Other Resources The Political Joe » Collusion Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2017-11-02 12:31 PM

User image

Champion
10157
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: Collusion
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/31/politics/mueller-charging-collusi...

So after 10 months of CNN pushing the "Russian Collusion" narrative they finally came out and stated matter of factly, "There is no actual federal crime of "collusion" in this kind of investigation, even though the word is popularly used to describe possible complicity between Trump associates and Russian operatives who tried to influence the 2016 presidential election."

Co collusion is not a crime. Buying dirt on your opposition is not a crime. Violation of campaign finance laws is a crime but doesn't very serious. Now if the Russians offered to hack the DNC and expected quid pro quo that would be a serious crime in my laymen opinion (IMLO).

I guess what has been frustrating to me is the lack of an reporting on what EXACTLY are the investigators looking for? Blackmail? Bribery? Cash for influence? What criminal activity might the Trump campaign have done that would rise to a level to justify millions being spend investing. Please tell me after 10 months and million of dollars spend you have more than "lying to investigators" and crimes committed long before (2008!?) the election that clearly had nothing to do with the Trump campaign.

Just in case I have to eat crow later on....I prefer my crow blacked Cajun style with a side of fava beans....


2017-11-02 10:40 PM
in reply to: 0

User image

Pro
6838
5000100050010010010025
Tejas
Subject: RE: Collusion
Youre looking for actual collusion while the reporting on the subject is merely the illusion of collusion. Make sense now?

Edited by mdg2003 2017-11-02 10:41 PM
2017-11-03 7:40 AM
in reply to: mdg2003

User image

Champion
10157
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: Collusion
Originally posted by mdg2003

Youre looking for actual collusion while the reporting on the subject is merely the illusion of collusion. Make sense now?


So is your conclusion that the illusion of collusion creates confusion and delusion?

2017-11-04 8:52 AM
in reply to: Rogillio

User image

Pro
6838
5000100050010010010025
Tejas
Subject: RE: Collusion
Originally posted by Rogillio

Originally posted by mdg2003

Youre looking for actual collusion while the reporting on the subject is merely the illusion of collusion. Make sense now?


So is your conclusion that the illusion of collusion creates confusion and delusion?




To think otherwise would be delusional.
2017-11-06 9:49 AM
in reply to: mdg2003

User image

Champion
10157
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: Collusion
Originally posted by mdg2003

Originally posted by Rogillio

Originally posted by mdg2003

Youre looking for actual collusion while the reporting on the subject is merely the illusion of collusion. Make sense now?


So is your conclusion that the illusion of collusion creates confusion and delusion?




To think otherwise would be delusional.


For which there is no absolution.
2017-11-07 7:31 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Pro
6838
5000100050010010010025
Tejas
Subject: RE: Collusion
Yes, that is my conclusion.

Edited by mdg2003 2017-11-07 7:32 AM


New Thread
Other Resources The Political Joe » Collusion Rss Feed