login
Cambridge Analytica and FB
-
No new posts
|
 2018-03-20 8:25 AM |
Champion  10157    Alabama |  Subject: Cambridge Analytica and FBEvery time I read a story about FB I have to chuckle! First off on 'privacy'....I have said for years that anything you post on Facebook is public domain. If you don't want the world to 'see you', don't post on FB. If you don't care if the worlds sees you, post on FB. It's all one big conspiracy to get my money anyway! If I do a search for "Hayward Pool Pumps" within hours I see FB ads for Pool pumps! This is how FB and Google make money. That is how FB makes money. It's not just FB, it's Google and Amazon too! I have no problem at all with this. I'd much rather see ads for pool pumps if I am shopping for pool pump than ads for something like feminine hygiene products. What Cambridge Analytica did was brilliant IMO. Supposedly they used FB profiles to develop techniques for influencing voters. |
| 2018-03-20 8:52 AM in reply to: Rogillio |
Expert 2373 Floriduh | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Rogillio Every time I read a story about FB I have to chuckle! First off on 'privacy'....I have said for years that anything you post on Facebook is public domain. If you don't want the world to 'see you', don't post on FB. If you don't care if the worlds sees you, post on FB. It's all one big conspiracy to get my money anyway! If I do a search for "Hayward Pool Pumps" within hours I see FB ads for Pool pumps! This is how FB and Google make money. That is how FB makes money. It's not just FB, it's Google and Amazon too! I have no problem at all with this. I'd much rather see ads for pool pumps if I am shopping for pool pump than ads for something like feminine hygiene products. What Cambridge Analytica did was brilliant IMO. Supposedly they used FB profiles to develop techniques for influencing voters. They had a hidden camera of CA execs saying they could use their system to broadcast phony political corruption events which they staged themselves. This is not brilliant, this is corrupt. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/19/cambridge-analytica-... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/19/cambrid... http://www.theweek.co.uk/92390/cambridge-analytica-ceo-admits-to-di... |
| 2018-03-20 9:18 AM in reply to: Oysterboy |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Every time I read a story about FB I have to chuckle! First off on 'privacy'....I have said for years that anything you post on Facebook is public domain. If you don't want the world to 'see you', don't post on FB. If you don't care if the worlds sees you, post on FB. It's all one big conspiracy to get my money anyway! If I do a search for "Hayward Pool Pumps" within hours I see FB ads for Pool pumps! This is how FB and Google make money. That is how FB makes money. It's not just FB, it's Google and Amazon too! I have no problem at all with this. I'd much rather see ads for pool pumps if I am shopping for pool pump than ads for something like feminine hygiene products. What Cambridge Analytica did was brilliant IMO. Supposedly they used FB profiles to develop techniques for influencing voters. They had a hidden camera of CA execs saying they could use their system to broadcast phony political corruption events which they staged themselves. This is not brilliant, this is corrupt. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/19/cambridge-analytica-... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/19/cambrid... http://www.theweek.co.uk/92390/cambridge-analytica-ceo-admits-to-di... OK, brilliantly corrupt. Actually, I don't see corruption. "Cambridge Analytica is a privately held company that combines data mining and data analysis with strategic communication for the electoral process." This is what they do for a living. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/camridge-analytica-scandal-how-... |
| 2018-03-20 9:36 AM in reply to: Rogillio |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy OK, brilliantly corrupt. Actually, I don't see corruption. "Cambridge Analytica is a privately held company that combines data mining and data analysis with strategic communication for the electoral process." This is what they do for a living. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/camridge-analytica-scandal-how-... Originally posted by Rogillio Every time I read a story about FB I have to chuckle! First off on 'privacy'....I have said for years that anything you post on Facebook is public domain. If you don't want the world to 'see you', don't post on FB. If you don't care if the worlds sees you, post on FB. It's all one big conspiracy to get my money anyway! If I do a search for "Hayward Pool Pumps" within hours I see FB ads for Pool pumps! This is how FB and Google make money. That is how FB makes money. It's not just FB, it's Google and Amazon too! I have no problem at all with this. I'd much rather see ads for pool pumps if I am shopping for pool pump than ads for something like feminine hygiene products. What Cambridge Analytica did was brilliant IMO. Supposedly they used FB profiles to develop techniques for influencing voters. They had a hidden camera of CA execs saying they could use their system to broadcast phony political corruption events which they staged themselves. This is not brilliant, this is corrupt. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/19/cambridge-analytica-... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/19/cambrid... http://www.theweek.co.uk/92390/cambridge-analytica-ceo-admits-to-di... What is different about CA doing what is done on a daily basis on Twitter? Twitter is full of misleading information, and frequently outright lies. There is practically an entire generation who get their news almost exclusively from that venue.....of course there are others in social media. Of course the people propagating BS on twitter are not a company, but the results are the same.....is Twitter corrupt? Is the platform? Everybody seems to love the "information age".......I say wallow in it. |
| 2018-03-20 10:03 AM in reply to: Left Brain |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy OK, brilliantly corrupt. Actually, I don't see corruption. "Cambridge Analytica is a privately held company that combines data mining and data analysis with strategic communication for the electoral process." This is what they do for a living. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/camridge-analytica-scandal-how-... Originally posted by Rogillio Every time I read a story about FB I have to chuckle! First off on 'privacy'....I have said for years that anything you post on Facebook is public domain. If you don't want the world to 'see you', don't post on FB. If you don't care if the worlds sees you, post on FB. It's all one big conspiracy to get my money anyway! If I do a search for "Hayward Pool Pumps" within hours I see FB ads for Pool pumps! This is how FB and Google make money. That is how FB makes money. It's not just FB, it's Google and Amazon too! I have no problem at all with this. I'd much rather see ads for pool pumps if I am shopping for pool pump than ads for something like feminine hygiene products. What Cambridge Analytica did was brilliant IMO. Supposedly they used FB profiles to develop techniques for influencing voters. They had a hidden camera of CA execs saying they could use their system to broadcast phony political corruption events which they staged themselves. This is not brilliant, this is corrupt. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/19/cambridge-analytica-... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/19/cambrid... http://www.theweek.co.uk/92390/cambridge-analytica-ceo-admits-to-di... What is different about CA doing what is done on a daily basis on Twitter? Twitter is full of misleading information, and frequently outright lies. There is practically an entire generation who get their news almost exclusively from that venue.....of course there are others in social media. Of course the people propagating BS on twitter are not a company, but the results are the same.....is Twitter corrupt? Is the platform? Everybody seems to love the "information age".......I say wallow in it. Same can be said of MSNBC, CNN....and yes, even Fox. Anyone can say or write anything they want and call it news. I read an article yesterday on Yahoo news that stated factually that "Trump is wrong about the Mueller investigation being a witch hunt". That is not factual, it is someone opinion. Just as Trump's assertion the investigation is a witch hunt is an opinion. I think people just need to wise up and think! And decide for themselves if the 'news' - from whatever source - is reliable, factual, opinions or lies. Even a cow has the good sense to eat only the good hay and spit out the sticks. I was on the debate team in college and had to do our research on a variety of current events and cite our sources on note cards. The research was done in the library by reading magazines and journals. Now all you have to do is Ask Siri! I'd like to see how college debate are conducted now with all the information in the world just a few keystrokes away. And you can prove anything pro or con with the internet! |
| 2018-03-20 10:24 AM in reply to: Rogillio |
Expert 2373 Floriduh | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy OK, brilliantly corrupt. Actually, I don't see corruption. "Cambridge Analytica is a privately held company that combines data mining and data analysis with strategic communication for the electoral process." This is what they do for a living. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/camridge-analytica-scandal-how-... Originally posted by Rogillio Every time I read a story about FB I have to chuckle! First off on 'privacy'....I have said for years that anything you post on Facebook is public domain. If you don't want the world to 'see you', don't post on FB. If you don't care if the worlds sees you, post on FB. It's all one big conspiracy to get my money anyway! If I do a search for "Hayward Pool Pumps" within hours I see FB ads for Pool pumps! This is how FB and Google make money. That is how FB makes money. It's not just FB, it's Google and Amazon too! I have no problem at all with this. I'd much rather see ads for pool pumps if I am shopping for pool pump than ads for something like feminine hygiene products. What Cambridge Analytica did was brilliant IMO. Supposedly they used FB profiles to develop techniques for influencing voters. They had a hidden camera of CA execs saying they could use their system to broadcast phony political corruption events which they staged themselves. This is not brilliant, this is corrupt. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/19/cambridge-analytica-... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/19/cambrid... http://www.theweek.co.uk/92390/cambridge-analytica-ceo-admits-to-di... What is different about CA doing what is done on a daily basis on Twitter? Twitter is full of misleading information, and frequently outright lies. There is practically an entire generation who get their news almost exclusively from that venue.....of course there are others in social media. Of course the people propagating BS on twitter are not a company, but the results are the same.....is Twitter corrupt? Is the platform? Everybody seems to love the "information age".......I say wallow in it. Same can be said of MSNBC, CNN....and yes, even Fox. Anyone can say or write anything they want and call it news. I read an article yesterday on Yahoo news that stated factually that "Trump is wrong about the Mueller investigation being a witch hunt". That is not factual, it is someone opinion. Just as Trump's assertion the investigation is a witch hunt is an opinion. I think people just need to wise up and think! And decide for themselves if the 'news' - from whatever source - is reliable, factual, opinions or lies. Even a cow has the good sense to eat only the good hay and spit out the sticks. I was on the debate team in college and had to do our research on a variety of current events and cite our sources on note cards. The research was done in the library by reading magazines and journals. Now all you have to do is Ask Siri! I'd like to see how college debate are conducted now with all the information in the world just a few keystrokes away. And you can prove anything pro or con with the internet! Spreading knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Fox, MSNBC, CNN et al do have the FCC looking over their shoulders so they are somewhat guarded in what they can say on air. CA manufacturing stuff for public consumption and using FB data to conduct targeted release of this information, doesn't anyone have any ethics anymore? Jeez. |
| 2018-03-20 10:27 AM in reply to: Oysterboy |
Expert 2373 Floriduh | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB I'd threaten to ditch my FB account, but I never use it anyways so kinda a hollow threat. |
| 2018-03-20 10:39 AM in reply to: Oysterboy |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Spreading knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Fox, MSNBC, CNN et al do have the FCC looking over their shoulders so they are somewhat guarded in what they can say on air. CA manufacturing stuff for public consumption and using FB data to conduct targeted release of this information, doesn't anyone have any ethics anymore? Jeez. Originally posted by Left Brain Same can be said of MSNBC, CNN....and yes, even Fox. Anyone can say or write anything they want and call it news. I read an article yesterday on Yahoo news that stated factually that "Trump is wrong about the Mueller investigation being a witch hunt". That is not factual, it is someone opinion. Just as Trump's assertion the investigation is a witch hunt is an opinion. I think people just need to wise up and think! And decide for themselves if the 'news' - from whatever source - is reliable, factual, opinions or lies. Even a cow has the good sense to eat only the good hay and spit out the sticks. I was on the debate team in college and had to do our research on a variety of current events and cite our sources on note cards. The research was done in the library by reading magazines and journals. Now all you have to do is Ask Siri! I'd like to see how college debate are conducted now with all the information in the world just a few keystrokes away. And you can prove anything pro or con with the internet! Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy OK, brilliantly corrupt. Actually, I don't see corruption. "Cambridge Analytica is a privately held company that combines data mining and data analysis with strategic communication for the electoral process." This is what they do for a living. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/camridge-analytica-scandal-how-... Originally posted by Rogillio Every time I read a story about FB I have to chuckle! First off on 'privacy'....I have said for years that anything you post on Facebook is public domain. If you don't want the world to 'see you', don't post on FB. If you don't care if the worlds sees you, post on FB. It's all one big conspiracy to get my money anyway! If I do a search for "Hayward Pool Pumps" within hours I see FB ads for Pool pumps! This is how FB and Google make money. That is how FB makes money. It's not just FB, it's Google and Amazon too! I have no problem at all with this. I'd much rather see ads for pool pumps if I am shopping for pool pump than ads for something like feminine hygiene products. What Cambridge Analytica did was brilliant IMO. Supposedly they used FB profiles to develop techniques for influencing voters. They had a hidden camera of CA execs saying they could use their system to broadcast phony political corruption events which they staged themselves. This is not brilliant, this is corrupt. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/19/cambridge-analytica-... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/19/cambrid... http://www.theweek.co.uk/92390/cambridge-analytica-ceo-admits-to-di... What is different about CA doing what is done on a daily basis on Twitter? Twitter is full of misleading information, and frequently outright lies. There is practically an entire generation who get their news almost exclusively from that venue.....of course there are others in social media. Of course the people propagating BS on twitter are not a company, but the results are the same.....is Twitter corrupt? Is the platform? Everybody seems to love the "information age".......I say wallow in it. No, they really don't. Ethics are for people who get caught. Apparently, everything else is OK. In reading Twitter, because it's part of what we do, follow certain accounts, it is beyond obvious that intentional lies are put forth on a daily basis.....and the masses of idiots who use the platform eat it up. It's no wonder a company like CA can be successful targeting and swaying election results......the electorate is dumb as a box of forking rocks and believes whatever it reads. |
| 2018-03-20 12:27 PM in reply to: Oysterboy |
Champion 7553 Albuquerque, New Mexico | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Spreading knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Fox, MSNBC, CNN et al do have the FCC looking over their shoulders so they are somewhat guarded in what they can say on air. CA manufacturing stuff for public consumption and using FB data to conduct targeted release of this information, doesn't anyone have any ethics anymore? Jeez. Originally posted by Left Brain Same can be said of MSNBC, CNN....and yes, even Fox. Anyone can say or write anything they want and call it news. I read an article yesterday on Yahoo news that stated factually that "Trump is wrong about the Mueller investigation being a witch hunt". That is not factual, it is someone opinion. Just as Trump's assertion the investigation is a witch hunt is an opinion. I think people just need to wise up and think! And decide for themselves if the 'news' - from whatever source - is reliable, factual, opinions or lies. Even a cow has the good sense to eat only the good hay and spit out the sticks. I was on the debate team in college and had to do our research on a variety of current events and cite our sources on note cards. The research was done in the library by reading magazines and journals. Now all you have to do is Ask Siri! I'd like to see how college debate are conducted now with all the information in the world just a few keystrokes away. And you can prove anything pro or con with the internet! Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy OK, brilliantly corrupt. Actually, I don't see corruption. "Cambridge Analytica is a privately held company that combines data mining and data analysis with strategic communication for the electoral process." This is what they do for a living. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/camridge-analytica-scandal-how-... Originally posted by Rogillio Every time I read a story about FB I have to chuckle! First off on 'privacy'....I have said for years that anything you post on Facebook is public domain. If you don't want the world to 'see you', don't post on FB. If you don't care if the worlds sees you, post on FB. It's all one big conspiracy to get my money anyway! If I do a search for "Hayward Pool Pumps" within hours I see FB ads for Pool pumps! This is how FB and Google make money. That is how FB makes money. It's not just FB, it's Google and Amazon too! I have no problem at all with this. I'd much rather see ads for pool pumps if I am shopping for pool pump than ads for something like feminine hygiene products. What Cambridge Analytica did was brilliant IMO. Supposedly they used FB profiles to develop techniques for influencing voters. They had a hidden camera of CA execs saying they could use their system to broadcast phony political corruption events which they staged themselves. This is not brilliant, this is corrupt. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/19/cambridge-analytica-... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/19/cambrid... http://www.theweek.co.uk/92390/cambridge-analytica-ceo-admits-to-di... What is different about CA doing what is done on a daily basis on Twitter? Twitter is full of misleading information, and frequently outright lies. There is practically an entire generation who get their news almost exclusively from that venue.....of course there are others in social media. Of course the people propagating BS on twitter are not a company, but the results are the same.....is Twitter corrupt? Is the platform? Everybody seems to love the "information age".......I say wallow in it. Isn't this the basics of ALL "my opponent is a scumbag" election advertising? |
| 2018-03-20 12:57 PM in reply to: McFuzz |
