General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Are running injuries directly related to body weight? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2012-04-13 9:40 PM

User image


353
1001001002525
Subject: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?

Do running injury occurences increase based on a person's body weight?

Aerobic and muscle/tendon/ligament conditioning all equal, would people in the, say,  180 lb range get injured more often than those in the for example 110lb range? Does it matter whether the 180 lb person is a 6 foot male or a 5 foot female (again, physical conditioning being equal).

What do you think? Posting your experience with injuries or lack thereof - and your weight - would of course be helpful.

I'll start. I am about 115 lbs; I've been a runner on and off for 9 yrs (took off 4 yrs from 2007-2011). Initially I was running about 20 mpw (2003-2006); recently back into it and right now at about 15 mpw. No injuries as of yet, knock wood!

 



2012-04-13 10:05 PM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Master
2855
20005001001001002525
Kailua, Hawaii
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?

I had read somewhere where for every pound of body weight translates to like 6-10lbs extra force on your joints -  hips, knees, ankles.

this isn't the exact article, but close..http://dougfioranelli.com/seminar-review/ucsf-sports-and-injury-rehabilitation-conference-recap-running-injuries-5/

2012-04-13 10:41 PM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?

I'd say it greatly depends.  Male vs Female will make a huge difference with certain types of injuries.  More weight will increase overall ground reaction forces, but then there's how you run and how that changes the impact force (your gait biomechanics).  Bigger people tend to have bigger ligaments/muscles which, all things being equal, should have a higher tensile strength, although this scaling effect isn't linear, then there's other properties of the tissues that come into play (elasticity/stiffness etc) which vary from person to person for a variety of factors including some I mentioned above. 

I, personally, think injury risk is more closely related with mileage and overuse, and all of the factors I mentioned above modify your risk.

2012-04-13 11:01 PM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Master
2563
20005002525
University Park, MD
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?

Weight is not the only contributor, but it certainly increases the risks.

Same joints +higher impact forces = higher injury risk.

2012-04-13 11:27 PM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Master
1441
100010010010010025
North edge of nowhere
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?

As already stated: it's one factor, but not the only one.

When I weighed 135ish pounds on my 5'8" frame, I experienced 5 stress fractures just about simultaneously. I think it was mostly because I'd not run much ever in my life so my body wasn't ready for it, but 90% of the other folks in the same situation didn't experience the same injury, so there has to be more to it.

2012-04-13 11:39 PM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Regular
184
100252525
Huntington Beach, CA
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?

Well I would bet it's form and over use.  I am heavy, especially on a 5'3" frame. (not going to put my weight) My husband and I started running in October 2010.  Although we were somewhat active prior (long time road cyclists), we had never been runners.  We are in our 50's so we took it easy and did NOT run every day and practiced smart increase in mileage week to week.   I did four 1/2 marathons last year and one this year.  I have never had an injury.

My husband who just qualifies for Clydesdale and is only like 5'9" and was injured in September last year, been in PT and has only started running again.   It's still hard for him, he feels it in his calves and bottoms of his feet.  In physical therapy they figured out from an old snow boarding injury where he broke his heel, he was overcompensating and not running correctly.  Most of his recovery was working on strengthing core and hips.

I still don't like to run and don't consider myself a runner, but it certainly is good cross training for riding and swimming.



2012-04-13 11:52 PM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Extreme Veteran
534
50025
Herriman, Utah
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?
No. I am at my ideal weight and am having a knee issue.
2012-04-14 5:10 AM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Pro
6011
50001000
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?
I wouldn't say they're directly related. I'd describe it as a risk factor. A greater weight does put more forces on joints and connective tissues, but it's not the only risk factor. Also, based on my experience with clients, the risk doesn't seem to increase linearly, but on a curve instead. In other words, I haven't seen a noticeable difference between people who weigh 130 pounds and those who weigh 190 (a 60 pound difference), but add an additional 60 pounds to 250+, and they seem to be much more common. Because of this, if I have someone carrying that much weight who tells me they want to run, I recommend weight loss as the highest priority and that they start with walking only, then working through a walk-run program that has very conservative progression, then eventually running.
2012-04-14 5:27 AM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Elite
3140
2000100010025
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?
It is always considered a risk factor if you are carrying extra body weight in relation to your height and frame. So its not based solely on scale weight but if you had a twin and the twin was 20 lbs heavier that would be a risk factor. However many things other that body weight need to be considered other than body weight. For exampleI have many thin patients with running injuries.
2012-04-14 8:22 AM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Expert
819
500100100100
Cincinnati
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?

When I was heavier, I never had injuries. I always kinda HURT when I ran, but I was never injured. Since dropping 35 lbs I've had a stress reaction and a few different varieties of muscle strain and tendonitis. However, I didn't try to run marathons when I was heavier either!

I think my flat feet and my stubborn streak have much more to do with my injury prone-ness than anything else. I am bummed, though. I consider myself to be more injury prone than others I know. Following the same training plans, I seem to be more likely to be injured. Since last year, I changed my shoes and changed my running form and felt much better - and got the same injury that plagued me last year.

I'm 5'5" and 135 lbs (carried mostly in the butt/thighs).

2012-04-14 8:44 AM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Veteran
178
100252525
, New York
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?
I agree that they're a factor, but not necessarily a large one.  I think training load and how training is done is a much greater factor.  When I was in high school I was 100lbs and got hurt frequently, but this was probably more due to the fact that I was racing 3x a week in track.  Now I'm 115 and haven't been hurt since recovering from a hip injury that took me out for 1.5 years, but I this time I slowly built up mileage and don't race as much.  


2012-04-14 9:17 AM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?
I agree it is a risk factor. But running poorly or too hard is probably a bigger risk factor. If you run within your limits you are less likely to get injured.
2012-04-14 9:49 AM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Pro
3804
20001000500100100100
Seacoast, NH!
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?
Running injuries are directly related to run fitness.  Run fitness is a combination of many things.  Weight is one of them.  Gender is not.
2012-04-14 12:11 PM
in reply to: #4149841

User image

Expert
1566
10005002525
Prattville Insane Asylum San Antonio
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?

I don't think it is the only factor.  I ran a marathon at my heavier weight, have since lost about 20 more pounds, and have had to change up my technique to avoid injury.  I have heard somewhere that for every extra pound of non productive body fat decreases your running performance by 1%.  

I think other factors would be strength and stabilization.  Some runners may carry extra weight, but their joints are able to compensate for the higher impact.  I would always suggest strength and flex training no matter your weight.  I also think you need to look at your strike and adapt your shoes.  It is possible to have a different stride with a little more weight on.  



Edited by ecozenmama 2012-04-14 12:12 PM
2012-04-16 7:54 PM
in reply to: #4149841

User image


353
1001001002525
Subject: RE: Are running injuries directly related to body weight?
Great fodder for thought everyone! thanks
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Are running injuries directly related to body weight? Rss Feed