General Discussion Triathlon Talk » should there be a universal time limit for marathons? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 12
 
 
2006-10-24 11:19 AM
in reply to: #576898

Regular
112
100
NC
Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
chirunner134 - 2006-10-24 12:06 PM

  • .. so knowing knowing I ahve 17 hours means I will train to finisin in 16:50:00 giving me 10 minutes to play with. if it was 14 hours I will have to train to 13:50:00. I agree with his point atleast to a point. I am still porbably good 85 - 100 lbs over weight and I ahve done 9 at a marathon+ distance. yes most of my goals are to finish within the time allowed even though I like to get into the sub 5s.

  • I want to do a marathon while my sister lives in russia for a couple of years. There cut off time is 5 hours. So basicly that means I need to get into better shape. People will compete as hard as they have to if they want something to do something.


    Well said.


    2006-10-24 11:42 AM
    in reply to: #576926

    User image

    Champion
    7036
    5000200025
    Sarasota, FL
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?

    awol - 2006-10-24 12:19 PM it's 100% up to the organizers of the race where they want to set the cutoff time. THEY set the rules and the rules are posted way ahead (usually at least a year) of the race. if people don't like the rules then they shouldn't enter. it's not up to the world to cater to the needs of slow people. it's NOT discrimination. besides, it's hard to keep roads closed in major cities for an unlimited amount of time.

    I like the way they do the Sarasota Marathon.   They tell everyone that the blocked-off roads open back to traffic after 5-1/2 hours and if you're still on the course then just move to the sidewalks.

    Mark

    2006-10-24 11:46 AM
    in reply to: #576985

    User image

    Resident Curmudgeon
    25290
    50005000500050005000100100252525
    The Road Back
    Gold member
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    RedCorvette - 2006-10-24 11:42 AM

    awol - 2006-10-24 12:19 PM it's 100% up to the organizers of the race where they want to set the cutoff time. THEY set the rules and the rules are posted way ahead (usually at least a year) of the race. if people don't like the rules then they shouldn't enter. it's not up to the world to cater to the needs of slow people. it's NOT discrimination. besides, it's hard to keep roads closed in major cities for an unlimited amount of time.

    I like the way they do the Sarasota Marathon.   They tell everyone that the blocked-off roads open back to traffic after 5-1/2 hours and if you're still on the course then just move to the sidewalks.

    Mark

    How do they handle the finish line/timing/awarding of finisher's medals?



    Edited by the bear 2006-10-24 11:46 AM
    2006-10-24 11:48 AM
    in reply to: #576898

    User image


    8763
    5000200010005001001002525
    Boulder, Colorado
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?

    Yes I would like to get to an IM some day. so knowing knowing I ahve 17 hours means I will train to finisin in 16:50:00 giving me 10 minutes to play with. if it was 14 hours I will have to train to 13:50:00. I agree with his point atleast to a point. I am still porbably good 85 - 100 lbs over weight and I ahve done 9 at a marathon+ distance. yes most of my goals are to finish within the time allowed even though I like to get into the sub 5s. 

    EXACTLY my point. And if the race cut offs were stricter, you would raise your own personal bar. And yes, losing that weight will improve your chances of making that 13:50 even more or into the 4:30 range. The sky is the limit for everyone once you open your mind up, work hard, and give yourself a chance. :-)

    2006-10-24 11:51 AM
    in reply to: #576753

    User image

    Giver
    18427
    5000500050002000100010010010010025
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    Also, not all iron-distance races have a 17hr limit. All m-dot branded races do, but, for example, GFT is 17.5 hours (I think), and there is at least one off-road 140.6 with a 24 hour limit.
    2006-10-24 11:56 AM
    in reply to: #577015

    User image

    Giver
    18427
    5000500050002000100010010010010025
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    The Atlanta Marathon has a 5 hour limit. It's on Thanksgiving day, so the organizers want to make sure the volunteers aren't spending all day on the course. The aid stations close down and the roads open according to an 11:27/mile pace, and if you fall behind that pace you're on your own.

