Better Heart Rate Monitor?
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
2015-11-16 10:11 AM |
353 Conroe, Texas | Subject: Better Heart Rate Monitor? I am on my second Garmin 910XT (first one passed away in a bike crash) and my 3rd Garmin premium heart rate monitor and I am unable to get consistent results from any of them. I have workouts in my Garmin Connect account dating back as for as August 2014 that look very similar to the workouts I completed this week in relation to the heart rate data. (see photo below) I very rarely get a whole workout in where the HR monitor stays connected for the duration. The second HR monitor I used was actually pretty consistent about dropping out right at the 20 minute mark and when it would come back 10 minutes later it was giving me half Hr readings( Actual HR was 140 and the Monitor would read 70) Is there a better HR out there that will work with my Garmin? Edited by sawyer1206 2015-11-16 10:13 AM (GarminHR-1.jpg) Attachments ---------------- GarminHR-1.jpg (136KB - 10 downloads) |
|
2015-11-16 12:20 PM in reply to: sawyer1206 |
Expert 2852 Pfafftown, NC | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? I just bought a 920xt....after using a 310xt for a while. It's mildly irritating, to me, to see the spikes. But, in the overall scheme of things, I don't get bent out of shape (not saying you are, mind you) too much. What's the big deal (sincere question) if you get a spike or two here and there? There's likely a great answer to this. I'm just not that knowledgeable. |
2015-11-16 12:38 PM in reply to: sawyer1206 |
Master 2094 | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? I have gone through about 6-7 Garmin and Polar heart rate straps. I tried the hybrid Polar strap/Garmin transmitter and it worked well for about a year with possibly less drops. I just bought a Mio Link http://www.mioglobal.com/Mio-Link-heart-rate-wristband/Product.aspxand couldn't be happier. It has been well reviewed http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2014/01/mio-link-first-look.html.I can't comment on the durability as I have only had it for a week but I don't see myself ever using a heart rate strap again |
2015-11-16 1:59 PM in reply to: pschriver |
353 Conroe, Texas | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? Originally posted by pschriver I have gone through about 6-7 Garmin and Polar heart rate straps. I tried the hybrid Polar strap/Garmin transmitter and it worked well for about a year with possibly less drops. I just bought a Mio Link http://www.mioglobal.com/Mio-Link-heart-rate-wristband/Product.aspxand couldn't be happier. It has been well reviewed http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2014/01/mio-link-first-look.html.I can't comment on the durability as I have only had it for a week but I don't see myself ever using a heart rate strap again YOU ARE DA MAN!! I had heard about a HR monitor that goes on your wrist but I couldn't find it. I will try the Mio next. Do you use any programs like TrainerRoad? If so have you noticed any of the Loooooong delays in registering the increased effort? |
2015-11-16 2:20 PM in reply to: 0 |
353 Conroe, Texas | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? Originally posted by nc452010 I just bought a 920xt....after using a 310xt for a while. It's mildly irritating, to me, to see the spikes. But, in the overall scheme of things, I don't get bent out of shape (not saying you are, mind you) too much. What's the big deal (sincere question) if you get a spike or two here and there? There's likely a great answer to this. I'm just not that knowledgeable. Also I have recently started using Trainer Road and it is HR based as well. Another issue I'm having is a long delay in the onscreen HR display. Meaning when the program calls for an interval from 120bpm to 160bpm for 2 minutes I will increase my intensity for the 2 minutes but the HR display will show the work about 2 minutes later. Strangest thing watching your HR climb and peak while you're on the recovery stage of the interval. Edited by sawyer1206 2015-11-16 2:23 PM |
2015-11-16 2:40 PM in reply to: sawyer1206 |
Pro 6582 Melbourne FL | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? I believe dcrainmaker has an article on the Garmin spikes and other issues. I've heard good things about the Wahoo BT/ANT+ combo HR strap. |
|
2015-11-16 2:57 PM in reply to: 0 |
319 Sarasota, Florida | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? I was looking into the Mio but I don't think I have device compatibility. The polar strap gets a little annoying. I have been using a simple FT4 and polar strap and haven't had accuracy issues I'm aware of. The strap slips the longer I go which gets annoying but the only inaccuracy I'm aware of is while doing crunches/sit ups but I have to trust periodic results and haven't tried their web app. So far it seems to work fine run/bike/swim in pool and ocean but haven't owned it a year nor do I use it all the time. Edited by runtim23 2015-11-16 2:58 PM |
2015-11-16 3:56 PM in reply to: 0 |
