login
FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE (Page 2)
-
No new posts
|
 2006-10-27 10:51 AM in reply to: #580973 |
Elite  2451    West Chicago, IL |  Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSERogillio - 2006-10-27 11:17 AM 1 Foot The Other - 2006-10-27 10:10 AM kimj81 - 2006-10-27 10:35 AM Ditto.I mostly agree with the OP (ie, I don't think everyone needs to own a gun). However, I'm a gun-toting liberal. Does that just f*** with your head or what, Mike?!
OK, listen up....all you gun-toting liberals lay down your guns, back up and get back in the box! *spits on the ground and glares at Rogillo* [Clint Eastwood voice]I ain't gettin' in no box. Not fer you. Not fer anybody. If you want me in a box, yer gonna have to put me there ... punk![/Clint Eastwood voice] |
| 2006-10-27 10:51 AM in reply to: #580813 |
Extreme Veteran 474 Mountains of Colorado! | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE i have a potato cannon...it's awesome! |
| 2006-10-27 10:57 AM in reply to: #580784 |
Elite 3519  San Jose, CA | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE Rogillio - 2006-10-27 6:13 AM 5. If guns are outlawed, can we use swords?
I like this one. Don't like guns..they are noisey and impersonal. With a sword, I can look into the eyes of my prey before I kill them. Oh I am not against guns...and I am gay and a liberal...Own many swords and know how to use them....what box do I go to...
|
| 2006-10-27 11:27 AM in reply to: #580784 |
Elite 2421 | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE Here in Cincy pro-concealed carry advocates have been on a roll lately. In the last few weeks a would be robber and a would-be carjacker got their come uppance to the tune of a high caliber chest massage. No stats on how many people accidentally shot themselves with their weapons over the same time period in the same area are available at this time... bts |
| 2006-10-27 2:13 PM in reply to: #580784 |
Extreme Veteran 452 Ottawa, Ontario | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE No, no, you are all confused. The Canadian Constitution includes the right to go to Florida in the winter and bare our arms. Man, I'm glad the original post was a joke. It was a joke, right? RIGHT??? D |
| 2006-10-27 2:58 PM in reply to: #581027 |
Pro 5153 Helena, MT | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE ellasdad - 2006-10-27 8:51 AM i have a potato cannon...it's awesome! LMAO!!! That's hilarious. |
| 2006-10-27 3:55 PM in reply to: #581426 |
Master 1219 Sachse | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE kimj81 - 2006-10-27 2:58 PM ellasdad - 2006-10-27 8:51 AM i have a potato cannon...it's awesome! LMAO!!! That's hilarious. haha... I have a few... found out that the state of Texas, doesn't allow spud guns that use combustion.. (considered a zip gun)...Seeing this, I made some that use air....much more powerful...haha.. 145 psi of potato (or whatever I put in the barrel) furry... GIT SUM!!!!! GIT SUM!!!!! Kenny |
| 2006-10-27 4:59 PM in reply to: #580812 |
Master 2232 Des Moines, Iowa | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE The Mac - 2006-10-27 8:30 AM 4. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control NO, religion is about control. I am not against people who own guns, rather, I am for people who choose not to own them. That's why i don't believe in religion.... |
| 2006-10-27 5:07 PM in reply to: #580813 |
molto veloce mama 9311 | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE anyone else hear the 'this american life' episode where sarah vowell sets off a cannon with her gunsmith father? http://www.thislife.org/pages/descriptions/97/81.html |
| 2006-10-27 5:07 PM in reply to: #580872 |
Master 2232 Des Moines, Iowa | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE Scout7 - 2006-10-27 8:57 AM run4yrlif - 2006-10-27 9:49 AM Again, who said they weren't allowed to own a cannon? My guess is that it wasn't prohibited, it was just something they couldn't afford, or had no interest in owning. Most of the guns owned back then were used for hunting and self protection. A cannon is rather difficult to use for either of those purposes. If you wish to debate the role of artillery in the defense, I am more than willing to do so.RedCorvette - 2006-10-27 9:39 AM the bear - 2006-10-27 9:30 AM marmadaddy - 2006-10-27 8:25 AM The 2nd Amendment guarantees a right to bear arms. When the 2nd Amendment was written and enacted, there were essentially 2 kinds of arms: muskets and cannons. Yet no one was allowed to own a cannon. Discuss. WHERE does it say I can't own a cannon?