    Edited by run4yrlif 2006-10-24 11:57 AM


    2006-10-24 11:56 AM
    in reply to: #576999

    User image

    Champion
    7036
    5000200025
    Sarasota, FL
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    the bear - 2006-10-24 12:46 PM
    RedCorvette - 2006-10-24 11:42 AM

    awol - 2006-10-24 12:19 PM it's 100% up to the organizers of the race where they want to set the cutoff time. THEY set the rules and the rules are posted way ahead (usually at least a year) of the race. if people don't like the rules then they shouldn't enter. it's not up to the world to cater to the needs of slow people. it's NOT discrimination. besides, it's hard to keep roads closed in major cities for an unlimited amount of time.

    I like the way they do the Sarasota Marathon.   They tell everyone that the blocked-off roads open back to traffic after 5-1/2 hours and if you're still on the course then just move to the sidewalks.

    Mark

    How do they handle the finish line/timing/awarding of finisher's medals?

    There are sidewalks along the entire course.  The final three miles run through some quiet residential neighborhoods and finishes up on the park-like grounds of the Ringling Museum on the Sarasota Bay waterfront.  Lots of space for officials, food, medical, entertainment, etc.

    Mark

    2006-10-24 11:56 AM
    in reply to: #577007

    User image

    SF Bay Area, Mountain View
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    mikericci - 2006-10-24 9:48 AM

  • The sky is the limit for everyone once you open your mind up, work hard, and give yourself a chance. :-)



  • amen!
    2006-10-24 12:01 PM
    in reply to: #576753

    User image

    Champion
    6993
    50001000500100100100100252525
    Chicago, Illinois
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    my fastest marathon I ever did was one with no set time limit. The reason I went so much faster was I was in better shape, full of health and the fact I did not know if they were going to shut the race down at 6 hours or if they would have say enough is enough at 6:30. It helped push me and if I did not bonk at mile 22 I would have had easy 5:30 finising time.

    my first Chicago marathon I thought I was only going to have 6:08:12 to finish the race and be considered a finisher so I did 6:08:05. I pushed myself hard at that end to make it. Yes I had an all out spirit at the end because well I did not know what would happen if I missed the time. last 2 years at chicago I finished in the 6:20s because of injury and my friend but I had no realy desire to push myself since well even people at 8 hours make it. if I needed 6:08 to finish I would ahve ditched my friend and made it. This year I would not have shown up since I was injuried and knew I could not push myself that hard safely.

    2006-10-24 12:21 PM
    in reply to: #576872

    Subject: ...
    This user's post has been ignored.
    2006-10-24 12:23 PM
    in reply to: #577007

    Subject: ...
    This user's post has been ignored.


    2006-10-24 12:27 PM
    in reply to: #577080

    Giver
    18427
    5000500050002000100010010010010025
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    spokes - 2006-10-24 1:21 PM

    Then how do we handle blind/hanicapped runners who might not be able to meet, say a 5 hour time limit?

    Who's "we"?

    To me, it's up to the participant to find the race that suits them best, rather than the race director's obligation to accommodate every possible person.

    2006-10-24 12:28 PM
    in reply to: #577080

    Queen BTich
    12411
    500050002000100100100100
    ,
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    spokes - 2006-10-24 12:21 PM
    Comet - 2006-10-24 10:55 AM

    Very interesting ideas Mike. I like those ideas and think people would work harder to meet those cut off times. Some couch potatoes would be put off by them, but then you can argue how motivated were they in the first place. Very interesting thoughts, but you're right, this isn't the area for it to be discussed.

    Then how do we handle blind/hanicapped runners who might not be able to meet, say a 5 hour time limit?

    Or those of us who want to do a marathon but really suck at running no matter how much base we put in ?  

    I'm not going to go into your situation exactly, but for blind or handicapped runners, they can pick a race with a time limit they can meet. Also, I would think the Special Olympics has a marathon and I'm sure most races out there accomodate those with disabilities--if they meet the requirements.

    Races with limits are races with limits. Fit, healthy people cannot participate in races because they cannot meet a deadline, so its not discriminating against those with disabilities. 

    Now, just because someone is blind does not mean they are slow and connot meet the time limits either. Here is a great article:
    http://www.usoc.org/paralympics/news_46496.htm



    Edited by Comet 2006-10-24 12:29 PM
    2006-10-24 12:38 PM
    in reply to: #577086


    8763
    5000200010005001001002525
    Boulder, Colorado
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    spokes - 2006-10-24 10:23 AM

    The sky is the limit for everyone once you open your mind up, work hard, and give yourself a chance. :-)

    I don't know if I can totally agree with that. Some of us are not athletically gifted and have to work 3-4x as hard as gifted people and still finish BOP in everything we do - I know - I'm one of 'em Tongue out

    I am willing to bet that even someone with a 35-40 VO2 max can run under 5:00 for a marathon. I don't consider myself athletically gifted either. Look at someone like Joel who has a 70+ V02 - I am not even close to that yet our HIM times are still pretty close. It's about 'how bad do you want it' and 'how much are you willing to sacrifice to get there' - that's the great thing about endurance sports. How hard you want to work is a personal choice and I am not saying one is better than the other, but I am not going to buy into the 'gifted/not gifted' argument. I wrecked my toe at age 15, and the Dr told me that I wouldn't be able to run on it and that he wanted to replace it with a plastic joint. My first thought was "i'll show you" - I left his office and RAN to the bus stop with a cast on my foot that day. I had to prove that I could run,  to me, not him. I still have the same toe.  I may not be able to bend it 90 degrees but it works for me.

    2006-10-24 12:39 PM
    in reply to: #576761

    Elite
    3650
    200010005001002525
    Laurium, MI
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    Comet - 2006-10-24 8:57 AM

    Its all about money.

    bingo

    Also as more races crop up with longer cut off times, it will reach a point where the races with shorter cut offs will be considered more 'elite' then the longer cut offs.  Very similar to how Boston is considered a more elite race then smaller local races because of it's qualifying time restrictions. 

    So the question that remains is, can you call someone a marathoner that did it in 12 hours or 14 hours?  Where is that time limit.  I say anyone can call themselves whatever the hell they want.  The metric shouldn't be "i did a marathon" it should be "I ran a 3:30 marathon".

    2006-10-24 12:40 PM
    in reply to: #576753

    Champion
    6993
    50001000500100100100100252525
    Chicago, Illinois
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    haha blind people can not finish fast. got I knoiw a blind lady she has only done about 70 marathons in all 50 states. I know she can kick my butt I think she is around a 4 hour marathoner but I am not 100% sure.


    2006-10-24 12:41 PM
    in reply to: #577007

    Master
    2052
    20002525
    Colorado
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    mikericci - 2006-10-24 12:48 PM

    The sky is the limit for everyone once you open your mind up, work hard, and give yourself a chance. :-)

    Word.

    2006-10-24 12:41 PM
    in reply to: #576753

    Queen BTich
    12411
    500050002000100100100100
    ,
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?

    Ok, since Mike addressed you Spokes I will too. You have been cycling for years, but not running.

    If you followed a plan, trained right, you could run a sub 5 hour marathon. I don't buy the 'gifted' stuff either. Yes there are athletically gifted people, but even the Kenyans train hard and for years to get as fast as they are. You just started running, and just started running to race. Give it time. Less than a whole season isn't enough time.

    Like many of us have said here, plenty of people can go from a couch to a sub 5 (or 4!) hour marathon if they work hard enough and follow a good plan. Get good advice or a coach and you'll continue to improve. THEN enter any race you want.

    2006-10-24 12:42 PM
    in reply to: #577007

    Champion
    7036
    5000200025
    Sarasota, FL
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    mikericci - 2006-10-24 12:48 PM

    EXACTLY my point. And if the race cut offs were stricter, you would raise your own personal bar. And yes, losing that weight will improve your chances of making that 13:50 even more or into the 4:30 range. The sky is the limit for everyone once you open your mind up, work hard, and give yourself a chance. :-)

    Not everyone has the physical ability or athletic talent to even complete an IM, no matter how hard they might train or how dedicated they may be.  Some of the most inspiring, motivated and dedicated triathletes I have met are the BOPers who struggle even to finish a sprint race.  We all have our own unique talents and limitations.  I guess I'd rather see us encourage the acheivement of our maximum individual potential rather than being measured against some arbitrary standard, that for many will be elitist.

    Mark

    2006-10-24 12:47 PM
    in reply to: #577086

    SF Bay Area, Mountain View
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    spokes - 2006-10-24 10:23 AM

    The sky is the limit for everyone once you open your mind up, work hard, and give yourself a chance. :-)

    I don't know if I can totally agree with that. Some of us are not athletically gifted and have to work 3-4x as hard as gifted people and still finish BOP in everything we do - I know - I'm one of 'em Tongue out



    besides what Mike said - you never suck as much as you think you do. have you ever watched "Running on the Sun"? if a guy without a leg and an arm can run the Badwater then you definitely can run a sub 5h marathon! it might take hard work but you're not exactly into this because it's easy, or are you?
    2006-10-24 12:53 PM
    in reply to: #577143

    Giver
    18427
    5000500050002000100010010010010025
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?

    awol - 2006-10-24 1:47 PM ...but you're not exactly into this because it's easy, or are you?

    Spokes is into it for the chicks.



    2006-10-24 12:59 PM
    in reply to: #577119

    Champion
    6993
    50001000500100100100100252525
    Chicago, Illinois
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    vortmax - 2006-10-24 12:39 PM

    Comet - 2006-10-24 8:57 AM

    Its all about money.

    bingo

    Also as more races crop up with longer cut off times, it will reach a point where the races with shorter cut offs will be considered more 'elite' then the longer cut offs.  Very similar to how Boston is considered a more elite race then smaller local races because of it's qualifying time restrictions. 

    So the question that remains is, can you call someone a marathoner that did it in 12 hours or 14 hours?  Where is that time limit.  I say anyone can call themselves whatever the hell they want.  The metric shouldn't be "i did a marathon" it should be "I ran a 3:30 marathon".



    that is the real question I guess I was trying to get at. a race maybe tough but if your elite runners are about 7 mins off WR pace and yet 1/3 of your finishers are after 6 1/2 it makes me wonder about direction marathons are taking. Do not get me wrong I do not want to see marathons cut offs before 6 hours but where exactly is that finish time. I am a slow marathoner at mile 6 I think people were laughing at me when I asked them ok who won. but the race had a winner then. the elites did get a 20 min head hard on me though before you think I am that slow. . Considering the race I gave the example at the first post on this thread my finishing time would have beaten 1/3 of the finishers of that race. I am a BOP and that would have put me right into the middle sure more to the back of the middle but still. I figure a 6:30:00 is pretty slow. not too slow but about as slow as one really should go.

    I know for some people 6:30:00 would be a miracle. marathon is tough for most people. yes the idea of a cut off even at 8 hours would make the sport more elistest but if you were an IM if you did IM over a week 1 time which would still be pretty touigh for most people it does take away from alot of its magic and beauty.
    2006-10-24 1:01 PM
    in reply to: #577161

    SF Bay Area, Mountain View
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    run4yrlif - 2006-10-24 10:53 AM

    awol - 2006-10-24 1:47 PM ...but you're not exactly into this because it's easy, or are you?

    Spokes is into it for the chicks.



    easy chicks?
    2006-10-24 1:13 PM
    in reply to: #576753

    Runner
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    Not every is a marathoner. I think the vast majority of people out there could finish a marathon the way most are set up these days, but you don't get to call yourself Ironman till you successfully complete one, under the cut-off.

    There is nothing wrong with this. Eventually, you find the distance you like to race. That doesn't matter if it's a 5k or marathon, a sprint tri or a IM. There's a reason why the marathoners aren't also the world class 800m guys. So what? If you never run a marathon, is anyone going to make fun of you? Doubtful. If you say "I'm not interested in doing that event", are you any less of a person? No. Personally, having a cut-off time at a race makes sense. It's a RACE. If you go out and walk the entire way, does that make you a marathoner? If I go out and walk an entire 5k, am I now a runner, because I finished a 5k road race, regardless of the fact that it took me an hour?

    Before anyone accuses me of being elitist, I am not trying to single people out, or exclude anyone. But, if you are going to a race, you should be prepared to meet the standards for that race. You may not agree. That's fine. I certainly understand that people feel that setting a certain time limit will disenfranchise people from the sport. I argue that it might make them train smarter, or better, to meet their goals. Ultimately, no matter how much you think you can run on external motivators, it will eventually boil down to how much YOU want it, to what motivates you on the inside. If you're motivated to complete a marathon, and it has a cut-off, you WILL do it. Plain fact.
    2006-10-24 1:16 PM
    in reply to: #576753

    SF Bay Area, Mountain View
    Subject: RE: should there be a universal time limit for marathons?
    you're not being elitist.

    everybody is born with a certain slow twitch/fast twitch muscle fiber ration and nothing can change that.

    but EVERYBODY can walk 26 miles if they train for it. 6:30 allows for that.
    New Thread
    General Discussion Triathlon Talk » should there be a universal time limit for marathons? Rss Feed  
     
     
    of 12