Tookie Williams
-
No new posts
| Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2005-12-12 4:39 PM |
Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC | Subject: Tookie WilliamsGov Schwarzenegger has denied clemency to Tookie Williams. Schwarzemegger said, "Without an apology and atonement for these senseless andbrutal killings there can be no redemption." Huh? Schwarzenegger is a freakin' Catholic politician. He should know that redemption does not require a public apology in the way he is saying it. I'm really PO'd at the majority of Catholic politicians in the United States. From John Kerry, on the abortion and receiving communion issue, to Schwarzenegger making statements about redemption and, it seems to me, basically ignoring Church teaching on the issue of capital punishment in our time, they seem to completely ingore the faith they claim to believe in. I wish Schwarzenegger had reflected on Pope John Paul II's words in the encyclical The Gospel of Life. It is clear that, for these purposes to be achieved, the nature and extent of the punishment must be carefully evaluated and decided upon, and ought not go to the extreme of executing the offender except in cases of absolute necessity: in other words, when it would not be possible otherwise to defend society. Today however, as a result of steady improvements in the organization of the penal system, such cases are very rare, if not practically non-existent. In any event, the principle set forth in the new Catechismof the Catholic Church remains valid: "If bloodless means are sufficient to defend human lives against an aggressor and to protect public order and the safety of persons, public authority must limit itself to such means, because they better correspond to the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person". I will keep Tookie Williams in my prayers tonight, as well as the souls of the victims I believe he murdered. Edited by dontracy 2005-12-12 4:41 PM |
|
2005-12-12 5:03 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Champion 5183![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsStop the Presses! I agree with Don! but not bc Arnold is Catholic. But because he is human being. |
2005-12-12 5:06 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Veteran 188![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tucson, Arizona | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsWell stated. In the end, it seems to me that if an inmate who works to prevent others from joining gangs is worth more to society alive than dead. This is a "finger in the wind" politician at his worst. No one is served when another human being is killed, we all become less human for it. |
2005-12-12 5:12 PM in reply to: #304094 |
Champion 8936![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Tookie Williamsdorkboy - 2005-12-12 5:06 PM Well stated. In the end, it seems to me that if an inmate who works to prevent others from joining gangs is worth more to society alive than dead. This is a "finger in the wind" politician at his worst. No one is served when another human being is killed, we all become less human for it. I don't disagree with your post or the sentiment of this thread, but you have no idea why he made the decision he did. |
2005-12-12 5:17 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Elite 2768![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Raleigh | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsI have to disagree... Just because a guy writes a book or two and makes a few speeches doesnt change what he did. He killed and even laughed and made a remark about the guy gurgling while he died. We have laws with consequences and if you dont obey the law you pay the price. He is paying the price for what he did, he new the consequences at the time he commited the acts. Changing your ways later on does not change your past. He received the death penalty for the brutality of the way he killed not because he killed. I think he gets what he deserves. |
2005-12-12 5:32 PM in reply to: #304098 |
Veteran 188![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tucson, Arizona | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsFair enough. It's difficult to know exactly what the Governator's intentions are, but this guy's in deep trouble politically and I can't help but think that has something to do with his decision. But you're right, I shouldn't presume. |
|
2005-12-12 5:46 PM in reply to: #304102 |
Champion 5183![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Tookie Williamsgolfinggods - 2005-12-12 5:17 PM I have to disagree... Just because a guy writes a book or two and makes a few speeches doesnt change what he did. He killed and even laughed and made a remark about the guy gurgling while he died. We have laws with consequences and if you dont obey the law you pay the price. He is paying the price for what he did, he new the consequences at the time he commited the acts. Changing your ways later on does not change your past. He received the death penalty for the brutality of the way he killed not because he killed. I think he gets what he deserves. you;re right. we have laws and consequences. It sickens me that murder is The US's consequence for murder. |
2005-12-12 6:25 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Expert 833![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Adrian, MI | Subject: RE: Tookie Williamsyou're right. we have laws and consequences. It sickens me that murder is The US's consequence for murder. I whole heartily agree. |
2005-12-12 6:40 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Elite 2458![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Livingston, MT | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsI'm glad he is being put to death. He is not only responsible for the deaths of those four people, but he is responsible for starting an epidemic in my city and it's name is the Crips. This gang has done far more damage than Tookie alone ever could have caused. The only complaint I have is that he didn't have to reimburse the city and state for the court costs and housing his worthless a$$ in jail. He is the one of the biggest pieces of garbage on this planet. |
2005-12-12 6:53 PM in reply to: #304131 |
Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsWe interupt this regularly broadcast thread to bring you a special bulletin: I agree with Possum! It is a legal killing. I just don't think it is a moral one. And the fact that he has done some good while in jail is irrelevent to my belief that killing him is immoral. He would be just as worthy of retaining his life if he had done none of these things in jail. I do not see a moral justification for depriving him of his inalienable right to life. And what about the Governor talking about atonement and redemption? Those are well chosen words, I'm sure. I can tell you that they are not aimed at people like me. Edited by dontracy 2005-12-12 6:54 PM |
2005-12-12 6:55 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
|
2005-12-12 7:02 PM in reply to: #304136 |
Elite 2458![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Livingston, MT | Subject: RE: Tookie Williamsdontracy - 2005-12-12 3:53 PM We interupt this regularly broadcast thread to bring you a special bulletin: I agree with Possum! It is a legal killing. I just don't think it is a moral one. And the fact that he has done some good while in jail is irrelevent to my belief that killing him is immoral. He would be just as worthy of retaining his life if he had done none of these things in jail. I do not see a moral justification for depriving him of his inalienable right to life. And what about the Governor talking about atonement and redemption? Those are well chosen words, I'm sure. I can tell you that they are not aimed at people like me. What constitutes a moral killing? Just curious. |
2005-12-12 7:14 PM in reply to: #304141 |
Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsChuckyFinster - What constitutes a moral killing? Just curious. One example: If someone broke into your home and you perceived that they threatened your life or the life of your family, and you had no other means to subdue them, I think that you would have the moral right to kill them. Another: I think the Sky Marshals had the moral right to kill the man on the plane last week. |
2005-12-12 7:17 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Elite 2777![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats. | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsCareful Don, the pagans are beginning to make sense on this issue. Hopefully Williams will open his heart to Christ ( if he hasn't already) and then whatever happens 'round midnight with be of little consequence to him. |
2005-12-12 7:26 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Champion 7036![]() ![]() ![]() Sarasota, FL | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsCarlie Brucia was abducted just a mile from my house here in Sarasota. As a father of a daughter, I cannot imagine any punishment on this earth that could ever atone for her brutal rape and murder. I have come to the conclusion that capital punishment does not serve as a deterent to rape, murder and other heinous crimes. At the same time, I believe that such offenders need to be permanently separated from society. Throw them in a cell (or a hole in the ground for that matter) and let them live out their natural life contemplating what they have done. No gymnasiums, cable TV, book deals, etc. Just four walls and three meals a day. In the end they will be judged by a higher authority. Mark |
2005-12-12 7:49 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsQuote dontracy - 2005-12-12 2:39 PM Gov Schwarzenegger has denied clemency to Tookie Williams. It's pretty easy to go through the bible and find some scripture you can make fit your scenerio. This is what I hope for, at this time, that the people who are in charge of ending his life are able to do their civic duty without any ill effects on themselves. That the people opposed to this accept it as this is being done in a legal means according to the law based on what the majority have voted for. I hope there is no illegal violence due to the law being carried out. I am thankfull to the politicians who do what they feel is the RIGHT thing to do as a publicly elected official regardless of their relegious affiliations. |
|
2005-12-12 8:04 PM in reply to: #304102 |
Giver 18427![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsWell, some of us believe that the death penalty is morally wrong. And it has nothing to do with what a guy does or does not do in prison. Beyond my personal beliefs regarding capital punishment, I believe he deserves clemency because he is doing good for society while incarcerated. All that will be wasted when he is put to death. golfinggods - 2005-12-12 6:17 PM I have to disagree... Just because a guy writes a book or two and makes a few speeches doesnt change what he did. He killed and even laughed and made a remark about the guy gurgling while he died. We have laws with consequences and if you dont obey the law you pay the price. He is paying the price for what he did, he new the consequences at the time he commited the acts. Changing your ways later on does not change your past. He received the death penalty for the brutality of the way he killed not because he killed. I think he gets what he deserves.
|
2005-12-12 8:14 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Elite 2777![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats. | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsAnd just when I think ChuckyFinster's ready to go to Sunday school with me , somebody's got to go and start this thread. Gee thanks. |
2005-12-12 8:27 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Elite Veteran 781![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsTookie has a one-way pass to Hell???!!! *Drops on knees* There is a God. Just let us know how 'Tookie's Little Night-Night Book' works for him. I'm sure a long sleep is included in Act 2. Nighty-night l'il Tookie. Killer. |
2005-12-12 8:35 PM in reply to: #304185 |
Champion 5183![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Tookie Williamslynda - 2005-12-12 8:27 PM Tookie has a one-way pass to Hell???!!! *Drops on knees* There is a God. Just let us know how 'Tookie's Little Night-Night Book' works for him. I'm sure a long sleep is included in Act 2. Nighty-night l'il Tookie. Killer. whoa. I'm....speechless. |
2005-12-12 8:35 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Veteran 264![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Halifax | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsI couldn’t care less if Tookie die’s or not. I have just heard about the guy a couple of days ago and I have no knowledge or opinion on his crimes. BUT I think you are very wrong to criticize Arnold for not doing the “Catholic” thing. Maybe if more people thought like him thousands of Muslims would never have been slaughtered in the crusades. I think he has to take the important step to keep church and state apart or else there WILL be more crusades to come. Cheers. Rice. |
|
2005-12-12 8:43 PM in reply to: #304076 |
Elite 2777![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats. | Subject: RE: Tookie WilliamsWell folks the time is nigh. You can argue the politics of it and you can argue the hypocrisy of the players...but now it's just Williams and the Executioner. The Executioner has no politics, he has no hypocrisy. He offers only finality. One should pray that Williams is ready for his executioner's song. Williams , as all of us will, is standing at the crossroads. Which path has he chosen? Which path have you chosen? |
2005-12-12 9:00 PM in reply to: #304191 |
Subject: RE: Tookie Williamsrice - 2005-12-12 6:35 PM I couldn’t care less if Tookie die’s or not. I have just heard about the guy a couple of days ago and I have no knowledge or opinion on his crimes. BUT I think you are very wrong to criticize Arnold for not doing the “Catholic” thing. Maybe if more people thought like him thousands of Muslims would never have been slaughtered in the crusades. I think he has to take the important step to keep church and state apart or else there WILL be more crusades to come. Cheers. Rice. That is like RIGHT ON RICE!!! Regarding the Holy Wars or Crusades, I think it was the Catholic's obligation to either convert or kill everyone who was non Catholic because that was their "Beleif" wasn't it?? |
2005-12-12 9:20 PM in reply to: #304123 |
Master 1462![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Michigan | Subject: RE: Tookie Williamsfromer - 2005-12-12 7:25 PM you're right. we have laws and consequences. It sickens me that murder is The US's consequence for murder. I whole heartily agree. Cha-ching I don't give a crap how many kids books he wrote. |
2005-12-12 9:38 PM in reply to: #304201 |
Champion 8936![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Tookie Williamscrusevegas - 2005-12-12 9:00 PM rice - 2005-12-12 6:35 PM I couldn’t care less if Tookie die’s or not. I have just heard about the guy a couple of days ago and I have no knowledge or opinion on his crimes. BUT I think you are very wrong to criticize Arnold for not doing the “Catholic” thing. Maybe if more people thought like him thousands of Muslims would never have been slaughtered in the crusades. I think he has to take the important step to keep church and state apart or else there WILL be more crusades to come. Cheers. Rice. That is like RIGHT ON RICE!!! Regarding the Holy Wars or Crusades, I think it was the Catholic's obligation to either convert or kill everyone who was non Catholic because that was their "Beleif" wasn't it?? And now we're equating the Catholic church of the Middle Ages with the present day Church? C'mon. And how exactly did the issue of church and state come up anyway? This is entirely a legal issue, however many people feel strongly one way or the other because of their PERSONAL religious beliefs. |
|
login




2005-12-12 4:39 PM
Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC






View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK