World Cup - Spoilers (Page 29)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2010-07-11 5:38 PM in reply to: #2973824 |
Expert 1207 Parker, Co | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers Usual dreary game - no space given so hard to build...an early goal for Spain in the 1st 15 mins would have been the remedy. Thought Spain should have used the width better and played quicker...too many touches and negative/short passes in the middle allowing the Dutch to retreat en mass and clog the middle. That said..so poor finishing from both teams...Spain the biggest criminals...Villa, Fabregas, Ramos, Iniesta but Robben had the chance to be the hero twice and failed. 4 years til the next one....start the countdown....might even start saving to make if to Rio for a game or two! |
|
2010-07-11 5:56 PM in reply to: #2973737 |
Expert 1058 Cambridge | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides?? REALLY?? Check back on that replay, ref. The law is "any goalscoring part of the body. In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt |
2010-07-11 8:20 PM in reply to: #2973871 |
Iron Donkey 38643 , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides?? REALLY?? Check back on that replay, ref. The law is "any goalscoring part of the body. In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt Addendum: Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382 - got the rule - |
2010-07-11 9:12 PM in reply to: #2974074 |
Pro 4612 MA | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 9:20 PM SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides?? REALLY?? Check back on that replay, ref. The law is "any goalscoring part of the body. In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt Addendum: Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382 - got the rule - Yeah, we talked about that, too, when we watched the game. We concluded that it was because van der Vaart that was directly in-line and intercepted the ball. Then of course it was followed by Mathilsen's "F you, ref!" |
2010-07-11 9:44 PM in reply to: #2974173 |
Expert 1207 Parker, Co | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers because even the ref wanted to see the game over......it was that dire I do agree..Iniesta could have been called because he was in an offside position at first and made an attempt for the ball.... The offside rule has become too much about interpretation by the officials and not a definitive rule in my opinion...if you are offside at any time...you are offside...end of..... |
2010-07-12 2:29 AM in reply to: #2974074 |
Expert 1058 Cambridge | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-12 2:20 AM SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides?? REALLY?? Check back on that replay, ref. The law is "any goalscoring part of the body. In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt Addendum: Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382 - got the rule - HE wasn't offside. Frame by frame the only part of his body at the time the ball was passed on the initial pass, only his arm was ahead of the last defender so he was still onside. |
|
2010-07-12 2:35 AM in reply to: #2974376 |
Expert 1058 Cambridge | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers SteveyD - 2010-07-12 8:29 AM 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-12 2:20 AM SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides?? REALLY?? Check back on that replay, ref. The law is "any goalscoring part of the body. In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt Addendum: Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382 - got the rule - HE wasn't offside. Frame by frame the only part of his body at the time the ball was passed on the initial pass, only his arm was ahead of the last defender so he was still onside. I present Exhibit A and B The second picture is the first pass ( i cant' find the one with the superimposed line on :p) Edited by SteveyD 2010-07-12 2:36 AM (pass2.JPG) (notoffside.JPG) Attachments ---------------- pass2.JPG (32KB - 12 downloads) notoffside.JPG (26KB - 11 downloads) |
2010-07-12 8:57 AM in reply to: #2974377 |
Iron Donkey 38643 , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers SteveyD - 2010-07-12 2:35 AM SteveyD - 2010-07-12 8:29 AM 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-12 2:20 AM SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides?? REALLY?? Check back on that replay, ref. The law is "any goalscoring part of the body. In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt Addendum: Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382 - got the rule - HE wasn't offside. Frame by frame the only part of his body at the time the ball was passed on the initial pass, only his arm was ahead of the last defender so he was still onside. I present Exhibit A and B The second picture is the first pass ( i cant' find the one with the superimposed line on :p) Looking at the frame by frame from 1:15 to the very end of 1:16 (in the link of the clip that I provided and clicking quickly to pause and run again), it was VERY close (per the poor quality) that he may have been offsides, since the 2nd pic that you provided was still a couple of frames off from the point of contact of the ball, and the 1st pic displays the "oh-he-wasn't-offsides here" which was still a couple of seconds BEFORE the point of when I thought he was offsides, BUT, I will concede and acknowledge, after further looking it over, that the play was executed very well. It would have been better to view this in a better HQ clip, and have better tools to disect it, though. |
2010-07-12 9:10 AM in reply to: #2915530 |
Champion 5874 Milton, GA | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers Wanted to thank all of you for making this a very entertaining thread!
See you back here in 4 years |
2010-07-12 10:06 AM in reply to: #2974681 |
Expert 1058 Cambridge | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-12 2:57 PM SteveyD - 2010-07-12 2:35 AM SteveyD - 2010-07-12 8:29 AM 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-12 2:20 AM SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM 1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides?? REALLY?? Check back on that replay, ref. The law is "any goalscoring part of the body. In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt Addendum: Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382 - got the rule - HE wasn't offside. Frame by frame the only part of his body at the time the ball was passed on the initial pass, only his arm was ahead of the last defender so he was still onside. I present Exhibit A and B The second picture is the first pass ( i cant' find the one with the superimposed line on :p) Looking at the frame by frame from 1:15 to the very end of 1:16 (in the link of the clip that I provided and clicking quickly to pause and run again), it was VERY close (per the poor quality) that he may have been offsides, since the 2nd pic that you provided was still a couple of frames off from the point of contact of the ball, and the 1st pic displays the "oh-he-wasn't-offsides here" which was still a couple of seconds BEFORE the point of when I thought he was offsides, BUT, I will concede and acknowledge, after further looking it over, that the play was executed very well. It would have been better to view this in a better HQ clip, and have better tools to disect it, though. Yeah I had to use the bbc i player version, which has "clunky" controls to say the least. That is the closest I could get to the point of contact ( about 2 frames indeed.) The first picture after the second picture ( ie just before he scores) |
2010-07-12 10:13 AM in reply to: #2974727 |
Pro 4612 MA | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers LowcountryTRI - 2010-07-12 10:10 AM Wanted to thank all of you for making this a very entertaining thread!
See you back here in 4 years Yep. We can do it again for Euro Cup 2012. Qualifying matches start soon. |
|
2010-07-12 10:25 AM in reply to: #2974897 |
Champion 15211 Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers D.K. - 2010-07-12 10:13 AM LowcountryTRI - 2010-07-12 10:10 AM Wanted to thank all of you for making this a very entertaining thread!
See you back here in 4 years Yep. We can do it again for Euro Cup 2012. Qualifying matches start soon. It has been fun. That's for certain. |
2010-07-12 10:34 AM in reply to: #2974897 |
Elite 3091 Spokane, WA | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers D.K. - 2010-07-12 10:13 AM LowcountryTRI - 2010-07-12 10:10 AM Wanted to thank all of you for making this a very entertaining thread!
See you back here in 4 years Yep. We can do it again for Euro Cup 2012. Qualifying matches start soon. Yes, thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread. It was a lot of fun and we've got some knowledgeable fans here. And we have another long-running thread "Any REAL football fans here?" that is fairly active where we discuss MLS, EPL, Serie A and other footy-related stuff. Of course the MLS season is running now and the EPL starts up in about a month. Edited by zed707 2010-07-12 10:37 AM |
2010-07-12 11:09 AM in reply to: #2915530 |
Champion 15211 Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers What is everyone's take on Webbs performance? I think he did quite well, over all, considering how both teams were "playing" the game. Of course the Netherlands are saying he ruined it and gave Spain the win. What say you? |
2010-07-12 11:16 AM in reply to: #2975077 |
Pro 4612 MA | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers crowny2 - 2010-07-12 12:09 PM What is everyone's take on Webbs performance? I think he did quite well, over all, considering how both teams were "playing" the game. Of course the Netherlands are saying he ruined it and gave Spain the win. What say you? I think he did a decent job calling fouls and such. I don't see bias. It's pretty clear that Robben and a couple of those van- something had been faking quite a bit since the 8th minute and Webb didn't buy it. |
2010-07-12 11:28 AM in reply to: #2975077 |
Champion 5874 Milton, GA | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers crowny2 - 2010-07-12 12:09 PM What is everyone's take on Webbs performance? I think he did quite well, over all, considering how both teams were "playing" the game. Of course the Netherlands are saying he ruined it and gave Spain the win. What say you? I think he kept the match under control as much as possible. Obviously De Jong should have gone out with a red for the karate clinic he put on out there. Puyol could have been shown a red, too, for trying to take down Robben. The Spanish players definitely took advantage of the ref's flurry of yellows to the Oranje as was evident in the sending off of Heitinga. I knew it was just a matter of time before the Dutch would be playing a man down. As for the offsides/not offsides call on the Iniesta goal. It was pretty close even in instant replay and can't imagine how quickly the game moves for the refs after being out there on the pitch after 116 minutes. |
|
2010-07-12 11:29 AM in reply to: #2975106 |
Champion 15211 Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers D.K. - 2010-07-12 11:16 AM crowny2 - 2010-07-12 12:09 PM What is everyone's take on Webbs performance? I think he did quite well, over all, considering how both teams were "playing" the game. Of course the Netherlands are saying he ruined it and gave Spain the win. What say you? I think he did a decent job calling fouls and such. I don't see bias. It's pretty clear that Robben and a couple of those van- something had been faking quite a bit since the 8th minute and Webb didn't buy it. I know he wasn't in position to call the red on DeJong's karate kick to Alonso. Still should have been a straight red in my mind. To me, Netherlands played quite a chippy game and had some of the simulation they tried turned on them. Robben flopped quite a bit and Spain caught on and it came back to bit Oranje in the azz. |
2010-07-12 11:29 AM in reply to: #2975151 |
Champion 15211 Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers LowcountryTRI - 2010-07-12 11:28 AM crowny2 - 2010-07-12 12:09 PM What is everyone's take on Webbs performance? I think he did quite well, over all, considering how both teams were "playing" the game. Of course the Netherlands are saying he ruined it and gave Spain the win. What say you? I think he kept the match under control as much as possible. Obviously De Jong should have gone out with a red for the karate clinic he put on out there. Puyol could have been shown a red, too, for trying to take down Robben. The Spanish players definitely took advantage of the ref's flurry of yellows to the Oranje as was evident in the sending off of Heitinga. I knew it was just a matter of time before the Dutch would be playing a man down. As for the offsides/not offsides call on the Iniesta goal. It was pretty close even in instant replay and can't imagine how quickly the game moves for the refs after being out there on the pitch after 116 minutes. This! |
2010-07-12 11:42 AM in reply to: #2975158 |
Veteran 1097 Elizabethtown, KY | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers Even though I haven't contributed, I've read most of this thread, so thanks for all the contributions. Here's a question for ongoing debate: With the deep run Team USA made and its associated drama, how much will MLS viewership/attendance increase the rest of this season, if any? I know if I lived closer to Columbus or Chicago, I'd be attending a match or two. Edited by roch1009 2010-07-12 11:43 AM |
2010-07-12 11:53 AM in reply to: #2975203 |
Champion 15211 Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers roch1009 - 2010-07-12 11:42 AM Even though I haven't contributed, I've read most of this thread, so thanks for all the contributions. Here's a question for ongoing debate: With the deep run Team USA made and its associated drama, how much will MLS viewership/attendance increase the rest of this season, if any? I know if I lived closer to Columbus or Chicago, I'd be attending a match or two. Good question. Here are the average attendance numbers for each year.
There doesn't appear to be any correlation between WC years and attendance. Over all, though, I'm glad to see that the general trend is upwards. |
2010-07-12 11:55 AM in reply to: #2975203 |
Champion 5874 Milton, GA | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers roch1009 - 2010-07-12 12:42 PM Even though I haven't contributed, I've read most of this thread, so thanks for all the contributions. Here's a question for ongoing debate: With the deep run Team USA made and its associated drama, how much will MLS viewership/attendance increase the rest of this season, if any? I know if I lived closer to Columbus or Chicago, I'd be attending a match or two. IMO, I think they'll experience a small spike but will quickly go back to normal level of viewership/attendance. I, personally, will watch one or two MLS matches a season but did watch every single WC match. The reason is time. Between work, family, kid's school and activities, training, etc. my time to watch a match is very limited. So if I do find myself with time to watch a match, I will opt to watch a European league match where I recognize more of the players. |
|
2010-07-26 1:35 PM in reply to: #2915530 |
Elite 3091 Spokane, WA | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers I just came across the Lego WC Final and thought you might enjoy it. http://www.legofussball.eu/?Lego-Videos:WM_2010:NED_-_ESP
|
2010-07-26 2:08 PM in reply to: #3005182 |
Champion 15211 Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers zed707 - 2010-07-26 1:35 PM I just came across the Lego WC Final and thought you might enjoy it. http://www.legofussball.eu/?Lego-Videos:WM_2010:NED_-_ESP
Loved the Kung Fu Kick/stomp! |
2010-07-26 8:21 PM in reply to: #3005291 |
Elite 3091 Spokane, WA | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers crowny2 - 2010-07-26 2:08 PM zed707 - 2010-07-26 1:35 PM I just came across the Lego WC Final and thought you might enjoy it. http://www.legofussball.eu/?Lego-Videos:WM_2010:NED_-_ESP
Loved the Kung Fu Kick/stomp! Yes, they did that right, and a lot of the other hard fouls. Funny!! ETA: I love the Lego refs giving the cards. Don't remember if we've seen that before. Edited by zed707 2010-07-26 8:25 PM |
2010-07-26 9:08 PM in reply to: #3006179 |
Pro 4612 MA | Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers zed707 - 2010-07-26 9:21 PM crowny2 - 2010-07-26 2:08 PM zed707 - 2010-07-26 1:35 PM I just came across the Lego WC Final and thought you might enjoy it. http://www.legofussball.eu/?Lego-Videos:WM_2010:NED_-_ESP
Loved the Kung Fu Kick/stomp! Yes, they did that right, and a lot of the other hard fouls. Funny!! ETA: I love the Lego refs giving the cards. Don't remember if we've seen that before. Love all of those matches. The US-ENG and ENG-GER were good ones. |
|