Other Resources My Cup of Joe » World Cup - Spoilers Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 37
 
 
2010-07-11 5:38 PM
in reply to: #2973824

User image

Expert
1207
1000100100
Parker, Co
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

Usual dreary game - no space given so hard to build...an early goal for Spain in the 1st 15 mins would have been the remedy. Thought Spain should have used the width better and played quicker...too many touches and negative/short  passes in the middle allowing the Dutch to retreat en mass and clog the middle.

That said..so poor finishing from both teams...Spain the biggest criminals...Villa, Fabregas, Ramos, Iniesta but Robben had the chance to be the hero twice and failed.

4 years til the next one....start the countdown....might even start saving to make if to Rio for a game or two!



2010-07-11 5:56 PM
in reply to: #2973737

User image

Expert
1058
10002525
Cambridge
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides??  REALLY??  Check back on that replay, ref.

The law is "any goalscoring part of the body.
In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm
however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt  
2010-07-11 8:20 PM
in reply to: #2973871

Iron Donkey
38643
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers
SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides??  REALLY??  Check back on that replay, ref.

The law is "any goalscoring part of the body.
In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm
however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt  


Addendum:

Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382

- got the rule -
"It's also important to note that offside applies at the moment the ball is passed, not at the moment the ball is received. Therefore, if the offensive player that will receive the pass is "onside" at the time the ball is passed, but then runs behind the unsuspecting defender before receiving the pass, the receiving offensive player is not offsides."

NOTE:  The "unsuspecting defender" was actually running to get the ball and not the offensive player running behind the "unsuspecting defender", but, that's just technicalities.

Now, why wasn't Spain's #6 called on the initial offsides (just a few seconds prior) - because at the time when the ball was passed towards him, it didn't get pass the two defenders that he already was behind, i.e. the ball didn't reach him, soooooo, no harm no foul??

2010-07-11 9:12 PM
in reply to: #2974074

User image

Pro
4612
20002000500100
MA
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 9:20 PM
SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides??  REALLY??  Check back on that replay, ref.

The law is "any goalscoring part of the body.
In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm
however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt  


Addendum:

Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382

- got the rule -
"It's also important to note that offside applies at the moment the ball is passed, not at the moment the ball is received. Therefore, if the offensive player that will receive the pass is "onside" at the time the ball is passed, but then runs behind the unsuspecting defender before receiving the pass, the receiving offensive player is not offsides."

NOTE:  The "unsuspecting defender" was actually running to get the ball and not the offensive player running behind the "unsuspecting defender", but, that's just technicalities.

Now, why wasn't Spain's #6 called on the initial offsides (just a few seconds prior) - because at the time when the ball was passed towards him, it didn't get pass the two defenders that he already was behind, i.e. the ball didn't reach him, soooooo, no harm no foul??


Yeah, we talked about that, too, when we watched the game.  We concluded that it was because van der Vaart that was directly in-line and intercepted the ball.  
Then of course it was followed by Mathilsen's "F you, ref!"
 
2010-07-11 9:44 PM
in reply to: #2974173

User image

Expert
1207
1000100100
Parker, Co
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

because even the ref wanted to see the game over......it was that dire

I do agree..Iniesta could have been called because he was in an offside position at first and made an attempt for the ball....

The offside rule has become too much about interpretation by the officials and not a definitive rule in my opinion...if you are offside at any time...you are offside...end of.....

2010-07-12 2:29 AM
in reply to: #2974074

User image

Expert
1058
10002525
Cambridge
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-12 2:20 AM
SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides??  REALLY??  Check back on that replay, ref.

The law is "any goalscoring part of the body.
In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm
however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt  


Addendum:

Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382

- got the rule -
"It's also important to note that offside applies at the moment the ball is passed, not at the moment the ball is received. Therefore, if the offensive player that will receive the pass is "onside" at the time the ball is passed, but then runs behind the unsuspecting defender before receiving the pass, the receiving offensive player is not offsides."

NOTE:  The "unsuspecting defender" was actually running to get the ball and not the offensive player running behind the "unsuspecting defender", but, that's just technicalities.

Now, why wasn't Spain's #6 called on the initial offsides (just a few seconds prior) - because at the time when the ball was passed towards him, it didn't get pass the two defenders that he already was behind, i.e. the ball didn't reach him, soooooo, no harm no foul??


HE wasn't offside. Frame by frame the only part of his body at the time the ball was passed on the initial pass, only his arm was ahead of the last defender so he was still onside.   


2010-07-12 2:35 AM
in reply to: #2974376

User image

Expert
1058
10002525
Cambridge
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers
SteveyD - 2010-07-12 8:29 AM
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-12 2:20 AM
SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides??  REALLY??  Check back on that replay, ref.

The law is "any goalscoring part of the body.
In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm
however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt  


Addendum:

Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382

- got the rule -
"It's also important to note that offside applies at the moment the ball is passed, not at the moment the ball is received. Therefore, if the offensive player that will receive the pass is "onside" at the time the ball is passed, but then runs behind the unsuspecting defender before receiving the pass, the receiving offensive player is not offsides."

NOTE:  The "unsuspecting defender" was actually running to get the ball and not the offensive player running behind the "unsuspecting defender", but, that's just technicalities.

Now, why wasn't Spain's #6 called on the initial offsides (just a few seconds prior) - because at the time when the ball was passed towards him, it didn't get pass the two defenders that he already was behind, i.e. the ball didn't reach him, soooooo, no harm no foul??


HE wasn't offside. Frame by frame the only part of his body at the time the ball was passed on the initial pass, only his arm was ahead of the last defender so he was still onside.   

I present Exhibit A and B
The second picture is the first pass ( i cant' find the one with the superimposed line on :p)

Edited by SteveyD 2010-07-12 2:36 AM




(pass2.JPG)



(notoffside.JPG)



Attachments
----------------
pass2.JPG (32KB - 12 downloads)
notoffside.JPG (26KB - 11 downloads)
2010-07-12 8:57 AM
in reply to: #2974377

Iron Donkey
38643
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers
SteveyD - 2010-07-12 2:35 AM
SteveyD - 2010-07-12 8:29 AM
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-12 2:20 AM
SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides??  REALLY??  Check back on that replay, ref.

The law is "any goalscoring part of the body.
In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm
however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt  


Addendum:

Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382

- got the rule -
"It's also important to note that offside applies at the moment the ball is passed, not at the moment the ball is received. Therefore, if the offensive player that will receive the pass is "onside" at the time the ball is passed, but then runs behind the unsuspecting defender before receiving the pass, the receiving offensive player is not offsides."

NOTE:  The "unsuspecting defender" was actually running to get the ball and not the offensive player running behind the "unsuspecting defender", but, that's just technicalities.

Now, why wasn't Spain's #6 called on the initial offsides (just a few seconds prior) - because at the time when the ball was passed towards him, it didn't get pass the two defenders that he already was behind, i.e. the ball didn't reach him, soooooo, no harm no foul??


HE wasn't offside. Frame by frame the only part of his body at the time the ball was passed on the initial pass, only his arm was ahead of the last defender so he was still onside.   

I present Exhibit A and B
The second picture is the first pass ( i cant' find the one with the superimposed line on :p)


Looking at the frame by frame from 1:15 to the very end of 1:16 (in the link of the clip that I provided and clicking quickly to pause and run again), it was VERY close (per the poor quality) that he may have been offsides, since the 2nd pic that you provided was still a couple of frames off from the point of contact of the ball, and the 1st pic displays the "oh-he-wasn't-offsides here" which was still a couple of seconds BEFORE the point of when I thought he was offsides, BUT, I will concede and acknowledge, after further looking it over, that the play was executed very well.
It would have been better to view this in a better HQ clip, and have better tools to disect it, though.
2010-07-12 9:10 AM
in reply to: #2915530

User image

Champion
5874
50005001001001002525
Milton, GA
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

Wanted to thank all of you for making this a very entertaining thread!

 

See you back here in 4 years

2010-07-12 10:06 AM
in reply to: #2974681

User image

Expert
1058
10002525
Cambridge
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-12 2:57 PM
SteveyD - 2010-07-12 2:35 AM
SteveyD - 2010-07-12 8:29 AM
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-12 2:20 AM
SteveyD - 2010-07-11 5:56 PM
1stTimeTri - 2010-07-11 10:16 PM Spain's #6 was NOT offsides??  REALLY??  Check back on that replay, ref.

The law is "any goalscoring part of the body.
In this case the only part that was offside was the hand/arm
however nothing like chest was so you are in deed correct mr 1tt  


Addendum:

Watched this - http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/2010_FIFA_World_Cup/Match_Highlights/ID=1542049382

- got the rule -
"It's also important to note that offside applies at the moment the ball is passed, not at the moment the ball is received. Therefore, if the offensive player that will receive the pass is "onside" at the time the ball is passed, but then runs behind the unsuspecting defender before receiving the pass, the receiving offensive player is not offsides."

NOTE:  The "unsuspecting defender" was actually running to get the ball and not the offensive player running behind the "unsuspecting defender", but, that's just technicalities.

Now, why wasn't Spain's #6 called on the initial offsides (just a few seconds prior) - because at the time when the ball was passed towards him, it didn't get pass the two defenders that he already was behind, i.e. the ball didn't reach him, soooooo, no harm no foul??


HE wasn't offside. Frame by frame the only part of his body at the time the ball was passed on the initial pass, only his arm was ahead of the last defender so he was still onside.   

I present Exhibit A and B
The second picture is the first pass ( i cant' find the one with the superimposed line on :p)


Looking at the frame by frame from 1:15 to the very end of 1:16 (in the link of the clip that I provided and clicking quickly to pause and run again), it was VERY close (per the poor quality) that he may have been offsides, since the 2nd pic that you provided was still a couple of frames off from the point of contact of the ball, and the 1st pic displays the "oh-he-wasn't-offsides here" which was still a couple of seconds BEFORE the point of when I thought he was offsides, BUT, I will concede and acknowledge, after further looking it over, that the play was executed very well.
It would have been better to view this in a better HQ clip, and have better tools to disect it, though.

Yeah I had to use the bbc i player version, which has "clunky" controls to say the least. That is the closest I could get to the point of contact ( about 2 frames indeed.)
The first picture after the second picture ( ie just before he scores)
2010-07-12 10:13 AM
in reply to: #2974727

User image

Pro
4612
20002000500100
MA
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers
LowcountryTRI - 2010-07-12 10:10 AM

Wanted to thank all of you for making this a very entertaining thread!

 

See you back here in 4 years


Yep. 
We can do it again for Euro Cup 2012. Qualifying matches start soon. 


2010-07-12 10:25 AM
in reply to: #2974897

User image

Champion
15211
500050005000100100
Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

D.K. - 2010-07-12 10:13 AM
LowcountryTRI - 2010-07-12 10:10 AM

Wanted to thank all of you for making this a very entertaining thread!

 

See you back here in 4 years


Yep. 
We can do it again for Euro Cup 2012. Qualifying matches start soon. 

It has been fun.  That's for certain.

2010-07-12 10:34 AM
in reply to: #2974897

User image

Elite
3091
20001000252525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

D.K. - 2010-07-12 10:13 AM
LowcountryTRI - 2010-07-12 10:10 AM

Wanted to thank all of you for making this a very entertaining thread!

 

See you back here in 4 years


Yep. 
We can do it again for Euro Cup 2012. Qualifying matches start soon. 

Yes, thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread. It was a lot of fun and we've got some knowledgeable fans here.

And we have another long-running thread "Any REAL football fans here?" that is fairly active where we discuss MLS, EPL, Serie A and other footy-related stuff. Of course the MLS season is running now and the EPL starts up in about a month.



Edited by zed707 2010-07-12 10:37 AM
2010-07-12 11:09 AM
in reply to: #2915530

User image

Champion
15211
500050005000100100
Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

What is everyone's take on Webbs performance?  I think he did quite well, over all, considering how both teams were "playing" the game.  Of course the Netherlands are saying he ruined it and gave Spain the win.  What say you?

2010-07-12 11:16 AM
in reply to: #2975077

User image

Pro
4612
20002000500100
MA
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers
crowny2 - 2010-07-12 12:09 PM

What is everyone's take on Webbs performance?  I think he did quite well, over all, considering how both teams were "playing" the game.  Of course the Netherlands are saying he ruined it and gave Spain the win.  What say you?


I think he did a decent job calling fouls and such.  I don't see bias. 
It's pretty clear that Robben and a couple of those van- something had been faking quite a bit since the 8th minute and Webb didn't buy it. 
2010-07-12 11:28 AM
in reply to: #2975077

User image

Champion
5874
50005001001001002525
Milton, GA
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

crowny2 - 2010-07-12 12:09 PM

What is everyone's take on Webbs performance?  I think he did quite well, over all, considering how both teams were "playing" the game.  Of course the Netherlands are saying he ruined it and gave Spain the win.  What say you?

I think he kept the match under control as much as possible.  Obviously De Jong should have gone out with a red for the karate clinic he put on out there.  Puyol could have been shown a red, too, for trying to take down Robben.  The Spanish players definitely took advantage of the ref's flurry of yellows to the Oranje as was evident in the sending off of Heitinga.  I knew it was just a matter of time before the Dutch would be playing a man down.

As for the offsides/not offsides call on the Iniesta goal.  It was pretty close even in instant replay and can't imagine how quickly the game moves for  the refs after being out there on the pitch after 116 minutes.



2010-07-12 11:29 AM
in reply to: #2975106

User image

Champion
15211
500050005000100100
Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

D.K. - 2010-07-12 11:16 AM
crowny2 - 2010-07-12 12:09 PM

What is everyone's take on Webbs performance?  I think he did quite well, over all, considering how both teams were "playing" the game.  Of course the Netherlands are saying he ruined it and gave Spain the win.  What say you?


I think he did a decent job calling fouls and such.  I don't see bias. 
It's pretty clear that Robben and a couple of those van- something had been faking quite a bit since the 8th minute and Webb didn't buy it. 

I know he wasn't in position to call the red on DeJong's karate kick to Alonso.  Still should have been a straight red in my mind.

To me, Netherlands played quite a chippy game and had some of the simulation they tried turned on them.  Robben flopped quite a bit and Spain caught on and it came back to bit Oranje in the azz.

2010-07-12 11:29 AM
in reply to: #2975151

User image

Champion
15211
500050005000100100
Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

LowcountryTRI - 2010-07-12 11:28 AM

crowny2 - 2010-07-12 12:09 PM

What is everyone's take on Webbs performance?  I think he did quite well, over all, considering how both teams were "playing" the game.  Of course the Netherlands are saying he ruined it and gave Spain the win.  What say you?

I think he kept the match under control as much as possible.  Obviously De Jong should have gone out with a red for the karate clinic he put on out there.  Puyol could have been shown a red, too, for trying to take down Robben.  The Spanish players definitely took advantage of the ref's flurry of yellows to the Oranje as was evident in the sending off of Heitinga.  I knew it was just a matter of time before the Dutch would be playing a man down.

As for the offsides/not offsides call on the Iniesta goal.  It was pretty close even in instant replay and can't imagine how quickly the game moves for  the refs after being out there on the pitch after 116 minutes.

This!

2010-07-12 11:42 AM
in reply to: #2975158

User image

Veteran
1097
1000252525
Elizabethtown, KY
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

Even though I haven't contributed, I've read most of this thread, so thanks for all the contributions. 

Here's a question for ongoing debate:

With the deep run Team USA made and its associated drama, how much will MLS viewership/attendance increase the rest of this season, if any?

I know if I lived closer to Columbus or Chicago, I'd be attending a match or two.



Edited by roch1009 2010-07-12 11:43 AM
2010-07-12 11:53 AM
in reply to: #2975203

User image

Champion
15211
500050005000100100
Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

roch1009 - 2010-07-12 11:42 AM

Even though I haven't contributed, I've read most of this thread, so thanks for all the contributions. 

Here's a question for ongoing debate:

With the deep run Team USA made and its associated drama, how much will MLS viewership/attendance increase the rest of this season, if any?

I know if I lived closer to Columbus or Chicago, I'd be attending a match or two.

Good question.

Here are the average attendance numbers for each year. 

17,406
199714,619
199814,312
199914,283
200013,756
200114,916
200215,822
200314,898
200415,559
200515,108
200615,504
200716,770
200816,460
200916,037

There doesn't appear to be any correlation between WC years and attendance.  Over all, though, I'm glad to see that the general trend is upwards. 

2010-07-12 11:55 AM
in reply to: #2975203

User image

Champion
5874
50005001001001002525
Milton, GA
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

roch1009 - 2010-07-12 12:42 PM

Even though I haven't contributed, I've read most of this thread, so thanks for all the contributions. 

Here's a question for ongoing debate:

With the deep run Team USA made and its associated drama, how much will MLS viewership/attendance increase the rest of this season, if any?

I know if I lived closer to Columbus or Chicago, I'd be attending a match or two.

IMO, I think they'll experience a small spike but will quickly go back to normal level of viewership/attendance.  I, personally, will watch one or two MLS matches a season but did watch every single WC match.  The reason is time.  Between work, family, kid's school and activities, training, etc.  my time to watch a match is very limited.  So if I do find myself with time to watch a match, I will opt to watch a European league match where I recognize more of the players. 



2010-07-26 1:35 PM
in reply to: #2915530

User image

Elite
3091
20001000252525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

I just came across the Lego WC Final and thought you might enjoy it.

http://www.legofussball.eu/?Lego-Videos:WM_2010:NED_-_ESP

 

2010-07-26 2:08 PM
in reply to: #3005182

User image

Champion
15211
500050005000100100
Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

zed707 - 2010-07-26 1:35 PM

I just came across the Lego WC Final and thought you might enjoy it.

http://www.legofussball.eu/?Lego-Videos:WM_2010:NED_-_ESP

 

Loved the Kung Fu Kick/stomp!

2010-07-26 8:21 PM
in reply to: #3005291

User image

Elite
3091
20001000252525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers

crowny2 - 2010-07-26 2:08 PM

zed707 - 2010-07-26 1:35 PM

I just came across the Lego WC Final and thought you might enjoy it.

http://www.legofussball.eu/?Lego-Videos:WM_2010:NED_-_ESP

 

Loved the Kung Fu Kick/stomp!

Yes, they did that right, and a lot of the other hard fouls. Funny!!

ETA: I love the Lego refs giving the cards. Don't remember if we've seen that before.



Edited by zed707 2010-07-26 8:25 PM
2010-07-26 9:08 PM
in reply to: #3006179

User image

Pro
4612
20002000500100
MA
Subject: RE: World Cup - Spoilers
zed707 - 2010-07-26 9:21 PM

crowny2 - 2010-07-26 2:08 PM

zed707 - 2010-07-26 1:35 PM

I just came across the Lego WC Final and thought you might enjoy it.

http://www.legofussball.eu/?Lego-Videos:WM_2010:NED_-_ESP

 

Loved the Kung Fu Kick/stomp!

Yes, they did that right, and a lot of the other hard fouls. Funny!!

ETA: I love the Lego refs giving the cards. Don't remember if we've seen that before.



Love all of those matches.  The US-ENG and ENG-GER were good ones.  
 
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » World Cup - Spoilers Rss Feed  
 
 
of 37