Subject: RE: Garmin vs. Polar Plissken74 - 2008-04-29 7:51 AM
brown_dog_us - 2008-04-28 12:42 PM I use the forerunner 305 and love it. I run from time to time with a buddy who has a polar. We always compare numbers and see which watch we think is more accurate. We've been running the same 10k loop for a few years now. Back when I had a forerunner 101 it was the polar that was more accurate everytime. The 101 had a different gps antenae that wasn't very good. Once I upgraded to the 305 the polar's flaws started to show. The 305 is very close to dead on for a 10k run while the polar jumps around by as much as .4 miles but generally it is about .2 miles off during the same loop. The course is fairly hilly and our guess has been that his stride is inconsistant through out the run. Does .2 miles matter? Not to us, but if you are into the finer details it is something to consider. btw, He does go to the track and adjust his settings for the footpod regularly. Well, measurement is a science and you should you ask to yourself who is right and who is not. When you say that the track is 10k, who measured that? How much accuracy is in that? Can it be that the Garmin is perfect and the "10k" is 0.2miles away? I would trust an average over 3-4 times Garmin 305 measurement. Not the first shot, not the second but an average and you will kill the "random noise".
You are correct. We have run this route a couple hundred times and we are pretty sure it is slightly shorter then the 10k it claims to be. Also, on the local high school track his footpod is very accurate, but it seems to be less accurate when he runs a hilly route. I should mention he loves his polar as much as I love my garmin. They are both great products.
|