General Discussion Triathlon Talk » post-Boston security Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2013-05-01 10:16 AM

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: post-Boston security

There was a thread about the new security in place for St. Anthony's, and it looks like it's becoming a trend. The Broad Street Run is this weekend, it's the biggest 10 mile race in the US with over 40,000 runners. I'm kind of sad and a little angry about this, especially since there are now NO coolers and parties at the Navy Yard after the race.

Important Race Weekend Information

1. There is no specific threat to Philadelphia, but there are enhanced security measures to ensure the Blue Cross Broad Street Run is a success.

2. All runners electing to use gear-check on race day must pack their gear in clear bags provided at the race expo. If it is a nice day, we recommend that runners not bring any gear with them.

3. Prior to the race, runners and spectators should sign up to receive emergency text alerts by visiting www.readynotifypa.org. This is how officials will alert runners and spectators if there is an emergency on race day.

4. If you see something suspicious on race day, report it to a police officer or call 911. There will be police officers along the course and at every water station.

5. There will be three evacuation shelters open along the race course. Please report to one of these locations if you need to seek shelter.

Benjamin Franklin High School (Broad and Spring Garden)
School for Creative and Performing Arts (Broad and Christian Streets)
South Philadelphia High School (Broad and Snyder Streets)

6. No bags, backpacks, coolers in the Navy Yard.



2013-05-01 10:23 AM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Veteran
513
500
Chicago (Old Town)
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
No coolers?!?  But...but...but...  Post race beer?!?
2013-05-01 11:31 AM
in reply to: #4722306


79
252525
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
I was annoyed about that e-mail too.  They're trying to make participants feel better, I don't think it will have any real impact on safety.
2013-05-01 11:37 AM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Pro
6520
50001000500
Bellingham, WA
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
Sounds like a big anti-terrorist exercise with a race thrown in there somewhere.
2013-05-01 11:44 AM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Veteran
2842
200050010010010025
Austin, Texas
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

Will the Navy sponsor a beer-barge?

If Harpoon didn't have beer tents at practically all our local events, I think there would not be any runners in the Northeast!

2013-05-01 12:06 PM
in reply to: #4722437

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

swimtochina - 2013-05-01 12:31 PM I was annoyed about that e-mail too.  They're trying to make participants feel better, I don't think it will have any real impact on safety.

Well considering that it's utterly impossible to provide foolproof security on 10 miles of public streets through a major city with hundreds of thousands of spectators, I'd say your right. As we saw in Boston, I don't think the runners are where to look for threats.

I'll be at Devilman and glad I will be missing this mayhem. I only heard about it because I was meeting up with a couple from my tri team last night and she's doing BSR. He's doing Devilman.



2013-05-01 12:19 PM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Champion
10471
500050001001001001002525
Dallas, TX
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
Just silly. So they are going to take away every backpack, bag, diaper bag, etc. from spectators? Spectators dropped the bombs. Not racers.

All it does is give people a false sense of security putting measures like this in place.

2013-05-01 12:20 PM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Veteran
335
10010010025
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

So other than clear gear check bags not much here... Info, thats about it.

1. Goal of every race.

2. Clear bag.

3. Info no impact on your race.

4. We have been in this situation for a very long time. Nothing new here.

5. Info, just in case again NO impact on your race.

6. Gear check in clear bag should have all you need. This impacts the spectator not runner.

I feel this is like TSA make you feel safe but... You are safer? Yes; but you are also as safe as you ever were.

 



Edited by 1_Mad_Madone 2013-05-01 12:22 PM
2013-05-01 12:34 PM
in reply to: #4722531

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
1_Mad_Madone - 2013-05-01 1:20 PM

So other than clear gear check bags not much here... Info, thats about it.

1. Goal of every race.

2. Clear bag.

3. Info no impact on your race.

4. We have been in this situation for a very long time. Nothing new here.

5. Info, just in case again NO impact on your race.

6. Gear check in clear bag should have all you need. This impacts the spectator not runner.

I feel this is like TSA make you feel safe but... You are safer? Yes; but you are also as safe as you ever were.

 

I just realized that if you take points 2 and 3 together, they are implying that you should carry your phone during the race.

An interesting point, since the biggest stress we had the day of Boston was that my buddy who got pulled off the course obviously didn't get his race-day bag at the finish, and we had no way of getting in touch with him until he was allowed back to his hotel. Not knowing any of this, we had no idea if he was safe or hurt.

2013-05-01 4:57 PM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Alpharetta, Georgia
Bronze member
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

Just wanted to chime in - my local half marathon on Sunday has implemented just a few things. Clear check bags and broadcasting that all/any bags left on the ground will be removed.

I'm okay with the new measures. If races did NOTHING, I think it would send a different message. I'm glad they are taking a few sensible steps.

2013-05-01 5:24 PM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Pro
6011
50001000
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

IMO, the various measures are just so RD's can have a defense against claims that they didn't take reasonable measures to protect participants and spectators.  It has absolutly no correlation with actual risk prevention.

 



2013-05-01 5:43 PM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Expert
3145
2000100010025
Scottsdale, AZ
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
I wonder why we still don't have clear uhaul trucks?
2013-05-01 5:49 PM
in reply to: #4723070


79
252525
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
lisac957 - 2013-05-01 5:57 PM

Just wanted to chime in - my local half marathon on Sunday has implemented just a few things. Clear check bags and broadcasting that all/any bags left on the ground will be removed.

I'm okay with the new measures. If races did NOTHING, I think it would send a different message. I'm glad they are taking a few sensible steps.

 

I understand the thought behind it, but now I'm left scrambling for something to do with my phone & inhaler during the race.  We're not allowed to put a bag within the clear bag and I don't want to advertise to the world the contents.  I'm probably just overthinking this...

 

These aren't sensible steps, IMO, because it's not actually doing anything to improve safety. It's like the patdown I get every single time I go through the airport (because I fly too often to feel comfortable using the x-ray machine).  Totally unnecessary - I posed no threat initially AND they don't actually discover anything during that (except perhaps the few extra lbs I carry during the winter).

2013-05-01 5:51 PM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Expert
2373
20001001001002525
Floriduh
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
How long before we will be runnin' nekkid.  Not that that would necessarily be a bad thing mind you...
2013-05-01 6:39 PM
in reply to: #4722531

User image

Regular
152
1002525
Gretna, Louisiana
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
1_Mad_Madone - 2013-05-01 12:20 PM

I feel this is like TSA make you feel safe but... You are safer? Yes; but you are also as safe as you ever were.

Exactly! Should some security measure be taken? Sure, but there is a point of diminishing returns. I think in many cases we have gone far past that point. 

2013-05-01 7:13 PM
in reply to: #4723144

User image

Alpharetta, Georgia
Bronze member
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
swimtochina - 2013-05-01 5:49 PM
lisac957 - 2013-05-01 5:57 PM

Just wanted to chime in - my local half marathon on Sunday has implemented just a few things. Clear check bags and broadcasting that all/any bags left on the ground will be removed.

I'm okay with the new measures. If races did NOTHING, I think it would send a different message. I'm glad they are taking a few sensible steps.

 

I understand the thought behind it, but now I'm left scrambling for something to do with my phone & inhaler during the race.  We're not allowed to put a bag within the clear bag and I don't want to advertise to the world the contents.  I'm probably just overthinking this...

 

These aren't sensible steps, IMO, because it's not actually doing anything to improve safety. It's like the patdown I get every single time I go through the airport (because I fly too often to feel comfortable using the x-ray machine).  Totally unnecessary - I posed no threat initially AND they don't actually discover anything during that (except perhaps the few extra lbs I carry during the winter).

I guess I see it as a "new world" and we'll all have to make some decisions when we participate. Leave the phone at home or in the car? Carry it with you? Risk it being stolen in the clear bag? Leave it with a spectator? All options you'll have to weigh and decide for yourself.

Would we feel "better" if race organizations ignored what happened at Boston and didn't address it at all? 



2013-05-01 8:36 PM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Master
2563
20005002525
University Park, MD
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

This all strikes me as darn silly. 

Airline security -- yes, there are good reasons why airplanes in flight might be a target for repeated attacks. 

Distance running events -- no evidence that random road races are a natural target for attacks, and no evidence that runners' gear bags are a special risk. There was one attack by non-participants in a very high profile event. It had nothing to do with running, and no good evidence of the perpetrators being part of a coordinated network.

The Boston Marathon bombing justifies special measures at regional running events about as much as it justifies confiscating all bags from people who enter Times Square.

2013-05-02 6:56 AM
in reply to: #4723146

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

Oysterboy - 2013-05-01 6:51 PM How long before we will be runnin' nekkid.  Not that that would necessarily be a bad thing mind you...

oh yes it would!

2013-05-02 7:20 AM
in reply to: #4722306

User image


489
100100100100252525
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

We don't live in a new world.  The appropriate response to the risk in this instance is to do nothing.

