login
FINAL CoJ 2012 Presidential Election Poll (Page 3)
-
No new posts
|
 2012-11-02 7:24 PM in reply to: #4481486 |
Elite  4547   |  Subject: RE: FINAL CoJ 2012 Presidential Election Pollgerald12 - 2012-11-02 7:20 PM tuwood - 2012-11-01 2:33 PM powerman - 2012-11-01 3:25 PM ChineseDemocracy - 2012-11-01 2:20 PM Hmm, I'm actually undecided. I'm not sure whether I want to vote for President Obama because he'll protect womens' rights...or if it's because he is much less likely to involve our military in unnecessary wars...or because he won't raise taxes on the bottom 98% of earners. Hmmm, tough choice.
hummm... more troops in Afghanistan today than when he took office... hummm... already raised taxes more on the bottom 98% more than any other President in History Not what Romney said: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkciMX8Xk-w So let's see, do we believe Mitt Romney when he says President Obama did not raise taxes in the last 4 years...or do we believe the folks posting here in COJ? |
| 2012-11-02 7:37 PM in reply to: #4481547 |
Champion 7347   SRQ, FL | Subject: RE: FINAL CoJ 2012 Presidential Election Poll ChineseDemocracy - 2012-11-02 8:24 PM gerald12 - 2012-11-02 7:20 PM tuwood - 2012-11-01 2:33 PM powerman - 2012-11-01 3:25 PM ChineseDemocracy - 2012-11-01 2:20 PM Hmm, I'm actually undecided. I'm not sure whether I want to vote for President Obama because he'll protect womens' rights...or if it's because he is much less likely to involve our military in unnecessary wars...or because he won't raise taxes on the bottom 98% of earners. Hmmm, tough choice.
hummm... more troops in Afghanistan today than when he took office... hummm... already raised taxes more on the bottom 98% more than any other President in History Not what Romney said: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkciMX8Xk-w So let's see, do we believe Mitt Romney when he says President Obama did not raise taxes in the last 4 years...or do we believe the folks posting here in COJ? Well he actually has. By passing Obamacare the middle class is going to see a big tax increase. It just won't hit until 2014. However he signed and passed the law. It's on his plate. As for Afghanistan, Obama has been in office for 3.75 years and has had 1477 deaths. Bush 8 years, 630 deaths. |
| 2012-11-02 7:44 PM in reply to: #4481547 |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: FINAL CoJ 2012 Presidential Election Poll ChineseDemocracy - 2012-11-02 7:24 PM gerald12 - 2012-11-02 7:20 PM tuwood - 2012-11-01 2:33 PM powerman - 2012-11-01 3:25 PM ChineseDemocracy - 2012-11-01 2:20 PM Hmm, I'm actually undecided. I'm not sure whether I want to vote for President Obama because he'll protect womens' rights...or if it's because he is much less likely to involve our military in unnecessary wars...or because he won't raise taxes on the bottom 98% of earners. Hmmm, tough choice.
hummm... more troops in Afghanistan today than when he took office... hummm... already raised taxes more on the bottom 98% more than any other President in History Not what Romney said: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkciMX8Xk-w So let's see, do we believe Mitt Romney when he says President Obama did not raise taxes in the last 4 years...or do we believe the folks posting here in COJ? Doesn't matter what he said, it is a tax. The only way the SC said it could be legal was if it was a tax. So it's either a tax, or an unconstitutional law. |
| 2012-11-03 12:12 PM in reply to: #4478734 |
Extreme Veteran 502 Tucson | Subject: RE: FINAL CoJ 2012 Presidential Election Poll I went other - Virgil Goode - I'd just like to see our 2 party setup shuffled a little. The Presidential debates should have had the top 5 or 6 candidates. Both these candidates are way too established and have way too many monied interests in them. IMHO |
 2012-11-03 12:43 PM in reply to: #4479144 |
| Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
| 2012-11-05 11:29 AM in reply to: #4481997 |
Champion 6056 Menomonee Falls, WI | Subject: RE: FINAL CoJ 2012 Presidential Election Poll Now that we have about the same number of respondents as the first two polls, it appears that there was no significant movement in results between the second and this, final, poll. It does appear there was a shift away from Romney between the first and second polls which, oddly, coincided with the timing of the first presidential debate that seemed to move national polls TOWARD Romney. Just something interesting to note, indicative of nothing. It's not like this is a scientific poll and the "sample" is obviously extremely skewed. However, from a numbers standpoint, I've seen statewide polls consist of a sample only five times greater in number, and you can't tell me there isn't a huge selection bias in who actually responds to political polls these days. I think many of these polls that people are getting excited about could be getting it significantly wrong. Guess we'll find out how wrong tomorrow. |
| 2012-11-06 2:24 PM in reply to: #4478734 |
| Pro 4339 Husker Nation | Subject: RE: FINAL CoJ 2012 Presidential Election Poll bump |
|
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK