General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Finally getting some balance = finally getting an AG podium Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2015-07-20 1:35 PM
in reply to: 3mar

User image


1502
1000500
Katy, Texas
Subject: RE: Finally getting some balance = finally getting an AG podium
Good stuff. I'll have to start practicing the no socks thing. I've wanted to try, but have been nervous I'd jack up my feet. But I suppose if I train more often without socks, I could build up the proper callouses.

I always have my shoes clipped in. For every training ride, I start off and finish by taking my shoes on and off while riding so it's second nature.

The sun glasses always slow me down, but taping them to the bike or helmet could be a big time saver. This time I held them in my teeth while I got on the bike but it really affected my breathing so I was quick to put them on, even before I was ready.


2015-07-20 1:49 PM
in reply to: 0


98
252525
, Idaho
Subject: RE: Finally getting some balance = finally getting an AG podium
Originally posted by 3mar
The sun glasses always slow me down, but taping them to the bike or helmet could be a big time saver. This time I held them in my teeth while I got on the bike but it really affected my breathing so I was quick to put them on, even before I was ready.

I put my helmet upside down on my bars (just like Shane's photo), and then my sunglasses sit in my helmet. Put your sunglasses on first (should only take a second or two), then put your helmet on...when you take your helmet off for the run, your glasses stay on.

Edited by d.wilk 2015-07-20 1:52 PM
2015-07-20 2:05 PM
in reply to: 3mar

User image

Extreme Veteran
959
5001001001001002525
Greenwood, South Carolina
Subject: RE: Finally getting some balance = finally getting an AG podium
Originally posted by 3mar

Good stuff. I'll have to start practicing the no socks thing. I've wanted to try, but have been nervous I'd jack up my feet. But I suppose if I train more often without socks, I could build up the proper callouses.

I always have my shoes clipped in. For every training ride, I start off and finish by taking my shoes on and off while riding so it's second nature.

The sun glasses always slow me down, but taping them to the bike or helmet could be a big time saver. This time I held them in my teeth while I got on the bike but it really affected my breathing so I was quick to put them on, even before I was ready.


When I train I wear socks for running but never wear for Sprint and International distance races. Each person is different so try it out one day on a short run. Never had any blisters or injuries after a race without socks.
2015-07-22 1:56 PM
in reply to: 0

User image


1502
1000500
Katy, Texas
Subject: RE: Finally getting some balance = finally getting an AG podium
Stop the press.....I took a look back at those transition times for T1 because something didn't sit right with me. There was something screwy going on. NOT ONE of the top 10 finishers were in the top 30 T1 times. There were 5 people that finished T1 in under 1:30. T1 was a 0.35 run from the swim exit to the bike exit, much of which was on the beach. So lets run some numbers here. Assuming they can grab their bike and put on their helmet in 10 seconds that means they ran 0.35 miles ON THE BEACH in under 1:20. That is a 5:40 minute mile pace...much of which was on the beach in bare feet. So these folks must have absolutely killed the 5k right? Let's take a look. Of those 5 people, here were their 5K times: 32:39, 28:14, 30:00, 23:42 & 32:10. I'm thinking there was a screw up somewhere. Nobody running a 30 minute 5k is doing a 0.35 mile transition run at a 5:40 pace.

Realistically, a decent runner (at a local level) like me who runs a 19:XX open 5k and did a 21:00 5k at the end of this sprint, can comfortably run in sand at, say 7:45 pace in this scenario, so that would put me in the transition area at 2:45. Add in 10 seconds for the bike and I should have been at sub 3:00. I was at 3:21 so I could have knocked 30 seconds off with a better run and more efficiency getting my stuff together. But I was certainly NOT 83rd at T1. First place did it in 2:21, I believe that. Anything under that is suspect to me.

I'm sure someone will say: "those times are possible, look at race X" (paging LB), but these ARE NOT those people.

Remember, this is not an elite race and ALL of the folks with sub-2:00 transition times were 8-10+ minute milers on the run. There WERE NOT running sub 6 pace out of the water on the beach. There was an error somewhere.

Hooray!! I don't s*ck at transition times as much as I thought I did!!

EDIT: I think I figured it out. All of the sub 2:20 T1 times were women. ALL of them. I think they didn't register the womens' chips on the mats leaving the water but instead got them going into the actual transition area with the bikes. That makes sense. That would also explain why everyone with a super fast T1 time had such a slow swim time; the run up the beach was counted as part of their swim.


Edited by 3mar 2015-07-22 2:01 PM
2015-07-22 2:03 PM
in reply to: 3mar

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Finally getting some balance = finally getting an AG podium

Originally posted by 3mar Stop the press.....I took a look back at those transition times for T1 because something didn't sit right with me. There was something screwy going on. NOT ONE of the top 10 finishers were in the top 30 T1 times. There were 5 people that finished T1 in under 1:30. T1 was a 0.35 run from the swim exit to the bike exit, much of which was on the beach. So lets run some numbers here. Assuming they can grab their bike and put on their helmet in 10 seconds that means they ran 0.35 miles ON THE BEACH in under 1:20. That is a 5:40 minute mile pace...much of which was on the beach in bare feet. So these folks must have absolutely killed the 5k right? Let's take a look. Of those 5 people, here were their 5K times: 32:39, 28:14, 30:00, 23:42 & 32:10. I'm thinking there was a screw up somewhere. Nobody running a 30 minute 5k is doing a 0.35 mile transition run at a 5:40 pace. Realistically, a decent runner (at a local level) like me who runs a 19:XX open 5k and did a 21:00 5k at the end of this sprint, can comfortably run in sand at, say 7:45 pace in this scenario, so that would put me in the transition area at 2:45. Add in 10 seconds for the bike and I should have been at sub 3:00. I was at 3:21 so I could have knocked 30 seconds off with a better run and more efficiency getting my stuff together. But I was certainly NOT 83rd at T1. First place did it in 2:21, I believe that. Anything under that is suspect to me. I'm sure someone will say: "those times are possible, look at race X" (paging LB), but these ARE NOT those people. Remember, this is not an elite race and ALL of the folks with sub-2:00 transition times were 8-10+ minute milers on the run. There WERE NOT running sub 6 pace out of the water on the beach. There was an error somewhere. Hooray!! I don't s*ck at transition times as much as I thought I did!! EDIT: I think I figured it out. All of the sub 2:20 T1 times were women. ALL of them. I think they didn't register the womens' chips on the mats leaving the water but instead got them going into the actual transition area with the bikes. That makes sense. That would also explain why everyone with a super fast T1 time had such a slow swim time; the run up the beach was counted as part of their swim.

That sounds right......your transitions still sucked. 

2015-07-22 2:09 PM
in reply to: 0

User image


1502
1000500
Katy, Texas
Subject: RE: Finally getting some balance = finally getting an AG podium
Originally posted by Left Brain

Originally posted by 3mar Stop the press.....I took a look back at those transition times for T1 because something didn't sit right with me. There was something screwy going on. NOT ONE of the top 10 finishers were in the top 30 T1 times. There were 5 people that finished T1 in under 1:30. T1 was a 0.35 run from the swim exit to the bike exit, much of which was on the beach. So lets run some numbers here. Assuming they can grab their bike and put on their helmet in 10 seconds that means they ran 0.35 miles ON THE BEACH in under 1:20. That is a 5:40 minute mile pace...much of which was on the beach in bare feet. So these folks must have absolutely killed the 5k right? Let's take a look. Of those 5 people, here were their 5K times: 32:39, 28:14, 30:00, 23:42 & 32:10. I'm thinking there was a screw up somewhere. Nobody running a 30 minute 5k is doing a 0.35 mile transition run at a 5:40 pace. Realistically, a decent runner (at a local level) like me who runs a 19:XX open 5k and did a 21:00 5k at the end of this sprint, can comfortably run in sand at, say 7:45 pace in this scenario, so that would put me in the transition area at 2:45. Add in 10 seconds for the bike and I should have been at sub 3:00. I was at 3:21 so I could have knocked 30 seconds off with a better run and more efficiency getting my stuff together. But I was certainly NOT 83rd at T1. First place did it in 2:21, I believe that. Anything under that is suspect to me. I'm sure someone will say: "those times are possible, look at race X" (paging LB), but these ARE NOT those people. Remember, this is not an elite race and ALL of the folks with sub-2:00 transition times were 8-10+ minute milers on the run. There WERE NOT running sub 6 pace out of the water on the beach. There was an error somewhere. Hooray!! I don't s*ck at transition times as much as I thought I did!! EDIT: I think I figured it out. All of the sub 2:20 T1 times were women. ALL of them. I think they didn't register the womens' chips on the mats leaving the water but instead got them going into the actual transition area with the bikes. That makes sense. That would also explain why everyone with a super fast T1 time had such a slow swim time; the run up the beach was counted as part of their swim.

That sounds right......your transitions still sucked. 




I said they didn't s*ck as much as I thought. I never said they didn't s*ck. There's a big difference.

Edited by 3mar 2015-07-22 2:10 PM


2015-07-22 2:18 PM
in reply to: 3mar

Master
10208
50005000100100
Northern IL
Subject: RE: Finally getting some balance = finally getting an AG podium

Originally posted by 3mar
Originally posted by Left Brain

Originally posted by 3mar Stop the press.....I took a look back at those transition times for T1 because something didn't sit right with me. There was something screwy going on. NOT ONE of the top 10 finishers were in the top 30 T1 times. There were 5 people that finished T1 in under 1:30. T1 was a 0.35 run from the swim exit to the bike exit, much of which was on the beach. So lets run some numbers here. Assuming they can grab their bike and put on their helmet in 10 seconds that means they ran 0.35 miles ON THE BEACH in under 1:20. That is a 5:40 minute mile pace...much of which was on the beach in bare feet. So these folks must have absolutely killed the 5k right? Let's take a look. Of those 5 people, here were their 5K times: 32:39, 28:14, 30:00, 23:42 & 32:10. I'm thinking there was a screw up somewhere. Nobody running a 30 minute 5k is doing a 0.35 mile transition run at a 5:40 pace. Realistically, a decent runner (at a local level) like me who runs a 19:XX open 5k and did a 21:00 5k at the end of this sprint, can comfortably run in sand at, say 7:45 pace in this scenario, so that would put me in the transition area at 2:45. Add in 10 seconds for the bike and I should have been at sub 3:00. I was at 3:21 so I could have knocked 30 seconds off with a better run and more efficiency getting my stuff together. But I was certainly NOT 83rd at T1. First place did it in 2:21, I believe that. Anything under that is suspect to me. I'm sure someone will say: "those times are possible, look at race X" (paging LB), but these ARE NOT those people. Remember, this is not an elite race and ALL of the folks with sub-2:00 transition times were 8-10+ minute milers on the run. There WERE NOT running sub 6 pace out of the water on the beach. There was an error somewhere. Hooray!! I don't s*ck at transition times as much as I thought I did!! EDIT: I think I figured it out. All of the sub 2:20 T1 times were women. ALL of them. I think they didn't register the womens' chips on the mats leaving the water but instead got them going into the actual transition area with the bikes. That makes sense. That would also explain why everyone with a super fast T1 time had such a slow swim time; the run up the beach was counted as part of their swim.

That sounds right......your transitions still sucked. 

I said they didn't s*ck as much as I thought. I never said they didn't s*ck. There's a big difference.

Time that could have been spent making them not s*ck ...

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Finally getting some balance = finally getting an AG podium Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2
 
 
RELATED POSTS

Finally getting faster on the bike.

Started by chevy57
Views: 1178 Posts: 4

2009-05-06 12:24 PM jkward

Finally getting into porn.

Started by MikeTri37
Views: 1428 Posts: 15

2008-08-07 6:24 PM ell-in-or

Getting New bike tomorrow FINALLY

Started by ShawnC13
Views: 826 Posts: 3

2007-11-28 11:42 PM ShawnC13

Finally gotten around to Registering for my first

Started by bsjracing
Views: 814 Posts: 2

2005-03-04 12:07 PM scuba-punk

finally getting my bike!!

Started by Live2Tri
Views: 1053 Posts: 10

2004-08-27 12:54 PM satchmo72
RELATED ARTICLES
date : October 21, 2011
author : Scott Tinley
comments : 0
Part Three: What's Reality Got to Do with Anything Old?
 
date : September 16, 2011
author : Scott Tinley
comments : 0
Part Two: On Appreciation and Acceptance. At some point your body will let you down. Then you have to decide whether it is really the enemy.
date : August 19, 2011
author : Scott Tinley
comments : 1
Part One: On Speed, Desire and Age. There are some advantages to running slowly. Now, give me a minute here and I'll try to think of one.
 
date : December 12, 2009
author : FitWerx
comments : 0
We are often asked the question, "What size frame should I buy" and the answer is “it depends”. I know that’s not the answer you want to hear, but hopefully the following will shed some more light.
date : September 10, 2009
author : Amy Kuitse
comments : 6
Should I be working on getting faster at running by doing the longer distances and working up slowly over time or run faster for shorter distances now?
 
date : September 15, 2008
author : lcthomas74
comments : 0
Soon after I got married, I decided I needed to get motivated to work out and focus on getting back into shape. I could barely jog a quarter-mile without needing a walk break.
date : July 8, 2008
author : amyro1234
comments : 0
Ever since I was 11 years old and first heard the word "triathlon" mentioned, I have made it my vow to do one. But what 11 year old does triathlons?”
 
date : April 9, 2005
author : AMSSM
comments : 2
Males should be screened from their twenties onward with a fasting lipid profile to assess overall cardiovascular disease risk.