Expert 2373 Floriduh | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by McFuzz Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Spreading knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Fox, MSNBC, CNN et al do have the FCC looking over their shoulders so they are somewhat guarded in what they can say on air. CA manufacturing stuff for public consumption and using FB data to conduct targeted release of this information, doesn't anyone have any ethics anymore? Jeez. Originally posted by Left Brain Same can be said of MSNBC, CNN....and yes, even Fox. Anyone can say or write anything they want and call it news. I read an article yesterday on Yahoo news that stated factually that "Trump is wrong about the Mueller investigation being a witch hunt". That is not factual, it is someone opinion. Just as Trump's assertion the investigation is a witch hunt is an opinion. I think people just need to wise up and think! And decide for themselves if the 'news' - from whatever source - is reliable, factual, opinions or lies. Even a cow has the good sense to eat only the good hay and spit out the sticks. I was on the debate team in college and had to do our research on a variety of current events and cite our sources on note cards. The research was done in the library by reading magazines and journals. Now all you have to do is Ask Siri! I'd like to see how college debate are conducted now with all the information in the world just a few keystrokes away. And you can prove anything pro or con with the internet! Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy OK, brilliantly corrupt. Actually, I don't see corruption. "Cambridge Analytica is a privately held company that combines data mining and data analysis with strategic communication for the electoral process." This is what they do for a living. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/camridge-analytica-scandal-how-... Originally posted by Rogillio Every time I read a story about FB I have to chuckle! First off on 'privacy'....I have said for years that anything you post on Facebook is public domain. If you don't want the world to 'see you', don't post on FB. If you don't care if the worlds sees you, post on FB. It's all one big conspiracy to get my money anyway! If I do a search for "Hayward Pool Pumps" within hours I see FB ads for Pool pumps! This is how FB and Google make money. That is how FB makes money. It's not just FB, it's Google and Amazon too! I have no problem at all with this. I'd much rather see ads for pool pumps if I am shopping for pool pump than ads for something like feminine hygiene products. What Cambridge Analytica did was brilliant IMO. Supposedly they used FB profiles to develop techniques for influencing voters. They had a hidden camera of CA execs saying they could use their system to broadcast phony political corruption events which they staged themselves. This is not brilliant, this is corrupt. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/19/cambridge-analytica-... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/19/cambrid... http://www.theweek.co.uk/92390/cambridge-analytica-ceo-admits-to-di... What is different about CA doing what is done on a daily basis on Twitter? Twitter is full of misleading information, and frequently outright lies. There is practically an entire generation who get their news almost exclusively from that venue.....of course there are others in social media. Of course the people propagating BS on twitter are not a company, but the results are the same.....is Twitter corrupt? Is the platform? Everybody seems to love the "information age".......I say wallow in it. Isn't this the basics of ALL "my opponent is a scumbag" election advertising? Not really, you will notice that they do print the source of any factual information that they site in those TV adds. Now is it an accurate betrayal of what was originally reported... This is why we have fact-checking websites like Snopes and Politifact, but that is only for the stuff that is obviously attributable to reputable information sources. I'm with Lefty, anyone who instantly believes what comes off Twitter, or FB or Snapchat, gotta be a fool. Then again 50% of our population has below average intelligence. |
| 2018-03-20 1:01 PM in reply to: Oysterboy |
Expert 2373 Floriduh | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Let me fix this : Getting paid to spread knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. |
| 2018-03-20 6:36 PM in reply to: Oysterboy |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB |
| 2018-03-20 9:33 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB It's coming.....watch and see. |
| 2018-03-21 6:47 AM in reply to: Oysterboy |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Oysterboy Let me fix this : Getting paid to spread knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Ala GPS Fusion? |
| 2018-03-21 8:05 AM in reply to: Rogillio |
Expert 2373 Floriduh | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy Let me fix this : Getting paid to spread knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Ala GPS Fusion? Umm, did they post the dossier on the web and allow it to spread? Nope. Also, much of that dossier has not been proven false. You can look for equivalency here but it is tough to find. |
| 2018-03-21 8:27 AM in reply to: Oysterboy |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy Let me fix this : Getting paid to spread knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Ala GPS Fusion? Umm, did they post the dossier on the web and allow it to spread? Nope. Also, much of that dossier has not been proven false. You can look for equivalency here but it is tough to find. No, they gave it to the FBI who used it as an excuse to spy on the Trump campaign! Worse than Watergate! |
| 2018-03-21 9:45 AM in reply to: Rogillio |
Expert 2373 Floriduh | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy Let me fix this : Getting paid to spread knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Ala GPS Fusion? Umm, did they post the dossier on the web and allow it to spread? Nope. Also, much of that dossier has not been proven false. You can look for equivalency here but it is tough to find. No, they gave it to the FBI who used it as an excuse to spy on the Trump campaign! Worse than Watergate! Are you writing Trumps tweets? |
| 2018-03-21 1:18 PM in reply to: Oysterboy |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy Let me fix this : Getting paid to spread knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Ala GPS Fusion? Umm, did they post the dossier on the web and allow it to spread? Nope. Also, much of that dossier has not been proven false. You can look for equivalency here but it is tough to find. No, they gave it to the FBI who used it as an excuse to spy on the Trump campaign! Worse than Watergate! Are you writing Trumps tweets? Sad. |
| 2018-03-21 1:33 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
Expert 2373 Floriduh | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Oysterboy Let me fix this : Getting paid to spread knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Ala GPS Fusion? Umm, did they post the dossier on the web and allow it to spread? Nope. Also, much of that dossier has not been proven false. You can look for equivalency here but it is tough to find. No, they gave it to the FBI who used it as an excuse to spy on the Trump campaign! Worse than Watergate! Are you writing Trumps tweets? Sad. Generally that is capitalized with an exclamation: SAD! |
| 2018-03-21 7:49 PM in reply to: Oysterboy |
Extreme Veteran 3025 Maryland | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Generally that is capitalized with an exclamation: SAD! Originally posted by Oysterboy Sad. Originally posted by Rogillio Are you writing Trumps tweets? Originally posted by Oysterboy No, they gave it to the FBI who used it as an excuse to spy on the Trump campaign! Worse than Watergate! Originally posted by Rogillio Umm, did they post the dossier on the web and allow it to spread? Nope. Also, much of that dossier has not been proven false. You can look for equivalency here but it is tough to find. Originally posted by Oysterboy Let me fix this : Getting paid to spread knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Ala GPS Fusion? FAKE NEWS poster rogilio can't even get his MOCKERY of my tweets right SAD! Little Rog might want to get his facts Straight. |
| 2018-03-22 7:29 AM in reply to: dmiller5 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by dmiller5 Originally posted by Oysterboy Originally posted by Rogillio Generally that is capitalized with an exclamation: SAD! Originally posted by Oysterboy Sad. Originally posted by Rogillio Are you writing Trumps tweets? Originally posted by Oysterboy No, they gave it to the FBI who used it as an excuse to spy on the Trump campaign! Worse than Watergate! Originally posted by Rogillio Umm, did they post the dossier on the web and allow it to spread? Nope. Also, much of that dossier has not been proven false. You can look for equivalency here but it is tough to find. Originally posted by Oysterboy Let me fix this : Getting paid to spread knowingly false and manufactured information for the purpose of swaying election results. Ok, maybe not illegal but entirely unethical. Ala GPS Fusion? FAKE NEWS poster rogilio can't even get his MOCKERY of my tweets right SAD! Little Rog might want to get his facts Straight. Dave, if you don't stop I will have Joe Biden come beat you up. |
| 2018-03-22 9:39 AM in reply to: Left Brain |
Extreme Veteran 3025 Maryland | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB PLEASE Malarkey Joe knows his FACTS. And would be on MY side. SAD! Brain is so uninformed he doesn't Know The Facts. |
| 2018-03-22 9:45 AM in reply to: dmiller5 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Originally posted by dmiller5 PLEASE Malarkey Joe knows his FACTS. And would be on MY side. SAD! Brain is so uninformed he doesn't Know The Facts. Bro, I'm worried about you....you seem to have found a way to channel your inner Donald.
|
| 2018-03-22 9:48 AM in reply to: Left Brain |
Extreme Veteran 3025 Maryland | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB i just try to tweet like an 8 year old having a tantrum |
| 2018-03-22 10:43 AM in reply to: dmiller5 |
Pro 6838 Tejas | Subject: RE: Cambridge Analytica and FB Uh oh. Dave is upset. |
|
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK