Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
2007-09-10 12:11 PM |
Extreme Veteran 705 | Subject: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Hi all, I have a friend who is setting up his goals for next year. He can run close to an 8 minute mile in a stand alone race, and is shooting for an 8:30 mile in a sprint and an Olympic distance event (15 and 25 miles respectively) That seems ambitious to me. I was thinking a loss of at least a minute or two, especially in an Olympic event, as I have a friend who runs 6:30 miles in a marathon and did 9:00 during an IM event, which may be more than average. Any info, much appreciated. |
|
2007-09-10 12:32 PM in reply to: #958174 |
Expert 986 Michiana | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race nancylee - 2007-09-10 1:11 PM Hi all, I have a friend who is setting up his goals for next year. He can run close to an 8 minute mile in a stand alone race, and is shooting for an 8:30 mile in a sprint and an Olympic distance event (15 and 25 miles respectively) That seems ambitious to me. I was thinking a loss of at least a minute or two, especially in an Olympic event, as I have a friend who runs 6:30 miles in a marathon and did 9:00 during an IM event, which may be more than average. Any info, much appreciated. I PR'ed my 10k at an Olympic event this year; 48:02 vs. 48:24 in previous year's stand-alone. However, for my Half-iron, I was nowhere close 2:02 run split vs. 1:41 I did yesterday in a stand-alone half-marathon. So.... I think if you have the training and capacity to go longer, it is manageable to come close to a stand-alone 10k or 5k run split in an Olympic or Sprint triathlon. Theory is that you're "warmed-up" for the run leg. However, if an Olympic is a stretch and 10k's are considered "long" races, it would be tough to replicate stand-alone splits in an Olympic race. In my opinion, the shorter (being relative of course) the race, the greater likelyhood of getting within spitting distance of a stand-alone run split. |
2007-09-10 12:35 PM in reply to: #958228 |
Extreme Veteran 705 | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Thanks for that info. SO maybe he is not that far off, because of the distances. |
2007-09-10 12:37 PM in reply to: #958174 |
Elite 4235 Spring, TX | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race My stand alone 10k time is usually right around 40 minutes (6:30ish). I've found that on an Oly distance that usually drops down to about 44 or 45 minutes (7:15). It's probably dependant on the individual. |
2007-09-10 12:47 PM in reply to: #958174 |
Cycling Guru 15134 Fulton, MD | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race It's not all about running ability/fitness and has everything to do with how the bike is handled. You can hammer the bike and be totally blown for the run and even if you "could" rip off 6 minute miles in a stand alone race you end up running mid 8's in a tri after going really hard on the bike (as a generic example). With that being said, if the person is a decent all-arounder and paces the bike well they can typically expect to be within the 10% range of their stand alone PR as a reference. |
2007-09-10 12:54 PM in reply to: #958174 |
Royal(PITA) 14270 West Chester, Ohio | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Nancylee, That's a good question, I appreciate the replies because I found in my first tri my run time was the same as my last stand alone 10K but my last 2 tris have had worse run paces (one was up hill for which the terrain around here leaves me little chance to seriously train for and the second I realy kicked up my bike tempo on so my legs were shot-as well as foot issues occuring during the event itself) |
|
2007-09-10 1:10 PM in reply to: #958266 |
Extreme Veteran 705 | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Daremo - 2007-09-10 12:47 PM It's not all about running ability/fitness and has everything to do with how the bike is handled. You can hammer the bike and be totally blown for the run and even if you "could" rip off 6 minute miles in a stand alone race you end up running mid 8's in a tri after going really hard on the bike (as a generic example). With that being said, if the person is a decent all-arounder and paces the bike well they can typically expect to be within the 10% range of their stand alone PR as a reference. Thanks for the figure and also for the example of the bike. So 10% of an 8:00 minute mile would add 80 seconds, if I am figuring right. |
2007-09-10 1:12 PM in reply to: #958292 |
Extreme Veteran 705 | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race zipp1 - 2007-09-10 12:54 PM Nancylee, That's a good question, I appreciate the replies because I found in my first tri my run time was the same as my last stand alone 10K but my last 2 tris have had worse run paces (one was up hill for which the terrain around here leaves me little chance to seriously train for and the second I realy kicked up my bike tempo on so my legs were shot-as well as foot issues occuring during the event itself) I think your first experience was more unusual - I haven't done any running races in the last 4 years, but I HOPE I am not now a 12 minute miler! |
2007-09-10 1:13 PM in reply to: #958332 |
Elite 4235 Spring, TX | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race nancylee - 2007-09-10 1:10 PM Daremo - 2007-09-10 12:47 PM It's not all about running ability/fitness and has everything to do with how the bike is handled. You can hammer the bike and be totally blown for the run and even if you "could" rip off 6 minute miles in a stand alone race you end up running mid 8's in a tri after going really hard on the bike (as a generic example). With that being said, if the person is a decent all-arounder and paces the bike well they can typically expect to be within the 10% range of their stand alone PR as a reference. Thanks for the figure and also for the example of the bike. So 10% of an 8:00 minute mile would add 80 seconds, if I am figuring right. 10% of 8 minutes is actually 48 seconds. |
2007-09-10 1:17 PM in reply to: #958332 |
Member 1699 | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race nancylee - 2007-09-10 1:10 PM Thanks for the figure and also for the example of the bike. So 10% of an 8:00 minute mile would add 80 seconds, if I am figuring right. Keep in mind that seconds are not 1/100 to minutes. It would be 8 minutes x 60 seconds or 480 seconds, so 10% of that would be 48 seconds. If it helps, remember that 10% of 10 minutes would be 1 minute, so you have to be under that for 10% of 8 minutes.. |
2007-09-10 1:30 PM in reply to: #958174 |
New user 3 | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race I ran a 6:34 pace for a stand alone 1/2 marathon and followed it up with a 7:37 pace in a HIM about a month later (in 2007) My 5k pace is approx. 5:55 and my last sprint tri had a 6:40 pace (4 mile run with each mile faster than the previous-last mile of 6:10) I had an 10:25 pace for the marathon leg of a full IM ealier this year and have a goal (not to pie in the sky) for the Chicago Marathon of about 7:00/mile. I will say that I have really run my butt off this summer and the IM time was a very poor nutrition effort and should have been closer to 9:00) Hope this helps. |
|
2007-09-10 1:40 PM in reply to: #958174 |
Resident Curmudgeon 25290 The Road Back | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Anecdotally, in two races within a month of each other, last season at my peak:
Latter was after a 20-mile bike in 50:23, averaging 23.82mph. I'm calculating less than 3% difference in total time. |
2007-09-10 1:45 PM in reply to: #958407 |
Champion 6539 South Jersey | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Or, you can be weirdo like me and post better run times in tris than in stand-alone races, even after a strong bike . Clarification: that's only for 5Ks...I've never run a standalone farther than that. |
2007-09-10 1:47 PM in reply to: #958407 |
Elite 4235 Spring, TX | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race the bear - 2007-09-10 1:40 PM Anecdotally, in two races within a month of each other, last season at my peak:
Latter was after a 20-mile bike in 50:23, averaging 23.82mph. I'm calculating less than 3% difference in total time. The % difference would be much smaller in a sprint triathlon. My normal 5k is between 18:30-19:00, and I've done a 19:30 in a triathlon. But for an Oly or HIM the % would go up significantly. But like you said, this is all anecdotal. |
2007-09-10 1:56 PM in reply to: #958174 |
Coach 10487 Boston, MA | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race It all depends on CURRENT fitness levele and race execution (pacing). I've found that if you have both you should be able to execute a solid run. How much slower from your open distance, it will depend on your tri distance. For instance if you have the fitness and do a good job pacing, you should be able to run your: IM at or near your Easy pace HIM at or near your Marathon pace Oly at or near your Half marathon or T pace Sprint at or near your 10K pace Again all of the above will vary based on fitness, weather, terrain fueling, etc. To determine your paces you can use any of the online calculators; I use Daniels VDOT for my athletes and myself (http://www.runbayou.com/jackd.htm). Of course, in order to dial into the best racing pace and define a racing strategy (pace range) the specifics will be greatly influenced by all sessions/testing done through training. Also remember, and this is VERY IMPORTANT: you have to base it on CURRENT results, IOW your CURRENT fitness level. |
2007-09-10 4:06 PM in reply to: #958347 |
Extreme Veteran 705 | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race OrbeaMan - 2007-09-10 1:13 PM nancylee - 2007-09-10 1:10 PM Daremo - 2007-09-10 12:47 PM It's not all about running ability/fitness and has everything to do with how the bike is handled. You can hammer the bike and be totally blown for the run and even if you "could" rip off 6 minute miles in a stand alone race you end up running mid 8's in a tri after going really hard on the bike (as a generic example). With that being said, if the person is a decent all-arounder and paces the bike well they can typically expect to be within the 10% range of their stand alone PR as a reference. Thanks for the figure and also for the example of the bike. So 10% of an 8:00 minute mile would add 80 seconds, if I am figuring right. 10% of 8 minutes is actually 48 seconds. Duh!! I was doing this at work and obviously was not paying attention!!! Thanks, Nancy |
