General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Cycling Hydration Options? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2008-08-15 2:45 PM

Regular
134
10025
SF Bay Area, CA
Subject: Cycling Hydration Options?
I just have a road bike, no aerobars.  Water bottles are really a pain.  I hate reaching around and tilting my head way back to drink.  I thought I saw a photo of some sort of bottle behind the seat with a tube going up to the handlebars?  What options do you all use besides plain bottles?


2008-08-15 2:49 PM
in reply to: #1606916

User image

Champion
5117
5000100
Brandon, MS
Subject: RE: Cycling Hydration Options?

On a road bike with no aerobars you're pretty much stuck with bottles in the cages or a camelbak.

Why are water bottles a pain for you?

2008-08-15 2:59 PM
in reply to: #1606916

User image

over a barrier
Subject: RE: Cycling Hydration Options?
The Never reach system is what you're thinking about..........

Camel pack might be a good solution for ya
2008-08-15 3:00 PM
in reply to: #1606916

Veteran
159
1002525
NC
Subject: RE: Cycling Hydration Options?

I like camelbak for my long rides because you can carry 3 liter of fluid and not have to worry about refills and whatnot.  I did a half using a camelbak on the bike and it wasn't a big deal, although it isn't "aero."

 

2008-08-15 3:04 PM
in reply to: #1606916

User image

Bob
2194
2000100252525
Binghamton, NY
Subject: RE: Cycling Hydration Options?

Winston63 - 2008-08-15 3:45 PM I just have a road bike, no aerobars.  Water bottles are really a pain.  I hate reaching around and tilting my head way back to drink.  I thought I saw a photo of some sort of bottle behind the seat with a tube going up to the handlebars?  What options do you all use besides plain bottles?

The NeverReach is what I use and absolutely love it! It holds 64 oz of fluid and the bite valve works great so you're not sucking air before fluid.

2008-08-15 3:17 PM
in reply to: #1606916

Regular
134
10025
SF Bay Area, CA
Subject: RE: Cycling Hydration Options?

Oooohhh.  That nevereach system is really cool, but $100!  Well, I guess you get what you pay for.  I really like the "truly" aerodynamic bottle.  Not some fake thing that is pointy in the front.  Yes, it is true that a "teardrop" is much more aerodynamic than a "missle" shape.

Isn't a camelback uncomfortable?  Seems like you would get all sweaty on your back, straps rub on your shoulders, etc.



2008-08-15 4:39 PM
in reply to: #1606979

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Cycling Hydration Options?
Winston63 - 2008-08-15 4:17 PM

Isn't a camelback uncomfortable?  Seems like you would get all sweaty on your back, straps rub on your shoulders, etc.

I love my camelbacks (yes, plural. See my name...). The 50 oz is pretty minimalist, enough water for a couple of hours of riding without stopping, and not too big.  100 oz is good for longer rides.  It's a little sweatier than going without, but well worth it.  Occasionally I hang up the mouthpiece on my aerobars, but if I remember to shorten the tube, it's OK.

Shoulder rub has never been an issue on the bike.  On a run, the ones with a sternum strap help.

I usually ride with water in my camelback and some sort of electryte drink in the water bottles. Best of both worlds.

2008-08-15 4:41 PM
in reply to: #1606916

User image

Lafayette, CO
Subject: RE: Cycling Hydration Options?

While you do still need to reach for these bottles they do eliminate the need to tip your head back which I do like on busy roads or trails I'm unfamiliar with.


2008-08-15 5:54 PM
in reply to: #1606916

Regular
134
10025
SF Bay Area, CA
Subject: RE: Cycling Hydration Options?

Oooh.  A bottle with a built in straw.  Never seen that before.  I guess I need to get out more.  That is probably the best solution for me.  I don't mind reaching for the bottle, it is just the head tilt/tip that i hate.  Thanks a lot.

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Cycling Hydration Options? Rss Feed