General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Cost/Benefit Analysis of Equipment Purchases Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2004-05-10 10:53 AM

Veteran
162
1002525
South Orange, NJ
Subject: Cost/Benefit Analysis of Equipment Purchases
There's a slew of directions one can go in spending money to make the next steps in this sport. Obviously a new bike can be a huge and the most expensive investment, but there are others that are currently in range and I guess I would like opinions on the cost/benefit analysis of each and where you would spend your money and in what order. Just the basics end up costing quite a bit, between the bike being tuned, tri-shorts, jammers, running sneaks, prescription goggles, etc. The next steps COULD include:

wetsuit
aero bars
clip on shoes/pedals

Obviously the water temperature would need to be taken into account before anything else can be considered. In my case the swim is in a lake in CT suggested to have an average June temperature of 70, and therefore a wetsuit is not a necessity.

So it boils down to this: If I were to make a list of birthday presents that I want, what should I put on it and in what order?


2004-05-10 11:58 AM
in reply to: #23935

User image

Elite Veteran
748
50010010025
northern Illinois
Subject: RE: Cost/Benefit Analysis of Equipment Purchases
Personally, I'd do this....

clipless pedals
aero bars
wet suit

in that order.

But that's from your short list. If you need new running shoes, that's a safety/injury prevention thing and that should come first. Again, depending on your vision, I might put presciption goggles in the same category.

The reasons I put the short list in that order: Clipless pedlas let you get more oomph from each pedal stroke. You won't get more tired and you will be able to go further and faster. Everybody wins I really could be convinced to put aero bars first -so if everyone else thinks that's where they should go, I'll concede. They're pretty much for speed -which in my little world comes well after endurance as a goal. But, I do have aero bars and do use them -even though my speeds only rival Lance Armistrong's great-grandmother rather than Lance himself. I see some benefit to your arms and shoulders to being able to change position occasionally -safely and comfortably. In the water temps you mentioned, a wet suit probably isn't necessary. It may well BECOME necessary, but it can safely go third. That's my thinking, anyway.

ANdrea
2004-05-10 12:35 PM
in reply to: #23935

User image

Master
1902
1000500100100100100
Berkeley, CA
Subject: RE: Cost/Benefit Analysis of Equipment Purchases
My personal order of importance would be to put clipless pedals/shoes first. I don't have any of the three you've mentioned yet, and that has been placed high on my list, for all the reason that Andrea sited. Efficiency of pedal stroke=stronger, faster cyclist.

Secondly, I would put the aero-bars next, primarily because you spend twice the amount of time on the bike that you do on the swim. A wetsuit gives you a humongous benefit, but I figure, that I'm more likely to experience significant improvement faster in the bike, and comfort for a longer period of time would be better.

I think the benefits of a wetsuit are considerable, but the water temp where I race is endurable--so the primary benefits would be bouyancy (which also will reduce drag, which will improve speed). And really I have a greater hope of improving my bike leg!! (o:

You sound just like me, though!! I'm lining up b-day and x-mas presents for the next 3 years!!

Dana
2004-05-10 1:19 PM
in reply to: #23935

User image

Champion
4902
20002000500100100100100
Ottawa, Ontario
Subject: RE: Cost/Benefit Analysis of Equipment Purchases
Number one on any list should be the tri shorts because they save a good deal of time in the transition. But, you already have those so:

Clipless pedals first because they will give you more power per stroke on the bike which, in sprint triathlons especially, will reduce your time tremendously.

Aero bars come second because you can adopt an aero tuck with drop bars for the first few triathlons. Although not as comfortable as tucking in aero bars, your first few triathlons will probably be sprints which are not long rides.

And the wetsuit is third because you probably won't need it until next spring so you can put that one on your Christmas wish list.
2004-05-10 10:00 PM
in reply to: #23935

User image

Veteran
247
10010025
Subject: RE: Cost/Benefit Analysis of Equipment Purchases
I have to agree with the pedals. I just feel so much smoother with them.

It is a toss up for me on the areo bars and Wetsuit. If the swim is more then 1.5km I think the wet suit. You won't get a huge time benefit on shorter courses, because you need to get the darn thing off. Aerobars are nice, but I still spend most of my time in the drops. I am still getting used to having no breaks and less control with the aerobars. They do seem to help when I use them.
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Cost/Benefit Analysis of Equipment Purchases Rss Feed