Frames/per/sec for race photo's (Page 2)

Forum guidelines BT super discount
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Frames/per/sec for race photo's Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2009-10-29 11:09 PM
in reply to: #2483987

User image

Subject: RE: Frames/per/sec for race photo's
Thanks.  SOme areas will be on a tripod, but some in a zodiac.  And I will have a body to push the ISO, but my underwater experience tells me that can only go so far.

2009-10-30 3:38 PM
in reply to: #2488031

User image

Expert
839
50010010010025
Central Mass
Subject: RE: Frames/per/sec for race photo's
puellasolis - 2009-10-29 6:39 PM
Bajapat - 2009-10-29 4:49 PM your right...

But i don't know anyone that had one and i was in to film back then
Only reason I know about it is that my dad had a film SLR with motor drive for shooting our volleyball games. This would have been mid-late 1990s.


By the mid 90s, most SLRs had motorized film advance built in .  Nikon started building in film advance in 85 with the N2000/F301.
Before that, motor drives were rare and very expensive.  IIRC motor drives were the same price as most bodies they fit on - or more expensive.

Ah, I don't put too much stock in KR...

Most people shouldn't .  He's got the only card test I've read.
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Frames/per/sec for race photo's Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2