Cycling for HUGE weightloss advice pls
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
![]() |
Member![]() ![]() | ![]() Hi folks, just found this site and a lot of useful advice so was hoping you could help me out. I want to lose weight and cycling is my thing. So the question is do I go for a routine where the onus is on 1 - distance or 2 - interval training sessions with just a couple of 'long' cycle runs per week I guess I'd best say what my starting point is... Last month I was 294lb and 53% body-fat (as judged by the electronic pulse from the scales), total couch potato with umpteen health issues, but got clearance from the doc to change. This month 287lb and 49% body-fat Exercise-wise I've gone from zero to 20 mile rides twice a week with 30min interval sessions on the exercise bike 3-4 days a week. I've also started weight training. So, to achieve on the greatest fat loss at this stage, do I concentrate on increasing the duration and number of my 'long' rides? i.e. 4-5 days per week distance rides and 1-2 days per week 30 min interval training Also on the distance rides... what sort of distance should I be aiming to get into a regular routine of doing? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Well, let me ask you this... what is your calorie consumption and how many calories are you burning? It doesn't matter what you do exercise wise, if you aren't eating right to lose weight. Do interval work. Go on long rides, etc. Honestly, it's all about burning calories and eating properly. Pretty simple stuff. Welcome to BT and I hope you stick around. Good luck with your weight loss! ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Member![]() ![]() | ![]() intake fluctuates between 1200 and 2000 per day calorific expenditure on the 30-45min exercise bike reads 400-600cal unknown on my outdoors runs. Diet is under control. I was just hoping for advice on the best type of cycling training for my current goals. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() BikeFu - 2009-05-27 4:22 PM intake fluctuates between 1200 and 2000 per day calorific expenditure on the 30-45min exercise bike reads 400-600cal unknown on my outdoors runs. Diet is under control. I was just hoping for advice on the best type of cycling training for my current goals. There are a lot of sites that will tell you how many calories you burned for your height/weight for x time spent on the bike at x mph. That's a great place to start. Now, you will want to make sure you are not starving yourself. If you eat too few calories you will not lose weight. The goal is to burn the most amount of calories. So find a website to plug your numbers into... and figure out what is going to benefit you more. Short, quick rides... or Long, slower rides. As far as distance goes... unless you are wanting to go a certain distance... just do what burns the most calories training wise. |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() This is just my $.02, but I wouldn't worry about intervals or regimented training plans, you said you are just starting out, you aerobic system hasn't really been developed enough to get a huge boost from the intervals. I would suggest three things, ride, ride, then ride some more. Don't worry about what kind of riding you are doing, just ride and let your muscles, cardio system, etc develope before worrying about structured training. To get the most fat burning benefit you need to stay aerobic as much as possible, I would venture to guess that when you are doing intervals, you no longer are aerobic. Again I am not an expert, just someone who has been down a similar road you are on. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I would venture calorie burn estimates on gym bikes are wrong. Based on my power meter that measures actual power that I produce that converts to KJ, if I ride 15 mph I burn about 400 calories/hour if I ride 19 mph more like 600 calories/hour. That is marginal calories burned above calories burned for living. You will burn more calories if you ride more. Ride outside up hills which is sort of like doing intervals as it is harder. You need to build up gradually. I would try to aim to ride 100-150 miles a week by mid summer and more going forward. Have you had a bike fit so you know you are riding in an optimal position? If not you are less likely to be comfortable on your bike and may have a great chance of getting injured. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Member![]() ![]() | ![]() Thanks for the input. I've taken all your advice and done some calculations and it does add up that I should just get out on the real bike for a couple of hours and enjoy the good weather while it lasts and save short intervals for busy or bad weather days. KathyG - my exercise bike also measures power in watts so are you saying I could use this to make a more accurate assessment of calories burned? To be honest I've found so many different calculators that give such varying results I dont know which to believe. What actual calculations are there based on height, weight, time, distance and for the exercise bike, watts and speed - that can allow you to create a better estimation of calories burned? Last week (my first week on a real bike and second week including exercise bike) I managed 80 miles. So hopefully I can get it up to 150 soon enough. As for 'bike fit' not since I bought the bike 5 years ago. I've just been playing with the seat height a lot but I've now got it to what feels good. i.e. not too low where my things burn up too quickly and not too high that I lock out my knees. The only problem I'm having is that my hands/wrists keep going numb. I'm putting this down to too much weight on them. I cant seem to change the height of the handlebars tho' so I'm just putting up with it. Thanks |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I agree with the advice to just ride, ride, ride. I've found that as I workout I naturally start to eat better. I just want to. Focus on adding healthy foods, it will help you resist the junk. Go to a bike shop and have your bike adjusted - it is worth the price. If it hurts you won't keep doing it. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I wouldn't worry about the exact calorie burn #s unless you are closely trying to balance your deficit of calories for the day. It doesn't mater if you start riding longer or workout on the indoor bike they both burn calories and that is that's your focus right now. If you know your eating below 2000 and including exercise at this point in the game you will lose no questions asked. If you don't plan on doing any races or whatever that require a long ride It's probably better to focus on your overall fitness and the way to do that is to make sure you are challenging your system at a moderate level. The harder you work the more calories you burn in a shorter time period. The more fit you start getting the more you have to add intensity wise to continue getting the same progress. When I was close to 300lbs it didn't take a whole lot to tax me out. A outdoor bike ride while sounds leisurely to most was challenging if I put my heart into it. Basically do what you like and what you feel you can stick to. Consistency is really important. |
![]() ![]() |
Member![]() ![]() | ![]() Thanks @ MuscleMomma - I have totally change my diet to include 'green things' now! ![]() @IdealMuse - I'm interested in the calculations as they dont seem to work out so am wondering if I'm doing something wrong. A couple of sites have suggested I eat over 3000 cal a day for a 2lb weight loss which seems incredulous. Based on the amount I've worked out last week and my total calorie intake I should have lost 8.6lb of fat. But my bodyfat % monitor scales tell me I've lost 3lb in weight comprised of 5.5lb fat loss and 2.5lb muscle gain. So just take the numbers with a pinch of salt? I know what you mean about things being challenging. I always put 100% into it. I have no idea how I managed the last 13 miles of a hilly route yesterday. The BURN!!!!! ![]() My first time ever cycling on hills - ouch! |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() To loose 8.6lbs of fat you need to have a calorie deficit of about 30.000 calories for the week! That means a 4300 calorie deficit a day! That is a hard (pretty much impossible) number to reach! How did you come up with your 8.6lbs? I started using a Bodybugg (a device that measures your calories burned during the day) about 2 weeks ago and I was shocked about how it measured calories burned while biking. It only gave me about 300 per hour of biking at a moderate speed. I did some research and most sites plus my garmin give me about 500-600 calories an hour (at a speed of about 15 mph) which I am using from now. It is still only half of what I burn during an hour of running.
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Those online calculators are fairly notorious for being way off base on telling you your caloric needs. Right now I'm using a body bug which if your interested in the numbers can be a good way to watch the deficit balance, but they are expensive. 3000 sounds like a lot but I assume your male? and because of your current weight as well... If your really interested in the numbers I'd get a BMR/RMR type test which will tell you the calories you'd burn laying in bed all day and then you can work on it from there. At 300 you can probably aim for up to 2-3 pounds a week safely if your working out. Anyway the body bugg seems fairly good at telling you how hard your working which can be a good guide for weight loss. Its not a perfect device but it's helpful. http://www.bodybugg.com/ |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() "That means a 4300 calorie deficit a day! That is a hard (pretty much impossible) number to reach!" Joblin for a fit person it's hard to reach but for a close to 300 pound person it's not unheard of if they are working out. For example at 230 I apparently I burned 4200 yesterday with a 3 hour walk (vigorous not leisurely) for a fit thin person 4300 would be damn hard though. There is a number of reasons why 8 pound loss didn't happen. Over estimating caloric needs. Not measuring food closely enough. Over estimating how many calories were burned etc etc. |
![]() ![]() |
New user![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Are you sure you're eating enough? 1200-2000 calories for someone your size is not enough. I weigh about the same as you. For your activity level you should be somewhere around 3500- 4000 calories a day to maintain. You're looking at a deficit of 2000+ Most will tell you not go below 500 calories, 1000 max. You could be starving yourself which will cause your metabolism to slow its self down. 2 pounds a week is what people will tell you is safe to loose. Don't look for those "Biggest Looser" amounts. |
![]() ![]() |
Member![]() ![]() | ![]() Thanks for the info folks and sorry for the delay in getting back to you. @Joblin yes as you've seen the 30,000 deficit from 11 hours of cycling was explained in this thread... http://www.beginnertriathlete.com/discussion/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=161558&posts=3&start=1 Additionally, I agree with IdealMuse in that the calories lost in a given exercise are dependant on the weight of the individual. @IdealMuse Yes I'm a bloke! By the way, a cycling magazine pointed me to this calculator http://www.maximuscle.com/static/caloriecalculatorwin.html#top However it gives a completely different reading of bodyfat compared to the scales I have. @JC5066 Yes I do know that an average (but variable) 500cal deficit is thought to be most productive. However as we are establishing here, the estimation of your base cals for maintenace level weight is horrendously inaccurate. I just want to point out that when I eat its either because I'm hungry or I'm forcing myself to eat something because I think I should. Its not because I have a 'plan' that forces me to starve myself. I'm finding that on days I work out my intake goes up to around 1900-2000 and on off days its around 1200-1300 for example Sunday I had a 5 hour ride = 4 protein shakes, bacon piece(1 slice wholemeal bread+ 2 slices bacon - I think you americans call it canadian bacon), 2.5 sandwiches, mini twix, mocha, 3 meatballs, 1 boiled egg, rice, 1 apple = 2010 cal Yesterday - 'rest' day = 1 sandwich, 1 bacon piece, apple, protein shake, 2 cups of tea, 2 tuna steaks (300g), salad. then I was going to go to bed but instead went for a 2.5hour walk downed 400ml skimmed milk (to force myself some protein) and then went to bed. = 1325cal So according to my electronic bodyfat sensing scales, since 26th April I've lost 24.5lb fat and gained 16.5lb muscle. I think it would perhaps be more accurate to plot the points on a graph and take an average to account for daily variance. Tho' even so I still find these figures somewhat incredulous. How can that possibly be anywhere near right??? |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Why don´t you go and get your BMR tested, then you know exactly how many calories your body burns a day just to stay alive. You add to that your lifestyle and your exercise. Burning more than 1000 calories per hour on a bike even if you are still close to 300lbs is very unlikely unless you go very very fast. I am 205lbs and even if I bike at a 20mph pace my calorie burn is "only" about 600-700 an hour! Scales are the most inaccurate way of measuring Bodyfat so you might want to get your bodyfat tested with a professional and do that at 2-3 months intervals. And also don't forget that your body is not a machine and other factors play into the calories in versus calories out rule.
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Are you just not mentioning your veggies? I am skeptical when I hear very overweight people say they have to force themselves to eat. Are you honestly recording everything you put in your mouth? I like to use fitday.com I'm 5'1" and 167#s. Even with lots of muscle I'm fat. I NEVER have to force myself to eat. I could stuff myself all day gladly. I always feel hungry and want to eat - it's why I'm fat. I find it difficult to maintain 1300 cal. days and workout - even with tons of veggies and fiber. Which makes me think - for how long have you been at this 1300 cal days? Maybe your body just needs to be at the deprivation level a while before your metabolism kicks in. Edited by MuscleMomma 2009-06-03 10:29 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Member![]() ![]() | ![]() Yes I agree 1300cal is absurdly low. I'm not obsessed with numbers or worried and stressing myself about daily calorie totals - I just jot down everything I eat when I eat it, and add them up 1/2 way through and at the end of every day. I'm careful enough to make sure that each new product I buy (e.g. different bread) has its calories accounted for accurately (to 5cal rounded up) in my daily log And yes MuscleMomma I'm afraid I just picked out 2 days when I pretty much skipped the fruit and veg entirely. oops! ![]() Normally I have 1 apple, 1 orange, 1 banana, 1/4 bag green leaves and 2-4 tomatoes and 1 -2 lemons as the base of most days. Usually when I get too busy I dont think about food. I've also changed my mindset on life substantially, so ... 1 - no more emotional eating, 2 - I make myself just get out there and do something even if I dont feel like it (be it housework, studying, exercise or whatever, as once you are into it - its ok and sometimes even fun!), 3 - If I am feeling shattered, got nothing in the fridge and need something warm and spicy from the curry shop I chose the extremely healthy option rather than the litres of fat option (as well as making sure my fridge doesnt run out as often!) 4- and a simple one of eating when I'm actually hungry rather than just not full. As I said I dont have any planned number of calories in a day. I've just changed what I eat, when I eat and why I eat - as well as adding in exercise that I love. I have had one 2600cal day but it was follwed by a 1160 day as I was still full from the day before, but 1200 to 2000 is my current normal range with the higher days being workout days. I've had a look at this bodybug thing and whilst I'm sure its great for some people its not for me. For a start I hate the thought of wearing anything and secondly I dont want to obsess over every little detail. So in terms of spending money on things... well I lost my job recently so until I get myself sorted out on that front as well then I'll hold off on any products or tests. Ultimately, all I want to know is roughly whats going on so that I can monitor trends which will allow me to see where things are going wrong and allow me to adjust promptly (i.e. weekly) and accordingly. But so far I think what we've established is that every tool I have at my disposal for calculating bmr, total calorie daily requirements, calories burned, weight, %bodyfat, % lean mass are utterly useless!!! All I know for sure is that in the last 5 weeks my thighs have gotten rather large again and my belt has gone down 1 notch. And crucially that instead of passing out after walking for 5 minutes, completely soaked in sweat, I can now go on a 7 hour hilly cycle run and the only thing I have to worry about is the lactic acid burning a hole through my thighs! :D |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() My .02 cents. You need to balance intake and output and also you need to monitor your heart rate. calculate your max rate and then when you are exercising keep your heart rate in the 55-65% of your max. Above that you are burning Carbs (which is still a good thing) and building endurance, which is a great thing. But for weight loss you need to really need to watch your heart rate. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() "calculate your max rate and then when you are exercising keep your heart rate in the 55-65% of your max" But the overall total calories burned at higher intensity still trumps the fat burn at lower intensity. You end up burning more at the higher intensity even though the percentage is lower. Fat burning zone thing is kinda a myth. The percentages are true but it's misleading. Plus all carbs not burned off or used for the body will be turned into fat stores. So what's the difference? If ones goal is to train and get faster and burn calories it's better to mix it up and do both moderate and higher intensity work. Or in my world anyway... ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Member![]() ![]() | ![]() I used to havre the same the issue with the numbness, are you wearing bike gloves? That helped me tremendously. As for the interval workout, IMHO (being new at this), this was the best way to get in bike shape and burn fat. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Member![]() ![]() | ![]() Thanks for the advice. I've found that slow and stead and low heart rate is better for the long all day rides. For shorter 2 hour rides I'm taking it easy for the first hour and then pushing hard for the last hour. Its good to mix it up a bit. For very short 1 hour exercise bike rides I tend to do straight interval training. In my experience what I find is that if I have the time then just putting in the miles at the lower intensity but higher duration makes me lose weight far more quickly. Also because of my poor starting condition its more important for me to concentrate on my heart to get a good base fitness. As for the numbness, I've started wearing gloves and its helped a bit but I think the source of the problem is the trapped nerve from a car crash. I thought it had healed up and I'd forgotten about it. I'm arranging some physio so that should hopefully help that out. And the numb feet issue has been sorted out by getting shoes 2 sizes larger that actually fit me! ![]() |