Subject: RE: Ahh... here it comes jdwright56 - 2009-08-03 4:12 PM Ummmm --- What???? OK - so who draws the line at who is too sick and who is not? I mean, are you only talking about terminal illness? I have personally met people that I was quite sure weren't going to live for another two weeks, and then a donor organ became available and they now live compelling, productive lives working a job and paying taxes. Would you have cut them off? How do you know when to say when? That is exactly Spokes' point. Somebody HAS to say when because we don't have an infinite amount of money to pay for every treatment. In government run programs, it is the government that says what is and what is not worth treating, and to what extent treatment is used. This is exactly what Britain does. In essence, the government is putting a value on human life...which is an extremely sensitive subject. Having personal choice is something that a lot of americans value, whether or not it actually makes them better off. For personal choice in healthcare, that means our healthcare will be expensive. I wish it were different, but I still want personal choice. EDIT: Don't take these comments personally. You are a great case why we should not move towards the British model of healthcare, at least not totally. I know and understand how inefficient our own health care model is, but I think it is better to pay more and get the treatment you deserve instead of being treated as a lost cause by your own government. From a book I read, The Undercover Economist, a chapter deals with this problem and the moral hazards a government plan cause. In Britain, the leading cause of blindness is macular degeneration. In Britain you don't get the laser treatment for it unless both eyes are having this problem...and then you only get it for one eye. Ugh. Edited by crazyyella 2009-08-03 3:33 PM
|