Subject: RE: Ankle surgery? Thanks for the reply!
It sounds like a great decision on your part for the knee. That is a definite success story!
I think in many cases there's just a lot of grey area where the decision hinges on how desperate the patient is.
I tried to pin my orthopedist down the other day and put the decision on him, "Depending on what you find on the scope, you could decide whether ligament reconstruction is necessary" and he pretty much dismissed that idea. Second opinion did same thing. I really can't blame them. We know the ligament is damaged.
Absolutely if I knew nothing would improve and I could not run again ever, it would be an easy decision. I guess there's just the chance that it will gradually improve over the next few years...
Lateral ligament reconstruction seems to be used PRIMARILY to restore lateral stability and prevent constant rolling of the ankle. It involves cutting ligaments and resuturing them back together or to bone. But my case would involve cutting ligaments that are actually already working to prevent rolling. So it's just hard to swallow.
OTOH, if everything is successful, reconstruction would make the ankle tighter and probably less prone to inflammation and pain. I would expect if all goes well to be lightly running again in 6 months. I can't tell you what a dream come true that would be. I mean like that would be incredible... |