbak, you've essentially wiped out any aero gains you made from adding either of those two very expensive upgrades. To wear a Camelbak while racing on a Cervelo P3 with race wheels shows a major misunderstanding in applying money to solve problems, and would likely elicit some humorous (and not so humorous) comments from those who realize the futility of maximizing aero while using Camelbak + uberpricey bike hardware. Now if these true low-profile zipperless bladders become comfortable enough and convenient enough to use on long distance racing, I'm sure they'll start becoming a real option. I believe some UCI road profesional cyclists have used similar ones in shorter time trials (1hr or less.) But in the current incarnation, a typical Camelbak as widely known, is definitely not aerodynamic. |