|
2007-09-10 4:07 PM in reply to: #958355 |
Extreme Veteran 705 | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race eberulf - 2007-09-10 1:17 PM nancylee - 2007-09-10 1:10 PM Thanks for the figure and also for the example of the bike. So 10% of an 8:00 minute mile would add 80 seconds, if I am figuring right. Keep in mind that seconds are not 1/100 to minutes. It would be 8 minutes x 60 seconds or 480 seconds, so 10% of that would be 48 seconds. If it helps, remember that 10% of 10 minutes would be 1 minute, so you have to be under that for 10% of 8 minutes.. Thank you for your kind response to my idiotic math! I used to be really good at math! How embarrassing! |
2007-09-10 4:08 PM in reply to: #958381 |
Extreme Veteran 705 | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Fattydo - 2007-09-10 1:30 PM I ran a 6:34 pace for a stand alone 1/2 marathon and followed it up with a 7:37 pace in a HIM about a month later (in 2007) My 5k pace is approx. 5:55 and my last sprint tri had a 6:40 pace (4 mile run with each mile faster than the previous-last mile of 6:10) I had an 10:25 pace for the marathon leg of a full IM ealier this year and have a goal (not to pie in the sky) for the Chicago Marathon of about 7:00/mile. I will say that I have really run my butt off this summer and the IM time was a very poor nutrition effort and should have been closer to 9:00) Hope this helps. So you have found the longer the race, the more the time slows. Makes sense - thanks! |
2007-09-10 4:09 PM in reply to: #958407 |
Extreme Veteran 705 | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race the bear - 2007-09-10 1:40 PM Anecdotally, in two races within a month of each other, last season at my peak:
Latter was after a 20-mile bike in 50:23, averaging 23.82mph. I'm calculating less than 3% difference in total time. That bike was very fast, and then the run, too. I think he is a decent biker, but nothing like that! |
2007-09-10 5:23 PM in reply to: #958174 |
Champion 19812 MA | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race What Jorge shared is right on for me. This spring I was frustrated that I could run easly 9:15 m/m aerobically and then in my first Oly ran more than a minute slower. Accepting that time difference would happen and expecting it helped me mentally race and feel better afterwards. My HIM will be interesting as my long runs are 10:15 m/m and I'm sure I'll be in the 11's in my HIM. I think a big part to is how deep a runner you are; I'm not....so my drop off is pretty signficant. |
2007-09-10 5:33 PM in reply to: #958174 |
Champion 5575 Butler | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Like others have said there is more too it than just comparing on paper Tri vs run only times. For me my 5K PR is around 22:30 and my PR Tri 5K is 24:30 so just less than 8%. However, I pretty much hammered on the bike. If I improve my bike performance and can maintain the same speed as before but work less I think I can actualy PR my stand alone 5K or at least get it close. That is actually my goal for next year. My problem for 5K's is I don't warm up well or pace well so having bad knees the beginning is tough and I feel better by the end. In a tri I have 45 minutes to warm up on the bike for the run so I start of feeling pretty good. Until he starts doing bricks in training putting a goal down on paper I think is almost pointless. |
|
2007-09-10 6:24 PM in reply to: #958463 |
Champion 5781 Northridge, California | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race amiine - 2007-09-10 11:56 AM Sprint at or near your 10K pace From what little evidence I've got from my own experience training so far, this has proven...I'm sub 49 min in an open 10K (sub 7.9 min/mi) and my one full "dress rehearsal" sprint tri (1/2 mi/18 mi/4 mi on the Malibu Tri course) yielded a 31:20 4 mi run (7.83 min/mi). Good food for thought... |
2007-09-10 7:19 PM in reply to: #958174 |
Coach 10487 Boston, MA | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race One more thing: many athletes which don't do regular testing through training tend to do open road racing before the tri season starts and then PR or get close to those open race times during a tri just because they've trained for months and are fitter. Also there are a few people who tend not to push as hard as they could during open road races hence their running times are pretty similar with tri races. |
2007-09-10 9:03 PM in reply to: #958174 |
Extreme Veteran 555 | Subject: RE: Run Times in a Tri as Opposed to Stand Alone Race Like some others my stand alone PB for 5k is 23:23 a few months later I did my first sprint Duathlon and although It felt like I was going SUPER slow I ended up doing the 2nd 5k run portion in 22:13. I have no idea how,but I'm wondering what my stand alone 5k time will be now since I've done alot more training since the first 5k. |