OK, so what should Bill Bennett's karma be?
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
Buttercup ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Does he get points for acknowledging that eliminating an entire generation of an entire race is a bad thing? My karma wish for Mr. Bennett is that he should be a birthing midwife for babies of color for an eternity so that he can learn to experience common humanity found in bringing life into the world. After about 3,423 years of birthing babies of color, the depravity of his remark and tinyness of his vision may sink into his dense and tiny gray matter. Then he can begin to know what it is to be a human being. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I knew I could count on you, Renee.... I think he should be offered the opportunity to live in an all black community for a few months. He might learn something useful about human beings who are different than he. He might actually be surprised that black babies and black children are just as funny and adorable and honest and hopeful as white babies. Oh yeah, and that they aren't born criminals. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Folks, I'm no Bill Bennett fan, but really his statement was taken out of context. In responding to, and disagreeing with, a caller who said that the Social Security system would be solid if abortion were illegal (because more people would be paying into the system) he referred to someone else's hypothesis (author's of Freakonomics) that crime rates go down because of abortion. And then went on to label it "impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible". This quote from Rev. Johnny M. Hunter, the national director of the Life Education and Resource Network is telling: It is absolutely hypocritical of people who call themselves pro-choice to criticize William Bennett for his comment when they have been pushing abortion down the throats of the black communities for years... Bennett stated that it is 'morally reprehensible' to abort black babies to reduce crime and that statement was ignored. What is also ignored is the fact that Planned Parenthood, following the agenda of its racist founder, Margaret Sanger, does consider aborting blacks to be helpful to society. Which is worse, one who talks about the wrongness of aborting black babies or the one who aborts black babies? How can we have a meaningful dialogue in society if you purposefully take things people say out of context and ascribe meaning to it that was not intended or even stated? Edited by dontracy 2005-10-04 11:07 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Buttercup ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Don, his words: "But I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could, if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country and your crime rate would go down." On national radio. It was a STUPID thing to say, context or not. I'm not interested in Rev. Hunter's red herring argument. What Bill Bennet said was stupid. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() OK, I agree that it was stupid. He should have known how people would pick it up and run with it. But to go from stupid to racist demands a closer examination. Anyway, is Rev. Hunter's statement a red herring? The issue is about aborting black babies, right? Care to take a walk down the memory lane of Margaret Sanger and her wonderful eugenic friends? If so, I'll be back after lunch. ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-10-04 10:06 AM Folks, I'm no Bill Bennett fan, but really his statement was taken out of context. In responding to, and disagreeing with, a caller who said that the Social Security system would be solid if abortion were illegal (because more people would be paying into the system) he referred to someone else's hypothesis (author's of Freakonomics) that crime rates go down because of abortion. And then went on to label it "impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible". This quote from Rev. Johnny M. Hunter, the national director of the Life Education and Resource Network is telling: It is absolutely hypocritical of people who call themselves pro-choice to criticize William Bennett for his comment when they have been pushing abortion down the throats of the black communities for years... Bennett stated that it is 'morally reprehensible' to abort black babies to reduce crime and that statement was ignored. What is also ignored is the fact that Planned Parenthood, following the agenda of its racist founder, Margaret Sanger, does consider aborting blacks to be helpful to society. Which is worse, one who talks about the wrongness of aborting black babies or the one who aborts black babies? How can we have a meaningful dialogue in society if you purposefully take things people say out of context and ascribe meaning to it that was not intended or even stated? whoa. OK but wasn't it Bennett who added the adjective "black?" And we are not talking about Margaret Sanger circa 1930's. We are talking about a man who was much more recently in the highest ranking Educational Position in our Country, who said it in 2005. To suggest that Planned Parenthood's current policies reflect the values of the founder is just plain wrong. How much do you know about PP TODAY? Talk about out of context! "aborting blacks is helpful to society?" FInd me a source for that. That last sentence in your linked quote is so outrageous and misleading I can barely stand it. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() It's kind of like saying you could end poverty by eating the poor. (Only Swift was being ironical) |
![]() ![]() |
Buttercup ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-10-04 11:19 AM OK, I agree that it was stupid. He should have known how people would pick it up and run with it. But to go from stupid to racist demands a closer examination. Anyway, is Rev. Hunter's statement a red herring? The issue is about aborting black babies, right? Care to take a walk down the memory lane of Margaret Sanger and her wonderful eugenic friends? If so, I'll be back after lunch. ![]() It's a red herring insofar as he is trying to divert attention from Mr. Bennet by using the ol' "But... but... Billy says worse things!" tactic. Know how they make this blow over? By saying "Mr. Bennet is my friend and I respect him. However, my friend said a stupid thing." End of story. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() possum - We are talking about a man who was much more recently in the highest ranking Educational Position in our Country, who said it in 2005. Again, his quote is being taken out of context. He was referring to someone else's theory. To suggest that Planned Parenthood's current policies reflect the values of the founder is just plain wrong. How much do you know about PP TODAY? My former wife of fourteen years worked for PP. I was a long time supporter. I use to think that working the line helping woman cross the gauntlet of "those anti-choice idiots" was a good thing. I think "population control" is a euphemism for what use to be just blatant eugenics. Let's take a look at changes in China policy, from Mao's belief that more people meant more power, to a one child system where women are forced to have abortions and forced to get setrilized. Why the change in policy? I think in large measure it was because of folks like PP and the Rockefeller foundation [edit]convincing counceling[edit] Chinese leaders that a smaller population would mean a stronger economy. Has PP denounced the one child policy in China? If so, I haven't seen it yet. If you have a link to it, I'd love to read it. I wish you were here, I would take you to see an elderly Quaker friend of mine. He's in his eighties. He is a long time supporter of PP and was a major force in getting it established in eastern Pennsylvania. He is also unabashadly a eugenisist. He'll make your hair curl talking about "those spicy people" and the need to make sure that people who can't affort children don't have them. He saw PP as a way to further his vision. Lastly, I have plenty of friends who work in the family planning industry. They are good hearted people. And I know, because they tell me, that even though they acknowlege that it is a woman's "choice" their bias is to councel poor women, often black women, to have abortions. It is out of concern for the woman's well being, but it's a bum rap for their babies. Talk about out of context! "aborting blacks is helpful to society? FInd me a source for that. You're right, I can't find you a direct quote of that from a current source. But 'cmon, isn't abortion generally considered helpful to society by those who support it? I think that is what the Rev. was referring to. It's considered helpful, and a disproportionate number of black children are dying because of it. Bill Bennett condemns it. PP does not. Edited by dontracy 2005-10-04 12:52 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Here's a useful analysis of what Bennett said and the backflips his apologists are performing: http://www.slate.com/id/2127378/?nav=tap3 As the article points out, here's where Bennett is wrong: Regardless of how you feel about abortion, the supposition that to abort black fetuses, and only black fetuses, will reduce the crime rate assumes that blacks are predisposed to commit crimes. Otherwise the argument would have to have included factors other than race, which it didn't. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Buttercup ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Don, Reminds me of an article I read about Jane Fonda, post-Christian phase. She was talking about the point at which she realized these good Christian women in Atlanta were perhaps... not so good. These good Christian women were totally against white women getting abortions but black women getting abortions was not so bad. Bash Jane if ya want, but the story is telling. Oh, to answer your question: Isn't abortion considered helpful to society by those who support it? No, I think it's hurtful to an individual as it is a self-inflicted loss. What is hurtful to an individual cannot be extrapolated as being helpful to society. I also believe it is a strictly private choice. I like what Hillary Clinton said (paraphrase) that it should never ever have to happen but that it should be available. I like the Kinsey Institute's position that sex carries with it grave responsibility and that we, our society, should do a much, much, much better job of teaching this grave responsibility to our kids, rather than just saying "Just don't do it." Have you heard the story that abortions have increased since W's tenure? That abortions had gone down during the Clinton tenure and they attribute this decrease to the efficacy of his administration's condom support (and other stuff I don't have details on) and sex education policies? Edited by Renee 2005-10-04 12:58 PM |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Renee - These good Christian women were totally against white women getting abortions but black women getting abortions was not so bad. Amen! Jane was right to criticize. |
![]() ![]() |
Buttercup ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Don, here's why I think Bennet is racist. He could have made the argument "if every black child born between now and the next 18 years received a college education, the crime rate would go down." Instead, he chose an extremely odious, contentious "if" statement. I don't think this was accidental. It was deliberate and I believe it betrayed a racist viewpoint. He could have made the exact same statement except changing "black" for "white" babies and still claimed to be technically correct, but he didn't . He zeroed in on the black population. Odious. Reprehensible. Disgusting. He should be trounced from the public arena, run out on a rail in disgrace. Imagine the blow to the black psyche when a former Cabinet member makes such a stupid, stupid, stupid remark... very sad. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() OK, I read Opus' link to William Saletan's article in Slate and Renee's points. Saletan makes a plausible case that Bennet's statement is racist. He points out that it links unborn black children with a particular behaviour later in life. That is certainly something I would not agree with. I think we all have free will to do right or wrong regardless of our heritage and should not be judged ahead of time. So if Bennett said something racist, and I'm still not sure he did, does that make him a racist? Is there anything else in his background that would suggest that he is? I have to think more about it. |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Opus - 2005-10-04 12:52 PM Regardless of how you feel about abortion, the supposition that to abort black fetuses, and only black fetuses, will reduce the crime rate assumes that blacks are predisposed to commit crimes. . That's exactly why his comments were racist. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-10-04 1:47 PM So if Bennett said something racist, and I'm still not sure he did, does that make him a racist? Is there anything else in his background that would suggest that he is? I have to think more about it. Y'know, it would be so simple for him to have said, "Upon reflection, my comments were poorly considered and expressed an opinion that was contrary to what I actually believe. It was not my intention to imply that black people are predisposed to commit crimes. I apologize to all those who I may have offended." End of story. These days people seem to think that admitting that you made a mistake is a weakness. |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-10-04 1:47 PMSo if Bennett said something racist, and I'm still not sure he did, does that make him a racist? If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck... The fact that he's standing by his statement is actually more telling than jus tthe original statement on it's own. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Here's Bennett's full conversation on his web site. It's the first time I've heard him on his show. I see how you can make a case that what he said was racist, but I don't see how you can make a case that he is a racist. Poor choice of words to be sure, but is it a betrayal of his real hidden nature, that of a racist? Give a listen to it in context. You're right, he should have just appologized for making a stupid statement. The nature of discourse in our country just seems to be at an all time low. When are we going to start talking to each other again? |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Okay, this topic isn't funny, but the end of page 1 cracked me up: "His remark was in response to a caller who had suggested that the Social Security system's finances would be in a much better position if it were not for the 1973 legalization of abortion, because there would be more people paying into the system." Bwah ha ha!!! That's just gold! You can't buy entertainment like that! It reminds me of the time Rush Limbaugh was making fun of Baghdad Bob's assessment of how the Iraq war was going by saying that Iraqis had landed in New York City. An irate caller couldn't believe that the government would let it happen...Rush was having a hard time not laughing directly at the guy...how did Billy boy take that caller seriously??? |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Opus said, "End of story. These days people seem to think that admitting that you made a mistake is a weakness." I would say that's been the case since the Roman Empire was the news. dontracy - 2005-10-04 2:36 PM The nature of discourse in our country just seems to be at an all time low. When are we going to start talking each other again? Read Allen Drury and tell me anything has changed in politics. He wrote his books in the 1960s, and they are at least as applicable today, if not more so. I don't want to ruin them, but they are fantastic reads, and quite freakish the way they've stood the test of time. Does anyone really remember talking? What were the issues that were so deeply decided on fundamental levels rather than chants of soundbites? Vietnam? Woman's lib? I just don't think the meaningful conversation has gone away, I think the same number of idealogues dominate the conversation and it's up to all of us to try to sort through their bullshit to come up with our own ideas. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-10-04 2:36 PM The nature of discourse in our country just seems to be at an all time low. It's pretty good here, though... |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() run4yrlif - It's pretty good here, though... Thankfully, it is. ![]() What is it about triathletes? |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() goodzen - 2005-10-05 8:09 AM Opus said, "End of story. These days people seem to think that admitting that you made a mistake is a weakness." I would say that's been the case since the Roman Empire was the news. I would agree that this is the case for politicians. GWB has raised not admitting to a mistake to a fine art (remember the golden opportunity handed to him to wipe his slate clean at that press conference). Public figures in the entertainment industry, like Bennett or Limbaugh, could easily just say, "I made a mistake", and that would snuff out the subsequent media frenzy. I, for one, would have loved to hear Limbaugh say, "I was wrong to call for the jailing of drug addicts. Having been one myself, I realize that drug addiction should be treated like an illness rather than a crime." It would have shown him to be capable of intellectual growth. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-10-05 9:05 AM run4yrlif - It's pretty good here, though... Thankfully, it is. ![]() What is it about triathletes? Honestly, I think it is that all of us being triathletes, we see each other in a light other than that of being from one end of the political spectrum or the other. There is a shared bond that makes us want to get along, whereas if you were to go to a forum dedicated to politics, no such bond exists. On those boards you become objectified and representative of something other than yourself. Hence how political conversations can become so nasty. |
|