Election 2016 (Page 30)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2016-10-10 2:48 PM in reply to: dmiller5 |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by dmiller5 Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by dmiller5 From the Washington Post: The attack on Clinton has less to do with the fact that she defended an accused rapist and more to do with how she did it and what she said about the case later -- specifically, her efforts to attack the girl's credibility and allegations that she spoke callously about getting the man a reduced charge, despite appearing to suggest he had been guilty. Clinton went after the character and mental state of Shelton. She wrote in an affidavit that Shelton should have undergone a psychiatric examination: "I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing. I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body.” In other words, attack the victim. See the pattern? Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by tuwood Kathy Shelton, was 12 years old when she accused a 41-year-old man of raping her. A 27-year-old Clinton was selected by a judge to defend the man in 1975, and despite insisting she didn't want the case, she defended him aggressively. Eventually, the prosecution's case fell apart, and the man pleaded to a lesser charge -- unlawful fondling of a minor under the age of 14. “Of course he [the defendant] claimed he didn’t [rape]. All this stuff. He took a lie detector test. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.” (Both Clinton and the reporter laugh) Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain You are starting to sound like media and taking stuff out of context. You are mixing two different scenarios. One involves an 11 yo girl who was molested by an adult which is sad. And sadder still that someone unilaterally decided not to believer her. This is totally different than men being accused of date rape by another adult like Kobe Byrant was. Then it's a he-said/she-said and by your own admission, you are gonna side with her.....and he is guilty until he proves himself not-guilty. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by tuwood Wow, that is hard to hear about that little girl. Just seems like men are in a lose-lose situation. Kobe Bryant had sex with a hotel worker who claimed he raped her....but the case was dropped because she refused to testify.....but she filed a civil suit against him. The case was settled out of court but he admitted no guilt. When it comes to the rich and famous it is hard to imagine why they would rape someone. Power? Dominance? Sick in the head? Certainly not for sex as they can get that anytime. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain Yep, and that is exactly what the cops did. They assumed he was guilty and must have thought he would run too if he could. Most of the country had already tied and convicted 3 Duke University lacrosse plays of rape turned out to be completely bogus. Any time there is a civil suit but no criminal case I am suspicious. In my mind, if a woman is raped she should go immediately to the police.....not wait 2 years and then go to a lawyer and claim she was raped. I never understood why the woman Bill Cosby allegedly raped never went to the police. Being a man, I cannot think like a woman so there may very well be good reasons woman don't report rape.....but I honestly don't understand. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain Good friend of mine in LA 20-odd years ago was out clubbing and pick-up this girl. The were both drunk. They went out to his car and had sex. Afterwards she made some snarky comment. He replied back in kind with something like, "You weren't that good anyway. Get out of my car." After cussing him out good, she left. The next day at his work, 4 cop cars came screeching into his work parking lot and arrested him for rape. He was in the process of getting an lawyer when he got word that she was dropping the charges. So it does happen. What's the saying...hell hath no fury like woman scorned. Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by dmiller5 That's it? That's the one claim that Trump sexually assaulted any woman? Nah.Trumps a blowhard when it comes to women and sex....but nobody has ever accused him of assaulting them.He's a dumbarse, but he's not an abuser. Originally posted by Left Brain C'mon Stacers, not every independent woman is jumping off the cliff on this. I get the point you are making.....but can anyone point to a woman who claims Trump sexually assaulted them? He's a blowhard like most guys who run their mouths in an all male setting.....nobody cares or even pays much attention to them. his ex wife who testified under oath that he raped her for instance Well, he's currently being sued for rape. So there's that. His hearing is scheduled for December, which will be interesting if he's president elect. By whom? What's the source on that? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/ It could certainly be nothing more than an attempt to shake down a rich man. There's also a woman named Jill Harth who was a model in the 90's and sued him for sexual assault (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/20/donald-trump-sexual-assault-allegations-jill-harth-interview). She dropped the suit after Trump settled a separate lawsuit with her husband. So again, maybe just someone out looking for money. And finally Melania testified in her deposition that Trump raped her. The account she gave was not pretty. She then walked back her word "rape" after receiving one of the largest divorce settlements in history that included a very strict confidentiality agreement. So she either lied under oath to get more money, or lied after receiving her money when she was at risk of losing it. Thanks for the links....I had found others. Obviously, I don't know much about those cases, so time will tell. I can say that I've personally conducted or supervised quite a few rape investigations.........I learned long ago not to ever discount the victim.....they are rarely lying. I wish I knew more about this one. That would be a deal breaker for me. Came screeching in, huh? Was it a movie? LOL Look, any rape investigator worth his salt always starts with the idea that it happened. First, you will be right 90% of the time and, secondly, you can always work your way back .....it's really hard to work your way forward from skepticism and the idea that victims are making it up.....that's just wrongheaded. It was a different culture in the 70's & 80's when it came to sexual assault. Without getting too personal I was witness to an underage family member being sexually assaulted by another family member in the early 80's and she did go to the police and I was a witness (I was 10, she was 12). With both of us telling the truth the Judge still said the perpetrator (50+ year old guy) was a nice guy and probably didn't do anything and didn't even let the case proceed. Then the victim was shamed by the family for "making up" such a terrible thing against a beloved family member. The victim has had a very rough life since then and it's really sad. This is one of the reasons I get a little more miffed about Bill's escapades, because they happened during that era and before when women were not treated well when they were victims of sexual assault. We tend to take todays criminal system which is extremely tough on sex crimes (too tough in many cases) and overlay it back to that era. So if somebody wasn't found guilty or charged then they "didn't do anything". Read the bolded part you wrote......then read the sentence after it....then go back and remember that you had to write the bolded sentence because NOBODY BELIEVED HER. THAT'S the real lose-lose. Wrong.....it's not his job to prove himself not-guilty. It's my job to prove he is. And no, the scenarios are not different.......date rape is rape, period. The same way forcible rape is rape, or statutory rape is rape. I will now only refer to you as Rogillianderthal on this topic. LOL I agree completely with your statement, but in my experience when it comes to sex crimes the defendant has to pretty much prove beyond all doubt that he/she is innocent in todays legal system. If they don't have money to get a decent attorney then they pretty much have no chance.
so she did her job? her job as a defense attorney is to do that, sorry bro She knew he was guilty of raping a 12 yo child and she attacked the victim. "A lawyer cannot pervert the course of justice." |
|
2016-10-10 3:06 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain You are starting to sound like media and taking stuff out of context. You are mixing two different scenarios. One involves an 11 yo girl who was molested by an adult which is sad. And sadder still that someone unilaterally decided not to believer her. This is totally different than men being accused of date rape by another adult like Kobe Byrant was. Then it's a he-said/she-said and by your own admission, you are gonna side with her.....and he is guilty until he proves himself not-guilty. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by tuwood Wow, that is hard to hear about that little girl. Just seems like men are in a lose-lose situation. Kobe Bryant had sex with a hotel worker who claimed he raped her....but the case was dropped because she refused to testify.....but she filed a civil suit against him. The case was settled out of court but he admitted no guilt. When it comes to the rich and famous it is hard to imagine why they would rape someone. Power? Dominance? Sick in the head? Certainly not for sex as they can get that anytime. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain Yep, and that is exactly what the cops did. They assumed he was guilty and must have thought he would run too if he could. Most of the country had already tied and convicted 3 Duke University lacrosse plays of rape turned out to be completely bogus. Any time there is a civil suit but no criminal case I am suspicious. In my mind, if a woman is raped she should go immediately to the police.....not wait 2 years and then go to a lawyer and claim she was raped. I never understood why the woman Bill Cosby allegedly raped never went to the police. Being a man, I cannot think like a woman so there may very well be good reasons woman don't report rape.....but I honestly don't understand. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain Good friend of mine in LA 20-odd years ago was out clubbing and pick-up this girl. The were both drunk. They went out to his car and had sex. Afterwards she made some snarky comment. He replied back in kind with something like, "You weren't that good anyway. Get out of my car." After cussing him out good, she left. The next day at his work, 4 cop cars came screeching into his work parking lot and arrested him for rape. He was in the process of getting an lawyer when he got word that she was dropping the charges. So it does happen. What's the saying...hell hath no fury like woman scorned. Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by dmiller5 That's it? That's the one claim that Trump sexually assaulted any woman? Nah.Trumps a blowhard when it comes to women and sex....but nobody has ever accused him of assaulting them.He's a dumbarse, but he's not an abuser. Originally posted by Left Brain C'mon Stacers, not every independent woman is jumping off the cliff on this. I get the point you are making.....but can anyone point to a woman who claims Trump sexually assaulted them? He's a blowhard like most guys who run their mouths in an all male setting.....nobody cares or even pays much attention to them. his ex wife who testified under oath that he raped her for instance Well, he's currently being sued for rape. So there's that. His hearing is scheduled for December, which will be interesting if he's president elect. By whom? What's the source on that? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/ It could certainly be nothing more than an attempt to shake down a rich man. There's also a woman named Jill Harth who was a model in the 90's and sued him for sexual assault (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/20/donald-trump-sexual-assault-allegations-jill-harth-interview). She dropped the suit after Trump settled a separate lawsuit with her husband. So again, maybe just someone out looking for money. And finally Melania testified in her deposition that Trump raped her. The account she gave was not pretty. She then walked back her word "rape" after receiving one of the largest divorce settlements in history that included a very strict confidentiality agreement. So she either lied under oath to get more money, or lied after receiving her money when she was at risk of losing it. Thanks for the links....I had found others. Obviously, I don't know much about those cases, so time will tell. I can say that I've personally conducted or supervised quite a few rape investigations.........I learned long ago not to ever discount the victim.....they are rarely lying. I wish I knew more about this one. That would be a deal breaker for me. Came screeching in, huh? Was it a movie? LOL Look, any rape investigator worth his salt always starts with the idea that it happened. First, you will be right 90% of the time and, secondly, you can always work your way back .....it's really hard to work your way forward from skepticism and the idea that victims are making it up.....that's just wrongheaded. It was a different culture in the 70's & 80's when it came to sexual assault. Without getting too personal I was witness to an underage family member being sexually assaulted by another family member in the early 80's and she did go to the police and I was a witness (I was 10, she was 12). With both of us telling the truth the Judge still said the perpetrator (50+ year old guy) was a nice guy and probably didn't do anything and didn't even let the case proceed. Then the victim was shamed by the family for "making up" such a terrible thing against a beloved family member. The victim has had a very rough life since then and it's really sad. This is one of the reasons I get a little more miffed about Bill's escapades, because they happened during that era and before when women were not treated well when they were victims of sexual assault. We tend to take todays criminal system which is extremely tough on sex crimes (too tough in many cases) and overlay it back to that era. So if somebody wasn't found guilty or charged then they "didn't do anything". Read the bolded part you wrote......then read the sentence after it....then go back and remember that you had to write the bolded sentence because NOBODY BELIEVED HER. THAT'S the real lose-lose. Wrong.....it's not his job to prove himself not-guilty. It's my job to prove he is. And no, the scenarios are not different.......date rape is rape, period. The same way forcible rape is rape, or statutory rape is rape. I will now only refer to you as Rogillianderthal on this topic. LOL I agree completely with your statement, but in my experience when it comes to sex crimes the defendant has to pretty much prove beyond all doubt that he/she is innocent in todays legal system. If they don't have money to get a decent attorney then they pretty much have no chance. Tony that's just waaaaay skewed thinking, and factually wrong. I don't know how many rape cases are never brought to trial or even have charges issued......but it's probably 5-1 vs. those that do. (or easily more...and you never hear of them) I know damn well that the ratio of not guilty to guilty should not be 5-1, but it's a very hard case to prove in court. Especially when we are talking about a date rape situation and alcohol or drugs are involved. To say it's "her word against his" might be an accurate statement.....but if that's all there is, forget it......never going to get charges issued. |
2016-10-10 4:31 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain You are starting to sound like media and taking stuff out of context. You are mixing two different scenarios. One involves an 11 yo girl who was molested by an adult which is sad. And sadder still that someone unilaterally decided not to believer her. This is totally different than men being accused of date rape by another adult like Kobe Byrant was. Then it's a he-said/she-said and by your own admission, you are gonna side with her.....and he is guilty until he proves himself not-guilty. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by tuwood Wow, that is hard to hear about that little girl. Just seems like men are in a lose-lose situation. Kobe Bryant had sex with a hotel worker who claimed he raped her....but the case was dropped because she refused to testify.....but she filed a civil suit against him. The case was settled out of court but he admitted no guilt. When it comes to the rich and famous it is hard to imagine why they would rape someone. Power? Dominance? Sick in the head? Certainly not for sex as they can get that anytime. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain Yep, and that is exactly what the cops did. They assumed he was guilty and must have thought he would run too if he could. Most of the country had already tied and convicted 3 Duke University lacrosse plays of rape turned out to be completely bogus. Any time there is a civil suit but no criminal case I am suspicious. In my mind, if a woman is raped she should go immediately to the police.....not wait 2 years and then go to a lawyer and claim she was raped. I never understood why the woman Bill Cosby allegedly raped never went to the police. Being a man, I cannot think like a woman so there may very well be good reasons woman don't report rape.....but I honestly don't understand. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain Good friend of mine in LA 20-odd years ago was out clubbing and pick-up this girl. The were both drunk. They went out to his car and had sex. Afterwards she made some snarky comment. He replied back in kind with something like, "You weren't that good anyway. Get out of my car." After cussing him out good, she left. The next day at his work, 4 cop cars came screeching into his work parking lot and arrested him for rape. He was in the process of getting an lawyer when he got word that she was dropping the charges. So it does happen. What's the saying...hell hath no fury like woman scorned. Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by dmiller5 That's it? That's the one claim that Trump sexually assaulted any woman? Nah.Trumps a blowhard when it comes to women and sex....but nobody has ever accused him of assaulting them.He's a dumbarse, but he's not an abuser. Originally posted by Left Brain C'mon Stacers, not every independent woman is jumping off the cliff on this. I get the point you are making.....but can anyone point to a woman who claims Trump sexually assaulted them? He's a blowhard like most guys who run their mouths in an all male setting.....nobody cares or even pays much attention to them. his ex wife who testified under oath that he raped her for instance Well, he's currently being sued for rape. So there's that. His hearing is scheduled for December, which will be interesting if he's president elect. By whom? What's the source on that? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/ It could certainly be nothing more than an attempt to shake down a rich man. There's also a woman named Jill Harth who was a model in the 90's and sued him for sexual assault (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/20/donald-trump-sexual-assault-allegations-jill-harth-interview). She dropped the suit after Trump settled a separate lawsuit with her husband. So again, maybe just someone out looking for money. And finally Melania testified in her deposition that Trump raped her. The account she gave was not pretty. She then walked back her word "rape" after receiving one of the largest divorce settlements in history that included a very strict confidentiality agreement. So she either lied under oath to get more money, or lied after receiving her money when she was at risk of losing it. Thanks for the links....I had found others. Obviously, I don't know much about those cases, so time will tell. I can say that I've personally conducted or supervised quite a few rape investigations.........I learned long ago not to ever discount the victim.....they are rarely lying. I wish I knew more about this one. That would be a deal breaker for me. Came screeching in, huh? Was it a movie? LOL Look, any rape investigator worth his salt always starts with the idea that it happened. First, you will be right 90% of the time and, secondly, you can always work your way back .....it's really hard to work your way forward from skepticism and the idea that victims are making it up.....that's just wrongheaded. It was a different culture in the 70's & 80's when it came to sexual assault. Without getting too personal I was witness to an underage family member being sexually assaulted by another family member in the early 80's and she did go to the police and I was a witness (I was 10, she was 12). With both of us telling the truth the Judge still said the perpetrator (50+ year old guy) was a nice guy and probably didn't do anything and didn't even let the case proceed. Then the victim was shamed by the family for "making up" such a terrible thing against a beloved family member. The victim has had a very rough life since then and it's really sad. This is one of the reasons I get a little more miffed about Bill's escapades, because they happened during that era and before when women were not treated well when they were victims of sexual assault. We tend to take todays criminal system which is extremely tough on sex crimes (too tough in many cases) and overlay it back to that era. So if somebody wasn't found guilty or charged then they "didn't do anything". Read the bolded part you wrote......then read the sentence after it....then go back and remember that you had to write the bolded sentence because NOBODY BELIEVED HER. THAT'S the real lose-lose. Wrong.....it's not his job to prove himself not-guilty. It's my job to prove he is. And no, the scenarios are not different.......date rape is rape, period. The same way forcible rape is rape, or statutory rape is rape. I will now only refer to you as Rogillianderthal on this topic. LOL I agree completely with your statement, but in my experience when it comes to sex crimes the defendant has to pretty much prove beyond all doubt that he/she is innocent in todays legal system. If they don't have money to get a decent attorney then they pretty much have no chance. Tony that's just waaaaay skewed thinking, and factually wrong. I don't know how many rape cases are never brought to trial or even have charges issued......but it's probably 5-1 vs. those that do. (or easily more...and you never hear of them) I know damn well that the ratio of not guilty to guilty should not be 5-1, but it's a very hard case to prove in court. Especially when we are talking about a date rape situation and alcohol or drugs are involved. To say it's "her word against his" might be an accurate statement.....but if that's all there is, forget it......never going to get charges issued. Yes and no. Obviously you see a lot more of this than I do and there's no question there are a lot of people that get away with stuff so it's not cut and dry. |
