General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Cycling Advice Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2004-04-18 8:51 PM

User image

Resident Matriarch
N 43° 32.927 W 071° 24.431
Subject: Cycling Advice
just a quick question of our knowledgable cyclists.....

is it better to work on being out of the saddle to power up the hills, or am I better of staying in the saddle?  Which way generates the most power?  Or is it just a matter of personal preference?

ok, I guess that was more than 1 quick question.  Thanx 


2004-04-18 9:25 PM
in reply to: #19909

User image

Champion
4902
20002000500100100100100
Ottawa, Ontario
Subject: RE: Cycling Advice
It all depends on the rider. For a cyclist like myself who weighs 213 lbs, I prefer to sit on those long uphills but some lighter riders like to stand; it affords them that little extra push. It takes a heck of a lot of energy to power your way up big hills standing and it it hard on older knees...so I shy away from it. I sometime stand and sprint for short climbs but certainly nothing over 500 meters.
2004-04-19 7:40 AM
in reply to: #19909

Champion
8903
500020001000500100100100100
Subject: RE: Cycling Advice
I like standing. It is more tiring, but for me to gear down and spin my way up the hill, I feel like I'm riding in soft sand, like I'm not getting anywhere. On a REALLY long hill, I may alternate, but for the most part I'll do the entire hill standing on hills up to a mile in length. Now If we're talking about the gentle grade changes, the small rolling type hills that require only 1 or 2 gear changes, I'll just stay seated. It's the ones where I have to drop into the small chainring that get me out of the saddle. Also the little abrupt ones you sometimes get, you know, the ones that require a dozen crank strokes to get over, those I just stay in the same gear, stand up briefly and power over. They're small enough that they don't put me in an anaerobic zone and the recovery from the extra effort is usually pretty brief.

Let's go riding!

Max
2004-04-19 11:23 AM
in reply to: #19909

User image

Veteran
202
100100
St. Catharines, Ontario
Subject: RE: Cycling Advice
I like to sit. I have a lot of power and can really go on long gradual climbs. Really steep climbs I have a tendency to fall off the back. I have been working more on standing climbing for the really steep stuff.
It depends on the hill and on the rider. When I biked across Canada we rode all the mountain passes in British Columbia. For these 20 miles climbs the best thing to do was stay seated and then stand for the shorter steep sections.
There is a local bike race that goes up a steep 750 yard climb. For this hill you have to stand.
In training do both and get good at doing both. In the race you need to analyze and figure out what is best.
2004-04-19 12:22 PM
in reply to: #19909

User image

Pro
6582
50001000500252525
Melbourne FL
Gold member
Subject: RE: Cycling Advice
We have some bridges locally that are about 1/4m in length to get up to the top. I used to stand but now I sit and push/pull with each leg and go faster than if I stand.

Don
2004-04-19 2:42 PM
in reply to: #19909

Veteran
285
100100252525
Keller, TX
Subject: RE: Cycling Advice

To stand up or not when climbing . . .

If your mass divided by your height in inches is less than 2, you should stand.

If that ratio is between 2 and 2.3, you could stand or sit.

If the ratio is 2.4-2.5, you will most likely want to sit.  If it is more than 2.5, you will probably only want to stand in order to change your muscle usage.

This is what Joe Friel told us at Tri-camp.  I think in the end, it's still a personal preference.

TB



New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Cycling Advice Rss Feed