General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Swim sets compared to endurance Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2010-01-21 1:23 PM

User image

Veteran
264
1001002525
Olathe
Subject: Swim sets compared to endurance
This may not be an easily answered question but here goes.  This is my first real season of training and competing and I am spending a lot more time in the pool as well as running.  I am up and capable of doing 2000 yrd swim workouts broken in to sets, but how does that translate to continous swimming?  I mean yeah I can swim a 2000 yrd workout but how is that preparing me for a 1500 meter or 1.2 mile continuous swim?
 


2010-01-21 1:33 PM
in reply to: #2626869

User image

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
It's building your fitness and, hopefully, your technique.  If you are not taking long rests between sets, you can build your endurance in sets just as well (perhaps better) than long continuous swimmming.  And you can typically focus better on achieving good technique within smaller sets.

That said, it's a good idea to do a few longer, continuous swims as you get closer to your races.
2010-01-21 1:33 PM
in reply to: #2626869

User image

Champion
7595
50002000500252525
Columbia, South Carolina
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
I'm not a swimming expert, but I'd say 'pretty well'.  I was in your boat not long ago, and until later in my IM prep, I did not do long continuous swims.  I did lots of sets of 100s and 200s, and 400s.  Later in the season, I did one long continuous swim per week.  I maybe did 6 or so of these, increasing the length each time.  Honestly, this was more for psychological comfort.  Those long continuous swims were much easier than the more intense sets (which probably means I wasn't swimming them hard enough).
2010-01-21 1:38 PM
in reply to: #2626890

User image

Champion
7233
5000200010010025
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
just to put some numbers to it, i swam for 2 or 3 years just doing longer intervals (500-800) and steady swims.

changed that to all shorter intervals (50-150 with a few up to 300 in), same total yardage or just a bit more, and i dropped my 2000m time by 8 min and my 1500m time be 5

i have swam over 500 in a pool in the last 2 years exactly 6 times.
2010-01-21 1:44 PM
in reply to: #2626909

User image

Veteran
278
100100252525
Chicago, IL
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
newbz - 2010-01-21 1:38 PM  i have swam over 500 in a pool in the last 2 years exactly 6 times.


Wow. This is officially my training nugget of the day to consider.
2010-01-21 1:46 PM
in reply to: #2626869

Extreme Veteran
502
500
Washington
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
i bet you could do the 2000 yards continous


2010-01-21 1:47 PM
in reply to: #2626931

User image

Champion
7233
5000200010010025
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
randomguymike - 2010-01-21 12:44 PM

newbz - 2010-01-21 1:38 PM i have swam over 500 in a pool in the last 2 years exactly 6 times.


Wow. This is officially my training nugget of the day to consider.



let me clarify, because that looks bad. total workouts are much longer than that. single intervasl are not,

i should have said i have not swam over 500 at one time, or in one interval
2010-01-21 1:52 PM
in reply to: #2626939

User image

Veteran
278
100100252525
Chicago, IL
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
newbz - 2010-01-21 1:47 PM
randomguymike - 2010-01-21 12:44 PM
newbz - 2010-01-21 1:38 PM i have swam over 500 in a pool in the last 2 years exactly 6 times.


Wow. This is officially my training nugget of the day to consider.
let me clarify, because that looks bad. total workouts are much longer than that. single intervasl are not, i should have said i have not swam over 500 at one time, or in one interval


I knew where you were going, I just always had one of my three weekly swims be a 1 x X,XXX set. Even in my ladder set, I usually had a 500 or 600 in there and at this point only going Oly for now, maybe HIM later this summer. Considering you're going longer & faster, something for me to think about changing up.
2010-01-21 1:59 PM
in reply to: #2626869

User image

Pro
4360
200020001001001002525
Baton Rouge area
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance

+1000 on what has been said.  Working towards my first HIM and basically substituing my Masters class for the swim portion of my HIM plan with some long swims thrown in.  The long swims are more mental barriors to push thru than an endurance issue.  Being new to swimming the thought of swimming a mile was a bit daunting.  After my first 1600m continuous swim I felt great and thrilled to have hit that mark.  After 1600 meters yesterday in my masters class I felt like I had been beat to heck and the coach was out to kill us (and we weren't even done yet).

2010-01-21 2:01 PM
in reply to: #2626953

User image

Champion
7233
5000200010010025
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
Yeah i think, unless you are swimming a lot (for triathletes upwards of 15-20k per week), the merrit of a long swim is really just for you to know you can, be ok doing it, etc (and there is nothing wrong with that), but from a speed standpoint i think you get very little out of it compared to the time you put into it vs what you could gain from intervals.

If you are going threshold intervals on short rest, you will end up getting in the distance, or logner, with only a few sec of rest, you can hold a faster speed for much longer like this, and not have form fall apart.
2010-01-21 2:02 PM
in reply to: #2626975

User image

Champion
7233
5000200010010025
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
GaryRM - 2010-01-21 12:59 PM

+1000 on what has been said. Working towards my first HIM and basically substituing my Masters class for the swim portion of my HIM plan with some long swims thrown in. The long swims are more mental barriors to push thru than an endurance issue. Being new to swimming the thought of swimming a mile was a bit daunting. After my first 1600m continuous swim I felt great and thrilled to have hit that mark. After 1600 meters yesterday in my masters class I felt like I had been beat to heck and the coach was out to kill us (and we weren't even done yet).



exactly. when i am actually swimming, those tough swim sets are my hardest workouts of the week.


2010-01-21 2:25 PM
in reply to: #2626869

User image

Veteran
264
1001002525
Olathe
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
Thanks for all the replies.  I guess I am just worried, the one tri I did last year was a sprint distance and I really struggled with the swim, now granted I have probably swam more this month than I did entirely before that event, but I just want to make sure that I don't struggle like that again.  
2010-01-21 2:44 PM
in reply to: #2626931

User image

Pro
4578
20002000500252525
Vancouver, BC
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance

randomguymike - 2010-01-21 11:44 AM
newbz - 2010-01-21 1:38 PM  i have swam over 500 in a pool in the last 2 years exactly 6 times.


Wow. This is officially my training nugget of the day to consider.

Yes, this is the same for me too. My 1 hour swim workouts (I swim with a masters club) are regularly 2500-3000m. I've been in this club for 3 or 4 years and we've swam a set of 400m probably not more than a dozen times.

2010-01-21 3:37 PM
in reply to: #2627131

User image

Veteran
139
10025
Metairie
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
I swam a great deal when I was younger.  I had a coach who was a sadist.  Even when we were doing 10,000 a day in summer two-a-days, our longest single interval was 800's.  We were FAR more likely to be doing 50's,100's,200's,400's.

During short course, I explicitly remember a fascination with 75 yard sets (go figure), I guess it just made you change things up some.

Now that I am doing Tri's and swimming again, I warmup with a 500, then after, I am somewhere between 50's and 300's 90% of the time.  That allows me to get out of the water toward the front end of the local sprint races (top 5 or so).

It all heads south from there.
2010-01-21 7:46 PM
in reply to: #2626869

User image

Bob
2194
2000100252525
Binghamton, NY
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance

I agree with David (newbz) that you do not NEED to swim the long swims. In fact, the only way to swim faster over a distance is to swim fast in workouts. The endurance training you get on the bike and run will transfer to the longer distance swims. That being said, I like to do some longer swims just for variety.

Typically, I start each workout with a 1000 warm-up. There are times that that warm-up turns into a 4500 yd straight swim. I tell people that are weak swimmers getting ready for their first triathlon to try to build your warm-up to the distance of your race. If you're getting ready for a sprint, try to build to a 800 yd warm-up. Think about it, if you go into your race knowing that you warm-up with this distance a lot of the pressure about the swim wades away.

2010-01-21 8:13 PM
in reply to: #2626869

Master
2460
20001001001001002525
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance

I learned about this "short set" training issue in swimming about 6 months ago, and (painfully) changed my swim workouts all to shorter sets of 50-200, and occsaional 400s. It's definitely working - I'm gradually accelerating in pace, after a lot of no speed increase. I had been doing some long continuous swims before that of 30-45 mins, to no effect on my swim pace.

Interestingly - I train at a pool with likely no competitive swimmers, and it seems that everyone else who actually can swim with a decent (or not so decent) form does long continuous swims of 20+ minutes, even when they look like they're going hard. However, the short set swim technique has done me good - I'm passing pretty much everybody who does these long sets now, regardless of time/distance. (Still got a LONG way to go, though!)



2010-01-22 9:09 AM
in reply to: #2627839

Veteran
277
100100252525
Syracuse, NY
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
I do one long, continuous workout and one shorter workout each week.

Really, the only way to swim fast is to practice swimming fast.

Which is why many people tend to favor repeating sets of shorter distances and higher intensity.
2010-01-22 9:16 AM
in reply to: #2626869

User image

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance

As others have indicated, I rarely swim over 400m in a set unless I am doing a test set (1500m).  My typical workouts are in the 2500-3500m range and will involve lots of time around threshold pace with short rest between the sets.  Your body will respond to the broken sets (assuming you are using short rest) as though it was continuous swimming but because of the short rests, you can maintain a faster pace to realize a bigger training effect.

Shane

2010-01-22 9:24 AM
in reply to: #2626869

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
Maybe I am doing something very wrong, since my results and training are very different.  When I take off time, my swimming slows to a crawl (haha - get it? crawl?  like the swim stroke?  never mind).  When I pick up again, I just start swimming distance.  This month, my swims have ranged from about 30-60+ minutes.  My time (I am slow - remember?) for 100 yards has decreased 15% - about 20 seconds when averaged out just since the beggining of this month.  My lap-lap times are more consistent, and I can tell which laps I zoned out too much as they are about 2 seconds slower than the ones I paid attention to my form.

So my experience is that I am improving significantly with long continuous swims.  Maybe I would be faster with shorter intervals?  But I am certainly happy with the results. Maybe it's because I am too slow to begin with, or because I don't have a coach, so I have to remember for myself what the plan for the day would be, and I am taking the easy way out (seriously, who besides a triathlete would say swimming for 1-1.5 or more miles is "taking the easy way out"?)

Edited by gearboy 2010-01-22 9:25 AM
2010-01-22 9:48 AM
in reply to: #2628588

User image

Regular
316
100100100
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
gsmacleod - 2010-01-22 9:16 AM

As others have indicated, I rarely swim over 400m in a set unless I am doing a test set (1500m).  My typical workouts are in the 2500-3500m range and will involve lots of time around threshold pace with short rest between the sets.  Your body will respond to the broken sets (assuming you are using short rest) as though it was continuous swimming but because of the short rests, you can maintain a faster pace to realize a bigger training effect.

Shane

As a wannabe HIMer struggling with the swim what would be a sample w/o per week???

2010-01-22 9:56 AM
in reply to: #2628620

User image

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
gearboy - 2010-01-22 10:24 AM Maybe I am doing something very wrong, since my results and training are very different.  When I take off time, my swimming slows to a crawl (haha - get it? crawl?  like the swim stroke?  never mind).  When I pick up again, I just start swimming distance.  This month, my swims have ranged from about 30-60+ minutes.  My time (I am slow - remember?) for 100 yards has decreased 15% - about 20 seconds when averaged out just since the beggining of this month.  My lap-lap times are more consistent, and I can tell which laps I zoned out too much as they are about 2 seconds slower than the ones I paid attention to my form.

So my experience is that I am improving significantly with long continuous swims.  Maybe I would be faster with shorter intervals?  But I am certainly happy with the results. Maybe it's because I am too slow to begin with, or because I don't have a coach, so I have to remember for myself what the plan for the day would be, and I am taking the easy way out (seriously, who besides a triathlete would say swimming for 1-1.5 or more miles is "taking the easy way out"?)


You're not doing anything "wrong".  Anybody who practices their swimming should get better and it doesn't really matter what kind of sets you use (or if you use any at all).  However, the most effective way to get faster is to swim faster.  Shorter sets have advantages in allowing you to both push yourself harder and still focus on maintaing form.  And they can build endurance just as effectively. 

So, yes, you would likely be faster if you started using some intervals and pushing yourself.  But, if you are happy with your results and enjoy it, there is nothing at all "wrong" with what you are doing.


2010-01-22 10:30 AM
in reply to: #2628690

User image

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
prieto539 - 2010-01-22 11:48 AM

As a wannabe HIMer struggling with the swim what would be a sample w/o per week??


Here are a couple, enjoy

400 ch (no more than 100 free)
6x50 drill
200 long, strong and technical
4x25 sprint on 1:00

40x50 on :50
16 as every 4th fast
12 as every 3rd fast
8 as every 2nd fast
4 all fast

300 ch (no free)

or

300 choice
4x100 drill as 50 drill/50 swim
4x75 descend on 25

4x{
300 T pace on 5:30
2x100 fast on 1:45}

400 choice

Shane
2010-01-22 11:20 AM
in reply to: #2626984

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
newbz - 2010-01-21 1:01 PM Yeah i think, unless you are swimming a lot (for triathletes upwards of 15-20k per week), the merrit of a long swim is really just for you to know you can, be ok doing it, etc (and there is nothing wrong with that), but from a speed standpoint i think you get very little out of it compared to the time you put into it vs what you could gain from intervals. If you are going threshold intervals on short rest, you will end up getting in the distance, or logner, with only a few sec of rest, you can hold a faster speed for much longer like this, and not have form fall apart.



I think it helps to do the occasional 1,000 yard set. It helps you as far as pacing, just the overall boredom level involved etc. I do mostly 100-200's but I like to throw in a 500 or 1000 once or twice a week.
2010-01-22 11:51 AM
in reply to: #2626869

User image

Supersonicus Idioticus
2439
200010010010010025
Thunder Bay, ON
Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
When you're out of shape, doing x thousand yards means you can probably swim maybe 80% straight.

When you are in shape, and you're not taking breaks between sets because you HAVE to, you can probably swim 200% more (300% if your life depended on it).
2010-01-22 12:12 PM
in reply to: #2627131

User image

Subject: RE: Swim sets compared to endurance
jeng - 2010-01-21 12:44 PM

randomguymike - 2010-01-21 11:44 AM
newbz - 2010-01-21 1:38 PMĀ  i have swam over 500 in a pool in the last 2 years exactly 6 times.


Wow. This is officially my training nugget of the day to consider.

Yes, this is the same for me too. My 1 hour swim workouts (I swim with a masters club) are regularly 2500-3000m. I've been in this club for 3 or 4 years and we've swam a set of 400m probably not more than a dozen times.



Add one more. But I'll add Spring - Fall we swim 1 to 2 miles in the ocean once a week. But over 500 in the pool? Unless I show up on a blown out Sunday to get a swim in and I am just too lazy to come up with a set, I rarely go over 500
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Swim sets compared to endurance Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2