You have nothing to fear except fear itself.

A lot of the world outside of the US is used to living with the threat of terrorism within its borders.  We certainly are here in London after the threat of the Irish terrorists (ironically often funded by collections in Boston) and we take great pride in doing very little as citizens in showing that we've been scared, feel threatened or even take their pathetic rhetoric seriously.

Most of these idiots are too stupid to be able to pull it off properly anyway.  The UK just put six Muslim terrorists in jail for life after they failed to blow up a right wing political rally because they turned up too late and there was no-one left to blow up.  They were stopped by the police on the way home because they weren't insured on their vehicle and the police found a bomb and a suicide note inside.  Most people's reaction has been to laugh at them, lock them up for life and carry on as normal.

2013-05-02 7:45 AM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

New user
49
25
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

I was involved in St. Anthony's last weekend and there was an increased police presence.  However, the clear bag rule was only slightly enforced.  There were many non clear bags both in and out of the transition area.   I also don't think that in the wake of Boston there was a different feel to the event.   Now if the weather had cooperated it would have been even better.

Scott Hazelton

2013-05-02 7:55 AM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Extreme Veteran
890
500100100100252525
Sterling
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

Last weekend our marathon/half/10k race in Illinois they had beefed up security and were not allowing any spectators into the stadium with bags that were over a certain "clearance" level.  At bag check they were checking people's bags when turning them in.  At my bag check line they just asked if we had anything electronic in them.  My brother in laws line they were visibly looking into everyone of them so their line was going super slow.

 

I can understand taking extra precausions but at the same time when we start taking all these extra measures and restricting people from doing things I think we partly let the terrorists win.  Look at what we have to go through to board a plane now because of guys with box cutters...

 

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --Ben Franklin.  

 



2013-05-02 8:29 AM
in reply to: #4722306

Member
326
10010010025
Subject: RE: post-Boston security

I got that email as well.  Too much hassle, so I won't even both.  I'll toss my phone, ID/Credit card and $20 in my spibelt and call it a day.  Leave all our stuff back at the car.

 

At least people still have a sense of humor, first post on the announcement on Facebook for the Broad Street Run "How many beers will fit in the clear bag?"

2013-05-02 8:57 AM
in reply to: #4722306

User image

Regular
247
10010025
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
My only real concern is that RDs will use this raise the already increasing entry fees. 
2013-05-02 9:57 AM
in reply to: #4723103

User image

Elite
5145
500010025
Cleveland
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
TriMyBest - 2013-05-01 6:24 PM

IMO, the various measures are just so RD's can have a defense against claims that they didn't take reasonable measures to protect participants and spectators.  It has absolutly no correlation with actual risk prevention.

 

That sounds about right.

It isn't about doing anything effective, it is about having the appearance of not doing nothing.

Fears of liability suits trump all.

2013-05-02 10:03 AM
in reply to: #4723543

User image

Veteran
335
10010010025
Subject: RE: post-Boston security
Dan-L - 2013-05-02 7:20 AM

We don't live in a new world.  The appropriate response to the risk in this instance is to do nothing.

You have nothing to fear except fear itself.

A lot of the world outside of the US is used to living with the threat of terrorism within its borders.  We certainly are here in London after the threat of the Irish terrorists (ironically often funded by collections in Boston) and we take great pride in doing very little as citizens in showing that we've been scared, feel threatened or even take their pathetic rhetoric seriously.

Most of these idiots are too stupid to be able to pull it off properly anyway.  The UK just put six Muslim terrorists in jail for life after they failed to blow up a right wing political rally because they turned up too late and there was no-one left to blow up.  They were stopped by the police on the way home because they weren't insured on their vehicle and the police found a bomb and a suicide note inside.  Most people's reaction has been to laugh at them, lock them up for life and carry on as normal.

WOW...

Same world new circumstances...

Do nothing; expect more of the same which is unacceptable.

Fear? This is not a game it is real life. Not fear but unaccepting of the new normal.

Expect more of this Normal? Get used to it why?

In London you have how many cameras? Maybe not the common citizen but your Government has taken extensive measures to ensure your safety.

You call them idiots and say they are not smart but think about it a few minutes earlier and you would have been on the news I guess that would be ok because it is normal to you... they have you fooled they will keep doing this as long as there are people that think they are not capable...

I guess it is strange that you live with the what you considered Normal; WE will not live with that Normal we will do something about it and we will need to learn how...



Edited by 1_Mad_Madone 2013-05-02 10:25 AM
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » post-Boston security Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2