General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2007-09-10 12:11 PM

User image

Extreme Veteran
705
500100100
Subject: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
Hi all,
I have a friend who is setting up his goals for next year. He can run close to an 8 minute mile in a stand alone race, and is shooting for an 8:30 mile in a sprint and an Olympic distance event (15 and 25 miles respectively) That seems ambitious to me. I was thinking a loss of at least a minute or two, especially in an Olympic event, as I have a friend who runs 6:30 miles in a marathon and did 9:00 during an IM event, which may be more than average.

Any info, much appreciated.


2007-09-10 12:32 PM
in reply to: #958174

User image

Expert
986
500100100100100252525
Michiana
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race

nancylee - 2007-09-10 1:11 PM Hi all, I have a friend who is setting up his goals for next year. He can run close to an 8 minute mile in a stand alone race, and is shooting for an 8:30 mile in a sprint and an Olympic distance event (15 and 25 miles respectively) That seems ambitious to me. I was thinking a loss of at least a minute or two, especially in an Olympic event, as I have a friend who runs 6:30 miles in a marathon and did 9:00 during an IM event, which may be more than average. Any info, much appreciated.

I PR'ed my 10k at an Olympic event this year; 48:02 vs. 48:24 in previous year's stand-alone.  However, for my Half-iron, I was nowhere close 2:02 run split vs. 1:41 I did yesterday in a stand-alone half-marathon.

So....  I think if you have the training and capacity to go longer, it is manageable to come close to a stand-alone 10k or 5k run split in an Olympic or Sprint triathlon.  Theory is that you're "warmed-up" for the run leg.  However, if an Olympic is a stretch and 10k's are considered "long" races, it would be tough to replicate stand-alone splits in an Olympic race.

In my opinion, the shorter (being relative of course) the race, the greater likelyhood of getting within spitting distance of a stand-alone run split.

2007-09-10 12:35 PM
in reply to: #958228

User image

Extreme Veteran
705
500100100
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
Thanks for that info. SO maybe he is not that far off, because of the distances.
2007-09-10 12:37 PM
in reply to: #958174

User image

Elite
4235
2000200010010025
Spring, TX
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
My stand alone 10k time is usually right around 40 minutes (6:30ish). I've found that on an Oly distance that usually drops down to about 44 or 45 minutes (7:15).

It's probably dependant on the individual.
2007-09-10 12:47 PM
in reply to: #958174

User image

Cycling Guru
15134
50005000500010025
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race

It's not all about running ability/fitness and has everything to do with how the bike is handled.  You can hammer the bike and be totally blown for the run and even if you "could" rip off 6 minute miles in a stand alone race you end up running mid 8's in a tri after going really hard on the bike (as a generic example).

With that being said, if the person is a decent all-arounder and paces the bike well they can typically expect to be within the 10% range of their stand alone PR as a reference.

2007-09-10 12:54 PM
in reply to: #958174

User image

Royal(PITA)
14270
50005000200020001001002525
West Chester, Ohio
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race

Nancylee,

That's a good question, I appreciate the replies because I found in my first tri my run time was the same as my last stand alone 10K but my last 2 tris have had worse run paces (one was up hill for which the terrain around here leaves me little chance to seriously train for and the second I realy kicked up my bike tempo on so my legs were shot-as well as foot issues occuring during the event itself)



2007-09-10 1:10 PM
in reply to: #958266

User image

Extreme Veteran
705
500100100
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
Daremo - 2007-09-10 12:47 PM

It's not all about running ability/fitness and has everything to do with how the bike is handled. You can hammer the bike and be totally blown for the run and even if you "could" rip off 6 minute miles in a stand alone race you end up running mid 8's in a tri after going really hard on the bike (as a generic example).

With that being said, if the person is a decent all-arounder and paces the bike well they can typically expect to be within the 10% range of their stand alone PR as a reference.


Thanks for the figure and also for the example of the bike. So 10% of an 8:00 minute mile would add 80 seconds, if I am figuring right.
2007-09-10 1:12 PM
in reply to: #958292

User image

Extreme Veteran
705
500100100
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
zipp1 - 2007-09-10 12:54 PM

Nancylee,

That's a good question, I appreciate the replies because I found in my first tri my run time was the same as my last stand alone 10K but my last 2 tris have had worse run paces (one was up hill for which the terrain around here leaves me little chance to seriously train for and the second I realy kicked up my bike tempo on so my legs were shot-as well as foot issues occuring during the event itself)



I think your first experience was more unusual - I haven't done any running races in the last 4 years, but I HOPE I am not now a 12 minute miler!
2007-09-10 1:13 PM
in reply to: #958332

User image

Elite
4235
2000200010010025
Spring, TX
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
nancylee - 2007-09-10 1:10 PM

Daremo - 2007-09-10 12:47 PM

It's not all about running ability/fitness and has everything to do with how the bike is handled. You can hammer the bike and be totally blown for the run and even if you "could" rip off 6 minute miles in a stand alone race you end up running mid 8's in a tri after going really hard on the bike (as a generic example).

With that being said, if the person is a decent all-arounder and paces the bike well they can typically expect to be within the 10% range of their stand alone PR as a reference.


Thanks for the figure and also for the example of the bike. So 10% of an 8:00 minute mile would add 80 seconds, if I am figuring right.


10% of 8 minutes is actually 48 seconds.
2007-09-10 1:17 PM
in reply to: #958332

User image

Member
1699
1000500100252525
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
nancylee - 2007-09-10 1:10 PM
Thanks for the figure and also for the example of the bike. So 10% of an 8:00 minute mile would add 80 seconds, if I am figuring right.


Keep in mind that seconds are not 1/100 to minutes. It would be 8 minutes x 60 seconds or 480 seconds, so 10% of that would be 48 seconds.

If it helps, remember that 10% of 10 minutes would be 1 minute, so you have to be under that for 10% of 8 minutes..
2007-09-10 1:30 PM
in reply to: #958174

New user
3

Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
I ran a 6:34 pace for a stand alone 1/2 marathon and followed it up with a 7:37 pace in a HIM about a month later (in 2007)

My 5k pace is approx. 5:55 and my last sprint tri had a 6:40 pace (4 mile run with each mile faster than the previous-last mile of 6:10)

I had an 10:25 pace for the marathon leg of a full IM ealier this year and have a goal (not to pie in the sky) for the Chicago Marathon of about 7:00/mile. I will say that I have really run my butt off this summer and the IM time was a very poor nutrition effort and should have been closer to 9:00)

Hope this helps.



2007-09-10 1:40 PM
in reply to: #958174

User image

Resident Curmudgeon
25290
50005000500050005000100100252525
The Road Back
Gold member
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race

Anecdotally, in two races within a month of each other, last season at my peak:

  • Stand-alone 5K in 22:47, 7:20 pace
  • Triathlon 5K in 23:28, 7:34 pace.

Latter was after a 20-mile bike in 50:23, averaging 23.82mph.

I'm calculating less than 3% difference in total time.

2007-09-10 1:45 PM
in reply to: #958407

Champion
6539
5000100050025
South Jersey
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race

Or, you can be weirdo like me and post better run times in tris than in stand-alone races, even after a strong bike .

Clarification: that's only for 5Ks...I've never run a standalone farther than that.

2007-09-10 1:47 PM
in reply to: #958407

User image

Elite
4235
2000200010010025
Spring, TX
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
the bear - 2007-09-10 1:40 PM

Anecdotally, in two races within a month of each other, last season at my peak:

  • Stand-alone 5K in 22:47, 7:20 pace
  • Triathlon 5K in 23:28, 7:34 pace.

Latter was after a 20-mile bike in 50:23, averaging 23.82mph.

I'm calculating less than 3% difference in total time.



The % difference would be much smaller in a sprint triathlon.

My normal 5k is between 18:30-19:00, and I've done a 19:30 in a triathlon. But for an Oly or HIM the % would go up significantly.

But like you said, this is all anecdotal.
2007-09-10 1:56 PM
in reply to: #958174

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race

It all depends on CURRENT fitness levele and race execution (pacing).

I've found that if you have both you should be able to execute a solid run. How much slower from your open distance, it will depend on your tri distance. For instance if you have the fitness and do a good job pacing, you should be able to run your:

IM at or near your Easy pace

HIM at or near your Marathon pace

Oly at or near your Half marathon or T pace

Sprint at or near your 10K pace

Again all of the above will vary based on fitness, weather, terrain fueling, etc.

To determine your paces you can use any of the online calculators; I use Daniels VDOT for my athletes and myself (http://www.runbayou.com/jackd.htm).  Of course, in order to dial into the best racing pace and define a racing strategy (pace range) the specifics will be greatly influenced by all sessions/testing done through training. Also remember, and this is VERY IMPORTANT: you have to base it on CURRENT results, IOW your CURRENT fitness level.

2007-09-10 4:06 PM
in reply to: #958347

User image

Extreme Veteran
705
500100100
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
OrbeaMan - 2007-09-10 1:13 PM

nancylee - 2007-09-10 1:10 PM

Daremo - 2007-09-10 12:47 PM

It's not all about running ability/fitness and has everything to do with how the bike is handled. You can hammer the bike and be totally blown for the run and even if you "could" rip off 6 minute miles in a stand alone race you end up running mid 8's in a tri after going really hard on the bike (as a generic example).

With that being said, if the person is a decent all-arounder and paces the bike well they can typically expect to be within the 10% range of their stand alone PR as a reference.


Thanks for the figure and also for the example of the bike. So 10% of an 8:00 minute mile would add 80 seconds, if I am figuring right.


10% of 8 minutes is actually 48 seconds.


Duh!! I was doing this at work and obviously was not paying attention!!! Thanks,
Nancy


2007-09-10 4:07 PM
in reply to: #958355

User image

Extreme Veteran
705
500100100
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
eberulf - 2007-09-10 1:17 PM

nancylee - 2007-09-10 1:10 PM
Thanks for the figure and also for the example of the bike. So 10% of an 8:00 minute mile would add 80 seconds, if I am figuring right.


Keep in mind that seconds are not 1/100 to minutes. It would be 8 minutes x 60 seconds or 480 seconds, so 10% of that would be 48 seconds.

If it helps, remember that 10% of 10 minutes would be 1 minute, so you have to be under that for 10% of 8 minutes..


Thank you for your kind response to my idiotic math! I used to be really good at math! How embarrassing!
2007-09-10 4:08 PM
in reply to: #958381

User image

Extreme Veteran
705
500100100
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
Fattydo - 2007-09-10 1:30 PM

I ran a 6:34 pace for a stand alone 1/2 marathon and followed it up with a 7:37 pace in a HIM about a month later (in 2007)

My 5k pace is approx. 5:55 and my last sprint tri had a 6:40 pace (4 mile run with each mile faster than the previous-last mile of 6:10)

I had an 10:25 pace for the marathon leg of a full IM ealier this year and have a goal (not to pie in the sky) for the Chicago Marathon of about 7:00/mile. I will say that I have really run my butt off this summer and the IM time was a very poor nutrition effort and should have been closer to 9:00)

Hope this helps.



So you have found the longer the race, the more the time slows. Makes sense - thanks!
2007-09-10 4:09 PM
in reply to: #958407

User image

Extreme Veteran
705
500100100
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
the bear - 2007-09-10 1:40 PM

Anecdotally, in two races within a month of each other, last season at my peak:

  • Stand-alone 5K in 22:47, 7:20 pace
  • Triathlon 5K in 23:28, 7:34 pace.

Latter was after a 20-mile bike in 50:23, averaging 23.82mph.

I'm calculating less than 3% difference in total time.



That bike was very fast, and then the run, too. I think he is a decent biker, but nothing like that!
2007-09-10 5:23 PM
in reply to: #958174

User image

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race

What Jorge shared is right on for me.

This spring I was frustrated that I could run easly 9:15 m/m aerobically and then in my first Oly ran more than a minute slower. Accepting that time difference would happen and expecting it helped me mentally race and feel better afterwards.

My HIM will be interesting as my long runs are 10:15 m/m and I'm sure I'll be in the 11's in my HIM.

I think a big part to is how deep a runner you are; I'm not....so my drop off is pretty signficant.

2007-09-10 5:33 PM
in reply to: #958174

User image

Champion
5575
5000500252525
Butler
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race

Like others have said there is more too it than just comparing on paper Tri vs run only times.  For me my 5K PR is around 22:30 and my PR Tri 5K is 24:30 so just less than 8%.  However, I pretty much hammered on the bike.  If I improve my bike performance and can maintain the same speed as before but work less I think I can actualy PR my stand alone 5K or at least get it close.  That is actually my goal for next year.  My problem for 5K's is I don't warm up well or pace well so having bad knees the beginning is tough and I feel better by the end.  In a tri I have 45 minutes to warm up on the bike for the run so I start of feeling pretty good.  Until he starts doing bricks in training putting a goal down on paper I think is almost pointless.



2007-09-10 6:24 PM
in reply to: #958463

User image

Champion
5781
5000500100100252525
Northridge, California
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
amiine - 2007-09-10 11:56 AM

Sprint at or near your 10K pace


From what little evidence I've got from my own experience training so far, this has proven...I'm sub 49 min in an open 10K (sub 7.9 min/mi) and my one full "dress rehearsal" sprint tri (1/2 mi/18 mi/4 mi on the Malibu Tri course) yielded a 31:20 4 mi run (7.83 min/mi). Good food for thought...
2007-09-10 7:19 PM
in reply to: #958174

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race

One more thing: many athletes which don't do regular testing through training tend to do open road racing before the tri season starts and then PR or get close to those open race times during a tri just because they've trained for months and are fitter. Also there are a few people who tend not to push as hard as they could during open road races hence their running times are pretty similar with tri races.

2007-09-10 9:03 PM
in reply to: #958174

User image

Extreme Veteran
555
5002525
Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
Like some others my stand alone PB for 5k is 23:23 a few months later I did my first sprint Duathlon and although It felt like I was going SUPER slow I ended up doing the 2nd 5k run portion in 22:13. I have no idea how,but I'm wondering what my stand alone 5k time will be now since I've done alot more training since the first 5k.
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Rss Feed