Scoring for Women's Gymnastics
-
No new posts
Moderators: alicefoeller | Reply |
2008-08-18 3:52 PM |
The Original 7834 Raleigh/Durham | Subject: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics I think the scoring has been a little funky. Last night Alicia didn't medal with the vault, even though the Chinese competitor totally fell on her landing? I understand that some athletes start out with a higher level of difficulty, but the scoring was just a little out there if you ask me. And then you have the situation below. Thoughts?? Edited by runnergirl 2008-08-18 3:52 PM |
|
2008-08-18 6:05 PM in reply to: #1611475 |
Pro 4339 Husker Nation | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics I'm sure if we dig deep enough we can find the link, but if that article had said it came down to the fact that a Chinese judge had scored He higher, thus relegating Liukin to third, then I would be pretty upset. Right now I don't see the incentive for an Australian judge to put a Chinese athlete over an American unless she just hates America, in which case: why? I do think the scoring has been woefully erratic at best during the entire competition and it's very frustrating to watch for all the athletes, not just those from the USA. |
2008-08-18 7:50 PM in reply to: #1611778 |
Pro 4612 MA | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics Bripod - 2008-08-18 7:05 PM I'm sure if we dig deep enough we can find the link, but if that article had said it came down to the fact that a Chinese judge had scored He higher, thus relegating Liukin to third, then I would be pretty upset. Right now I don't see the incentive for an Australian judge to put a Chinese athlete over an American unless she just hates America, in which case: why? I do think the scoring has been woefully erratic at best during the entire competition and it's very frustrating to watch for all the athletes, not just those from the USA. Chinese judge? I thought if a country is in the competition, there would not be a judge of that nationality? Although I suspect there was some type of negotiation going on.... |
2008-08-19 8:15 AM in reply to: #1611475 |
Pro 4612 MA | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics I really don't like the new system. What's wrong with have 2 people with the same score? If they are equally good, why can't they be in the sample place? He Kexin is good (regardless of age). Nastisa is good, too. They both deserved to get gold. |
2008-08-19 8:16 AM in reply to: #1611475 |
Alpharetta, GA | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics In so far as the tie breaker goes, I think the system being used for tie-breaking in uneven bars is totally illogical. With that said, when this system was devised all coaches were told of it beforehand. I personally am more shocked that there weren't serious protests against the system that was devised. I don't see why there needs to be a tie breaker. In both swimming AND track a tie means both get a medal. Why does the IOC insist it be any different in gymnastics? Perhaps it is because it is a JUDGED event as opposed to a timed event. I dunno. Of course, I love to watch gymnastics but dislike judged events in the olympics and think they should all go away. I realize I am in the minority with that opinion. Andi |
2008-08-19 8:51 AM in reply to: #1611970 |
Expert 1014 Virginia | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics D.K. - 2008-08-18 8:50 PM Bripod - 2008-08-18 7:05 PM I'm sure if we dig deep enough we can find the link, but if that article had said it came down to the fact that a Chinese judge had scored He higher, thus relegating Liukin to third, then I would be pretty upset. Right now I don't see the incentive for an Australian judge to put a Chinese athlete over an American unless she just hates America, in which case: why? I do think the scoring has been woefully erratic at best during the entire competition and it's very frustrating to watch for all the athletes, not just those from the USA. Chinese judge? I thought if a country is in the competition, there would not be a judge of that nationality? Although I suspect there was some type of negotiation going on....
You are right. There was a LOT of talk about the fact that since you can't have judges from any of the countries represented in the competition, you get some less knowledgable judges. In the case of the uneven bars, you couldn't have a judge from America, China, Romania, Russia, ect. So you end up with judges from like South Africa and Australia judging Olympic competitions. And we all know about the storied gymnastics histories those countries have, riiiight. So the judges in effect, end up sucking big time. I agree, the uneven bars tie breaker is completely illogical. In the case of that event, you really just need to have two gold medalists. If they can do it in other sports, I don't see why you can't in gymnastics. There were actually two tie breakers last night, one in the men's vault. But that tie breaker is much more obvious - that the person with the highest single vault wins. What happened in the women's vault - I can't figure that one out for the life of me. |
|
2008-08-19 8:54 AM in reply to: #1612922 |
Expert 1014 Virginia | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics Anditrigirl - 2008-08-19 9:16 AM In so far as the tie breaker goes, I think the system being used for tie-breaking in uneven bars is totally illogical. With that said, when this system was devised all coaches were told of it beforehand. I personally am more shocked that there weren't serious protests against the system that was devised. I don't see why there needs to be a tie breaker. In both swimming AND track a tie means both get a medal. Why does the IOC insist it be any different in gymnastics? Perhaps it is because it is a JUDGED event as opposed to a timed event. I dunno. Of course, I love to watch gymnastics but dislike judged events in the olympics and think they should all go away. I realize I am in the minority with that opinion. Andi
Just to play devil's advocate - do people realize how many events have a judges opinion in them???? Weightlifting has judges that say whether a lift counts or not. Basketball, soccer, water polo, volleyball, and baseball/softball have referees. Fencing had a judge that called which person got the touch. Almost every sport has an outcome that can be directly affected by someone outside of the athlete. Really the only sports that don't work that way are ones on the track and ones in the pool. |
2008-08-19 8:56 AM in reply to: #1613024 |
Pro 4612 MA | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics kimmitri408 - 2008-08-19 9:54 AM Anditrigirl - 2008-08-19 9:16 AM In so far as the tie breaker goes, I think the system being used for tie-breaking in uneven bars is totally illogical. With that said, when this system was devised all coaches were told of it beforehand. I personally am more shocked that there weren't serious protests against the system that was devised. I don't see why there needs to be a tie breaker. In both swimming AND track a tie means both get a medal. Why does the IOC insist it be any different in gymnastics? Perhaps it is because it is a JUDGED event as opposed to a timed event. I dunno. Of course, I love to watch gymnastics but dislike judged events in the olympics and think they should all go away. I realize I am in the minority with that opinion. Andi
Just to play devil's advocate - do people realize how many events have a judges opinion in them???? Weightlifting has judges that say whether a lift counts or not. Basketball, soccer, water polo, volleyball, and baseball/softball have referees. Fencing had a judge that called which person got the touch. Almost every sport has an outcome that can be directly affected by someone outside of the athlete. Really the only sports that don't work that way are ones on the track and ones in the pool. Heh, not for water polo and diving....
|
2008-08-19 8:58 AM in reply to: #1613018 |
Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics kimmitri408 - 2008-08-19 9:51 AM I agree, the uneven bars tie breaker is completely illogical. In the case of that event, you really just need to have two gold medalists. If they can do it in other sports, I don't see why you can't in gymnastics. There were actually two tie breakers last night, one in the men's vault. But that tie breaker is much more obvious - that the person with the highest single vault wins. What happened in the women's vault - I can't figure that one out for the life of me. Just despicable, imo. I agree with crazy old Bela Karoly on this one. If you FALL, you do not win! I'm sorry! Simple as that. He wasn't upset about the floor results, even though they didn't necessarily work out the way people would have liked. That was a fair competition. The best girl won. All three were amazing. But this sort of thing has been happening for years. Russian figure skaters falling all over themselves and still winning, the Chinese messing up and still winning. Come on, folks - does none of this seem fishy? I'm all for believing in equality and not hating on countries that do not run the way America does, but given the extensive history of those two countries, you can't help but wonder, ya know? |
2008-08-19 10:17 AM in reply to: #1613032 |
Expert 1014 Virginia | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics D.K. - 2008-08-19 9:56 AM kimmitri408 - 2008-08-19 9:54 AM Anditrigirl - 2008-08-19 9:16 AM In so far as the tie breaker goes, I think the system being used for tie-breaking in uneven bars is totally illogical. With that said, when this system was devised all coaches were told of it beforehand. I personally am more shocked that there weren't serious protests against the system that was devised. I don't see why there needs to be a tie breaker. In both swimming AND track a tie means both get a medal. Why does the IOC insist it be any different in gymnastics? Perhaps it is because it is a JUDGED event as opposed to a timed event. I dunno. Of course, I love to watch gymnastics but dislike judged events in the olympics and think they should all go away. I realize I am in the minority with that opinion. Andi
Just to play devil's advocate - do people realize how many events have a judges opinion in them???? Weightlifting has judges that say whether a lift counts or not. Basketball, soccer, water polo, volleyball, and baseball/softball have referees. Fencing had a judge that called which person got the touch. Almost every sport has an outcome that can be directly affected by someone outside of the athlete. Really the only sports that don't work that way are ones on the track and ones in the pool. Heh, not for water polo and diving....
hey i did mention water polo - but i forgot diving! but i meant the swimming races only |
2008-08-19 10:22 AM in reply to: #1613024 |
Pro 4339 Husker Nation | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics kimmitri408 - 2008-08-19 8:54 AM
Just to play devil's advocate - do people realize how many events have a judges opinion in them???? Weightlifting has judges that say whether a lift counts or not. Basketball, soccer, water polo, volleyball, and baseball/softball have referees. Fencing had a judge that called which person got the touch. Almost every sport has an outcome that can be directly affected by someone outside of the athlete. Really the only sports that don't work that way are ones on the track and ones in the pool. Not sure I'm on board with this comparison 100%. In order for it to be apples to apples [let's use Basketball for an example] then the referees would need to determine who gets what score. Really the referees are there to prevent things from getting out of control and to keep people and objects inside the field of play. Nobody has ever lost a point in a basketball game because a referee from the North Pole didn't think it should count. |
|
2008-08-19 10:23 AM in reply to: #1613038 |
Expert 1014 Virginia | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics wurkit_gurl - 2008-08-19 9:58 AM kimmitri408 - 2008-08-19 9:51 AM I agree, the uneven bars tie breaker is completely illogical. In the case of that event, you really just need to have two gold medalists. If they can do it in other sports, I don't see why you can't in gymnastics. There were actually two tie breakers last night, one in the men's vault. But that tie breaker is much more obvious - that the person with the highest single vault wins. What happened in the women's vault - I can't figure that one out for the life of me. Just despicable, imo. I agree with crazy old Bela Karoly on this one. If you FALL, you do not win! I'm sorry! Simple as that. He wasn't upset about the floor results, even though they didn't necessarily work out the way people would have liked. That was a fair competition. The best girl won. All three were amazing. But this sort of thing has been happening for years. Russian figure skaters falling all over themselves and still winning, the Chinese messing up and still winning. Come on, folks - does none of this seem fishy? I'm all for believing in equality and not hating on countries that do not run the way America does, but given the extensive history of those two countries, you can't help but wonder, ya know? Agreed (Bela is a nutball). And yeah, you gotta wonder what's really going on. I do think that since the judges are not experienced with gymnastics b/c they are from non-gymnastics savvy countries, that a lot of it goes to reputation and who the home country is. Aside from when judges are bought off (which hopefully we aren't seeing here again...), I think those two things play a major roll. When the crowd is that rowdy I'd bet it impacts the judges a lot more than they want to admit. |
2008-08-19 10:24 AM in reply to: #1613335 |
Champion 6539 South Jersey | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics kimmitri408 - 2008-08-19 11:17 AM D.K. - 2008-08-19 9:56 AM kimmitri408 - 2008-08-19 9:54 AM Anditrigirl - 2008-08-19 9:16 AM In so far as the tie breaker goes, I think the system being used for tie-breaking in uneven bars is totally illogical. With that said, when this system was devised all coaches were told of it beforehand. I personally am more shocked that there weren't serious protests against the system that was devised. I don't see why there needs to be a tie breaker. In both swimming AND track a tie means both get a medal. Why does the IOC insist it be any different in gymnastics? Perhaps it is because it is a JUDGED event as opposed to a timed event. I dunno. Of course, I love to watch gymnastics but dislike judged events in the olympics and think they should all go away. I realize I am in the minority with that opinion. Andi
Just to play devil's advocate - do people realize how many events have a judges opinion in them???? Weightlifting has judges that say whether a lift counts or not. Basketball, soccer, water polo, volleyball, and baseball/softball have referees. Fencing had a judge that called which person got the touch. Almost every sport has an outcome that can be directly affected by someone outside of the athlete. Really the only sports that don't work that way are ones on the track and ones in the pool. Heh, not for water polo and diving....
hey i did mention water polo - but i forgot diving! but i meant the swimming races only Actually, there are judges in swimming too . People can do things wrong in the pool... |
2008-08-19 10:25 AM in reply to: #1613352 |
Expert 1014 Virginia | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics Bripod - 2008-08-19 11:22 AM kimmitri408 - 2008-08-19 8:54 AM Not sure I'm on board with this comparison 100%. In order for it to be apples to apples [let's use Basketball for an example] then the referees would need to determine who gets what score. Really the referees are there to prevent things from getting out of control and to keep people and objects inside the field of play. Nobody has ever lost a point in a basketball game because a referee from the North Pole didn't think it should count.
Just to play devil's advocate - do people realize how many events have a judges opinion in them???? Weightlifting has judges that say whether a lift counts or not. Basketball, soccer, water polo, volleyball, and baseball/softball have referees. Fencing had a judge that called which person got the touch. Almost every sport has an outcome that can be directly affected by someone outside of the athlete. Really the only sports that don't work that way are ones on the track and ones in the pool. True the ref's don't determine the actual scoring. But take my home team, the Pistons for example. Call a few quick fouls and it completely changes the tactics of the team and takes them out of their rhythm. Call a few quick fouls on whoever is guarding Kobe or Lebron and watch how the defense loosens up on them and they score more, because the defender is worried about fouling out or causing a 3 point play. Then watch Kobe or Lebron take advantage. It's not the actual scoring, but the referees can greatly impact the way a team plays, which in effect can end up deciding who wins and who loses. |
2008-08-19 10:57 AM in reply to: #1611475 |
Alpharetta, GA | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics Let me re-phrase. I think events where outcome is determined 100% on subjective human judging should be eliminated. Of course, it won't happen, it's just my opinion. Sure, there will be situations where close calls are determined by judging in other sports. Was the tennis ball in or out? Was the basketball player fouled or not? Did the swimmer use an illegal kick? It is rare (but does happen) that these human calls determine the outcome of the game or race in these other sports. Also, replay is available and usually fairly clear - sometimes it isn't used though. And, I know 100% judged sports (gymnastics, diving) are wildly popular and I certainly enjoy watching them, but the outcome generally doesn't mean a lot to me. I can say all this and I do compete in a sport where only judging is used (at the top in my state in taekwondo). As a competitor you just remind yourself that it's what you signed up for and need to always have a good attitude regardless of the outcome. I've won when I shouldn't have and lost when I shouldn't have. Oh well. I don't get too excited about either... One of the main reasons I still do tri's (Other than I love them) although I could be very competitive in taekwondo is that I am hesitant to devote a lot of myself to something where the outcome is so subjective, although I do love both sports. I am often torn - tri or taekwondo this weekend? Mostly, it is tri's. Andi Edited by Anditrigirl 2008-08-19 11:07 AM |
2008-08-19 11:28 AM in reply to: #1613361 |
Pro 4339 Husker Nation | Subject: RE: Scoring for Women's Gymnastics kimmitri408 - 2008-08-19 10:25 AM True the ref's don't determine the actual scoring. But take my home team, the Pistons for example. Call a few quick fouls and it completely changes the tactics of the team and takes them out of their rhythm. Call a few quick fouls on whoever is guarding Kobe or Lebron and watch how the defense loosens up on them and they score more, because the defender is worried about fouling out or causing a 3 point play. Then watch Kobe or Lebron take advantage. It's not the actual scoring, but the referees can greatly impact the way a team plays, which in effect can end up deciding who wins and who loses. Meh, I still think it's a stretch to compare the two. What if Kobe or Lebron don't take advantage or aren't shooting well? Then the effect of the foul-calling is nullified. Either team can rise above penalties and score more points than the other, regardless of how many infractions are called. Not so with the topic at hand; these gymnasts are at the complete mercy of the judges. They can have a flawless routine and still lose because of an incompetent judge. I do agree with the above poster that it's surprising none of the coaches made any strides with overturning the agreement of the tie-breaking procedures when they were first established. Perhaps none of them considered the first two criteria would have been met? It went down to the third criterion which was the points averaging thing. |
|