Other Resources The Political Joe » Impeachment Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2019-10-01 8:43 AM

User image

Champion
9591
500020002000500252525
Alabama
Subject: Impeachment
The impeachment narrative by the.dems/media is that Trump “pressured Ukraine to dig up dirt on a political opponent”.

I’ve read the transcript and he does not ask for “dirt”, he asks for them to investigate. You have to presume Biden acted corruptly to say Trump was looking for dirt. Maybe Trump was looking to exonerate Biden? TIC. Maybe he was trying to help Ukraine root out corruption? Maybe he is trying to further clear his name on the whole Russian collusion hoax. Point being, no one knows why he asked them to investigate. What we do know is he did NOT ask for DIRT.

Been thinking this for a few day and at least someone else is thinking along the same lines:

“About 500 words later in the transcript, President Trump asked that the question of the Bidens’ involvement in Ukraine be scrutinized too, without indicating a desired response, (though he said, correctly, that it looked “horrible”). If, as they claim, the Bidens are innocent of any wrongdoing or impropriety, the Ukrainians presumably will say so and the Bidens should then thank President Trump for eliciting that answer.” - American Greatness

If impeachment goes to trial in the Senate the Trump team will have some of the best defense lawyers in the country working on his behalf. The Senate will fail to convict and this will be seen as an exoneration of Trump. Worst case scenario for dems is if a few dem senators also vote to acquit.

Politically I think Trump surrogates need to push the narrative that, with the election just 13 months away, Democrats want to overrule the will of the people by impeaching him before his uneducated, deplorable, white supremacist, racist, homophobic voters elect him again! IOW, they know better than the voters.


2019-10-01 9:24 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Pro
15134
50005000500010025
Subject: RE: Impeachment

This is NOTHING but the democrats trying to get out ahead of Barr's investigation into the DNC and the REAL corruption of the 2016 election.

Yesterday Pelosi was telling everybody who would listen that this was a sad time for America and we needed to be "prayerful" toward the President and our country.   How in the hell that woman said that with a straight face is one of life's great mysteries.

The Democrats will do and say ANYTHING to get the Presidency back.  They know that the Republicans are changing the nature of the Appellate courts and the Supreme court at an unprecedented rate....and their ideas of "social justice" through the courts are rat forked for decades.

I've said this a dozen times and it has to be repeated......who do you think is the most likely to be corrupt, the DNC and lifetime politicians trying to protect their arses, or Donald Trump.  If you say Donald Trump you just don't pay enough attention to what is actually going on in Washington.

The party of buffoons has pulled the pin on a big grenade without clearing the blast zone, and they will have to dive on it to save themselves. 



Edited by Left Brain 2019-10-01 9:26 AM
2019-10-01 1:45 PM
in reply to: Left Brain

User image

Pro
15134
50005000500010025
Subject: RE: Impeachment




(2aram9.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
2aram9.jpg (78KB - 1 downloads)
2019-10-01 6:50 PM
in reply to: Left Brain

User image

Champion
9591
500020002000500252525
Alabama
Subject: RE: Impeachment
"The whole thing that the attorney general is involved in is highly unusual," Holder said. "Ordering an investigation of our intelligence and law enforcement agencies when there was already an investigation underway by the inspector general."

No so. The IG is limited to investigating the FBI. Durham has no such constraint and can investigate the intel community as well as current and FORMER FBI, CIA, State Department employees as well as talk to foreign intel agencies. The IG has no such authority.

Sure looks like Holder is trying to get out in front of the Durham investigation and trying to discredit Barr.
2019-10-01 7:04 PM
in reply to: 0

User image

Pro
15134
50005000500010025
Subject: RE: Impeachment

Holder. hahahahaha

 

Holder added: "I think when people of this country look at the Justice Department and think it is in some ways politicized, that has a negative long-term impact on the department. FBI agents have to testify in trials all around this country, and to the extent a person looks at an FBI agent and thinks that person serves in a politicized agency, that could make a person -- a juror for instance -- think the FBI agent is not telling the truth, in a way we traditionally have."

 

Gee Eric.....ya think??  Now, lemme see here, when did THAT happen?  LMAO



Edited by Left Brain 2019-10-01 7:28 PM
2019-10-01 7:36 PM
in reply to: 0

User image

Pro
15134
50005000500010025
Subject: RE: Impeachment

In case anybody is following the "impeachment" proceedings but not really paying attention......do you know why Pelosi has not called for a vote?  Do you know that once a vote is cast in favor of impeachment (if they can muster the votes) that the House minority (the Republicans) can also subpoena witnesses.  Until that happens, you get one side and one side only.  Does that sound right to anybody?  Can anybody tell me why that isn't happening? 

Hint:  I already know....and so do you.

Again, the ONLY thing this is about is the Democrats getting in front of Barr's investigation into the FISA warrants and 2016 election corruption.  You know, the corruption that NO investigation could find Trump guilty of.   Again, ask yourself who was more capable of corruption.

Hint:  You already know.



Edited by Left Brain 2019-10-01 7:38 PM


2019-10-02 10:13 PM
in reply to: Left Brain

User image

Master
2428
200010010010010025
Gilmer Texas
Gold member
Subject: RE: Impeachment
well said
2019-10-07 1:42 PM
in reply to: CBarnes

User image

Pro
15134
50005000500010025
Subject: RE: Impeachment

This is actually a good read.  Some of you won't like it because it comes from Fox, but until you read Fox as much as I read CNN and CNBC, that's just weak liberal crap in my ears.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/steve-hilton-reporting-trump-ukraine-impeachment-saga

2019-10-08 10:18 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Champion
9591
500020002000500252525
Alabama
Subject: RE: Impeachment
State Department bars ambassador from testifying. Media is claiming this is part of the WH strategy to obstruct and delay. I found this funny because yesterday they claimed the WH had no strategy. I guess they thought Trump was just gonna roll over and play dead. They obviously have learned nothing in 3 years of fighting this man.

Clearly the mustard is off the hotdog!

Edited by Rogillio 2019-10-08 10:25 AM
2019-10-08 10:37 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Pro
15134
50005000500010025
Subject: RE: Impeachment

On some level, the WH has to be laughing at how stupid these people are.  Does anyone think the administration's lawyers have not advised the WH how to proceed?  Do you see alot of winning from the Democrats behind these ridiculous stunts?? 

If you want to see some winning.....wait until Barr's report comes out regarding Brenner and Comey (again, you have to be paying attention to really see what's going on) and FISAgate.....maybe the Dems can hire somebody to take notes on how to actually find evidence (and what actually CONSTITUTES evidence) before leveling charges.

I don't know what it says about the people in the districts that elected them......but geez.....these are your shining stars?  HAHAHAHA!!! 



Edited by Left Brain 2019-10-08 10:43 AM
2019-10-08 11:04 AM
in reply to: Left Brain

User image

Champion
9591
500020002000500252525
Alabama
Subject: RE: Impeachment
“House Democrats Weigh Masking Whistleblower’s Identity, Disguising Voice During Interviews”

This cracks me up! I have this image of Darth Vader speaking in a computer synthesized voice while Schifty listens all big-eyed.

Republicans will question:

Will the witness state his full name

Congressman I cannot do that.

What is you position in the WH or Intel community?

Congressman I cannot divulged that.

Who is your direct supervisor?

Congressman I cannot answer that.

Did you meet with Chairman Schift or his staff before submitting you complaint?

Yes

I got no more use for this guy!


2019-10-09 7:13 AM
in reply to: Rogillio

User image

Pro
9380
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Impeachment
2019-10-09 12:55 PM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Champion
9591
500020002000500252525
Alabama
Subject: RE: Impeachment
War’s over fellas...Trump dropped the big one and went nuclear! Just read that he hired Trey Gowdy! Katie bar the door.

Grab the popcorn, this is about to really fun.
2019-10-10 8:58 PM
in reply to: Rogillio

User image

Pro
9380
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Impeachment

Originally posted by Rogillio War’s over fellas...Trump dropped the big one and went nuclear! Just read that he hired Trey Gowdy! Katie bar the door. Grab the popcorn, this is about to really fun.

Love that guy!

New Thread
Other Resources The Political Joe » Impeachment Rss Feed  
RELATED POSTS

Impeachment

Started by Left Brain
Views: 147 Posts: 3

2019-03-07 2:40 PM Left Brain