2016-10-11 7:42 AM in reply to: tuwood |
Extreme Veteran 3025 Maryland | Subject: RE: Election 2016 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. |
2016-10-11 8:12 AM in reply to: dmiller5 |
Extreme Veteran 3025 Maryland | Subject: RE: Election 2016 |
2016-10-11 8:57 AM in reply to: dmiller5 |
New user 1351 Austin, Texas | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by dmiller5 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. Couldn't agree with this more. |
|
2016-10-11 9:18 AM in reply to: trijamie |
Veteran 1019 St. Louis | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Trump just tweeted that his shackles are now off and he can finally fight the way he wants to. Wait, what we've seen so far is Trump holding back? Where's my popcorn, this gonna get good! |
2016-10-11 9:21 AM in reply to: trijamie |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by trijamie Originally posted by dmiller5 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. Couldn't agree with this more. I don't know if there is a correlation between that kind of dumb talk and sexual assault. I've heard an awful lot of dumb stuff over the years.....not sure I could say everyone who said something was prone to sexual assault. Still, I'd be disappointed if my own son said those things.....because that's not how we raised him, and I think that's the most important thing. I could hear that stuff all day and I would never sexually assault anyone. Neither would you guys is my bet. |
2016-10-11 9:26 AM in reply to: tuwood |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain You are starting to sound like media and taking stuff out of context. You are mixing two different scenarios. One involves an 11 yo girl who was molested by an adult which is sad. And sadder still that someone unilaterally decided not to believer her. This is totally different than men being accused of date rape by another adult like Kobe Byrant was. Then it's a he-said/she-said and by your own admission, you are gonna side with her.....and he is guilty until he proves himself not-guilty. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by tuwood Wow, that is hard to hear about that little girl. Just seems like men are in a lose-lose situation. Kobe Bryant had sex with a hotel worker who claimed he raped her....but the case was dropped because she refused to testify.....but she filed a civil suit against him. The case was settled out of court but he admitted no guilt. When it comes to the rich and famous it is hard to imagine why they would rape someone. Power? Dominance? Sick in the head? Certainly not for sex as they can get that anytime. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain Yep, and that is exactly what the cops did. They assumed he was guilty and must have thought he would run too if he could. Most of the country had already tied and convicted 3 Duke University lacrosse plays of rape turned out to be completely bogus. Any time there is a civil suit but no criminal case I am suspicious. In my mind, if a woman is raped she should go immediately to the police.....not wait 2 years and then go to a lawyer and claim she was raped. I never understood why the woman Bill Cosby allegedly raped never went to the police. Being a man, I cannot think like a woman so there may very well be good reasons woman don't report rape.....but I honestly don't understand. Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by Left Brain Good friend of mine in LA 20-odd years ago was out clubbing and pick-up this girl. The were both drunk. They went out to his car and had sex. Afterwards she made some snarky comment. He replied back in kind with something like, "You weren't that good anyway. Get out of my car." After cussing him out good, she left. The next day at his work, 4 cop cars came screeching into his work parking lot and arrested him for rape. He was in the process of getting an lawyer when he got word that she was dropping the charges. So it does happen. What's the saying...hell hath no fury like woman scorned. Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by dmiller5 That's it? That's the one claim that Trump sexually assaulted any woman? Nah.Trumps a blowhard when it comes to women and sex....but nobody has ever accused him of assaulting them.He's a dumbarse, but he's not an abuser. Originally posted by Left Brain C'mon Stacers, not every independent woman is jumping off the cliff on this. I get the point you are making.....but can anyone point to a woman who claims Trump sexually assaulted them? He's a blowhard like most guys who run their mouths in an all male setting.....nobody cares or even pays much attention to them. his ex wife who testified under oath that he raped her for instance Well, he's currently being sued for rape. So there's that. His hearing is scheduled for December, which will be interesting if he's president elect. By whom? What's the source on that? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/ It could certainly be nothing more than an attempt to shake down a rich man. There's also a woman named Jill Harth who was a model in the 90's and sued him for sexual assault (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/20/donald-trump-sexual-assault-allegations-jill-harth-interview). She dropped the suit after Trump settled a separate lawsuit with her husband. So again, maybe just someone out looking for money. And finally Melania testified in her deposition that Trump raped her. The account she gave was not pretty. She then walked back her word "rape" after receiving one of the largest divorce settlements in history that included a very strict confidentiality agreement. So she either lied under oath to get more money, or lied after receiving her money when she was at risk of losing it. Thanks for the links....I had found others. Obviously, I don't know much about those cases, so time will tell. I can say that I've personally conducted or supervised quite a few rape investigations.........I learned long ago not to ever discount the victim.....they are rarely lying. I wish I knew more about this one. That would be a deal breaker for me. Came screeching in, huh? Was it a movie? LOL Look, any rape investigator worth his salt always starts with the idea that it happened. First, you will be right 90% of the time and, secondly, you can always work your way back .....it's really hard to work your way forward from skepticism and the idea that victims are making it up.....that's just wrongheaded. It was a different culture in the 70's & 80's when it came to sexual assault. Without getting too personal I was witness to an underage family member being sexually assaulted by another family member in the early 80's and she did go to the police and I was a witness (I was 10, she was 12). With both of us telling the truth the Judge still said the perpetrator (50+ year old guy) was a nice guy and probably didn't do anything and didn't even let the case proceed. Then the victim was shamed by the family for "making up" such a terrible thing against a beloved family member. The victim has had a very rough life since then and it's really sad. This is one of the reasons I get a little more miffed about Bill's escapades, because they happened during that era and before when women were not treated well when they were victims of sexual assault. We tend to take todays criminal system which is extremely tough on sex crimes (too tough in many cases) and overlay it back to that era. So if somebody wasn't found guilty or charged then they "didn't do anything". Read the bolded part you wrote......then read the sentence after it....then go back and remember that you had to write the bolded sentence because NOBODY BELIEVED HER. THAT'S the real lose-lose. Wrong.....it's not his job to prove himself not-guilty. It's my job to prove he is. And no, the scenarios are not different.......date rape is rape, period. The same way forcible rape is rape, or statutory rape is rape. I will now only refer to you as Rogillianderthal on this topic. LOL I agree completely with your statement, but in my experience when it comes to sex crimes the defendant has to pretty much prove beyond all doubt that he/she is innocent in todays legal system. If they don't have money to get a decent attorney then they pretty much have no chance. Tony that's just waaaaay skewed thinking, and factually wrong. I don't know how many rape cases are never brought to trial or even have charges issued......but it's probably 5-1 vs. those that do. (or easily more...and you never hear of them) I know damn well that the ratio of not guilty to guilty should not be 5-1, but it's a very hard case to prove in court. Especially when we are talking about a date rape situation and alcohol or drugs are involved. To say it's "her word against his" might be an accurate statement.....but if that's all there is, forget it......never going to get charges issued. Yes and no. Obviously you see a lot more of this than I do and there's no question there are a lot of people that get away with stuff so it's not cut and dry. And my experience is that the laws and processes are still tilted in favor of people who commit these crimes. Date rape is maddening to try and prove. I can't count how many conversations I've had with my teenage daughters on how to protect themselves.....because trying to get it right on the back end is a really tough deal. |
2016-10-11 9:36 AM in reply to: dmiller5 |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by dmiller5 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. Do you believe that pornography causes sexual assaults? Do you believe women dressing provocativelay causes sexual assaults? If you don't then how is it that you believe talking about women in a derogatory way causes sexual assaults? |
2016-10-11 11:34 AM in reply to: dmiller5 |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by dmiller5 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. You don't really believe that is the reason we have people like Brock do you? One could just as easily say when the sitting POTUS sodomizes a 19 year old intern with a cigar in an extramarital affair in the Oval office and it is brushed way, that is the reason we have creeps like Brock Turner. |
|
2016-10-11 11:43 AM in reply to: Rogillio |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by dmiller5 You don't really believe that is the reason we have people like Brock do you? One could just as easily say when the sitting POTUS sodomizes a 19 year old intern with a cigar in an extramarital affair in the Oval office and it is brushed way, that is the reason we have creeps like Brock Turner. stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. DOH!!!!!!! Rogillianderthal has awakened. |
2016-10-11 11:45 AM in reply to: Left Brain |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by dmiller5 You don't really believe that is the reason we have people like Brock do you? One could just as easily say when the sitting POTUS sodomizes a 19 year old intern with a cigar in an extramarital affair in the Oval office and it is brushed way, that is the reason we have creeps like Brock Turner. stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. DOH!!!!!!! Rogillianderthal has awakened. It's been hard to type.....by knuckles are all scraped up from dragging on the concrete. |
2016-10-11 12:25 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Seems like Wikileaks is going to be releasing about 1000 or so emails a day all the way to the election. I suspect they'll save the juicier stuff for later. Poor Hillary (oh, and please don't let there be a Hillary sex tape) please please please!!! |
2016-10-11 12:29 PM in reply to: 0 |
New user 1351 Austin, Texas | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by dmiller5 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. Do you believe that pornography causes sexual assaults? Do you believe women dressing provocativelay causes sexual assaults? If you don't then how is it that you believe talking about women in a derogatory way causes sexual assaults?
And what about impressionable young men, many of whom don't have good dads like I know you guys are, to teach them right from wrong? I mean really teach them. I think when you've got a person in a position of power who represents our country speaking like that, the cavemen, along with the racists, and the bigots come crawling out of their holes and feel like it's ok to talk the same way. When enough young men hear that kind of "harmless locker room talk" , yes I think that influences their decision making process. It's startling how many young people don't even know what qualifies as sexual assault. Is she drunk? Oh it's not a big deal then. How about leading by example by not even joking about sexual assault. It's not funny, it happens all the time. I'm not going to defend Bill and what he did either. Edited by trijamie 2016-10-11 12:33 PM |
2016-10-11 12:34 PM in reply to: trijamie |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by trijamie Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by dmiller5 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. Do you believe that pornography causes sexual assaults? Do you believe women dressing provocativelay causes sexual assaults? If you don't then how is it that you believe talking about women in a derogatory way causes sexual assaults?