I know a guy in a local gun club who owns a cannon. I'm not about to tell him he can't have it. Mark "Yet no one was allowed to own a cannon." I'm pretty sure Mike was talking about when the ammendmant was enacted, not today. Yeah...it would be tough to go squirrel hunting with a cannon :-) |
| 2006-10-28 12:33 PM in reply to: #580997 |
 Extreme Veteran 1491 northeast Ohio | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE gullahcracker - 2006-10-27 11:34 AM lol...and to complicate the issue even further..I'm a gun(s) toting liberal who can't stand the NRA's bs. Gee and I thought I was the only one of these. Gun toting liberals unite!!!!! Edited by drdi 2006-10-28 12:34 PM |
| 2006-10-28 3:07 PM in reply to: #580784 |
Expert 1065 Montreal | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE >9. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. From an outsider looking at the US now it looks like the whole country opted for that with your Patriot Act and Terrorist Surveillance Act. As I said - I'm an outsider so maybe I am missing the nuances of these acts but they seem like curiosities in a country where the citizenry value their liberty. |
| 2006-10-28 3:17 PM in reply to: #580784 |
| Elite 3650 Laurium, MI | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE you don't need swords when you have mad bow-staff skills. |
| 2006-10-28 3:33 PM in reply to: #581954 |
Expert 1065 Montreal | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE vortmax - 2006-10-28 3:17 PM you don't need swords when you have mad bow-staff skills. What about nunchuck skills, bowhunting skills, computer hacking skills? |
| 2006-10-28 3:33 PM in reply to: #580784 |
Coach 9167 Stairway to Seven | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE kenny, please change your avatar! |
| 2006-10-28 3:35 PM in reply to: #581947 |
Coach 9167 Stairway to Seven | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE Wookiee - 2006-10-28 2:07 PM >9. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. From an outsider looking at the US now it looks like the whole country opted for that with your Patriot Act and Terrorist Surveillance Act. As I said - I'm an outsider so maybe I am missing the nuances of these acts but they seem like curiosities in a country where the citizenry value their liberty. I'm pretty sure the president/house/congress did that without the approval of most americans. Actually, I have no idea what the american public thinks of the patriot act in terms of for/against, but I wouldn't be surprised if those living outside the US received more accurate media related education on the topic than those of us living IN the country. |
| 2006-10-28 3:50 PM in reply to: #581960 |
Master 1219 Sachse | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE AdventureBear - 2006-10-28 3:33 PM kenny, please change your avatar! Is this better ? I changed it just for you....  Kenny |
| 2006-10-28 3:59 PM in reply to: #581965 |
Pro 5153 Helena, MT | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE Ten9T6 - 2006-10-28 1:50 PM AdventureBear - 2006-10-28 3:33 PM kenny, please change your avatar! Is this better ? I changed it just for you.... KennyAww... that one's better. It's like you're hugging all of us. |
| 2006-10-28 10:43 PM in reply to: #581965 |
Coach 9167 Stairway to Seven | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE Ten9T6 - 2006-10-28 2:50 PM AdventureBear - 2006-10-28 3:33 PM kenny, please change your avatar! Is this better ? I changed it just for you.... Kenny You're a handsome devil afterall! Still with bright brown eyes even.  |
| 2006-10-29 12:42 AM in reply to: #581947 |
Master 3019 West Jordan, UT | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE Wookiee - 2006-10-28 2:07 PM >9. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. From an outsider looking at the US now it looks like the whole country opted for that with your Patriot Act and Terrorist Surveillance Act. As I said - I'm an outsider so maybe I am missing the nuances of these acts but they seem like curiosities in a country where the citizenry value their liberty. 49.5% of us did not vote for the current leadership. And it is not like our Legistlature cares what the public thinks anyway. Edited by tkbslc 2006-10-29 12:43 AM |
| 2006-10-29 1:08 AM in reply to: #581959 |
Extreme Veteran 345 Tucson, AZ | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE Wookiee - 2006-10-28 1:33 PM vortmax - 2006-10-28 3:17 PM What about nunchuck skills, bowhunting skills, computer hacking skills?you don't need swords when you have mad bow-staff skills. Dumb @ss brought a stick/knife/sword to my gun fight |
| 2006-10-29 1:10 AM in reply to: #581962 |
Extreme Veteran 345 Tucson, AZ | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE AdventureBear - 2006-10-28 1:35 PM Wookiee - 2006-10-28 2:07 PM >9. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. From an outsider looking at the US now it looks like the whole country opted for that with your Patriot Act and Terrorist Surveillance Act. As I said - I'm an outsider so maybe I am missing the nuances of these acts but they seem like curiosities in a country where the citizenry value their liberty. I'm pretty sure the president/house/congress did that without the approval of most americans. Actually, I have no idea what the american public thinks of the patriot act in terms of for/against, but I wouldn't be surprised if those living outside the US received more accurate media related education on the topic than those of us living IN the country.do any of us KNOW anyone effected by the Patiot Act? I don't, just a thought. BTW here in AZ anyone but a convicted felon may own and carry a firearm as long as it's not concealed. if you want to cover it all you have to do is pass a simple 8 hour concealed cary class. |
| 2006-10-29 6:45 AM in reply to: #581947 |
Master 2006 Portland, ME | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE Wookiee - 2006-10-28 3:07 PM >9. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. From an outsider looking at the US now it looks like the whole country opted for that with your Patriot Act and Terrorist Surveillance Act. As I said - I'm an outsider so maybe I am missing the nuances of these acts but they seem like curiosities in a country where the citizenry value their liberty. I know, it is an absolute attack on our personal freedoms. We are looking more and more like Canada everyday......it's ironic that it is "conservative" leadership that is leading us down this slippery slope. You think a bunch of our buddies can form a militia and take over the government with our hunting rifles?.......kind of sounds like amendment #2 is a little obsolete. Edited by Jackemy 2006-10-29 6:47 AM |
| 2006-10-29 6:53 AM in reply to: #581962 |
Master 2006 Portland, ME | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE AdventureBear - 2006-10-28 3:35 PM Wookiee - 2006-10-28 2:07 PM >9. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. From an outsider looking at the US now it looks like the whole country opted for that with your Patriot Act and Terrorist Surveillance Act. As I said - I'm an outsider so maybe I am missing the nuances of these acts but they seem like curiosities in a country where the citizenry value their liberty. I'm pretty sure the president/house/congress did that without the approval of most americans. Actually, I have no idea what the american public thinks of the patriot act in terms of for/against, but I wouldn't be surprised if those living outside the US received more accurate media related education on the topic than those of us living IN the country.Are you suggesting that the "freedom of the press" thingy we hear so much about in school is a farce? There are plenty of resources for Americans to learn and understand the Patriot act. The only problem is that you have to do your homework and most Americans are unwilling to to do that. |
| 2006-10-29 11:17 AM in reply to: #582110 |
Master 1219 Sachse | Subject: RE: FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE jsttri - 2006-10-29 1:10 AM AdventureBear - 2006-10-28 1:35 PM Wookiee - 2006-10-28 2:07 PM >9. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. From an outsider looking at the US now it looks like the whole country opted for that with your Patriot Act and Terrorist Surveillance Act. As I said - I'm an outsider so maybe I am missing the nuances of these acts but they seem like curiosities in a country where the citizenry value their liberty. I'm pretty sure the president/house/congress did that without the approval of most americans. Actually, I have no idea what the american public thinks of the patriot act in terms of for/against, but I wouldn't be surprised if those living outside the US received more accurate media related education on the topic than those of us living IN the country.do any of us KNOW anyone effected by the Patiot Act? I don't, just a thought. BTW here in AZ anyone but a convicted felon may own and carry a firearm as long as it's not concealed. if you want to cover it all you have to do is pass a simple 8 hour concealed cary class. I don't either.... It just gives a lot of people something else gripe about.... Like I mentioned in another thread, things have changed in this World and you have to deal with it.......Suck it up and move on.... On the concealed class, I went through it here in Texas.... I do wish they would use a silhoutte that was a little smaller....we had people missing these. It is out of control to miss a target half...that is the size of a NFL lineman in a situation where there is no stress. Kenny |
|
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK