Accused Sexual Assaulter POTUS Endorses Accused Pedophile for Governor (Page 3)

I agree completely.  I was chatting with a pretty liberal friend on FB last night who sees this as a sign that the Democrats are going to sweep every election going forward.  I mean, they won in a deep red state so everywhere else is guaranteed.  Um, the guy was dating teenage girls and people didn't want to vote for him and held their nose and voted for the other guy or didn't vote at all.  I don't think that's a platform for national victories.

I wasn't in Alabama, so I could be wrong on this but it doesn't seem like Jones campaigned in any way on a platform or issues.  It seemed to be 100% that Judge Moore is bad, vote for me.  In the case of a candidate who is actually bad that can work.

C'mon now, that's a bit hyperbolic.  Hell, the same was said about Trump's victory and just as over the top.  I guess there's sleeping giants all over the damn place.   

Nothing was awakened.......a degenerate was running for office......that's all.  If the GOP ran a decent candidate the result would have been vastly different.

I agree completely.  I was chatting with a pretty liberal friend on FB last night who sees this as a sign that the Democrats are going to sweep every election going forward.  I mean, they won in a deep red state so everywhere else is guaranteed.  Um, the guy was dating teenage girls and people didn't want to vote for him and held their nose and voted for the other guy or didn't vote at all.  I don't think that's a platform for national victories.

I wasn't in Alabama, so I could be wrong on this but it doesn't seem like Jones campaigned in any way on a platform or issues.  It seemed to be 100% that Judge Moore is bad, vote for me.  In the case of a candidate who is actually bad that can work.

Just read something interesting.  Democrats turned out 92% of their general election turnout number and Republicans only turned out 50% of their general election number and Jones won by 1%.

Some are claiming foul play, but I think it makes sense because the Democrats were very motivated at a chance to win in a state that they normally have zero chance of winning and the Republicans were very unmotivated about their candidate.

LOOK ROG y'all lost a senate seat for 3 years.  the dems put in the money and the work to take it from your child molester candidate.  which we told you would happen.  its a victory for humanity.

this would have been unthinkable very recently, alabama is blood red.  its a bit of a statement that the dems are able to get their base motivated right now, thats what people are talking about with this "wave" not that we think alabama is now blue, but that a lot of the closer districts are very much in play because dems are turning out to vote against this sh!tstain candidates like moore.

LOOK ROG y'all lost a senate seat for 3 years.  the dems put in the money and the work to take it from your child molester candidate.  which we told you would happen.  its a victory for humanity.

this would have been unthinkable very recently, alabama is blood red.  its a bit of a statement that the dems are able to get their base motivated right now, thats what people are talking about with this "wave" not that we think alabama is now blue, but that a lot of the closer districts are very much in play because dems are turning out to vote against this sh!tstain candidates like moore.

I would caution anyone, Democrat or Republican, from trying to glean any patterns from Alabama when it comes to support in other elections.  The identical same thing would happen if the Democrats put up a candidate in a heavy blue state who had a history of dating teenagers when they were 30.
The Republicans put up a flawed candidate.

I do also agree that Trump won against Hillary who was a very flawed candidate, but don't forget he also had all the sexual assault charges alegged at the identical point in time as Moore and he still won in an electoral landslide.  Would Hillary have won any states, had that not come out?  haha

The Democrats have an opportunity to bring forth newer and younger leadership to right the ship, but at this point they seem to be doubling down on Pelosi and Pocahontas.  It wouldn't surprise me in the least if Pocahontas were the nominee (or if Hillary were nominated again), because the only reason they lost before was from the Russian interference.  ya know

ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE?

It's Liberal ADD, that's all it can be.

Dave's post did actually peak my curiosity as to what was considered a "landslide" in the terms of the electoral college.  It seems the term is thrown around pretty subjectively, but most pundits agree that 375 or (70%) is considered a "landslide".

So Dave is right that Trumps victory wasn't really a landslide, but only a moderate butt whooping.  :-)

Agree that they'd definitely lose with Pocahontas or Hillary, but I can assure you the establishment powers that run the parties (R & D) will still throw them out there.  (Romney/McCain/Hillary)  The Super Delegates still hold the power in the DNC, so whoever the establishment favorite is, will win the nomination. (unless they change the rules)

I've seen some interesting names thrown around. 
Mark Zuckerberg: Definitely has the money, but his introvert personality just doesn't seem like he'd be a very good politician to me.
Bernie: I think he'd be an easy win for Trump, especially if the economy is still booming.
Biden: they're already running the creepy Joe meme's, so he might have a tough road in the sex charged climate.
Kamala Harris, I feel would be a really good candidate but she has an interesting "natural born citizen" issue because her mother was Indian and her father was Jamaican (neither US citizens).  However, she was born in Oakland and a citizen at birth.  (yay, another birther movement)  hah

Agree that they'd definitely lose with Pocahontas or Hillary, but I can assure you the establishment powers that run the parties (R & D) will still throw them out there.  (Romney/McCain/Hillary)  The Super Delegates still hold the power in the DNC, so whoever the establishment favorite is, will win the nomination. (unless they change the rules)

I've seen some interesting names thrown around. 
Mark Zuckerberg: Definitely has the money, but his introvert personality just doesn't seem like he'd be a very good politician to me.
Bernie: I think he'd be an easy win for Trump, especially if the economy is still booming.
Biden: they're already running the creepy Joe meme's, so he might have a tough road in the sex charged climate.
Kamala Harris, I feel would be a really good candidate but she has an interesting "natural born citizen" issue because her mother was Indian and her father was Jamaican (neither US citizens).  However, she was born in Oakland and a citizen at birth.  (yay, another birther movement)  hah