And what about impressionable young men, many of which don't have good dads like I know you guys are, to teach them right from wrong? I mean really teach them. I think when you've got a person in a position of power who represents our country speaking like that, the cavemen, along with the racists, and the bigots come crawling out of their holes and feel like it's ok to talk the same way. When enough young men hear that kind of "harmless locker room talk" , yes I think that influences their decision making process. It's startling how many young people don't even know what qualifies as sexual assault. Is she drunk? Oh it's not a big deal then. How about leading by example by not even joking about sexual assault. It's not funny, it happens all the time. I'm not going to defend Bill and what he did either. You do realize you're making the argument that Christian Conservatives have been making for decades. It's the progressives that have been pushing porn, smut, and anything goes in our culture because if it makes you happy you should do it (public nudity anyone?). Next you're going to want to ban marijuana and get God back in schools. |
|
2016-10-11 12:50 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Extreme Veteran 3025 Maryland | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by trijamie Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by dmiller5 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. Do you believe that pornography causes sexual assaults? Do you believe women dressing provocativelay causes sexual assaults? If you don't then how is it that you believe talking about women in a derogatory way causes sexual assaults?
And what about impressionable young men, many of which don't have good dads like I know you guys are, to teach them right from wrong? I mean really teach them. I think when you've got a person in a position of power who represents our country speaking like that, the cavemen, along with the racists, and the bigots come crawling out of their holes and feel like it's ok to talk the same way. When enough young men hear that kind of "harmless locker room talk" , yes I think that influences their decision making process. It's startling how many young people don't even know what qualifies as sexual assault. Is she drunk? Oh it's not a big deal then. How about leading by example by not even joking about sexual assault. It's not funny, it happens all the time. I'm not going to defend Bill and what he did either. You do realize you're making the argument that Christian Conservatives have been making for decades. It's the progressives that have been pushing porn, smut, and anything goes in our culture because if it makes you happy you should do it (public nudity anyone?). Next you're going to want to ban marijuana and get God back in schools. if you can't see the difference between public nudity and saying that it is ok to sexually assault women, I'm not sure we can have a reasonable conversation. porn is difficult. I've seen and heard many things that make me think it negatively influences young men. I'm not sure banning it is the answer, but I think adults, and educators, and other people should be having a real conversation with young men about this. Part of the problem in my estimation is that we don't talk about sex in this country. Its a big taboo topic and young people learn about it from porn, or from older men bragging about it. this is why we can't let a presidential candidate off the hook for bragging about sexually assaulting and forcing himself upon women.
as to the bill Clinton comment. I think what he did was terrible. however, I didn't see him on stage saying oh boys being boys, and I seem to remember there being an uproar on both sides of the aisle about it. |
2016-10-11 1:04 PM in reply to: dmiller5 |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by dmiller5 Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by trijamie Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by dmiller5 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. Do you believe that pornography causes sexual assaults? Do you believe women dressing provocativelay causes sexual assaults? If you don't then how is it that you believe talking about women in a derogatory way causes sexual assaults?
And what about impressionable young men, many of which don't have good dads like I know you guys are, to teach them right from wrong? I mean really teach them. I think when you've got a person in a position of power who represents our country speaking like that, the cavemen, along with the racists, and the bigots come crawling out of their holes and feel like it's ok to talk the same way. When enough young men hear that kind of "harmless locker room talk" , yes I think that influences their decision making process. It's startling how many young people don't even know what qualifies as sexual assault. Is she drunk? Oh it's not a big deal then. How about leading by example by not even joking about sexual assault. It's not funny, it happens all the time. I'm not going to defend Bill and what he did either. You do realize you're making the argument that Christian Conservatives have been making for decades. It's the progressives that have been pushing porn, smut, and anything goes in our culture because if it makes you happy you should do it (public nudity anyone?). Next you're going to want to ban marijuana and get God back in schools. if you can't see the difference between public nudity and saying that it is ok to sexually assault women, I'm not sure we can have a reasonable conversation. porn is difficult. I've seen and heard many things that make me think it negatively influences young men. I'm not sure banning it is the answer, but I think adults, and educators, and other people should be having a real conversation with young men about this. Part of the problem in my estimation is that we don't talk about sex in this country. Its a big taboo topic and young people learn about it from porn, or from older men bragging about it. this is why we can't let a presidential candidate off the hook for bragging about sexually assaulting and forcing himself upon women.
as to the bill Clinton comment. I think what he did was terrible. however, I didn't see him on stage saying oh boys being boys, and I seem to remember there being an uproar on both sides of the aisle about it. The key difference is one was billionaire playboy at the time and one was the sitting president of the United States at the time. One was physical acts and the other was talk. One there was semen stained dress and one there was audio of a guy bragging to two other guys. There was uproar for a while.....but mainly because he perjured himself. That is what he was impeached for. That is why he lost his law license. Many people brushed off the sexual assault on a subordinate saying it was consensual and therefore not assault and the infidelity was between him and Hillary. Had any CEO in the country done what he had done to an intern he would have been fired and sued. |
2016-10-11 1:16 PM in reply to: 0 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by dmiller5 Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by trijamie Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by dmiller5 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. Do you believe that pornography causes sexual assaults? Do you believe women dressing provocativelay causes sexual assaults? If you don't then how is it that you believe talking about women in a derogatory way causes sexual assaults?
And what about impressionable young men, many of which don't have good dads like I know you guys are, to teach them right from wrong? I mean really teach them. I think when you've got a person in a position of power who represents our country speaking like that, the cavemen, along with the racists, and the bigots come crawling out of their holes and feel like it's ok to talk the same way. When enough young men hear that kind of "harmless locker room talk" , yes I think that influences their decision making process. It's startling how many young people don't even know what qualifies as sexual assault. Is she drunk? Oh it's not a big deal then. How about leading by example by not even joking about sexual assault. It's not funny, it happens all the time. I'm not going to defend Bill and what he did either. You do realize you're making the argument that Christian Conservatives have been making for decades. It's the progressives that have been pushing porn, smut, and anything goes in our culture because if it makes you happy you should do it (public nudity anyone?). Next you're going to want to ban marijuana and get God back in schools. if you can't see the difference between public nudity and saying that it is ok to sexually assault women, I'm not sure we can have a reasonable conversation. porn is difficult. I've seen and heard many things that make me think it negatively influences young men. I'm not sure banning it is the answer, but I think adults, and educators, and other people should be having a real conversation with young men about this. Part of the problem in my estimation is that we don't talk about sex in this country. Its a big taboo topic and young people learn about it from porn, or from older men bragging about it. this is why we can't let a presidential candidate off the hook for bragging about sexually assaulting and forcing himself upon women.
as to the bill Clinton comment. I think what he did was terrible. however, I didn't see him on stage saying oh boys being boys, and I seem to remember there being an uproar on both sides of the aisle about it. Nah....he was funnier.....he said, "it depends on what your definition of Is is." LMAO Same thing. I know the point you're making....and I won't argue it. For me it's hard to get behind because I see all of these things as personal responsibility issues. I teach my kids right and wrong. I try to send them on their way with a decent moral compass. I don't know how many conversations I had with Jr. over the summer about respect and girls and alcohol and sex. I'm sure I wore him out. (I know it wore me out) In that regard I tend to look at things that someone like Trump says as, Meh, whatever......another guy being a dope. I'm doing my job regardless.....and even used that idiot as an example of what can happen if you're stupid. Still.....I don't expect the President to be anything outside of someone who can keep the ship afloat and moving forward.....and I think Trump beats HIllary in that regard. I think she's dangerous....the same way President Obama has been. Trump doesn't scare me any more then Bill Clinton, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, etc......who ALL had outside affairs, lied, etc. I don't care......not my business. Now.....just sit back, watch Trump lose his forking mind, and enjoy the show. I think you guys win this one. Edited by Left Brain 2016-10-11 1:24 PM |
2016-10-11 1:45 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by dmiller5 Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by trijamie Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by dmiller5 stolen from the internet but.
Dismissing Trump's behavior as locker room talk is the reason we have young men like Brock Turner. Do you believe that pornography causes sexual assaults? Do you believe women dressing provocativelay causes sexual assaults? If you don't then how is it that you believe talking about women in a derogatory way causes sexual assaults?
And what about impressionable young men, many of which don't have good dads like I know you guys are, to teach them right from wrong? I mean really teach them. I think when you've got a person in a position of power who represents our country speaking like that, the cavemen, along with the racists, and the bigots come crawling out of their holes and feel like it's ok to talk the same way. When enough young men hear that kind of "harmless locker room talk" , yes I think that influences their decision making process. It's startling how many young people don't even know what qualifies as sexual assault. Is she drunk? Oh it's not a big deal then. How about leading by example by not even joking about sexual assault. It's not funny, it happens all the time. I'm not going to defend Bill and what he did either. You do realize you're making the argument that Christian Conservatives have been making for decades. It's the progressives that have been pushing porn, smut, and anything goes in our culture because if it makes you happy you should do it (public nudity anyone?). Next you're going to want to ban marijuana and get God back in schools. if you can't see the difference between public nudity and saying that it is ok to sexually assault women, I'm not sure we can have a reasonable conversation. porn is difficult. I've seen and heard many things that make me think it negatively influences young men. I'm not sure banning it is the answer, but I think adults, and educators, and other people should be having a real conversation with young men about this. Part of the problem in my estimation is that we don't talk about sex in this country. Its a big taboo topic and young people learn about it from porn, or from older men bragging about it. this is why we can't let a presidential candidate off the hook for bragging about sexually assaulting and forcing himself upon women.
as to the bill Clinton comment. I think what he did was terrible. however, I didn't see him on stage saying oh boys being boys, and I seem to remember there being an uproar on both sides of the aisle about it. Nah....he was funnier.....he said, "it depends on what your definition of Is is." LMAO Same thing. I know the point you're making....and I won't argue it. For me it's hard to get behind because I see all of these things as personal responsibility issues. I teach my kids right and wrong. I try to send them on their way with a decent moral compass. I don't know how many conversations I had with Jr. over the summer about respect and girls and alcohol and sex. I'm sure I wore him out. (I know it wore me out) In that regard I tend to look at things that someone like Trump says as, Meh, whatever......another guy being a dope. I'm doing my job regardless.....and even used that idiot as an example of what can happen if you're stupid. Still.....I don't expect the President to be anything outside of someone who can keep the ship afloat and moving forward.....and I think Trump beats HIllary in that regard. I think she's dangerous. Trump doesn't scare me any more then Bill Clinton, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, etc......who ALL had outside affairs, lied, etc. I don't care......not my business. Now.....just sit back, watch Trump lose his forking mind, and enjoy the show. I think you guys win this one. I'm starting to think Hillary is going to win....unless there is some huge bombshell that comes out in her email. So far the media is downplaying most of the leaks. My biggest fear is the country is going to implode under it's own debt and entitlements. 94 million people don't work in this country! We will end up having to use austerity measures to keep from going under and there will be riots in the streets. There is racial tension in the country....an anti-cop movement....and radical Muslims everywhere trying to kill Americans. I've watched things slowly go downhill for the last 20 years and Hillary is gonna give us another 8 years of the same.....if we last that long. People laugh at the possibility of a second US Civil War but I don't think it is as far-fetched as people think it is. It would start with riots and just spiral out of control. Someone takes out a large part of the power grid this interrupts the supply of gas which mean trucks shut down for lack of fuel, within 2 weeks people are starving in the inner cities and chaos follows....the NG is activated.....marshal law is declared.....militias are formed to protect property and food....maybe of the guys in the NG won't shoot the guy he went to HS with......military order breaks down. Side note, I have a neighbor that raises hogs out in the county to the west of us. In 1999 he put up a fence across the dirt road that to goes back to where his hogs are. The road is not even his property! I asked him why he put the fence up and he said he was worried about Y2K and what would happen should the power grid fail and banks fail and food shortage start happening.....he was preparing to protect his pigs expecting famine! I concluded he was a nut.......but I also know a lot of people who have 10,000 rds of various ammo stockpiled in their house. These are relatively sane people! I'm not really sure what they are expecting but they are prepared should push come to shove. OK, this may be the most draconian political post evah! :-) I will vote for Trump and hope for the best.....gonna pick up another couple hundred rounds at Cabala's on the drive home tonight. :-) |
2016-10-11 2:28 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
Oakville | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Rogillio I'm starting to think Hillary is going to win. If I was a Republican and Trump ends up losing, I would be might pissed at my party. After the Romney loss and the RNC's post-election autopsy report, it was concluded that in order to win in 2016 the party would have to broaden its base and attract more minority and women voters. How Republicans felt that Trump is the candidate to achieve that goal is beyond me. I believe it was in Trump's presidential announcement speech that he referred to illegal Mexican immigrants as criminals, drug dealers and rapists. If the RNC has any hope of electing a Republican president in 2020 (or ever for that matter), they need to listen to their own recommendations and nominate a candidate that is appealing to all voters. With hindsight being 20/20, I wonder how Kasich or Cruz would be polling right now? |
|
2016-10-11 2:38 PM in reply to: Scott71 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Scott71 Originally posted by Rogillio I'm starting to think Hillary is going to win. If I was a Republican and Trump ends up losing, I would be might pissed at my party. After the Romney loss and the RNC's post-election autopsy report, it was concluded that in order to win in 2016 the party would have to broaden its base and attract more minority and women voters. How Republicans felt that Trump is the candidate to achieve that goal is beyond me. I believe it was in Trump's presidential announcement speech that he referred to illegal Mexican immigrants as criminals, drug dealers and rapists. If the RNC has any hope of electing a Republican president in 2020 (or ever for that matter), they need to listen to their own recommendations and nominate a candidate that is appealing to all voters. With hindsight being 20/20, I wonder how Kasich or Cruz would be polling right now? Or they can always block highways, burn cars and businesses, and generally disrupt people just going about their lives.......that seems to work ok. This election might be over for the republicans.....but this is not nearly over with for our country. You DO notice how Hillary can barely squeak by against a complete dumbarse right? You think she can right the ship?? LMAO |
2016-10-11 3:20 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
Master 5557 , California | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Rogillio Originally posted by spudone Sure he is. And a lot of people are voting for a Clinton 3rd term. Bill's been accused by multiple women of sexual assault. Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. Trump's also been accused by multiple women. Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. Only Trump, Clinton, and their accusers really know. I just find it ridiculously hypocritical for Trump to be attacking Bill given his own accusations. ... and the fact that Bill isn't running for president I'll refer you back to your own comment here, since Bill was the last one to run the country at a budget surplus :P |
2016-10-11 3:25 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
Master 5557 , California | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Rogillio I'm starting to think Hillary is going to win....unless there is some huge bombshell that comes out in her email. So far the media is downplaying most of the leaks. My biggest fear is the country is going to implode under it's own debt and entitlements. 94 million people don't work in this country! We will end up having to use austerity measures to keep from going under and there will be riots in the streets. There is racial tension in the country....an anti-cop movement....and radical Muslims everywhere trying to kill Americans. I've watched things slowly go downhill for the last 20 years and Hillary is gonna give us another 8 years of the same.....if we last that long. and maybe re-read this: please, follow these steps: 1. Pick up the TV remote 2. Turn off Fox News 3. Emerge from your panic room/bunker 4. Go outside and throw a frisbee or something. The world isn't as scary as you think (and constantly read right-wing articles to reinforce) it is.
|
2016-10-11 3:34 PM in reply to: Scott71 |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Scott71 Originally posted by Rogillio I'm starting to think Hillary is going to win. If I was a Republican and Trump ends up losing, I would be might pissed at my party. After the Romney loss and the RNC's post-election autopsy report, it was concluded that in order to win in 2016 the party would have to broaden its base and attract more minority and women voters. How Republicans felt that Trump is the candidate to achieve that goal is beyond me. I believe it was in Trump's presidential announcement speech that he referred to illegal Mexican immigrants as criminals, drug dealers and rapists. If the RNC has any hope of electing a Republican president in 2020 (or ever for that matter), they need to listen to their own recommendations and nominate a candidate that is appealing to all voters. With hindsight being 20/20, I wonder how Kasich or Cruz would be polling right now? If you're going to disparagingly quote Trump at least be accurate. He has never said all illegal immigrants are criminals. He said that many of them are and there is no denying that because it's true. As for broadening it's base Trump is that broadening. He has more labor/union support than any Republican candidate. He has more Democratic support than any other Republican. He is consistently crushing Hillary in the independent vote. We'll all find out of course next month, but I don't think this race is anywhere near over yet. The steady drip of wikileaks doesn't seem to be slowing down and who knows what other bombshells are out there for Trump. If I were betting money I'm still on Trump at this point. |
|
2016 - WTF Pages: 1 2 | |||
Election 2014 Pages: 1 2 3 | |||