General Discussion Triathlon Talk » (Another) Chainring question for the cycling experts.... Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2008-04-14 2:57 PM

User image

Expert
828
50010010010025
Subject: (Another) Chainring question for the cycling experts....
Is there a difference in the physics in pedaling when going from the small ring to the big ring or is the difference purely subjective?

Reason I ask is that I am much more comfortable in the big ring and say in my 25 in the rear vs the small ring and in the 12 (or whatever is essentially the same to maintain "X" speed at same cadence)....Does that make sense? Is there a benefit to my riding in the big ring and on my 25??? Thx....Scott



2008-04-14 3:10 PM
in reply to: #1337192

User image

Champion
6786
50001000500100100252525
Two seat rocket plane
Subject: RE: (Another) Chainring question for the cycling experts....

Check your gear ratios here

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/

In old-school theory, you should not be using the big-big combination or the small-small combination. I'm not sure how much it actually matters, but running your set-up through the calcualtor above will tell you what gear combinations give you roughly equivalent gearing.

2008-04-14 3:12 PM
in reply to: #1337192

User image

Slower Than You
9566
5000200020005002525
Cracklantaburbs
Subject: RE: (Another) Chainring question for the cycling experts....
I know what you mean, but I can't explain it either. Sometimes a low rear gear in the big ring feels better than a high gear in the small ring...

*Eventually*, extreme cross-chaining will wear out components faster, but a small stream *eventually* became the Grand Canyon...

Edited by bcart1991 2008-04-14 3:13 PM
2008-04-14 3:20 PM
in reply to: #1337192

User image

Champion
10668
500050005001002525
Tacoma, Washington
Subject: RE: (Another) Chainring question for the cycling experts....

Actually, there is a difference. And the extreme propellor-heads can even say why that is and how much of an effect it produces.

But to my mind, the differences are WAY down on the scale, such that if I did one more high-intensity ride it would make more of a difference on race day. So I don't worry about it.

But do avoid cross-chaining.

2008-04-14 3:22 PM
in reply to: #1337192

User image

Champion
5575
5000500252525
Butler
Subject: RE: (Another) Chainring question for the cycling experts....

So assuming 53-39 front and 25-12 rear with 90rpm and 170mm crank

39-12  =  23.5mph
53-25  =  15.3mph

So basically ridingin both big front and rear and keeping the same cadence you lose 8.2mph.  If you rode 53-16 you would maintain 23.9mph so pretty close. 

Hope that make since.  I have heard some people say they stay in the small ring in front until they can stay around 20mph.  Personally I like to say where I have the most gears available in the back just incase I need to climb.  Sorry but I doubt I can explain this without actually showing you.  But I do prefer the front in the big gear.

2008-04-14 4:58 PM
in reply to: #1337275

User image

Cycling Guru
15134
50005000500010025
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: (Another) Chainring question for the cycling experts....
Yes, but you should NOT cross-chain like that.  All you have to do is put it in either of those gears and go look at it from the back, you'll immediately see why .......


New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » (Another) Chainring question for the cycling experts.... Rss Feed