Master 2094 | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? Originally posted by sawyer1206 Originally posted by pschriver I have gone through about 6-7 Garmin and Polar heart rate straps. I tried the hybrid Polar strap/Garmin transmitter and it worked well for about a year with possibly less drops. I just bought a Mio Link http://www.mioglobal.com/Mio-Link-heart-rate-wristband/Product.aspxand couldn't be happier. It has been well reviewed http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2014/01/mio-link-first-look.html.I can't comment on the durability as I have only had it for a week but I don't see myself ever using a heart rate strap again YOU ARE DA MAN!! I had heard about a HR monitor that goes on your wrist but I couldn't find it. I will try the Mio next. Do you use any programs like TrainerRoad? If so have you noticed any of the Loooooong delays in registering the increased effort? I use Zwift and Golden Cheetah (Live Training) and have had ZERO drops. The device is Ant+ but also does BlueTooth so you can synch it with your smart phone. I have enough devices already so I don't do the cell phone. I'm not sure what you mean by long delays but on short supra-threshold efforts the delay is physiologic. I am relatively sure the device is very accurate and the technology is sound.The same technology is used in intensive care units throughout the world on a daily basis. Edited by pschriver 2015-11-16 4:04 PM |
2015-11-16 4:09 PM in reply to: pschriver |
Master 1433 Calgary, AB | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? I have the MIO Link and multiple garmin straps (I'm on the 920XT now) I found the MIO screwed up when I was running, no matter which arm or how tight/loose it would show CRAZY numbers like 190+ hr when I was jogging then it would drop to 70, then back. It was ok if I was sitting but swinging the arm even remotely made it bonkers. So I've just settled on using the garmin and changing the battery every 4-5 months as they are cheap and that seems to be the root of most issues. |
2015-11-16 4:27 PM in reply to: Khyron |
928 | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? I have a MIO link and I love it. It is very reliable for me-- way more than the Garmin or Polar that rely on an electrical connection (and would often spike because of static, or lose the signal if I wasn't sweating enough). It doesn't have to be super tight but the trick is to put it right next to the ulnar bone on your wrist, and make sure no ambient light leaks in. |
2015-11-16 4:36 PM in reply to: Khyron |
Master 2094 | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? Originally posted by Khyron I have the MIO Link and multiple garmin straps (I'm on the 920XT now) I found the MIO screwed up when I was running, no matter which arm or how tight/loose it would show CRAZY numbers like 190+ hr when I was jogging then it would drop to 70, then back. It was ok if I was sitting but swinging the arm even remotely made it bonkers. So I've just settled on using the garmin and changing the battery every 4-5 months as they are cheap and that seems to be the root of most issues. Did you try moving it up to your mid-forearm? So far I haven't noted any issues. The problem with the Garmin strap is also in the strap. If it was a matter of just replacing the batteries, it would be fine. |
|
2015-11-16 5:53 PM in reply to: 0 |
Master 8247 Eugene, Oregon | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? Not sure I have anything new to offer as far as equipment suggestions, but have done quite a bit of training with HR. A delay in registering increased effort may be your physical response, not your monitor. There is typically a noticeable lag between increasing effort and your body's increasing HR to respond to the demand. For example, when I'm doing tempo pickups on a run, it might take me one to two minutes to actually get my HR "into the zone" unless I started way faster than the target speed/effort. It's quite normal for HR for short intervals to peak AFTER the burst is over, shortly after you've started recovery. That's a normal body process, not your monitor, and one reason why training with HR is not quite as accurate as, say, training with power. Edited by Hot Runner 2015-11-16 5:55 PM |
2015-11-16 6:47 PM in reply to: Hot Runner |
319 Sarasota, Florida | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? I think the spikes the OP is reporting is related to poor contact or transmission. I'm curious why though? dcrainmaker.com does mention it in a couple posts. One mentions the type of shirt and another comment claims it's from the contacts rusting. I haven't had any issues with my Polar. I have never seen it drop connection or display questionable rates. I do wear mine as tight as possible while swimming and loosen a little for biking and running. Even when the straps loosen up 30 minutes later causing it to slide a little, I still get good readings but I guess time will be the ultimate test. |
2015-11-17 10:08 AM in reply to: sawyer1206 |
Pro 5361 | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? After years of dealing with static spikes and unreliability of chest straps, I went with the Mio Link. Been working near flawlessly for me for over a year. The Scosche Rhythm+ is also good. Both $80.
the two downsides to the optical monitors. 1. the rechargeable battery only lasts 7-8 hours. So, not good for IMs or Ultras. and 2. the HRV data is inaccurate. So, if your watch gives you recovery time metrics based on the FirstBeat heart rate variability measurements, they won't be accurate.
Bonus- you can wear the wrist strap next to your watch, so you can get real-time HR during swims. Works on Ambits and v800's, but not garmins, as the garmin firmware won't allow it when in their swim modes. |
2015-12-05 3:16 PM in reply to: morey000 |
319 Sarasota, Florida | Subject: RE: Better Heart Rate Monitor? Well my FT4 was perfect. Lately it's been disconnecting, spiking between 80 and 170 and today it started slowly rising so I started slowing my pace until I was walking and it was still stuck on 172. I stopped took my hr which was lower but it was stuck on 172 for over 10 minutes. I was hoping to start some hr training but can't trust it now. I'll try a reset but the opticals do look tempting. |
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|