Subject: RE: Garmin 910xt vs edge 500 I have both. I had the Edge 500 before I got the 910xt. Personally I really like the Edge 500 better for cycling. It is easier to see and the customization is better. I want 5 pieces of information on my screen (speed, cadence, HR, distance and elapsed time) so the edge is really the only way to go for that. Even with 4 I don't think I would like the 910xt screen b/c everything is the same size. I like the fact that I can have one section bigger than the rest on the Edge with 5 pieces of info (b/c like you I don't like scrolling while on the bike). I really don't like the quick release on the 910xt. That said if you can only have 1 and you are going to do multisport then get the 910xt because of the flexibility. While I don't like it as much for purely cycling as my Edge 500, if I could only have 1 I would want the 910xt for the running and the swimming. However, if you can have both and/or are happy with your current solution for swimming and running then get the Edge 500. It is a better cycling option IMO than the 910xt. When I just ride I never use the 910xt and when I compete or do brick workouts I use both the 910xt and the Edge 500. Some pros/cons of each...The Edge also has better battery life IMO than the 910xt. Screen is easier to read on the edge and there are more mounting options IMO. The size of the Edge can be an advantage also. However, the wireless communication of the 910xt make it more user friendly for Garmin Connect and TrainingPeaks. The 910xt is more flexible and useful over more sports. Satellite pick up is quicker on Edge. Edited by bet 2012-08-09 2:10 PM
|