Subject: RE: Why do shorter swim sets in the pool? dgunthert - 2012-03-07 3:47 PM
We don't train like track runners, we don't train like track cyclists, so why do we train like the equivalent of track swimmers?
IME, most triathletes don't. If you look at what most triathletes are doing in the pool, it is more akin to what a 1500m swimmer would do in training as opposed to what a 50 or 100m specialist would do.
I don't buy the "technique" rationale, either. If you're technique breaks down that much during a long set, you're not ready for that set.
When I was in swim shape, I could do a 1500m TT at a given pace (let's call it T pace ) but I could do a set of 20x100 at T pace less 3s with 10s rest. For training I could have gotten into the pool and just done 1500m's, but in addition to be crazy boring, I know that my form at the end of the 1500 was not as good as at the beginning and I would have only done 1500m. If I did the 20x100, I did an extra 500, faster than I would have in doing a TT and with better form overall. It doesn't take a huge breakdown in technique to matter when it comes to improving one's swimming.
Good or bad, my swim training looks like my bike and run training: VO2 max sets once per week, threshold sets once per week, long steady state swim once per week, and easy mid-length recovery swim once per week.
I would guess that you would see more improvement, with little if any impact on your other training, if you switched the last two workouts into broken swims at around threshold effort.
Shane |