Hate the new mini graphs...

I dont think they are accurate either.  In the "Planned vs. Actual graph" the planned graph doesnt match up with the Total Volume graph.  For that week, Ive only done the tri sports, so they should match.

-Rob 

I don't get it, I can't find any graphs that have changed. I even did a full refresh and deleted my cookies.

We're checking on this.  It was 3-D when we first came out with it, then due to some 3rd party software issues for the minigraph only, we took it to the flat view months ago for accuracy until they fixed it. 

Honestly I don't know why it's back to 3-D unless we fixed the prior issues.  Will check.

Pseudoyams, what about Planned vs Actual not matching up?  Can you give me an example?  The way all the planned vs actual graphs work is they are 'connect the dots'...so if there is a full week of no training, the line doesn't dip to zero for that week but goes to the next week.  We did this so if you are viewing the big AVP graphs with 'daily' increments, it seemed to clean it up a lot better.

Let me know and will update on the 3-D minigraphs.

Ditto here, easy to see on week 9/18 as the 3D total looks to be under 400 minutes but the actual is 408.  Verified same issue on the other weeks. 

IMHO, the 3D graph is ok, it needs less of a top down viewing angle.

 I was just using the planned vs actual graph as an example of how the amount of time I put in last week didnt match up in the total volume graph.  For example, the actual bar in planned vs actual graph reads almost 500 min, but in the total volume graph (the 3d one) its shows more like 425 or so.  during that week I only did tri specific sports, so the two should be equal.

Now that the 2d graphs are back its fine. 

-Rob 

Ok, we're back to flat-at least next time you log.  It momentarily reverted to the 3-D style that we had dropped when we were updating the HR zone stuff today.

Sorry.