General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2007-05-31 12:36 PM

User image

Extreme Veteran
395
100100100252525
Cincinnati
Subject: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists


2007-05-31 12:50 PM
in reply to: #824256

User image

Champion
6742
5000100050010010025
The Green Between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists
Story doesn't mention he was driving with a suspended license and under the influence of alcohol.
2007-05-31 12:51 PM
in reply to: #824256

User image

Expert
994
500100100100100252525
Dallas, TX
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists
If you want to get away with murder all you have to do is hit them with a car, be it a pedestrian, cyclist or another motorist. For some reason we don't tend to prosecute those who kill with cars very harshly.

2007-05-31 3:12 PM
in reply to: #824256

User image

Expert
1092
1000252525
Earth
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists
16 years for killing 2 people, WHILE FREEKING DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE.... WHAT horse #$&*@.  He apologized to the victims families.   Gee I feel SO MUCH BETTER NOW, knowing this guy feels sorry for killing someone.
2007-05-31 3:21 PM
in reply to: #824256

Elite
3130
2000100010025
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists

Well, we could argue all day about whether 16 years in prison is adequate justice for killing 2 people.

However, let's at least be thankful that this guy is off of the street and won't be killing anyone else for a while. And I would claim that 16 years in prison is a long time. Justice for killing 2 people while DWI? I won't say that, but I will say that some justice is better than no justice.

It's much worse to hear about those incidents with similar circumstances where the drivers are found not guilty or, worse, are not even charged.

2007-05-31 3:41 PM
in reply to: #824592

User image

Champion
10471
500050001001001001002525
Dallas, TX
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists
ScottoNM - 2007-05-31 3:21 PM

Well, we could argue all day about whether 16 years in prison is adequate justice for killing 2 people.

However, let's at least be thankful that this guy is off of the street and won't be killing anyone else for a while. And I would claim that 16 years in prison is a long time. Justice for killing 2 people while DWI? I won't say that, but I will say that some justice is better than no justice.

It's much worse to hear about those incidents with similar circumstances where the drivers are found not guilty or, worse, are not even charged.



Very true. I am even shocked this guy has gotten jail time for killing cyclists.

It seems that someone can mow down a cyclist and get no jail time.



2007-05-31 4:37 PM
in reply to: #824256

Extreme Veteran
422
100100100100
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists
Wonder what you would get if you shot 2 people while under the influence?
2007-05-31 4:58 PM
in reply to: #824291

User image

Master
3019
20001000
West Jordan, UT
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists

sebjamesm - 2007-05-31 11:51 AM If you want to get away with murder all you have to do is hit them with a car, be it a pedestrian, cyclist or another motorist. For some reason we don't tend to prosecute those who kill with cars very harshly.

The difference is that you are participating in an activity that is not intended to kill people, but did.  If you just murder someone your primary action was the killing.    45000 people die each year in vehicle related accidents.   I don't think we need to start sending all the drivers from those accidents (that lived) to prison.    It sucks when people get hit, but the vast majority of the time it truly is an accident.   The situations surrounding this specific case warranted extra punishment, but I don't think every bike death warrants a jail sentence.  

2007-05-31 5:03 PM
in reply to: #824744

User image

Expert
994
500100100100100252525
Dallas, TX
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists
tkbslc - 2007-05-31 4:58 PM
The difference is that you are participating in an activity that is not intended to kill people, but did.  If you just murder someone your primary action was the killing.    45000 people die each year in vehicle related accidents.   I don't think we need to start sending all the drivers from those accidents (that lived) to prison.    It sucks when people get hit, but the vast majority of the time it truly is an accident.   The situations surrounding this specific case warranted extra punishment, but I don't think every bike death warrants a jail sentence.  



I disagree; a lot of these people are driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. This is hardly an "accident". Even more are distracted drivers: cell phones, text messaging, kids bouncing around in the back, etc.
2007-05-31 5:11 PM
in reply to: #824744

User image

Master
1862
10005001001001002525
San Mateo, CA
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists
tkbslc - 2007-05-31 2:58 PM

sebjamesm - 2007-05-31 11:51 AM If you want to get away with murder all you have to do is hit them with a car, be it a pedestrian, cyclist or another motorist. For some reason we don't tend to prosecute those who kill with cars very harshly.

The difference is that you are participating in an activity that is not intended to kill people, but did.  If you just murder someone your primary action was the killing. 



Indeed, I think you've touched on the key element here; intent. Most drivers who get behind the wheel probably do so without the intention of killing someone else, regardless of whether they are drunk or sober. I'd be willing to bet that most of the drivers who are arrested in these incidents never envisioned themselves killing another person. Perhaps there's some denial involved where the driver chose to drive drink - the "it can't happen to me" mindset. Regardless, it doesn't lessen or excuse the impact of their actions.
2007-05-31 5:13 PM
in reply to: #824256

User image

Expert
994
500100100100100252525
Dallas, TX
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists
I don't know. My father impressed onto me from a young age that you are basically driving with a loaded gun.


2007-06-01 7:10 AM
in reply to: #824256

User image

Expert
798
500100100252525
Potomac, Maryland
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists
He  plowed into a group of ten cyclists and hit a car with two passengers in it. I'd say its lucky many more weren't killed.  Other articles state his license had been suspended six times previously.  Not to absolve him of anything, but it makes me think that laws regarding the privilege of driving are far too lax, at least in that state.
2007-06-01 7:38 AM
in reply to: #824766

User image

Crystal Lake, IL
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists

sebjamesm - 2007-05-31 5:13 PM I don't know. My father impressed onto me from a young age that you are basically driving with a loaded gun.

I agree with you.  I understand the other point that in GENERAL many drivers involved in accidents with fatalities are not intentional murderers and prison time is probably not appropriate.  However, I believe that the minute you get behind the wheel under the influence you have given up your right to classify anything that happens after that an "accident".  You intentionally got drunk, and you intentionally drove.  Anything that happens as a result of those decisions, therefore, was intended on your part. 

For the record, I was arrested for DUI and thank God that I was brought to my senses before I killed anyone with my behavior.  It was a wake up call.  That was about 15 years ago.

2007-06-01 7:42 AM
in reply to: #824749

User image

Champion
8936
50002000100050010010010010025
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists

I was gonna post something similar.  I'd venture to say that the vast majority are not accidents.  They're due to people being irresponsible with the privilege of driving. 

sebjamesm - 2007-05-31 5:03 PM
tkbslc - 2007-05-31 4:58 PM The difference is that you are participating in an activity that is not intended to kill people, but did.  If you just murder someone your primary action was the killing.    45000 people die each year in vehicle related accidents.   I don't think we need to start sending all the drivers from those accidents (that lived) to prison.    It sucks when people get hit, but the vast majority of the time it truly is an accident.   The situations surrounding this specific case warranted extra punishment, but I don't think every bike death warrants a jail sentence.  

 

I disagree; a lot of these people are driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. This is hardly an "accident". Even more are distracted drivers: cell phones, text messaging, kids bouncing around in the back, etc.
2007-06-01 8:47 AM
in reply to: #824256

User image

Elite
2796
2000500100100252525
Texas
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists

My experience (I fly patient's from maybe 50 DUI wrecks a year) is that the over-whelming majority of drunk drivers involved are serial offenders. Despite having multiple convictions, they keep doing it until they are behind bars.

Personally I think maybe a highly visible roadside gallows might be an effectve deterrent. "Have a few drinks, drive, and come hang out with us...."

 

2007-06-01 9:51 AM
in reply to: #824256

User image

Expert
1092
1000252525
Earth
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists

I don't know that hanging someone who kills while DUI is right, but then again.... People who drive under the influence generally get away with it because we do not have effective means to keep them out from behind the wheel.

Come up with an effective means, and likely you will have some lawyer take you to court and tell you their clients rights have been infringed.  Now tell that to the poor families that had to bury their husband, father, son, daughter, mother, sister, brother.... who's right to live were infringed.  The problem is chronic offenders generally don't have cash or assets, and they can't don't get insurance.  So if you are harmed, are basically in a tough spot.  You can't remove their ability to drive, because some idiot will "do them a favor" and let them use their car.

And part of my outrage is because we are in a society that seems to think "as long as they say they are sorry, it is ok."  While the guy's intent was not to kill someone, does that really matter?  I drop a brick from an overpass and it kills someone, my intent was to see how the brick smashed on the ground.  When it smashed on someone that was not my intent, but they are injured and/or dead just the same.  My wife was just recently hit while driving by someone who was drinking/drunk, thank God no one was horribly injured, but it ticks me off that we dismiss the results so easily.

We expect people to see the possible outcomes from their actions, why is it we dismiss that we someone gets drunk then drives over 10 cyclist?  I think if cyclists started pushing for harsher inforcement when someone is injured, that the states would start coming down harder on them.



2007-06-01 11:49 AM
in reply to: #824576

Expert
1113
1000100
Las Vegas
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists

wsm9363 - 2007-05-31 1:12 PM Gee I feel SO MUCH BETTER NOW, knowing this guy feels sorry for killing someone.

 I realize this was sarcasm...but even so, he doesn't feel sorry for killing someone as much as he feels sorry he's going to prison.  They should let him rot in there.

2007-06-01 12:08 PM
in reply to: #825179

User image

Expert
789
500100100252525
Lake Forest, Illinois
Subject: RE: Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists
hangloose - 2007-06-01 7:38 AM

sebjamesm - 2007-05-31 5:13 PM I don't know. My father impressed onto me from a young age that you are basically driving with a loaded gun.

I agree with you.  I understand the other point that in GENERAL many drivers involved in accidents with fatalities are not intentional murderers and prison time is probably not appropriate.  However, I believe that the minute you get behind the wheel under the influence you have given up your right to classify anything that happens after that an "accident".  You intentionally got drunk, and you intentionally drove.  Anything that happens as a result of those decisions, therefore, was intended on your part. 

For the record, I was arrested for DUI and thank God that I was brought to my senses before I killed anyone with my behavior.  It was a wake up call.  That was about 15 years ago.

I would ditto most of these comments.  My only addition to the conversation is that people should be able to make a mistake...once.  As posted earlier in this thread it is the serial offender I'm most concerned with.  I'm not saying you should be able to get away with killing somebody once.  I mean drunk driving in general.

Right now even if you lose your license the penalty for driving under a suspended license is a joke.

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Man Gets 16 Years for Killing 2 Bicyclists Rss Feed