I don't think that article is accurate. These "Profits" were from going public and the public buying in. The article does not take into account Liabilities...You know...that thing that happened 45 minutes after they went public?
It is pretty publicly known (with bullhorns, billboards, and skywriting) that Facebook LOST over half of it's value as soon as it became a public entity. (Hence the refund being approximately half of the "profits")
They pay no taxes because they didn't net any money. Somebody else lost half of their money.
If somebody lent me $20, and by the time it reached my hand it was only $10...I wouldn't pay them back the full $20. This is just that.
Perhaps I am seeing it wrong, but anybody who had a finger in the name "Facebook" lost half of their money last year. Even by signing a piece of paper, Mark Zuckerberg is only half as rich as he was...Everybody lost money on that transaction.
I wouldn't be the least bit concerned about their executive stock options. They aren't nearly as valuable as the article implies.
I don't say this specifically to defend Facebook, as I feel that every facet of their move to go public contains a scam of some level. Not just on their part, but on Wallstreet's part as well. (What a funny glitch that occurred the second it went public!)...but this article doesn't take that into account.
Edited by lifejustice 2013-02-19 1:34 PM