goal setting
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Besides being entirely unrealistic, I have no idea how to really set time goals. If a person in training can run a 8:30 mile avg what will it look like on race day after swimming and biking? Same with biking, if I hit 19-20mph avg should i expect that on race day? Further, how do you set goals for distances >sprint&oly. |
|
![]() ![]() |
New user![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() To many variables. As a couple: How long do you normally ride compared to the race you're doing. Do you normally ride 12 miles and it's a 12 mile course then it will effect your run much more then someone who normally rides 40 miles at a time on a 12 mile course. The same thing applies to time. |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I found that the 9 mile bike/1 mile run brick I did before tapering for my sprint tri predicted my 9:00 running pace perfectly. It was recommended to me and I'll recommend it to you - do a brick before your tri if it all possible. |
![]() ![]() |
New user![]() | ![]() What's a brick? |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() It's doing two events consecutively, i.e. swim then bike or bike then run. I found biking, running my bike down my "transition area" (driveway), and then going for a short run VERY helpful in preparing for the sensation of running on tired legs on race day. |
![]() ![]() |
Cycling Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() A "brick" is a combined bike and run workout simulating the process that you will go through in a race situation. You do your ride, come off the bike and change into whatever it is you will be running with and do a very short and relaxed run (at least that is the pace I prescribe - never anything fast off the bike in training for me and my newer athletes). A "swike" will be the same thing but as a swim and then bike. They are good workouts to get understanding of how your body will feel as you go from one workout to another and they are a useful way to get in multiple workouts for those that are time constrained. I will prescribe bricks for newer athletes more than I will for experienced ones. I personally almost never do them anymore. Welcome to the sport and BT!! |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I started a thread last week provoking discussion about goals. It's worth reading the various points people make in that thread. Fundamentally, goals are something that require a long-term strategy and committment to achieve. Sometimes, we need to change a behavior (get off the couch and start exercising) to achieve the goal. Sometimes, we can achieve it by maintaining a behavior (continuing to save money to buy a house). They are very personal things that you should want to nurture and protect so they come to fruition. There's a big difference between saying "I want to average 20 mph at my half-ironman next summer" (a goal) and "I want to average 20 mph on my half-ironman next week" (unless you've been saying that all along, and working to achieve it with your training). The latter may be more of a dream (if your training pace has been 16-17 mph) or an expectation (if your training pace has been 19-21 mph). Why? There really isn't a lot you can do in the next week to make that 20 mph split a reality if you haven't already been training for it. But over the next year... Expectations should be realistic. (Maybe aggressive too, but always realistic.) If you don't have a million bucks today, there's a good chance you won't have a million bucks tomorrow. Goals have no such constraints. Maybe you want to qualify for Kona even though you haven't completed your first tri. No problem, you can have that as a goal and you can start working to achieve that goal. You may not have a million bucks today, but there's no reason you can't have as your goal to have a million bucks 20 years from now. The challenge is we all have lots of goals and some are conflicting. Only you can decide which have priority. IMO, everyone should have at least one or two goals that seem outlandish, that take you out of your comfort zone to see what you are capable of doing. Some may seem "easy" to achieve. Here's a personal example. A few years ago, I took a group of scouts to New Mexico for a backpacking trip. One of my goals as the tour leader was to have everyone return safely. Pretty basic, and some might even give it a duh! Guess what? Two people came off the trail early because of an emergency back home. At least I could point to the reason I didn't feel fully accomplished during our return: I failed to achieve that goal. More specifically, I don't change goals for races within a month. (I say change, because I've probably set goals well before the season started. ) In that last month, I set some expectations (what if the weather is perfect, what if it's stupendously crappy) and usually come up with a range of splits and overall times. These expectations will get dialed in the closer we get to race day based on weather forecasts and how I'm feeling. Maybe that race comes at the end of a peak training week, and I'm far more fatigued than I expected to be, so I dial things back. Maybe I'm feeling great in spite of a huge week and I'm ready to rock the race. Do I hit all of my goals? Nope. Sometimes I'm OK, sometimes I mope (a little), sometimes I recommit to try again. I didn't hit my 6-hour HIM goal in 2006 (but I did hit my 20 mph bike split goal for that race) and that goal was back on my list for this year. An injury in June pushed it further out, so that's going to be my focus for training in 2010. I hope this helps. |