login
TTX 9 v Equinox 7 v Felt B16
-
No new posts
 2010-03-07 12:23 AM |
Member 60 |  Subject: TTX 9 v Equinox 7 v Felt B16Looking for expert opinions on how to spend some $. I am in my 3rd yr of tri with many sprint and oly distances plus 2 1/2 IM this year and the IM WI in 2011. Looking at the three bikes listed in the subject line. Know the TTX and Felt are carbon, and EQ is alum. Deciding if extra $ for TTX would be better used on other accessories like 305/310 Garmin, wheels, etc. Looking for any honest opinions. Leaning towards Trek bc heard issues with Felt frames at one point and I'm from WI- buy "local" |
 2010-03-07 6:10 AM in reply to: #2712272 |
| Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
| 2010-03-07 2:57 PM in reply to: #2712272 |
Veteran 133  Fort Worth, TX | Subject: RE: TTX 9 v Equinox 7 v Felt B16 |
| 2010-03-07 3:23 PM in reply to: #2712799 |
Elite 3315  Miami | Subject: RE: TTX 9 v Equinox 7 v Felt B16 nice man...although i i love cervelo bikes, whenever i see a felt i always turn my head. |
| 2010-03-07 7:20 PM in reply to: #2712272 |
Expert 701 Boise | Subject: RE: TTX 9 v Equinox 7 v Felt B16 I'm going to say go with... See below. (The white/red/black is the best color out of all the felt IMO but I'm very biased). I couldn't pass up the bike for the price. The frame is identical to the $3,000 B12 so it gives me room in the future to upgrade things and have a great frame to build off of. Edited by crazyquick23 2010-03-07 7:23 PM (IMG_0694.jpg) Attachments ---------------- IMG_0694.jpg (18KB - 21 downloads) |
| 2010-03-08 8:59 PM in reply to: #2712272 |
| Extreme Veteran 682 Mendenhall, MS | Subject: RE: TTX 9 v Equinox 7 v Felt B16 I have the E7 aluminum and could not be happier. |
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK