Google argues for right to continue scanning Gmail
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Rather than post in the zombie thread I figured this was worthy of a new one. I just saw this AP article that could have huge implications to the whole email/search provider privacy model. From a legal side I was kind of on google's side until I read the part about them scanning emails of people who send emails to gmail addresses. They don't agree to any terms, yet all of their email is scanned without consent. It's easy to say don't email a gmail.com address, but I have my personal domain hosted by google apps, so anyone who emails my personal email would have their message scanned without consent. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() the post office has been screening mail for decades, maybe longer (centuries?) and no one cares. how is this any different, other than you are using their service for free and you were/are paying the post office? |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Originally posted by Clempson the post office has been screening mail for decades, maybe longer (centuries?) and no one cares. how is this any different, other than you are using their service for free and you were/are paying the post office? I don't think it's quite the same. The post office is scanning the envelope, they're not opening the mail and scanning every word of the letter. If it were purely in the context of them seeing who is emailing who, then I would agree with you, but this is a lot deeper than that. I don't have a huge problem with what they're doing personally because there haven't been any examples of them mis-using the data. However, I also recognize that there's an interesting legal question that needs to be answered. Fedex is a company that would be analogous to google. People use them as a private entity to send their mail. Fedex isn't allowed to open a package and read the letter for marketing purposes or anything else. So, with email being digital it's obviously easier to do but it's the same legal argument. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Clempson the post office has been screening mail for decades, maybe longer (centuries?) and no one cares. how is this any different, other than you are using their service for free and you were/are paying the post office? I don't think it's quite the same. The post office is scanning the envelope, they're not opening the mail and scanning every word of the letter. If it were purely in the context of them seeing who is emailing who, then I would agree with you, but this is a lot deeper than that. I don't have a huge problem with what they're doing personally because there haven't been any examples of them mis-using the data. However, I also recognize that there's an interesting legal question that needs to be answered. Fedex is a company that would be analogous to google. People use them as a private entity to send their mail. Fedex isn't allowed to open a package and read the letter for marketing purposes or anything else. So, with email being digital it's obviously easier to do but it's the same legal argument. You mean no examples have been leaked yet right? |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Originally posted by JoshR Originally posted by tuwood You mean no examples have been leaked yet right? Originally posted by Clempson the post office has been screening mail for decades, maybe longer (centuries?) and no one cares. how is this any different, other than you are using their service for free and you were/are paying the post office? I don't think it's quite the same. The post office is scanning the envelope, they're not opening the mail and scanning every word of the letter. If it were purely in the context of them seeing who is emailing who, then I would agree with you, but this is a lot deeper than that. I don't have a huge problem with what they're doing personally because there haven't been any examples of them mis-using the data. However, I also recognize that there's an interesting legal question that needs to be answered. Fedex is a company that would be analogous to google. People use them as a private entity to send their mail. Fedex isn't allowed to open a package and read the letter for marketing purposes or anything else. So, with email being digital it's obviously easier to do but it's the same legal argument. True, the system is ripe for abuse. I think purely in the context of them having algorithms that parse data to give ads, it's easier to justify. But, there's nothing that says that's all they do. It's probably safe to assume an engineer working at google can go through emails and read them for "testing purposes". What if that person he's viewing just so happens to be his wife that he's going through an ugly divorce with and uses the information against her. Now the legal argument gets a little deeper because you can either view the contents or you can't. You can either open somebodies snail mail or you can't. |
![]() | |||
![]() | ![]() Views: 817 Posts: 12 | ||
![]() | |||
![]() | |||
![]() |
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|